|
|
|
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Copyright (C) 2012 Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
|
|
|
|
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
|
|
|
|
# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
|
|
|
|
# (at your option) any later version.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
|
|
|
|
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
|
|
|
|
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
|
|
|
|
# GNU General Public License for more details.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from functools import partial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from six.moves import filter as ifilter, filterfalse as ifilterfalse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from britney_util import iter_except
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class InstallabilityTester(object):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def __init__(self, universe, revuniverse, testing, broken, essentials,
|
|
|
|
safe_set, eqv_table):
|
|
|
|
"""Create a new installability tester
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
universe is a dict mapping package tuples to their
|
|
|
|
dependencies and conflicts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
revuniverse is a set of all packages with reverse relations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
testing is a (mutable) set of package tuples that determines
|
|
|
|
which of the packages in universe are currently in testing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
broken is a (mutable) set of package tuples that are known to
|
|
|
|
be uninstallable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
essentials is a set of packages with "Essential: yes".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
safe_set is a set of all packages which have no conflicts and
|
|
|
|
either have no dependencies or only depends on other "safe"
|
|
|
|
packages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Package tuple: (pkg_name, pkg_version, pkg_arch)
|
|
|
|
- NB: arch:all packages are "re-mapped" to given architecture.
|
|
|
|
(simplifies caches and dependency checking)
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self._universe = universe
|
|
|
|
self._testing = testing
|
|
|
|
self._broken = broken
|
|
|
|
self._essentials = essentials
|
|
|
|
self._revuniverse = revuniverse
|
|
|
|
self._safe_set = safe_set
|
|
|
|
self._eqv_table = eqv_table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Cache of packages known to be broken - we deliberately do not
|
|
|
|
# include "broken" in it. See _optimize for more info.
|
|
|
|
self._cache_broken = set()
|
|
|
|
# Cache of packages known to be installable
|
|
|
|
self._cache_inst = set()
|
|
|
|
# Per "arch" cache of the "minimal" (possibly incomplete)
|
|
|
|
# pseudo-essential set. This includes all the packages that
|
|
|
|
# are essential and packages that will always follow.
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# It may not be a complete essential set, since alternatives
|
|
|
|
# are not always resolved. Noticably cases like "awk" may be
|
|
|
|
# left out (since it could be either gawk, mawk or
|
|
|
|
# original-awk) unless something in this sets depends strictly
|
|
|
|
# on one of them
|
|
|
|
self._cache_ess = {}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def compute_testing_installability(self):
|
|
|
|
"""Computes the installability of packages in testing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This method computes the installability of all packages in
|
|
|
|
testing and caches the result. This has the advantage of
|
|
|
|
making "is_installable" queries very fast for all packages
|
|
|
|
in testing.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
check_inst = self._check_inst
|
|
|
|
cbroken = self._cache_broken
|
|
|
|
cache_inst = self._cache_inst
|
|
|
|
eqv_table = self._eqv_table
|
|
|
|
testing = self._testing
|
|
|
|
tcopy = [x for x in testing]
|
|
|
|
for t in ifilterfalse(cache_inst.__contains__, tcopy):
|
|
|
|
if t in cbroken:
|
|
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
res = check_inst(t)
|
|
|
|
if t in eqv_table:
|
|
|
|
eqv = (x for x in eqv_table[t] if x in testing)
|
|
|
|
if res:
|
|
|
|
cache_inst.update(eqv)
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
eqv_set = frozenset(eqv)
|
|
|
|
testing -= eqv_set
|
|
|
|
cbroken |= eqv_set
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def are_equivalent(self, p1, p2):
|
|
|
|
"""Test if p1 and p2 are equivalent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Returns True if p1 and p2 have the same "signature" in
|
|
|
|
the package dependency graph (i.e. relations can not tell
|
|
|
|
them appart sematically except for their name)
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
eqv_table = self._eqv_table
|
|
|
|
return p1 in eqv_table and p2 in eqv_table[p1]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def add_testing_binary(self, pkg_name, pkg_version, pkg_arch):
|
|
|
|
