First implementation of conflicts for UpgradeRun.

bzr-import-20160707
Fabio Tranchitella 19 years ago
parent e3b6b42181
commit 17bade51a7

@ -180,6 +180,7 @@ import re
import sys
import string
import time
import copy
import optparse
import operator
@ -715,7 +716,7 @@ class Britney:
return (len(packages) > 0, packages)
def excuse_unsat_deps(self, pkg, src, arch, suite, excuse=None, excluded=[]):
def excuse_unsat_deps(self, pkg, src, arch, suite, excuse=None, excluded=[], conflicts=False):
"""Find unsatisfied dependencies for a binary package
This method analyzes the dependencies of the binary package specified
@ -735,9 +736,6 @@ class Britney:
if not binary_u.has_key(type_key):
continue
# this list will contain the packages that satisfy the dependency
packages = []
# for every block of dependency (which is formed as conjunction of disconjunction)
for block, block_txt in zip(apt_pkg.ParseDepends(binary_u[type_key]), binary_u[type_key].split(',')):
# if the block is satisfied in testing, then skip the block
@ -765,7 +763,59 @@ class Britney:
else:
excuse.add_break_dep(p, arch)
# otherwise, the package is installable
# otherwise, the package is installable (not considering conflicts)
# if we have been called inside UpgradeRun, then check conflicts before
# saying that the package is really installable
if not excuse and conflicts:
return self.check_conflicts(pkg, arch, [], {})
return True
def check_conflicts(self, pkg, arch, system, conflicts):
# if we are talking about a virtual package, skip it
if not self.binaries['testing'][arch][0].has_key(pkg):
return True
binary_u = self.binaries['testing'][arch][0][pkg]
# check the conflicts
if conflicts.has_key(pkg):
name, version, op = conflicts[pkg]
if op == '' and version == '' or apt_pkg.CheckDep(binary_u['version'], op, version):
return False
# add the package
lconflicts = conflicts
system.append(pkg)
# register conflicts
if binary_u.has_key('conflicts'):
for block in map(operator.itemgetter(0), apt_pkg.ParseDepends(binary_u['conflicts'])):
if block[0] != pkg and block[0] in system:
name, version, op = block
binary_c = self.binaries['testing'][arch][0][block[0]]
if op == '' and version == '' or apt_pkg.CheckDep(binary_c['version'], op, version):
return False
lconflicts[block[0]] = block
# dependencies
dependencies = []
for type in ('Pre-Depends', 'Depends'):
type_key = type.lower()
if not binary_u.has_key(type_key): continue
dependencies.extend(apt_pkg.ParseDepends(binary_u[type_key]))
# go through them
for block in dependencies:
valid = False
for name, version, op in block:
if name in system or self.check_conflicts(name, arch, system, lconflicts):
valid = True
break
if not valid:
return False
conflicts.update(lconflicts)
return True
# Package analisys methods
@ -1393,7 +1443,7 @@ class Britney:
for p in filter(lambda x: x[3] == arch, affected):
if not self.binaries['testing'][arch][0].has_key(p[0]) or \
skip_archall and self.binaries['testing'][arch][0][p[0]]['architecture'] == 'all': continue
r = self.excuse_unsat_deps(p[0], None, arch, 'testing', None, excluded=broken)
r = self.excuse_unsat_deps(p[0], None, arch, 'testing', None, excluded=broken, conflicts=True)
if not r and p[0] not in broken: broken.append(p[0])
l = 0
@ -1403,7 +1453,7 @@ class Britney:
for p in self.binaries['testing'][arch][0][j]['rdepends']:
if not self.binaries['testing'][arch][0].has_key(p[0]) or \
skip_archall and self.binaries['testing'][arch][0][p[0]]['architecture'] == 'all': continue
r = self.excuse_unsat_deps(p[0], None, arch, 'testing', None, excluded=broken)
r = self.excuse_unsat_deps(p[0], None, arch, 'testing', None, excluded=broken, conflicts=True)
if not r and p[0] not in broken: broken.append(p[0])
nuninst[arch] = sorted(broken)

Loading…
Cancel
Save