Add more verdicts to provide more detailed excuses

Signed-off-by: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
ubuntu/rebased
Niels Thykier 8 years ago
parent d7a676d074
commit 9ca5f7e24e

@ -1358,7 +1358,7 @@ class Britney(object):
else:
excuse.addhtml("NEEDS APPROVAL BY RM")
excuse.addreason("block")
excuse.policy_verdict = PolicyVerdict.REJECTED_PERMANENTLY
excuse.policy_verdict = PolicyVerdict.REJECTED_NEEDS_APPROVAL
# at this point, we check the status of the builds on all the supported architectures
# to catch the out-of-date ones
@ -1436,7 +1436,7 @@ class Britney(object):
else:
excuse.policy_verdict = PolicyVerdict.REJECTED_PERMANENTLY
else:
excuse.policy_verdict = PolicyVerdict.REJECTED_PERMANENTLY
excuse.policy_verdict = PolicyVerdict.REJECTED_CANNOT_DETERMINE_IF_PERMANENT
excuse.missing_build_on_arch(arch)
excuse.addhtml(text)
@ -1489,7 +1489,7 @@ class Britney(object):
text = text + " (but %s isn't keeping up, so never mind)" % (arch)
excuse.missing_build_on_ood_arch(arch)
else:
excuse.policy_verdict = PolicyVerdict.REJECTED_PERMANENTLY
excuse.policy_verdict = PolicyVerdict.REJECTED_CANNOT_DETERMINE_IF_PERMANENT
excuse.missing_build_on_arch(arch)
excuse.addhtml(text)

@ -19,6 +19,26 @@ import re
from britney2.policies.policy import PolicyVerdict
VERDICT2DESC = {
PolicyVerdict.PASS:
'OK: Will attempt migration (Any information below is purely informational)',
PolicyVerdict.PASS_HINTED:
'OK: Will attempt migration due to a hint (Any information below is purely informational)',
PolicyVerdict.REJECTED_TEMPORARILY:
'WAITING: Waiting for test results, another package or too young (no action required now - check later)',
PolicyVerdict.REJECTED_WAITING_FOR_ANOTHER_ITEM:
'WAITING: Waiting for another item to be ready to migrate (no action required now - check later)',
PolicyVerdict.REJECTED_BLOCKED_BY_ANOTHER_ITEM:
'BLOCKED: Cannot migrate due to another item, which is blocked (please check which dependencies are stuck)',
PolicyVerdict.REJECTED_NEEDS_APPROVAL:
'BLOCKED: Needs an approval (either due to a freeze or due to the source suite)',
PolicyVerdict.REJECTED_CANNOT_DETERMINE_IF_PERMANENT:
'BLOCKED: Maybe temporary, maybe blocked but Britney is missing information (check below or the buildds)',
PolicyVerdict.REJECTED_PERMANENTLY:
'BLOCKED: Rejected/introduces a regression (please see below)'
}
class Excuse(object):
"""Excuse class
@ -154,16 +174,9 @@ class Excuse(object):
def _format_verdict_summary(self):
verdict = self._policy_verdict
if not verdict.is_rejected:
msg = 'OK: Will attempt migration'
if verdict == PolicyVerdict.PASS_HINTED:
msg = 'OK: Will attempt migration due to a hint'
msg += " (Any information below is purely informational)"
return msg
if verdict == PolicyVerdict.REJECTED_PERMANENTLY:
msg = "BLOCKED: Will not migrate (Please review if it introduces a regression or needs approval/unblock)"
return msg
return "TEMP-BLOCKED: Waiting for test results, another package or too young (no action required at this time)"
if verdict in VERDICT2DESC:
return VERDICT2DESC[verdict]
return "UNKNOWN: Missing description for {0} - Please file a bug against Britney".format(verdict.name)
def html(self):
"""Render the excuse in HTML"""

@ -27,15 +27,41 @@ class PolicyVerdict(Enum):
"""
REJECTED_TEMPORARILY = 3
"""
The migration item is temporarily unable to migrate due to another item. The other item is temporarily blocked.
"""
REJECTED_WAITING_FOR_ANOTHER_ITEM = 4
"""
The migration item is permanently unable to migrate due to another item. The other item is permanently blocked.
"""
REJECTED_BLOCKED_BY_ANOTHER_ITEM = 5
"""
The migration item needs approval to migrate
"""
REJECTED_NEEDS_APPROVAL = 6
"""
The migration item is blocked, but there is not enough information to determine
if this issue is permanent or temporary
"""
REJECTED_CANNOT_DETERMINE_IF_PERMANENT = 7
"""
The migration item did not pass the policy and the failure is believed
to be uncorrectable (i.e. a hint or a new version is needed)
"""
REJECTED_PERMANENTLY = 4
REJECTED_PERMANENTLY = 8
@property
def is_rejected(self):
return True if self.name.startswith('REJECTED') else False
def is_blocked(self):
"""Whether the item (probably) needs a fix or manual assistance to migrate"""
return self in {
PolicyVerdict.REJECTED_BLOCKED_BY_ANOTHER_ITEM,
PolicyVerdict.REJECTED_NEEDS_APPROVAL,
PolicyVerdict.REJECTED_CANNOT_DETERMINE_IF_PERMANENT, # Assuming the worst
PolicyVerdict.REJECTED_PERMANENTLY,
}
class BasePolicy(object):

@ -801,6 +801,11 @@ def invalidate_excuses(excuses, valid, invalid):
# if the dependency can be satisfied by a testing-proposed-updates excuse, skip the item
if (ename + "_tpu") in valid:
continue
rdep_verdict = PolicyVerdict.REJECTED_WAITING_FOR_ANOTHER_ITEM
if excuses[ename].policy_verdict.is_blocked:
rdep_verdict = PolicyVerdict.REJECTED_BLOCKED_BY_ANOTHER_ITEM
# loop on the reverse dependencies
for x in revdeps[ename]:
if x in valid:
@ -815,8 +820,8 @@ def invalidate_excuses(excuses, valid, invalid):
invalid.append(valid.pop(p))
excuses[x].addhtml("Invalidated by dependency")
excuses[x].addreason("depends")
if excuses[x].policy_verdict.value < PolicyVerdict.REJECTED_TEMPORARILY.value:
excuses[x].policy_verdict = PolicyVerdict.REJECTED_TEMPORARILY
if excuses[x].policy_verdict.value < rdep_verdict.value:
excuses[x].policy_verdict = rdep_verdict
def compile_nuninst(binaries_t, inst_tester, architectures, nobreakall_arches):

Loading…
Cancel
Save