#!/usr/bin/python2.5 -u # -*- coding: utf-8 -*- # Copyright (C) 2001-2008 Anthony Towns # Andreas Barth # Fabio Tranchitella # Copyright (C) 2010-2011 Adam D. Barratt # This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify # it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by # the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or # (at your option) any later version. # This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, # but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of # MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the # GNU General Public License for more details. """ = Introdution = This is the Debian testing updater script, also known as "Britney". Packages are usually installed into the `testing' distribution after they have undergone some degree of testing in unstable. The goal of this software is to do this task in a smart way, allowing testing to be always fully installable and close to being a release candidate. Britney's source code is split between two different but related tasks: the first one is the generation of the update excuses, while the second tries to update testing with the valid candidates; first each package alone, then larger and even larger sets of packages together. Each try is accepted if testing is not more uninstallable after the update than before. = Data Loading = In order to analyze the entire Debian distribution, Britney needs to load in memory the whole archive: this means more than 10.000 packages for twelve architectures, as well as the dependency interconnections between them. For this reason, the memory requirements for running this software are quite high and at least 1 gigabyte of RAM should be available. Britney loads the source packages from the `Sources' file and the binary packages from the `Packages_${arch}' files, where ${arch} is substituted with the supported architectures. While loading the data, the software analyzes the dependencies and builds a directed weighted graph in memory with all the interconnections between the packages (see Britney.read_sources and Britney.read_binaries). Other than source and binary packages, Britney loads the following data: * BugsV, which contains the list of release-critical bugs for a given version of a source or binary package (see Britney.read_bugs). * Dates, which contains the date of the upload of a given version of a source package (see Britney.read_dates). * Urgencies, which contains the urgency of the upload of a given version of a source package (see Britney.read_urgencies). * Hints, which contains lists of commands which modify the standard behaviour of Britney (see Britney.read_hints). For a more detailed explanation about the format of these files, please read the documentation of the related methods. The exact meaning of them will be instead explained in the chapter "Excuses Generation". = Excuses = An excuse is a detailed explanation of why a package can or cannot be updated in the testing distribution from a newer package in another distribution (like for example unstable). The main purpose of the excuses is to be written in an HTML file which will be published over HTTP. The maintainers will be able to parse it manually or automatically to find the explanation of why their packages have been updated or not. == Excuses generation == These are the steps (with references to method names) that Britney does for the generation of the update excuses. * If a source package is available in testing but it is not present in unstable and no binary packages in unstable are built from it, then it is marked for removal. * Every source package in unstable and testing-proposed-updates, if already present in testing, is checked for binary-NMUs, new or dropped binary packages in all the supported architectures (see Britney.should_upgrade_srcarch). The steps to detect if an upgrade is needed are: 1. If there is a `remove' hint for the source package, the package is ignored: it will be removed and not updated. 2. For every binary package built from the new source, it checks for unsatisfied dependencies, new binary package and updated binary package (binNMU) excluding the architecture-independent ones and the packages not built from the same source. 3. For every binary package built from the old source, it checks if it is still built from the new source; if this is not true and the package is not architecture-independent, the script removes it from testing. 4. Finally, if there is something worth doing (eg. a new or updated binary package) and nothing wrong it marks the source package as "Valid candidate", or "Not considered" if there is something wrong which prevented the update. * Every source package in unstable and testing-proposed-updates is checked for upgrade (see Britney.should_upgrade_src). The steps to detect if an upgrade is needed are: 1. If the source package in testing is more recent the new one is ignored. 2. If the source package doesn't exist (is fake), which means that a binary package refers to it but it is not present in the `Sources' file, the new one is ignored. 3. If the package doesn't exist in testing, the urgency of the upload is ignored and set to the default (actually `low'). 4. If there is a `remove' hint for the source package, the package is ignored: it will be removed and not updated. 5. If there is a `block' hint for the source package without an `unblock` hint or a `block-all source`, the package is ignored. 6. If there is a `block-udeb' hint for the source package, it will have the same effect as `block', but may only be cancelled by a subsequent `unblock-udeb' hint. 7. If the suite is unstable, the update can go ahead only if the upload happened more than the minimum days specified by the urgency of the upload; if this is not true, the package is ignored as `too-young'. Note that the urgency is sticky, meaning that the highest urgency uploaded since the previous testing transition is taken into account. 8. If the suite is unstable, all the architecture-dependent binary packages and the architecture-independent ones for the `nobreakall' architectures have to be built from the source we are considering. If this is not true, then these are called `out-of-date' architectures and the package is ignored. 9. The source package must have at least a binary package, otherwise it is ignored. 10. If the suite is unstable, the new source package must have no release critical bugs which do not also apply to the testing one. If this is not true, the package is ignored as `buggy'. 11. If there is a `force' hint for the source package, then it is updated even if it is marked as ignored from the previous steps. 12. If the suite is {testing-,}proposed-updates, the source package can be updated only if there is an explicit approval for it. Unless a `force' hint exists, the new package must also be available on all of the architectures for which it has binary packages in testing. 