You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.

1258 lines
58 KiB

#!/usr/bin/env python2.4
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
# Copyright (C) 2001-2004 Anthony Towns <ajt@debian.org>
# Andreas Barth <aba@debian.org>
# Fabio Tranchitella <kobold@debian.org>
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
# (at your option) any later version.
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
# GNU General Public License for more details.
"""
= Introdution =
This is the Debian testing updater script, also known as "Britney".
Packages are usually installed into the `testing' distribution after
they have undergone some degree of testing in unstable. The goal of
this software is to do this task in a smart way, allowing testing
to be always fully installable and close to being a release candidate.
Britney source code is splitted in two different but related tasks:
the first one is the generation of the update excuses, while the
second tries to update testing with the valid candidates; first
each package alone, then larger and even larger sets of packages
together. Each try is accepted if testing is not more uninstallable
after the update than before.
= Data Loading =
In order to analyze the entire Debian distribution, Britney needs to
load in memory the whole archive: this means more than 10.000 packages
for twelve architectures, as well as the dependency interconnection
between them. For this reason, the memory requirement for running this
software are quite high and at least 1 gigabyte of RAM should be available.
Britney loads the source packages from the `Sources' file and the binary
packages from the `Packages_${arch}' files, where ${arch} is substituted
with the supported architectures. While loading the data, the software
analyze the dependencies and build a directed weighted graph in memory
with all the interconnections between the packages (see Britney.read_sources
and Britney.read_binaries).
Other than source and binary packages, Britney loads the following data:
* Bugs, which contains the count of release-critical bugs for a given
version of a source package (see Britney.read_bugs).
* Dates, which contains the date of the upload of a given version
of a source package (see Britney.read_dates).
* Urgencies, which contains the urgency of the upload of a given
version of a source package (see Britney.read_urgencies).
* Approvals, which contains the list of approved testing-proposed-updates
packages (see Britney.read_approvals).
* Hints, which contains lists of commands which modify the standard behaviour
of Britney (see Britney.read_hints).
For a more detailed explanation about the format of these files, please read
the documentation of the related methods. The exact meaning of them will be
instead explained in the chapter "Excuses Generation".
= Excuses =
An excuse is a detailed explanation of why a package can or cannot
be updated in the testing distribution from a newer package in
another distribution (like for example unstable). The main purpose
of the excuses is to be written in an HTML file which will be
published over HTTP. The maintainers will be able to parse it manually
or automatically to find the explanation of why their packages have
been updated or not.
== Excuses generation ==
These are the steps (with references to method names) that Britney
does for the generation of the update excuses.
* If a source package is available in testing but it is not
present in unstable and no binary packages in unstable are
built from it, then it is marked for removal.
* Every source package in unstable and testing-proposed-updates,
if already present in testing, is checked for binary-NMUs, new
or dropped binary packages in all the supported architectures
(see Britney.should_upgrade_srcarch). The steps to detect if an
upgrade is needed are:
1. If there is a `remove' hint for the source package, the package
is ignored: it will be removed and not updated.
2. For every binary package build from the new source, it checks
for unsatisfied dependencies, new binary package and updated
binary package (binNMU) excluding the architecture-independent
ones and the packages not built from the same source.
3. For every binary package build from the old source, it checks
if it is still built from the new source; if this is not true
and the package is not architecture-independent, the script
removes it from testing.
4. Finally, if there is something worth doing (eg. a new or updated
binary package) and nothing wrong it marks the source package
as "Valid candidate", or "Not considered" if there is something
wrong which prevented the update.
* Every source package in unstable and testing-proposed-updates is
checked for upgrade (see Britney.should_upgrade_src). The steps
to detect if an upgrade is needed are:
1. If the source package in testing is more recent the new one
is ignored.
2. If the source package doesn't exist (is fake), which means that
a binary package refers to it but it is not present in the
`Sources' file, the new one is ignored.
3. If the package doesn't exist in testing, the urgency of the
upload is ignored and set to the default (actually `low').
4. If there is a `remove' hint for the source package, the package
is ignored: it will be removed and not updated.
5. If there is a `block' hint for the source package without an
`unblock` hint or a `block-all source`, the package is ignored.
7. If the suite is unstable, the update can go ahead only if the
upload happend more then the minimum days specified by the
urgency of the upload; if this is not true, the package is
ignored as `too-young'. Note that the urgency is sticky, meaning
that the highest urgency uploaded since the previous testing
transition is taken into account.
8. All the architecture-dependent binary packages and the
architecture-independent ones for the `nobreakall' architectures
have to be built from the source we are considering. If this is
not true, then these are called `out-of-date' architectures and
the package is ignored.
9. The source package must have at least a binary package, otherwise
it is ignored.
10. If the suite is unstable, the count of release critical bugs for
the new source package must be less then the count for the testing
one. If this is not true, the package is ignored as `buggy'.
11. If there is a `force' hint for the source package, then it is
updated even if it is marked as ignored from the previous steps.
12. If the suite is testing-proposed-updates, the source package can
be updated only if there is an explicit approval for it.
13. If the package will be ignored, mark it as "Valid candidate",
otherwise mark it as "Not considered".
* The list of `remove' hints is processed: if the requested source
package is not already being updated or removed and the version
actually in testing is the same specified with the `remove' hint,
it is marked for removal.
* The excuses are sorted by the number of days from the last upload
(days-old) and by name.
* A list of unconsidered excuses (for which the package is not upgraded)
is built. Using this list, all the excuses depending on them is marked
as invalid for "unpossible dependency".
* The excuses are written in an HTML file.