"""Add a binary package to "testing"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the package is not known, this method will throw an
|
|
|
|
Keyrror.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t = (pkg_name, pkg_version, pkg_arch)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if t not in self._universe:
|
|
|
|
raise KeyError(str(t))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if t in self._broken:
|
|
|
|
self._testing.add(t)
|
|
|
|
elif t not in self._testing:
|
|
|
|
self._testing.add(t)
|
|
|
|
self._cache_inst = set()
|
|
|
|
if self._cache_broken:
|
|
|
|
# Re-add broken packages as some of them may now be installable
|
|
|
|
self._testing |= self._cache_broken
|
|
|
|
self._cache_broken = set()
|
|
|
|
if t in self._essentials and t[2] in self._cache_ess:
|
|
|
|
# Adds new essential => "pseudo-essential" set needs to be
|
|
|
|
# recomputed
|
|
|
|
del self._cache_ess[t[2]]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return True
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def remove_testing_binary(self, pkg_name, pkg_version, pkg_arch):
|
|
|
|
"""Remove a binary from "testing"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the package is not known, this method will throw an
|
|
|
|
Keyrror.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t = (pkg_name, pkg_version, pkg_arch)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if t not in self._universe:
|
|
|
|
raise KeyError(str(t))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self._cache_broken.discard(t)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if t in self._testing:
|
|
|
|
self._testing.remove(t)
|
|
|
|
if t[2] in self._cache_ess and t in self._cache_ess[t[2]][0]:
|
|
|
|
# Removes a package from the "pseudo-essential set"
|
|
|
|
del self._cache_ess[t[2]]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if t not in self._revuniverse:
|
|
|
|
# no reverse relations - safe
|
|
|
|
return True
|
|
|
|
if t not in self._broken and t in self._cache_inst:
|
|
|
|
# It is in our cache (and not guaranteed to be broken) - throw out the cache
|
|
|
|
self._cache_inst = set()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return True
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def is_installable(self, pkg_name, pkg_version, pkg_arch):
|
|
|
|
"""Test if a package is installable in this package set
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The package is assumed to be in "testing" and only packages in
|
|
|
|
"testing" can be used to satisfy relations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Returns True iff the package is installable.
|
|
|
|
Returns False otherwise.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t = (pkg_name, pkg_version, pkg_arch)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if t not in self._universe:
|
|
|
|
raise KeyError(str(t))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if t not in self._testing or t in self._broken:
|
|
|
|
return False
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if t in self._cache_inst:
|
|
|
|
return True
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return self._check_inst(t)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _check_inst(self, t, musts=None, never=None, choices=None):
|
|
|
|
# See the explanation of musts, never and choices below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cache_inst = self._cache_inst
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if t in cache_inst and not never:
|
|
|
|
# use the inst cache only for direct queries/simple queries.
|
|
|
|
cache = True
|
|
|
|
if choices:
|
|
|
|
# This is a recursive call, where there is no "never" so far.
|
|
|
|
# We know t satisfies at least one of the remaining choices.
|
|
|
|
# If it satisfies all remaining choices, we can use the cache
|
|
|
|
# in this case (since never is empty).
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# Otherwise, a later choice may be incompatible with t.
|
|
|
|
for choice in choices:
|
|
|
|
if t in choice:
|
|
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
cache = False
|
|
|
|
break
|
|
|
|
if cache:
|
|
|
|
return True
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
universe = self._universe
|
|
|
|
testing = self._testing
|
|
|
|
cbroken = self._cache_broken
|
|
|
|
safe_set = self._safe_set
|
|
|
|
eqv_table = self._eqv_table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Our installability verdict - start with "yes" and change if
|
|
|
|
# prove otherwise.
|
|
|
|
verdict = True
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# set of packages that must be installed with this package
|
|
|
|
if musts is None:
|
|
|
|
musts = set()
|
|
|
|
musts.add(t)
|
|
|
|
# set of packages we can *never* choose (e.g. due to conflicts)
|
|
|
|
if never is None:
|
|
|
|
never = set()
|
|
|
|
# set of relations were we have a choice, but where we have not
|
|
|
|
# committed ourselves yet. Hopefully some choices may be taken
|
|
|
|
# for us (if one of the alternatives appear in "musts")
|
|
|
|
if choices is None:
|
|
|
|
choices = set()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# The subset of musts we haven't checked yet.
