|
|
|
@ -1137,15 +1137,13 @@ class Britney(object):
|
|
|
|
|
return True
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def should_upgrade_srcarch(self, src, arch, suite):
|
|
|
|
|
"""Check if a binary package should be upgraded
|
|
|
|
|
"""Check if a set of binary packages should be upgraded
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This method checks if a binary package should be upgraded; this can
|
|
|
|
|
happen also if the binary package is a binary-NMU for the given arch.
|
|
|
|
|
The analysis is performed for the source package specified by the
|
|
|
|
|
`src' parameter, checking the architecture `arch' for the distribution
|
|
|
|
|
`suite'.
|
|
|
|
|
This method checks if the binary packages produced by the source
|
|
|
|
|
package on the given architecture should be upgraded; this can
|
|
|
|
|
happen also if the migration is a binary-NMU for the given arch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It returns False if the given package doesn't need to be upgraded,
|
|
|
|
|
It returns False if the given packages don't need to be upgraded,
|
|
|
|
|
True otherwise. In the former case, a new excuse is appended to
|
|
|
|
|
the the object attribute excuses.
|
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
@ -1162,6 +1160,8 @@ class Britney(object):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# if there is a `remove' hint and the requested version is the same as the
|
|
|
|
|
# version in testing, then stop here and return False
|
|
|
|
|
# (as a side effect, a removal will generate such excuses for both the source
|
|
|
|
|
# package and its binary packages on each architecture)
|
|
|
|
|
for hint in [ x for x in self.hints.search('remove', package=src) if self.same_source(source_t[VERSION], x.version) ]:
|
|
|
|
|
excuse.addhtml("Removal request by %s" % (hint.user))
|
|
|
|
|
excuse.addhtml("Trying to remove package, not update it")
|
|
|
|
@ -1190,12 +1190,14 @@ class Britney(object):
|
|
|
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# if the new binary package is not from the same source as the testing one, then skip it
|
|
|
|
|
# this implies that this binary migration is part of a source migration
|
|
|
|
|
if not self.same_source(source_t[VERSION], pkgsv):
|
|
|
|
|
anywrongver = True
|
|
|
|
|
excuse.addhtml("From wrong source: %s %s (%s not %s)" % (pkg_name, binary_u[VERSION], pkgsv, source_t[VERSION]))
|
|
|
|
|
break
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# if the source package has been updated in unstable and this is a binary migration, skip it
|
|
|
|
|
# (the binaries are now out-of-date)
|
|
|
|
|
if self.same_source(source_t[VERSION], pkgsv) and source_t[VERSION] != source_u[VERSION]:
|
|
|
|
|
anywrongver = True
|
|
|
|
|
excuse.addhtml("From wrong source: %s %s (%s not %s)" % (pkg_name, binary_u[VERSION], pkgsv, source_u[VERSION]))
|
|
|
|
@ -1243,6 +1245,9 @@ class Britney(object):
|
|
|
|
|
if pkg not in self.binaries[suite][arch][0]:
|
|
|
|
|
tpkgv = self.binaries['testing'][arch][0][pkg][VERSION]
|
|
|
|
|
excuse.addhtml("Removed binary: %s %s" % (pkg, tpkgv))
|
|
|
|
|
# the removed binary is only interesting if this is a binary-only migration,
|
|
|
|
|
# as otherwise the updated source will already cause the binary packages
|
|
|
|
|
# to be updated
|
|
|
|
|
if ssrc: anyworthdoing = True
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# if there is nothing wrong and there is something worth doing, this is a valid candidate
|
|
|
|
|