"""
import os
import re
import sys
import string
import time
import optparse
import apt_pkg
from excuse import Excuse
__author__ = 'Fabio Tranchitella'
__version__ = '2.0.alpha1'
class Britney:
"""Britney, the debian testing updater script
This is the script that updates the testing_ distribution. It is executed
each day after the installation of the updated packages. It generates the
`Packages' files for the testing distribution, but it does so in an
intelligent manner; it try to avoid any inconsistency and to use only
non-buggy packages.
For more documentation on this script, please read the Developers Reference.
"""
HINTS_STANDARD = ("easy", "hint", "remove", "block", "unblock", "urgent", "approve")
HINTS_ALL = ("force", "force-hint", "block-all") + HINTS_STANDARD
def __init__(self):
"""Class constructor
This method initializes and populates the data lists, which contain all
the information needed by the other methods of the class.
"""
self.date_now = int(((time.time() / (60*60)) - 15) / 24)
# parse the command line arguments
self.__parse_arguments()
# initialize the apt_pkg back-end
apt_pkg.init()
# read the source and binary packages for the involved distributions
self.sources = {'testing': self.read_sources(self.options.testing),
'unstable': self.read_sources(self.options.unstable),
'tpu': self.read_sources(self.options.tpu),}
self.binaries = {'testing': {}, 'unstable': {}, 'tpu': {}}
for arch in self.options.architectures:
self.binaries['testing'][arch] = self.read_binaries(self.options.testing, "testing", arch)
self.binaries['unstable'][arch] = self.read_binaries(self.options.unstable, "unstable", arch)
self.binaries['tpu'][arch] = self.read_binaries(self.options.tpu, "tpu", arch)
# read the release-critical bug summaries for testing and unstable
self.bugs = {'unstable': self.read_bugs(self.options.unstable),
'testing': self.read_bugs(self.options.testing),}
self.normalize_bugs()
# read additional data
self.dates = self.read_dates(self.options.testing)
self.urgencies = self.read_urgencies(self.options.testing)
self.approvals = self.read_approvals(self.options.tpu)
self.hints = self.read_hints(self.options.unstable)
self.excuses = []
def __parse_arguments(self):
"""Parse the command line arguments
This method parses and initializes the command line arguments.
While doing so, it preprocesses some of the options to be converted
in a suitable form for the other methods of the class.
"""
# initialize the parser
self.parser = optparse.OptionParser(version="%prog")
self.parser.add_option("-v", "", action="count", dest="verbose", help="enable verbose output")
self.parser.add_option("-c", "--config", action="store", dest="config",
default="/etc/britney.conf", help="path for the configuration file")
(self.options, self.args) = self.parser.parse_args()
# if the configuration file exists, than read it and set the additional options
if not os.path.isfile(self.options.config):
self.__log("Unable to read the configuration file (%s), exiting!" % self.options.config, type="E")
sys.exit(1)
# minimum days for unstable-testing transition and the list of hints
# are handled as an ad-hoc case
self.MINDAYS = {}
self.HINTS = {}
for k, v in [map(string.strip,r.split('=', 1)) for r in file(self.options.config) if '=' in r and not r.strip().startswith('#')]:
if k.startswith("MINDAYS_"):
self.MINDAYS[k.split("_")[1].lower()] = int(v)
elif k.startswith("HINTS_"):
self.HINTS[k.split("_")[1].lower()] = \
reduce(lambda x,y: x+y, [hasattr(self, "HINTS_" + i) and getattr(self, "HINTS_" + i) or (i,) for i in v.split()])
else:
setattr(self.options, k.lower(), v)
# Sort the architecture list
allarches = sorted(self.options.architectures.split())
arches = [x for x in allarches if x in self.options.nobreakall_arches]
arches += [x for x in allarches if x not in arches and x not in self.options.fucked_arches]
arches += [x for x in allarches if x not in arches and x not in self.options.break_arches]
arches += [x for x in allarches if x not in arches]
self.options.architectures = arches
def __log(self, msg, type="I"):
"""Print info messages according to verbosity level
An easy-and-simple log method which prints messages to the standard
output. The type parameter controls the urgency of the message, and
can be equal to `I' for `Information', `W' for `Warning' and `E' for
`Error'. Warnings and errors are always printed, and information are
printed only if the verbose logging is enabled.
"""
if self.options.verbose or type in ("E", "W"):
print "%s: [%s] - %s" % (type, time.asctime(), msg)
# Data reading/writing methods
# ----------------------------
def read_sources(self, basedir):
"""Read the list of source packages from the specified directory
The source packages are read from the `Sources' file within the
directory specified as `basedir' parameter. Considering the
large amount of memory needed, not all the fields are loaded
in memory. The available fields are Version, Maintainer and Section.
The method returns a list where every item represents a source
package as a dictionary.
"""
sources = {}
package = None
filename = os.path.join(basedir, "Sources")
self.__log("Loading source packages from %s" % filename)
packages = apt_pkg.ParseTagFile(open(filename))
while packages.Step():
pkg = packages.Section.get('Package')
sources[pkg] = {'binaries': [],
'version': packages.Section.get('Version'),
'maintainer': packages.Section.get('Maintainer'),
'section': packages.Section.get('Section'),
}
return sources
def read_binaries(self, basedir, distribution, arch):
"""Read the list of binary packages from the specified directory
The binary packages are read from the `Packages_${arch}' files
within the directory specified as `basedir' parameter, replacing
${arch} with the value of the arch parameter. Considering the
large amount of memory needed, not all the fields are loaded
in memory. The available fields are Version, Source, Pre-Depends,
Depends, Conflicts, Provides and Architecture.
After reading the packages, reverse dependencies are computed
and saved in the `rdepends' keys, and the `Provides' field is
used to populate the virtual packages list.
The dependencies are parsed with the apt.pkg.ParseDepends method,
and they are stored both as the format of its return value and
text.