|
|
|
|
check = set([t])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if len(musts) == 1:
|
|
|
|
# Include the essential packages in testing as a starting point.
|
|
|
|
if t[2] not in self._cache_ess:
|
|
|
|
# The minimal essential set cache is not present -
|
|
|
|
# compute it now.
|
|
|
|
(start, ess_never) = self._get_min_pseudo_ess_set(t[2])
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
(start, ess_never) = self._cache_ess[t[2]]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if t in ess_never:
|
|
|
|
# t conflicts with something in the essential set or the essential
|
|
|
|
# set conflicts with t - either way, t is f***ed
|
|
|
|
cbroken.add(t)
|
|
|
|
testing.remove(t)
|
|
|
|
return False
|
|
|
|
musts.update(start)
|
|
|
|
never.update(ess_never)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# curry check_loop
|
|
|
|
check_loop = partial(self._check_loop, universe, testing,
|
|
|
|
eqv_table, musts, never, choices,
|
|
|
|
cbroken)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Useful things to remember:
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# * musts and never are disjointed at all times
|
|
|
|
# - if not, t cannot be installable. Either t, or one of
|
|
|
|
# its dependencies conflict with t or one of its (other)
|
|
|
|
# dependencies.
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# * choices should generally be avoided as much as possible.
|
|
|
|
# - picking a bad choice requires backtracking
|
|
|
|
# - sometimes musts/never will eventually "solve" the choice.
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# * check never includes choices (these are always in choices)
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# * A package is installable if never and musts are disjoined
|
|
|
|
# and both check and choices are empty.
|
|
|
|
# - exception: _pick_choice may determine the installability
|
|
|
|
# of t via recursion (calls _check_inst). In this case
|
|
|
|
# check and choices are not (always) empty.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _pick_choice(rebuild, set=set, len=len):
|
|
|
|
"""Picks a choice from choices and updates rebuild.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prunes the choices and updates "rebuild" to reflect the
|
|
|
|
pruned choices.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Returns True if t is installable (determined via recursion).
|
|
|
|
Returns False if a choice was picked and added to check.
|
|
|
|
Returns None if t is uninstallable (no choice can be picked).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NB: If this returns False, choices should be replaced by
|
|
|
|
rebuild.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# We already satisfied/chosen at least one of the litterals
|
|
|
|
# in the choice, so the choice is gone
|
|
|
|
for choice in ifilter(musts.isdisjoint, choices):
|
|
|
|
# cbroken is needed here because (in theory) it could
|
|
|
|
# have changed since the choice was discovered and it
|
|
|
|
# is smaller than testing (so presumably faster)
|
|
|
|
remain = choice - never - cbroken
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if len(remain) > 1 and not remain.isdisjoint(safe_set):
|
|
|
|
first = None
|
|
|
|
for r in ifilter(safe_set.__contains__, remain):
|
|
|
|
# don't bother giving extra arguments to _check_inst. "safe" packages are
|
|
|
|
# usually trivial to satisfy on their own and will not involve conflicts
|
|
|
|
# (so never will not help)
|
|
|
|
if r in cache_inst or self._check_inst(r):
|
|
|
|
first = r
|
|
|
|
break
|
|
|
|
if first:
|
|
|
|
musts.add(first)
|
|
|
|
check.add(first)
|
|
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
# None of the safe set choices are installable, so drop them
|
|
|
|
remain -= safe_set
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if len(remain) == 1:
|
|
|
|
# the choice was reduced to one package we haven't checked - check that
|
|
|
|
check.update(remain)
|
|
|
|
musts.update(remain)
|
|
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if not remain:
|
|
|
|
# all alternatives would violate the conflicts or are uninstallable
|
|
|
|
# => package is not installable
|
|
|
|
return None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# The choice is still deferred
|
|
|
|
rebuild.add(frozenset(remain))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if check or not rebuild:
|
|
|
|
return False
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
choice = iter(rebuild.pop())
|
|
|
|
last = next(choice) # pick one to go last
|
|
|
|
for p in choice:
|
|
|
|
musts_copy = musts.copy()
|
|
|
|
never_tmp = set()
|
|
|
|
choices_tmp = set()
|
|
|
|
check_tmp = set([p])
|
|
|
|
if not self._check_loop(universe, testing, eqv_table,
|
|
|
|
musts_copy, never_tmp,
|
|
|
|
choices_tmp, cbroken,
|
|
|
|
check_tmp):
|
|
|
|
# p cannot be chosen/is broken (unlikely, but ...)
|
|
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Test if we can pick p without any consequences.
