switch removal to detailed excuse info

Also, set verdict to REJECTED_PERMANENTLY explicitly. This was already done
implicitly, because that is the default and it was never set to anything else.
ubuntu/rebased
Ivo De Decker 5 years ago
parent 8cff83a8c6
commit e25ca70427

@ -120,15 +120,16 @@ class ExcuseFinder(object):
# otherwise, add a new excuse for its removal
src = item.suite.sources[pkg]
excuse = Excuse(item.name)
excuse.addhtml("Package not in %s, will try to remove" % source_suite.name)
excuse.addinfo("Package not in %s, will try to remove" % source_suite.name)
excuse.set_vers(src.version, None)
src.maintainer and excuse.set_maint(src.maintainer)
src.section and excuse.set_section(src.section)
# if the package is blocked, skip it
for hint in self.hints.search('block', package=pkg, removal=True):
excuse.addhtml("Not touching package, as requested by %s "
"(contact debian-release if update is needed)" % hint.user)
excuse.policy_verdict = PolicyVerdict.REJECTED_PERMANENTLY
excuse.add_verdict_info(excuse.policy_verdict, "Not touching package, as requested by %s "
"(contact debian-release if update is needed)" % hint.user)
excuse.addreason("block")
self.excuses[excuse.name] = excuse
return False
@ -168,8 +169,9 @@ class ExcuseFinder(object):
# package and its binary packages on each architecture)
for hint in self.hints.search('remove', package=src, version=source_t.version):
excuse.add_hint(hint)
excuse.addhtml("Removal request by %s" % (hint.user))
excuse.addhtml("Trying to remove package, not update it")
excuse.policy_verdict = PolicyVerdict.REJECTED_PERMANENTLY
excuse.add_verdict_info(excuse.policy_verdict, "Removal request by %s" % (hint.user))
excuse.add_verdict_info(excuse.policy_verdict, "Trying to remove package, not update it")
self.excuses[excuse.name] = excuse
return False
@ -371,9 +373,9 @@ class ExcuseFinder(object):
if source_t and source_t.version == hint.version or \
source_u.version == hint.version:
excuse.add_hint(hint)
excuse.addhtml("Removal request by %s" % (hint.user))
excuse.addhtml("Trying to remove package, not update it")
excuse.policy_verdict = PolicyVerdict.REJECTED_PERMANENTLY
excuse.add_verdict_info(excuse.policy_verdict, "Removal request by %s" % (hint.user))
excuse.add_verdict_info(excuse.policy_verdict, "Trying to remove package, not update it")
break
all_binaries = self.all_binaries
@ -587,12 +589,13 @@ class ExcuseFinder(object):
# add the removal of the package to actionable_items and build a new excuse
excuse = Excuse("-%s" % (src))
excuse.set_vers(tsrcv, None)
excuse.addhtml("Removal request by %s" % (hint.user))
excuse.addinfo("Removal request by %s" % (hint.user))
# if the removal of the package is blocked, skip it
blocked = False
for blockhint in self.hints.search('block', package=src, removal=True):
excuse.addhtml("Not removing package, due to block hint by %s "
"(contact debian-release if update is needed)" % blockhint.user)
excuse.policy_verdict = PolicyVerdict.REJECTED_PERMANENTLY
excuse.add_verdict_info(excuse.policy_verdict, "Not removing package, due to block hint by %s "
"(contact debian-release if update is needed)" % blockhint.user)
excuse.addreason("block")
blocked = True
@ -601,7 +604,7 @@ class ExcuseFinder(object):
continue
actionable_items_add("-%s" % (src))
excuse.addhtml("Package is broken, will try to remove")
excuse.addinfo("Package is broken, will try to remove")
excuse.add_hint(hint)
# Using "PASS" here as "Created by a hint" != "accepted due to hint". In a future
# where there might be policy checks on removals, it would make sense to distinguish

Loading…
Cancel
Save