The method returns a tuple. The first element is a list where
every item represents a binary package as a dictionary; the second
element is a dictionary which maps virtual packages to real
packages that provide it.
"""
packages = {}
provides = {}
package = None
filename = os.path.join(basedir, "Packages_%s" % arch)
self.__log("Loading binary packages from %s" % filename)
Packages = apt_pkg.ParseTagFile(open(filename))
while Packages.Step():
pkg = Packages.Section.get('Package')
version = Packages.Section.get('Version')
dpkg = {'rdepends': [],
'version': version,
'source': pkg,
'source-ver': version,
'pre-depends': Packages.Section.get('Pre-Depends'),
'depends': Packages.Section.get('Depends'),
'conflicts': Packages.Section.get('Conflicts'),
'provides': Packages.Section.get('Provides'),
'architecture': Packages.Section.get('Architecture'),
}
# retrieve the name and the version of the source package
source = Packages.Section.get('Source')
if source:
dpkg['source'] = source.split(" ")[0]
if "(" in source:
dpkg['source-ver'] = source.split("(")[1].split(")")[0]
# if the source package is available in the distribution, then register this binary package
if dpkg['source'] in self.sources[distribution]:
self.sources[distribution][dpkg['source']]['binaries'].append(pkg + "/" + arch)
# if the source package doesn't exist, create a fake one
else:
self.sources[distribution][dpkg['source']] = {'binaries': [pkg + "/" + arch],
'version': dpkg['source-ver'], 'maintainer': None, 'section': None, 'fake': True}
# register virtual packages and real packages that provide them
if dpkg['provides']:
parts = map(string.strip, dpkg['provides'].split(","))
for p in parts:
try:
provides[p].append(pkg)
except KeyError:
provides[p] = [pkg]
del dpkg['provides']
# append the resulting dictionary to the package list
packages[pkg] = dpkg
# loop again on the list of packages to register reverse dependencies
for pkg in packages:
dependencies = []
# analyze dependencies
if packages[pkg]['depends']:
packages[pkg]['depends-txt'] = packages[pkg]['depends']
packages[pkg]['depends'] = apt_pkg.ParseDepends(packages[pkg]['depends'])
dependencies.extend(packages[pkg]['depends'])
# analyze pre-dependencies
if packages[pkg]['pre-depends']:
packages[pkg]['pre-depends-txt'] = packages[pkg]['pre-depends']
packages[pkg]['pre-depends'] = apt_pkg.ParseDepends(packages[pkg]['pre-depends'])
dependencies.extend(packages[pkg]['pre-depends'])
# register the list of the dependencies for the depending packages
for p in dependencies:
for a in p:
if a[0] not in packages: continue
packages[a[0]]['rdepends'].append((pkg, a[1], a[2]))
# return a tuple with the list of real and virtual packages
return (packages, provides)
def read_bugs(self, basedir):
"""Read the release critial bug summary from the specified directory
The RC bug summaries are read from the `Bugs' file within the
directory specified as `basedir' parameter. The file contains
rows with the format:
<package-name> <count-of-rc-bugs>
The method returns a dictionary where the key is the binary package
name and the value is the number of open RC bugs for it.
"""
bugs = {}
filename = os.path.join(basedir, "Bugs")
self.__log("Loading RC bugs count from %s" % filename)
for line in open(filename):
l = line.strip().split()
if len(l) != 2: continue
try:
bugs[l[0]] = int(l[1])
except ValueError:
self.__log("Bugs, unable to parse \"%s\"" % line, type="E")
return bugs
def __maxver(self, pkg, dist):
"""Return the maximum version for a given package name
This method returns None if the specified source package
is not available in the `dist' distribution. If the package
exists, then it returns the maximum version between the
source package and its binary packages.
"""
maxver = None
if self.sources[dist].has_key(pkg):
maxver = self.sources[dist][pkg]['version']
for arch in self.options.architectures:
if not self.binaries[dist][arch][0].has_key(pkg): continue
pkgv = self.binaries[dist][arch][0][pkg]['version']
if maxver == None or apt_pkg.VersionCompare(pkgv, maxver) > 0:
maxver = pkgv
return maxver
def normalize_bugs(self):
"""Normalize the release critical bug summaries for testing and unstable
The method doesn't return any value: it directly modifies the
object attribute `bugs'.
"""
# loop on all the package names from testing and unstable bug summaries
for pkg in set(self.bugs['testing'].keys() + self.bugs['unstable'].keys()):
# make sure that the key is present in both dictionaries
if not self.bugs['testing'].has_key(pkg):
self.bugs['testing'][pkg] = 0
elif not self.bugs['unstable'].has_key(pkg):
self.bugs['unstable'][pkg] = 0
# retrieve the maximum version of the package in testing:
maxvert = self.__maxver(pkg, 'testing')
# if the package is not available in testing or it has the
# same RC bug count, then do nothing
if maxvert == None or \
self.bugs['testing'][pkg] == self.bugs['unstable'][pkg]:
continue
# retrieve the maximum version of the package in testing:
maxveru = self.__maxver(pkg, 'unstable')
# if the package is not available in unstable, then do nothing
if maxveru == None:
continue
# else if the testing package is more recent, then use the
# unstable RC bug count for testing, too
elif apt_pkg.VersionCompare(maxvert, maxveru) >= 0:
self.bugs['testing'][pkg] = self.bugs['unstable'][pkg]
def read_dates(self, basedir):
"""Read the upload date for the packages from the specified directory
The upload dates are read from the `Date' file within the directory
specified as `basedir' parameter. The file contains rows with the
format:
<package-name> <version> <date-of-upload>
The dates are expressed as days starting from the 1970-01-01.