|
|
|
|
# - when we can, we avoid a backtrack point.
|
|
|
|
if never_tmp <= never and choices_tmp <= rebuild:
|
|
|
|
# we can pick p without picking up new conflicts
|
|
|
|
# or unresolved choices. Therefore we commit to
|
|
|
|
# using p.
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# NB: Optimally, we would go to the start of this
|
|
|
|
# routine, but to conserve stack-space, we return
|
|
|
|
# and expect to be called again later.
|
|
|
|
musts.update(musts_copy)
|
|
|
|
return False
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if not musts.isdisjoint(never_tmp):
|
|
|
|
# If we pick p, we will definitely end up making
|
|
|
|
# t uninstallable, so p is a no-go.
|
|
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# We are not sure that p is safe, setup a backtrack
|
|
|
|
# point and recurse.
|
|
|
|
never_tmp |= never
|
|
|
|
choices_tmp |= rebuild
|
|
|
|
if self._check_inst(p, musts_copy, never_tmp,
|
|
|
|
choices_tmp):
|
|
|
|
# Success, p was a valid choice and made it all
|
|
|
|
# installable
|
|
|
|
return True
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# If we get here, we failed to find something that
|
|
|
|
# would satisfy choice (without breaking the
|
|
|
|
# installability of t). This means p cannot be used
|
|
|
|
# to satisfy the dependencies, so pretend to conflict
|
|
|
|
# with it - hopefully it will reduce future choices.
|
|
|
|
never.add(p)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Optimization for the last case; avoid the recursive call
|
|
|
|
# and just assume the last will lead to a solution. If it
|
|
|
|
# doesn't there is no solution and if it does, we don't
|
|
|
|
# have to back-track anyway.
|
|
|
|
check.add(last)
|
|
|
|
musts.add(last)
|
|
|
|
return False
|
|
|
|
# END _pick_choice
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
while check:
|
|
|
|
if not check_loop(check):
|
|
|
|
verdict = False
|
|
|
|
break
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if choices:
|
|
|
|
rebuild = set()
|
|
|
|
# We have to "guess" now, which is always fun, but not cheap
|
|
|
|
r = _pick_choice(rebuild)
|
|
|
|
if r is None:
|
|
|
|
verdict = False
|
|
|
|
break
|
|
|
|
if r:
|
|
|
|
# The recursive call have already updated the
|
|
|
|
# cache so there is not point in doing it again.
|
|
|
|
return True
|
|
|
|
choices = rebuild
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if verdict:
|
|
|
|
# if t is installable, then so are all packages in musts
|
|
|
|
self._cache_inst.update(musts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return verdict
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _check_loop(self, universe, testing, eqv_table, musts, never,
|
|
|
|
choices, cbroken, check, len=len,
|
|
|
|
frozenset=frozenset):
|
|
|
|
"""Finds all guaranteed dependencies via "check".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If it returns False, t is not installable. If it returns True
|
|
|
|
then "check" is exhausted. If "choices" are empty and this
|
|
|
|
returns True, then t is installable.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
# Local variables for faster access...
|
|
|
|
not_satisfied = partial(ifilter, musts.isdisjoint)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# While we have guaranteed dependencies (in check), examine all
|
|
|
|
# of them.
|
|
|
|
for cur in iter_except(check.pop, KeyError):
|
|
|
|
(deps, cons) = universe[cur]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if cons:
|
|
|
|
# Conflicts?
|
|
|
|
if cur in never:
|
|
|
|
# cur adds a (reverse) conflict, so check if cur
|
|
|
|
# is in never.
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# - there is a window where two conflicting
|
|
|
|
# packages can be in check. Example "A" depends
|
|
|
|
# on "B" and "C". If "B" conflicts with "C",
|
|
|
|
# then both "B" and "C" could end in "check".
|
|
|
|
return False
|
|
|
|
# We must install cur for the package to be installable,
|
|
|
|
# so "obviously" we can never choose any of its conflicts
|
|
|
|
never.update(cons & testing)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# depgroup can be satisifed by picking something that is
|
|
|
|
# already in musts - lets pick that (again). :)
|
|
|
|
for depgroup in not_satisfied(deps):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Of all the packages listed in the relation remove those that
|
|
|
|
# are either:
|
|
|
|
# - not in testing
|
|
|
|
# - known to be broken (by cache)
|
|
|
|
# - in never
|
|
|
|
candidates = frozenset((depgroup & testing) - never)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if len(candidates) == 0:
|
|
|
|
# We got no candidates to satisfy it - this
|
|
|
|
# package cannot be installed with the current
|
|
|
|
# testing
|
|
|
|
if cur not in cbroken and depgroup.isdisjoint(never):
|
|
|
|
# cur's dependency cannot be satisfied even if never was empty.
|
|
|
|
# This means that cur itself is broken (as well).
|
|
|
|
cbroken.add(cur)
|
|
|
|
testing.remove(cur)
|
|
|
|
return False
|
|
|
|
if len(candidates) == 1:
|
|
|
|
# only one possible solution to this choice and we
|
|
|
|
# haven't seen it before
|
|
|
|
check.update(candidates)
|
|
|
|
musts.update(candidates)
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
possible_eqv = set(x for x in candidates if x in eqv_table)
|
|
|
|
if len(possible_eqv) > 1:
|
|
|
|
# Exploit equivalency to reduce the number of
|
|
|
|
# candidates if possible. Basically, this
|
|
|
|
# code maps "similar" candidates into a single
|
|
|
|
# candidate that will give a identical result
|
|
|
|
# to any other candidate it eliminates.
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# See InstallabilityTesterBuilder's
|
|
|
|
# _build_eqv_packages_table method for more
|
|
|
|
# information on how this works.
|
|
|
|
new_cand = set(x for x in candidates if x not in possible_eqv)
|
|
|
|
for chosen in iter_except(possible_eqv.pop, KeyError):
|
|
|
|
new_cand.add(chosen)
|
|
|
|
possible_eqv -= eqv_table[chosen]
|
|
|
|
if len(new_cand) == 1:
|
|
|
|
check.update(new_cand)
|
|
|
|
musts.update(new_cand)
|
|
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
candidates = frozenset(new_cand)
|
|
|
|
# defer this choice till later
|
|
|
|
choices.add(candidates)
|
|
|
|
return True
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _get_min_pseudo_ess_set(self, arch):
|
|
|
|
if arch not in self._cache_ess:
|
|
|
|
# The minimal essential set cache is not present -
|
|
|
|
# compute it now.
|
|
|
|
testing = self._testing
|
|
|
|
eqv_table = self._eqv_table
|
|
|
|
cbroken = self._cache_broken
|
|
|
|
universe = self._universe
|
|
|
|
safe_set = self._safe_set
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ess_base = set(x for x in self._essentials if x[2] == arch and x in testing)
|
|
|
|
start = set(ess_base)
|
|
|
|
ess_never = set()
|
|
|
|
ess_choices = set()
|
|
|
|
not_satisified = partial(ifilter, start.isdisjoint)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
while ess_base:
|
|
|
|
self._check_loop(universe, testing, eqv_table,
|
|
|
|
start, ess_never, ess_choices,
|
|
|
|
cbroken, ess_base)
|
|
|
|
if ess_choices:
|
|
|
|
# Try to break choices where possible
|
|
|
|
nchoice = set()
|
|
|
|
for choice in not_satisified(ess_choices):
|
|
|
|
b = False
|
|
|
|
for c in choice:
|
|
|
|
if universe[c][1] <= ess_never and \
|
|
|
|
not any(not_satisified(universe[c][0])):
|
|
|
|
ess_base.add(c)
|
|
|
|
b = True
|
|
|
|
break
|
|
|
|
if not b:
|
|
|
|
nchoice.add(choice)
|
|
|
|
ess_choices = nchoice
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
break
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for x in start:
|
|
|
|
ess_never.update(universe[x][1])
|
|
|
|
self._cache_ess[arch] = (frozenset(start), frozenset(ess_never))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return self._cache_ess[arch]
|
|
|
|
|