mirror of
https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/britney/+git/britney2-ubuntu
synced 2025-02-23 19:31:55 +00:00
switch removal to detailed excuse info
Also, set verdict to REJECTED_PERMANENTLY explicitly. This was already done implicitly, because that is the default and it was never set to anything else.
This commit is contained in:
parent
8cff83a8c6
commit
e25ca70427
@ -120,15 +120,16 @@ class ExcuseFinder(object):
|
||||
# otherwise, add a new excuse for its removal
|
||||
src = item.suite.sources[pkg]
|
||||
excuse = Excuse(item.name)
|
||||
excuse.addhtml("Package not in %s, will try to remove" % source_suite.name)
|
||||
excuse.addinfo("Package not in %s, will try to remove" % source_suite.name)
|
||||
excuse.set_vers(src.version, None)
|
||||
src.maintainer and excuse.set_maint(src.maintainer)
|
||||
src.section and excuse.set_section(src.section)
|
||||
|
||||
# if the package is blocked, skip it
|
||||
for hint in self.hints.search('block', package=pkg, removal=True):
|
||||
excuse.addhtml("Not touching package, as requested by %s "
|
||||
"(contact debian-release if update is needed)" % hint.user)
|
||||
excuse.policy_verdict = PolicyVerdict.REJECTED_PERMANENTLY
|
||||
excuse.add_verdict_info(excuse.policy_verdict, "Not touching package, as requested by %s "
|
||||
"(contact debian-release if update is needed)" % hint.user)
|
||||
excuse.addreason("block")
|
||||
self.excuses[excuse.name] = excuse
|
||||
return False
|
||||
@ -168,8 +169,9 @@ class ExcuseFinder(object):
|
||||
# package and its binary packages on each architecture)
|
||||
for hint in self.hints.search('remove', package=src, version=source_t.version):
|
||||
excuse.add_hint(hint)
|
||||
excuse.addhtml("Removal request by %s" % (hint.user))
|
||||
excuse.addhtml("Trying to remove package, not update it")
|
||||
excuse.policy_verdict = PolicyVerdict.REJECTED_PERMANENTLY
|
||||
excuse.add_verdict_info(excuse.policy_verdict, "Removal request by %s" % (hint.user))
|
||||
excuse.add_verdict_info(excuse.policy_verdict, "Trying to remove package, not update it")
|
||||
self.excuses[excuse.name] = excuse
|
||||
return False
|
||||
|
||||
@ -371,9 +373,9 @@ class ExcuseFinder(object):
|
||||
if source_t and source_t.version == hint.version or \
|
||||
source_u.version == hint.version:
|
||||
excuse.add_hint(hint)
|
||||
excuse.addhtml("Removal request by %s" % (hint.user))
|
||||
excuse.addhtml("Trying to remove package, not update it")
|
||||
excuse.policy_verdict = PolicyVerdict.REJECTED_PERMANENTLY
|
||||
excuse.add_verdict_info(excuse.policy_verdict, "Removal request by %s" % (hint.user))
|
||||
excuse.add_verdict_info(excuse.policy_verdict, "Trying to remove package, not update it")
|
||||
break
|
||||
|
||||
all_binaries = self.all_binaries
|
||||
@ -587,12 +589,13 @@ class ExcuseFinder(object):
|
||||
# add the removal of the package to actionable_items and build a new excuse
|
||||
excuse = Excuse("-%s" % (src))
|
||||
excuse.set_vers(tsrcv, None)
|
||||
excuse.addhtml("Removal request by %s" % (hint.user))
|
||||
excuse.addinfo("Removal request by %s" % (hint.user))
|
||||
# if the removal of the package is blocked, skip it
|
||||
blocked = False
|
||||
for blockhint in self.hints.search('block', package=src, removal=True):
|
||||
excuse.addhtml("Not removing package, due to block hint by %s "
|
||||
"(contact debian-release if update is needed)" % blockhint.user)
|
||||
excuse.policy_verdict = PolicyVerdict.REJECTED_PERMANENTLY
|
||||
excuse.add_verdict_info(excuse.policy_verdict, "Not removing package, due to block hint by %s "
|
||||
"(contact debian-release if update is needed)" % blockhint.user)
|
||||
excuse.addreason("block")
|
||||
blocked = True
|
||||
|
||||
@ -601,7 +604,7 @@ class ExcuseFinder(object):
|
||||
continue
|
||||
|
||||
actionable_items_add("-%s" % (src))
|
||||
excuse.addhtml("Package is broken, will try to remove")
|
||||
excuse.addinfo("Package is broken, will try to remove")
|
||||
excuse.add_hint(hint)
|
||||
# Using "PASS" here as "Created by a hint" != "accepted due to hint". In a future
|
||||
# where there might be policy checks on removals, it would make sense to distinguish
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user