The method returns a dictionary where the key is the binary package
name and the value is tuple with two items, the version and the date.
"""
dates = {}
filename = os.path.join(basedir, "Dates")
self.__log("Loading upload data from %s" % filename)
for line in open(filename):
l = line.strip().split()
if len(l) != 3: continue
try:
dates[l[0]] = (l[1], int(l[2]))
except ValueError:
self.__log("Dates, unable to parse \"%s\"" % line, type="E")
return dates
def read_urgencies(self, basedir):
"""Read the upload urgency of the packages from the specified directory
The upload urgencies are read from the `Urgency' file within the
directory specified as `basedir' parameter. The file contains rows
with the format:
<package-name> <version> <urgency>
The method returns a dictionary where the key is the binary package
name and the value is the greatest urgency from the versions of the
package that are higher then the testing one.
"""
urgencies = {}
filename = os.path.join(basedir, "Urgency")
self.__log("Loading upload urgencies from %s" % filename)
for line in open(filename):
l = line.strip().split()
if len(l) != 3: continue
# read the minimum days associated to the urgencies
urgency_old = urgencies.get(l[0], self.options.default_urgency)
mindays_old = self.MINDAYS.get(urgency_old, self.MINDAYS[self.options.default_urgency])
mindays_new = self.MINDAYS.get(l[2], self.MINDAYS[self.options.default_urgency])
# if the new urgency is lower (so the min days are higher), do nothing
if mindays_old <= mindays_new:
continue
# if the package exists in testing and it is more recent, do nothing
tsrcv = self.sources['testing'].get(l[0], None)
if tsrcv and apt_pkg.VersionCompare(tsrcv['version'], l[1]) >= 0:
continue
# if the package doesn't exist in unstable or it is older, do nothing
usrcv = self.sources['unstable'].get(l[0], None)
if not usrcv or apt_pkg.VersionCompare(usrcv['version'], l[1]) < 0:
continue
# update the urgency for the package
urgencies[l[0]] = l[2]
return urgencies
def read_approvals(self, basedir):
"""Read the approval commands from the specified directory
The approval commands are read from the files contained by the
`Approved' directory within the directory specified as `basedir'
parameter. The name of the files has to be the same of the
authorized users for the approvals.
The file contains rows with the format:
<package-name> <version>
The method returns a dictionary where the key is the binary package
name followed by an underscore and the version number, and the value
is the user who submitted the command.
"""
approvals = {}
for approver in self.options.approvers.split():
filename = os.path.join(basedir, "Approved", approver)
self.__log("Loading approvals list from %s" % filename)
for line in open(filename):
l = line.strip().split()
if len(l) != 2: continue
approvals["%s_%s" % (l[0], l[1])] = approver
return approvals
def read_hints(self, basedir):
"""Read the hint commands from the specified directory
The hint commands are read from the files contained by the `Hints'
directory within the directory specified as `basedir' parameter.
The name of the files has to be the same of the authorized users
for the hints.
The file contains rows with the format:
<command> <package-name>[/<version>]
The method returns a dictionary where the key is the command, and
the value is the list of affected packages.
"""
hints = dict([(k,[]) for k in self.HINTS_ALL])
for who in self.HINTS.keys():
filename = os.path.join(basedir, "Hints", who)
self.__log("Loading hints list from %s" % filename)
for line in open(filename):
line = line.strip()
if line == "": continue
l = line.split()
if l[0] == 'finished':
break
elif l[0] not in self.HINTS[who]:
continue
elif l[0] in ["easy", "hint", "force-hint"]:
hints[l[0]].append((who, [k.split("/") for k in l if "/" in k]))
elif l[0] in ["block-all"]:
hints[l[0]].extend([(y, who) for y in l[1:]])
elif l[0] in ["block"]:
hints[l[0]].extend([(y, who) for y in l[1:]])
elif l[0] in ["remove", "approve", "unblock", "force", "urgent"]:
hints[l[0]].extend([(k.split("/")[0], (k.split("/")[1],who) ) for k in l if "/" in k])
for x in ["block", "block-all", "unblock", "force", "urgent", "remove"]:
z = {}
for a, b in hints[x]:
if z.has_key(a):
self.__log("Overriding %s[%s] = %s with %s" % (x, a, z[a], b), type="W")
z[a] = b
hints[x] = z
return hints
# Utility methods for package analisys
# ------------------------------------
def same_source(self, sv1, sv2):
"""Check if two version numbers are built from the same source
This method returns a boolean value which is true if the two
version numbers specified as parameters are built from the same
source. The main use of this code is to detect binary-NMU.
"""
if sv1 == sv2:
return 1
m = re.match(r'^(.*)\+b\d+$', sv1)
if m: sv1 = m.group(1)
m = re.match(r'^(.*)\+b\d+$', sv2)
if m: sv2 = m.group(1)
if sv1 == sv2:
return 1
if re.search("-", sv1) or re.search("-", sv2):
m = re.match(r'^(.*-[^.]+)\.0\.\d+$', sv1)
if m: sv1 = m.group(1)
m = re.match(r'^(.*-[^.]+\.[^.]+)\.\d+$', sv1)
if m: sv1 = m.group(1)
m = re.match(r'^(.*-[^.]+)\.0\.\d+$', sv2)
if m: sv2 = m.group(1)
m = re.match(r'^(.*-[^.]+\.[^.]+)\.\d+$', sv2)
if m: sv2 = m.group(1)
return (sv1 == sv2)
else:
m = re.match(r'^([^-]+)\.0\.\d+$', sv1)
if m and sv2 == m.group(1): return 1
m = re.match(r'^([^-]+)\.0\.\d+$', sv2)
if m and sv1 == m.group(1): return 1
return 0
def get_dependency_solvers(self, block, arch, distribution):
"""Find the packages which satisfy a dependency block
This method returns the list of packages which satisfy a dependency
block (as returned by apt_pkg.ParseDepends) for the given architecture
and distribution.
