Launchpad currently doesn't enforce this, so it doesn't make too much
sense to do so in proposed-migration.
Once https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1868558 is fixed, we
should think about probably re-enabling this.
On some distros (Ubuntu), arch:all packages are built along with one of
the architectures. We shouldn't be listing 'all' as its own arch in this
case. Instead we filter out the binaries except for on the
'all_buildarch'.
It works like this. We wait until all tests have finished running. and
then grab their results. If there are any regressions, we mail each bug
with a link to pending-sru.html. There's a state file which records the
mails we've sent out, so that we don't mail the same bug multiple times.
We want to treat linux-$flavor and linux-meta-$flavor as one set in
britney which goes in together or not at all. We never want to promote
linux-$flavor without the accompanying linux-meta-$flavor.
Add a new LinuxPolicy which runs after most of the other policies, which
invalidates linux-foo if linux-meta-foo is invalid.
Hint to allow smooth update, even if the section isn't allowed in the
configuration.
Note that this takes the source name and the source version IN TESTING
of the binaries that must be allowed to stay around to allow a smooth
update.
Adding a source parameter to the SourcePackage allow finding the source
the object is referring to, so that parameter doesn't have to be passed
along separately.
Signed-off-by: Ivo De Decker <ivodd@debian.org>
When an allow-uninst hint is added for an unversioned binary package, items
are allowed to migrate, even if they make that binary package uninstallable
(on the architecture specified in the hint, if one was specified, or on all
architectures otherwise).
Using this hint should avoid using force-hint to allow specific breakage.
Signed-off-by: Ivo De Decker <ivodd@debian.org>
When do_all fails, and there is no transaction to rollback, we will probably
leave a broken state behind. This codepath probably isn't triggered unless
something else is broken.
Signed-off-by: Ivo De Decker <ivodd@debian.org>
If the cruft removal item has a different version than the binary currently in
testing, then the cruft item was replaced since it was added, or it was added
in error. In this case, the item should not be processed.
Signed-off-by: Ivo De Decker <ivodd@debian.org>
This enables us to remove the recursion in iter_packages (and thereby
the added noise from it). As a side-effect of this change, the solver
can now solve the "left-binary-removal" test case as it can see the
relevant cruft item together with the regular items needed to solve
the migration.
Signed-off-by: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
Iain Lane
Iain Lane
Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak
Tiago Daitx
Robert Bruce Park
Colin Watson
Ivo De Decker
Niels Thykier
Matthias Klumpp
Paul Gevers