|
|
|
@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Britney complains about a fixed bug in the source suite (bug policy)
|
|
|
|
|
All decisions about bugs are related to data set extracted
|
|
|
|
|
from the bug tracker. If britney says that the new version
|
|
|
|
|
introduces a bug, then it is because the data set from the bug
|
|
|
|
|
tracker lists that bug for *a* version in the source suite and
|
|
|
|
|
tracker lists that bug for *a* version in the source suite,
|
|
|
|
|
without it appearing for the version(s) in the target suite.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please note that these data sets do not include versions, so
|
|
|
|
@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ There is a number of common cases, where this is observed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* The bug is fixed, but the old version is still around in
|
|
|
|
|
the source suite. In this case, britney will generally
|
|
|
|
|
mention a "missing build" or "old binaries".
|
|
|
|
|
also mention a "missing build" or "old binaries".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the metadata is wrong, the solution is to fix it in the bug
|
|
|
|
|
tracker and wait until britney receives a new data set. In
|
|
|
|
@ -37,9 +37,9 @@ Britney complains about "missing builds"
|
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A "missing build" happens when britney detects that the binaries
|
|
|
|
|
for a given architecture are missing or is not up to date. This
|
|
|
|
|
for a given architecture are missing or not up to date. This
|
|
|
|
|
is detected by checking the "Packages" files in the archive, so
|
|
|
|
|
britney have no knowledge of *why* the build is missing.
|
|
|
|
|
britney has no knowledge of *why* the build is missing.
|
|
|
|
|
Accordingly, this kind of issue is flagged as a "possibly permanent"
|
|
|
|
|
issue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|