It returns a tuple with two items: the first is a boolean which is
True if the dependency is satisfied, the second is the list of the
solving packages.
"""
packages = []
# for every package, version and operation in the block
for name, version, op in block:
# look for the package in unstable
if name in self.binaries[distribution][arch][0]:
package = self.binaries[distribution][arch][0][name]
# check the versioned dependency (if present)
if op == '' and version == '' or apt_pkg.CheckDep(package['version'], op, version):
packages.append(name)
# look for the package in the virtual packages list
if name in self.binaries[distribution][arch][1]:
# loop on the list of packages which provides it
for prov in self.binaries[distribution][arch][1][name]:
package = self.binaries[distribution][arch][0][prov]
# check the versioned dependency (if present)
# TODO: this is forbidden by the debian policy, which says that versioned
# dependencies on virtual packages are never satisfied. The old britney
# does it and we have to go with it, but at least a warning should be raised.
if op == '' and version == '' or apt_pkg.CheckDep(package['version'], op, version):
packages.append(prov)
break
return (len(packages) > 0, packages)
def excuse_unsat_deps(self, pkg, src, arch, suite, excuse):
"""Find unsatisfied dependencies for a binary package
This method analyzes the dependencies of the binary package specified
by the parameter `pkg', built from the source package `src', for the
architecture `arch' within the suite `suite'. If the dependency can't
be satisfied in testing and/or unstable, it updates the excuse passed
as parameter.
The dependency fields checked are Pre-Depends and Depends.
"""
# retrieve the binary package from the specified suite and arch
binary_u = self.binaries[suite][arch][0][pkg]
# analyze the dependency fields (if present)
for type in ('Pre-Depends', 'Depends'):
type_key = type.lower()
if not binary_u[type_key]:
continue
# this list will contain the packages that satisfy the dependency
packages = []
# for every block of dependency (which is formed as conjunction of disconjunction)
for block, block_txt in map(None, binary_u[type_key], binary_u[type_key + '-txt'].split(',')):
# if the block is satisfied in testing, then skip the block
solved, packages = self.get_dependency_solvers(block, arch, 'testing')
if solved: continue
# check if the block can be satisfied in unstable, and list the solving packages
solved, packages = self.get_dependency_solvers(block, arch, suite)
packages = [self.binaries[suite][arch][0][p]['source'] for p in packages]
# if the dependency can be satisfied by the same source package, skip the block:
# obviously both binary packages will enter testing togheter
if src in packages: continue
# if no package can satisfy the dependency, add this information to the excuse
if len(packages) == 0:
excuse.addhtml("%s/%s unsatisfiable %s: %s" % (pkg, arch, type, block_txt.strip()))
# for the solving packages, update the excuse to add the dependencies
for p in packages:
if arch not in self.options.break_arches.split():
excuse.add_dep(p)
else:
excuse.add_break_dep(p, arch)
# Package analisys methods
# ------------------------
def should_remove_source(self, pkg):
"""Check if a source package should be removed from testing
This method checks if a source package should be removed from the
testing distribution; this happen if the source package is not
present in the unstable distribution anymore.
It returns True if the package can be removed, False otherwise.
In the former case, a new excuse is appended to the the object
attribute excuses.
"""
# if the soruce package is available in unstable, then do nothing
if self.sources['unstable'].has_key(pkg):
return False
# otherwise, add a new excuse for its removal and return True
src = self.sources['testing'][pkg]
excuse = Excuse("-" + pkg)
excuse.set_vers(src['version'], None)
src['maintainer'] and excuse.set_maint(src['maintainer'].strip())
src['section'] and excuse.set_section(src['section'].strip())
excuse.addhtml("Valid candidate")
self.excuses.append(excuse)
return True
def should_upgrade_srcarch(self, src, arch, suite):
"""Check if binary package should be upgraded
This method checks if a binary package should be upgraded; this can
happen also if the binary package is a binary-NMU for the given arch.
The analisys is performed for the source package specified by the
`src' parameter, checking the architecture `arch' for the distribution
`suite'.
It returns False if the given package doesn't need to be upgraded,
True otherwise. In the former case, a new excuse is appended to
the the object attribute excuses.
"""
# retrieve the source packages for testing and suite
source_t = self.sources['testing'][src]
source_u = self.sources[suite][src]
# build the common part of the excuse, which will be filled by the code below
ref = "%s/%s%s" % (src, arch, suite != 'unstable' and "_" + suite or "")
excuse = Excuse(ref)
excuse.set_vers(source_t['version'], source_t['version'])
source_u['maintainer'] and excuse.set_maint(source_u['maintainer'].strip())
source_u['section'] and excuse.set_section(source_u['section'].strip())
# if there is a `remove' hint and the requested version is the same of the
# version in testing, then stop here and return False
if self.hints["remove"].has_key(src) and \
self.same_source(source_t['version'], self.hints["remove"][src][0]):
excuse.addhtml("Removal request by %s" % (self.hints["remove"][src][1]))
excuse.addhtml("Trying to remove package, not update it")
excuse.addhtml("Not considered")
self.excuses.append(excuse)
return False
# the starting point is that there is nothing wrong and nothing worth doing
anywrongver = False
anyworthdoing = False
# for every binary package produced by this source in unstable for this architecture
for pkg in sorted(filter(lambda x: x.endswith("/" + arch), source_u['binaries'])):
pkg_name = pkg.split("/")[0]
# retrieve the testing (if present) and unstable corresponding binary packages
binary_t = pkg in source_t['binaries'] and self.binaries['testing'][arch][0][pkg_name] or None
binary_u = self.binaries[suite][arch][0][pkg_name]
# this is the source version for the new binary package
pkgsv = self.binaries[suite][arch][0][pkg_name]['source-ver']
# if the new binary package is architecture-independent, then skip it
if binary_u['architecture'] == 'all':
excuse.addhtml("Ignoring %s %s (from %s) as it is arch: all" % (pkg_name, binary_u['version'], pkgsv))
continue
# if the new binary package is not from the same source as the testing one, then skip it
if not self.same_source(source_t['version'], pkgsv):
anywrongver = True
excuse.addhtml("From wrong source: %s %s (%s not %s)" % (pkg_name, binary_u['version'], pkgsv, source_t['version']))
break
# find unsatisfied dependencies for the new binary package
self.excuse_unsat_deps(pkg_name, src, arch, suite, excuse)
# if the binary is not present in testing, then it is a new binary;
# in this case, there is something worth doing
if not binary_t:
excuse.addhtml("New binary: %s (%s)" % (pkg_name, binary_u['version']))
anyworthdoing = True
continue
# at this point, the binary package is present in testing, so we can compare
# the versions of the packages ...
vcompare = apt_pkg.VersionCompare(binary_t['version'], binary_u['version'])
# ... if updating would mean downgrading, then stop here: there is something wrong
if vcompare > 0:
anywrongver = True
excuse.addhtml("Not downgrading: %s (%s to %s)" % (pkg_name, binary_t['version'], binary_u['version']))
break
# ... if updating would mean upgrading, then there is something worth doing
elif vcompare < 0:
excuse.addhtml("Updated binary: %s (%s to %s)" % (pkg_name, binary_t['version'], binary_u['version']))
anyworthdoing = True
# if there is nothing wrong and there is something worth doing or the source
# package is not fake, then check what packages shuold be removed
if not anywrongver and (anyworthdoing or self.sources[suite][src].has_key('fake')):
srcv = self.sources[suite][src]['version']
ssrc = self.same_source(source_t['version'], srcv)
# for every binary package produced by this source in testing for this architecture
for pkg in sorted([x.split("/")[0] for x in self.sources['testing'][src]['binaries'] if x.endswith("/"+arch)]):
# if the package is architecture-independent, then ignore it
if self.binaries['testing'][arch][0][pkg]['architecture'] == 'all':
excuse.addhtml("Ignoring removal of %s as it is arch: all" % (pkg))
continue
# if the package is not produced by the new source package, then remove it from testing
if not self.binaries[suite][arch][0].has_key(pkg):
tpkgv = self.binaries['testing'][arch][0][pkg]['version']
excuse.addhtml("Removed binary: %s %s" % (pkg, tpkgv))
if ssrc: anyworthdoing = True
# if there is nothing wrong and there is something worth doing, this is valid candidate
if not anywrongver and anyworthdoing:
excuse.addhtml("Valid candidate")
self.excuses.append(excuse)
# else if there is something worth doing (but something wrong, too) this package won't be considered
elif anyworthdoing:
excuse.addhtml("Not considered")
self.excuses.append(excuse)
return False
# otherwise, return True
return True
def should_upgrade_src(self, src, suite):
"""Check if source package should be upgraded
This method checks if a source package should be upgraded. The analisys
is performed for the source package specified by the `src' parameter,
checking the architecture `arch' for the distribution `suite'.
It returns False if the given package doesn't need to be upgraded,
True otherwise. In the former case, a new excuse is appended to
the the object attribute excuses.
"""
# retrieve the source packages for testing (if available) and suite
source_u = self.sources[suite][src]
if src in self.sources['testing']:
source_t = self.sources['testing'][src]
# if testing and unstable have the same version, then this is a candidate for binary-NMUs only
if apt_pkg.VersionCompare(source_t['version'], source_u['version']) == 0:
return False
else:
source_t = None
# build the common part of the excuse, which will be filled by the code below
ref = "%s%s" % (src, suite != 'unstable' and "_" + suite or "")
excuse = Excuse(ref)
excuse.set_vers(source_t and source_t['version'] or None, source_u['version'])
source_u['maintainer'] and excuse.set_maint(source_u['maintainer'].strip())
source_u['section'] and excuse.set_section(source_u['section'].strip())
# the starting point is that we will update the candidate
update_candidate = True
# if the version in unstable is older, then stop here with a warning in the excuse and return False
if source_t and apt_pkg.VersionCompare(source_u['version'], source_t['version']) < 0:
excuse.addhtml("ALERT: %s is newer in testing (%s %s)" % (src, source_t['version'], source_u['version']))
self.excuses.append(excuse)
return False
# check if the source package really exists or if it is a fake one
if source_u.has_key('fake'):
excuse.addhtml("%s source package doesn't exist" % (src))
update_candidate = False
# retrieve the urgency for the upload, ignoring it if this is a NEW package (not present in testing)
urgency = self.urgencies.get(src, self.options.default_urgency)
if not source_t and urgency != self.options.default_urgency:
excuse.addhtml("Ignoring %s urgency setting for NEW package" % (urgency))
urgency = self.options.default_urgency
# if there is a `remove' hint and the requested version is the same of the
# version in testing, then stop here and return False
if self.hints["remove"].has_key(src):
if source_t and self.same_source(source_t['version'], self.hints['remove'][src][0]) or \
self.same_source(source_u['version'], self.hints['remove'][src][0]):
excuse.addhtml("Removal request by %s" % (self.hints["remove"][src][1]))
excuse.addhtml("Trying to remove package, not update it")
update_candidate = False
# check if there is a `block' hint for this package or a `block-all source' hint
blocked = None
if self.hints["block"].has_key(src):
blocked = self.hints["block"][src]
elif self.hints["block-all"].has_key("source"):
blocked = self.hints["block-all"]["source"]
# if the source is blocked, then look for an `unblock' hint; the unblock request
# is processed only if the specified version is correct
if blocked:
unblock = self.hints["unblock"].get(src,(None,None))
if unblock[0] != None:
if self.same_source(unblock[0], source_u['version']):
excuse.addhtml("Ignoring request to block package by %s, due to unblock request by %s" % (blocked, unblock[1]))
else:
excuse.addhtml("Unblock request by %s ignored due to version mismatch: %s" % (unblock[1], unblock[0]))
else:
excuse.addhtml("Not touching package, as requested by %s (contact debian-release if update is needed)" % (blocked))
update_candidate = False
# if the suite is unstable, then we have to check the urgency and the minimum days of
# permanence in unstable before updating testing; if the source package is too young,
# the check fails and we set update_candidate to False to block the update
if suite == 'unstable':
if not self.dates.has_key(src):
self.dates[src] = (source_u['version'], self.date_now)
elif not self.same_source(self.dates[src][0], source_u['version']):
self.dates[src] = (source_u['version'], self.date_now)
days_old = self.date_now - self.dates[src][1]
min_days = self.MINDAYS[urgency]
excuse.setdaysold(days_old, min_days)
if days_old < min_days:
if self.hints["urgent"].has_key(src) and self.same_source(source_u['version'], self.hints["urgent"][src][0]):
excuse.addhtml("Too young, but urgency pushed by %s" % (self.hints["urgent"][src][1]))
else:
update_candidate = False
# at this point, we check what is the status of the builds on all the supported architectures
# to catch the out-of-date ones
pkgs = {src: ["source"]}
for arch in self.options.architectures:
oodbins = {}
# for every binary package produced by this source in the suite for this architecture
for pkg in sorted([x.split("/")[0] for x in self.sources[suite][src]['binaries'] if x.endswith("/"+arch)]):
if not pkgs.has_key(pkg): pkgs[pkg] = []
pkgs[pkg].append(arch)
# retrieve the binary package and its source version
binary_u = self.binaries[suite][arch][0][pkg]
pkgsv = binary_u['source-ver']
# if it wasn't builded by the same source, it is out-of-date
if not self.same_source(source_u['version'], pkgsv):
if not oodbins.has_key(pkgsv):
oodbins[pkgsv] = []
oodbins[pkgsv].append(pkg)
continue
# if the package is architecture-dependent or the current arch is `nobreakall'
# find unsatisfied dependencies for the binary package
if binary_u['architecture'] != 'all' or arch in self.options.nobreakall_arches:
self.excuse_unsat_deps(pkg, src, arch, suite, excuse)
# if there are out-of-date packages, warn about them in the excuse and set update_candidate
# to False to block the update; if the architecture where the package is out-of-date is
# in the `fucked_arches' list, then do not block the update
if oodbins:
oodtxt = ""
for v in oodbins.keys():
if oodtxt: oodtxt = oodtxt + "; "
oodtxt = oodtxt + "%s (from <a href=\"http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?" \
"arch=%s&pkg=%s&ver=%s\" target=\"_blank\">%s</a>)" % \
(", ".join(sorted(oodbins[v])), arch, src, v, v)
text = "out of date on <a href=\"http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?" \
"arch=%s&pkg=%s&ver=%s\" target=\"_blank\">%s</a>: %s" % \
(arch, src, source_u['version'], arch, oodtxt)
if arch in self.options.fucked_arches:
text = text + " (but %s isn't keeping up, so nevermind)" % (arch)
else:
update_candidate = False
if self.date_now != self.dates[src][1]:
excuse.addhtml(text)
# if the source package has no binaries, set update_candidate to False to block the update
if len(self.sources[suite][src]['binaries']) == 0:
excuse.addhtml("%s has no binaries on any arch" % src)
update_candidate = False
# if the suite is unstable, then we have to check the release-critical bug counts before
# updating testing; if the unstable package have a RC bug count greater than the testing
# one, the check fails and we set update_candidate to False to block the update
if suite == 'unstable':
for pkg in pkgs.keys():
if not self.bugs['testing'].has_key(pkg):
self.bugs['testing'][pkg] = 0
if not self.bugs['unstable'].has_key(pkg):
self.bugs['unstable'][pkg] = 0
if self.bugs['unstable'][pkg] > self.bugs['testing'][pkg]:
excuse.addhtml("%s (%s) is <a href=\"http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?" \
"which=pkg&data=%s&sev-inc=critical&sev-inc=grave&sev-inc=serious\" " \
"target=\"_blank\">buggy</a>! (%d > %d)" % \
(pkg, ", ".join(pkgs[pkg]), pkg, self.bugs['unstable'][pkg], self.bugs['testing'][pkg]))
update_candidate = False
elif self.bugs['unstable'][pkg] > 0:
excuse.addhtml("%s (%s) is (less) <a href=\"http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?" \
"which=pkg&data=%s&sev-inc=critical&sev-inc=grave&sev-inc=serious\" " \
"target=\"_blank\">buggy</a>! (%d <= %d)" % \
(pkg, ", ".join(pkgs[pkg]), pkg, self.bugs['unstable'][pkg], self.bugs['testing'][pkg]))
# check if there is a `force' hint for this package, which allows it to go in even if it is not updateable
if not update_candidate and self.hints["force"].has_key(src) and \
self.same_source(source_u['version'], self.hints["force"][src][0]):
excuse.dontinvalidate = 1
excuse.addhtml("Should ignore, but forced by %s" % (self.hints["force"][src][1]))
update_candidate = True
# if the suite is testing-proposed-updates, the package needs an explicit approval in order to go in
if suite == "tpu":
if self.approvals.has_key("%s_%s" % (src, source_u['version'])):
excuse.addhtml("Approved by %s" % approvals["%s_%s" % (src, source_u['version'])])
else:
excuse.addhtml("NEEDS APPROVAL BY RM")
update_candidate = False
# if the package can be updated, it is a valid candidate
if update_candidate:
excuse.addhtml("Valid candidate")
# else it won't be considered
else:
excuse.addhtml("Not considered")
self.excuses.append(excuse)
return update_candidate
def reversed_exc_deps(self):
"""Reverse the excuses dependencies
This method returns a dictionary where the keys are the package names
and the values are the excuse names which depend on it.
"""
res = {}
for exc in self.excuses:
for d in exc.deps:
if not res.has_key(d): res[d] = []
res[d].append(exc.name)
return res
def invalidate_excuses(self, valid, invalid):
"""Invalidate impossible excuses
This method invalidates the impossible excuses, which depend
on invalid excuses. The two parameters contains the list of
`valid' and `invalid' excuses.
"""
# build a lookup-by-name map
exclookup = {}
for e in self.excuses:
exclookup[e.name] = e
# build the reverse dependencies
revdeps = self.reversed_exc_deps()
# loop on the invalid excuses
i = 0
while i < len(invalid):
# if there is no reverse dependency, skip the item
if not revdeps.has_key(invalid[i]):
i += 1
continue
# if there dependency can be satisfied by a testing-proposed-updates excuse, skip the item
if (invalid[i] + "_tpu") in valid:
i += 1
continue
# loop on the reverse dependencies
for x in revdeps[invalid[i]]:
# if the item is valid and it is marked as `dontinvalidate', skip the item
if x in valid and exclookup[x].dontinvalidate:
continue
# otherwise, invalidate the dependency and mark as invalidated and
# remove the depending excuses
exclookup[x].invalidate_dep(invalid[i])
if x in valid:
p = valid.index(x)
invalid.append(valid.pop(p))
exclookup[x].addhtml("Invalidated by dependency")
exclookup[x].addhtml("Not considered")
i = i + 1
def write_excuses(self):
"""Produce and write the update excuses
This method handles the update excuses generation: the packages are
looked to determine whether they are valid candidates. For the details
of this procedure, please refer to the module docstring.
"""
# this list will contain the packages which are valid candidates;
# if a package is going to be removed, it will have a "-" prefix
upgrade_me = []
# for every source package in testing, check if it should be removed
for pkg in self.sources['testing']:
if self.should_remove_source(pkg):
upgrade_me.append("-" + pkg)
# for every source package in unstable check if it should be upgraded
for pkg in self.sources['unstable']:
# if the source package is already present in testing,
# check if it should be upgraded for every binary package
if self.sources['testing'].has_key(pkg):
for arch in self.options.architectures:
if self.should_upgrade_srcarch(pkg, arch, 'unstable'):
upgrade_me.append("%s/%s" % (pkg, arch))
# check if the source package should be upgraded
if self.should_upgrade_src(pkg, 'unstable'):
upgrade_me.append(pkg)
# for every source package in testing-proposed-updates, check if it should be upgraded
for pkg in self.sources['tpu']:
# if the source package is already present in testing,
# check if it should be upgraded for every binary package
if self.sources['testing'].has_key(pkg):
for arch in self.options.architectures:
if self.should_upgrade_srcarch(pkg, arch, 'tpu'):
upgrade_me.append("%s/%s_tpu" % (pkg, arch))
# check if the source package should be upgraded
if self.should_upgrade_src(pkg, 'tpu'):
upgrade_me.append("%s_tpu" % pkg)
# process the `remove' hints, if the given package is not yet in upgrade_me
for src in self.hints["remove"].keys():
if src in upgrade_me: continue
if ("-"+src) in upgrade_me: continue
if not self.sources['testing'].has_key(src): continue
# check if the version specified in the hint is the same of the considered package
tsrcv = self.sources['testing'][src]['version']
if not self.same_source(tsrcv, self.hints["remove"][src][0]): continue
# add the removal of the package to upgrade_me and build a new excuse
upgrade_me.append("-%s" % (src))
excuse = Excuse("-%s" % (src))
excuse.set_vers(tsrcv, None)
excuse.addhtml("Removal request by %s" % (self.hints["remove"][src][1]))
excuse.addhtml("Package is broken, will try to remove")
self.excuses.append(excuse)
# sort the excuses by daysold and name
self.excuses.sort(lambda x, y: cmp(x.daysold, y.daysold) or cmp(x.name, y.name))
# extract the not considered packages, which are in the excuses but not in upgrade_me
unconsidered = [e.name for e in self.excuses if e.name not in upgrade_me]
# invalidate impossible excuses
for e in self.excuses:
for d in e.deps:
if d not in upgrade_me and d not in unconsidered:
e.addhtml("Unpossible dep: %s -> %s" % (e.name, d))
self.invalidate_excuses(upgrade_me, unconsidered)
# write excuses to the output file
f = open(self.options.excuses_output, 'w')
f.write("<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC \"-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN\" \"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/strict.dtd\">\n")
f.write("<html><head><title>excuses...</title>")
f.write("<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html;charset=utf-8\"></head><body>\n")
f.write("<p>Generated: " + time.strftime("%Y.%m.%d %H:%M:%S %z", time.gmtime(time.time())) + "</p>\n")
f.write("<ul>\n")
for e in self.excuses:
f.write("<li>%s" % e.html())
f.write("</ul></body></html>\n")
f.close()
def main(self):
"""Main method
This is the entry point for the class: it includes the list of calls
for the member methods which will produce the output files.
"""
self.write_excuses()
if __name__ == '__main__':
Britney().main()