13. If the package will be ignored, mark it as "Valid candidate", otherwise mark it as "Not considered". * The list of `remove' hints is processed: if the requested source package is not already being updated or removed and the version actually in testing is the same specified with the `remove' hint, it is marked for removal. * The excuses are sorted by the number of days from the last upload (days-old) and by name. * A list of unconsidered excuses (for which the package is not upgraded) is built. Using this list, all of the excuses depending on them are marked as invalid "impossible dependencies". * The excuses are written in an HTML file. """ import os import re import sys import string import time import optparse import operator import urllib import apt_pkg from excuse import Excuse from britney import buildSystem __author__ = 'Fabio Tranchitella and the Debian Release Team' __version__ = '2.0' # source package VERSION = 0 SECTION = 1 BINARIES = 2 MAINTAINER = 3 FAKESRC = 4 # binary package SOURCE = 2 SOURCEVER = 3 ARCHITECTURE = 4 PREDEPENDS = 5 DEPENDS = 6 CONFLICTS = 7 PROVIDES = 8 RDEPENDS = 9 RCONFLICTS = 10 class Britney: """Britney, the Debian testing updater script This is the script that updates the testing distribution. It is executed each day after the installation of the updated packages. It generates the `Packages' files for the testing distribution, but it does so in an intelligent manner; it tries to avoid any inconsistency and to use only non-buggy packages. For more documentation on this script, please read the Developers Reference. """ HINTS_HELPERS = ("easy", "hint", "remove", "block", "block-udeb", "unblock", "unblock-udeb", "approve") HINTS_STANDARD = ("urgent", "age-days") + HINTS_HELPERS HINTS_ALL = ("force", "force-hint", "block-all") + HINTS_STANDARD def __init__(self): """Class constructor This method initializes and populates the data lists, which contain all the information needed by the other methods of the class. """ self.date_now = int(((time.time() / (60*60)) - 15) / 24) # parse the command line arguments self.__parse_arguments() # initialize the apt_pkg back-end apt_pkg.init() self.systems = {} # if requested, build the non-installable status and save it # if this or the population of self.binaries below takes a very # long time, try increasing SIZEOFHASHMAP in lib/dpkg.c and rebuilding if not self.options.nuninst_cache: self.__log("Building the list of non-installable packages for the full archive", type="I") self.sources = {'testing': self.read_sources(self.options.testing)} nuninst = {} for arch in self.options.architectures: self.binaries = {'testing': {arch: self.read_binaries(self.options.testing, "testing", arch)}} self.build_systems(arch) self.__log("> Checking for non-installable packages for architecture %s" % arch, type="I") result = self.get_nuninst(arch, build=True) nuninst.update(result) self.__log("> Found %d non-installable packages" % len(nuninst[arch]), type="I") if self.options.print_uninst: self.nuninst_arch_report(nuninst, arch) if not self.options.print_uninst: self.write_nuninst(nuninst) else: self.__log("Not building the list of non-installable packages, as requested", type="I") # if running in --print-uninst mode, quit here if self.options.print_uninst: print '* summary' print '\n'.join(map(lambda x: '%4d %s' % (len(nuninst[x]), x), self.options.architectures)) return # read the source and binary packages for the involved distributions # if this takes a very long time, try increasing SIZEOFHASHMAP in # lib/dpkg.c and rebuilding self.sources = {'testing': self.read_sources(self.options.testing), 'unstable': self.read_sources(self.options.unstable), 'tpu': self.read_sources(self.options.tpu),} if hasattr(self.options, 'pu'): self.sources['pu'] = self.read_sources(self.options.pu) else: self.sources['pu'] = {} self.binaries = {'testing': {}, 'unstable': {}, 'tpu': {}, 'pu': {}} for arch in self.options.architectures: self.binaries['testing'][arch] = self.read_binaries(self.options.testing, "testing", arch) self.binaries['unstable'][arch] = self.read_binaries(self.options.unstable, "unstable", arch) self.binaries['tpu'][arch] = self.read_binaries(self.options.tpu, "tpu", arch) if hasattr(self.options, 'pu'): self.binaries['pu'][arch] = self.read_binaries(self.options.pu, "pu", arch) # build the testing system self.build_systems(arch) # read the release-critical bug summaries for testing and unstable self.bugs = {'unstable': self.read_bugs(self.options.unstable), 'testing': self.read_bugs(self.options.testing),} self.normalize_bugs() # read additional data self.dates = self.read_dates(self.options.testing) self.urgencies = self.read_urgencies(self.options.testing) self.hints = self.read_hints(self.options.unstable) self.excuses = [] self.dependencies = {} def __parse_arguments(self): """Parse the command line arguments This method parses and initializes the command line arguments. While doing so, it preprocesses some of the options to be converted in a suitable form for the other methods of the class. """ # initialize the parser parser = optparse.OptionParser(version="%prog") parser.add_option("-v", "", action="count", dest="verbose", help="enable verbose output") parser.add_option("-c", "--config", action="store", dest="config", default="/etc/britney.conf", help="path for the configuration file") parser.add_option("", "--architectures", action="store", dest="architectures", default=None, help="override architectures from configuration file") parser.add_option("", "--actions", action="store", dest="actions", default=None, help="override the list of actions to be performed") parser.add_option("", "--hints", action="store", dest="hints", default=None, help="additional hints, separated by semicolons") parser.add_option("", "--hint-tester", action="store_true", dest="hint_tester", default=None, help="provide a command line interface to test hints") parser.add_option("", "--dry-run", action="store_true", dest="dry_run", default=False, help="disable all outputs to the testing directory") parser.add_option("", "--compatible", action="store_true", dest="compatible", default=False, help="enable full compatibility with old britney's output") parser.add_option("", "--auto-hinter", action="store_true", dest="autohinter", default=False, help="enable use of auto-hinter") parser.add_option("", "--control-files", action="store_true", dest="control_files", default=False, help="enable control files generation") parser.add_option("", "--nuninst-cache", action="store_true", dest="nuninst_cache", default=False, help="do not build the non-installability status, use the cache from file") parser.add_option("", "--print-uninst", action="store_true", dest="print_uninst", default=False, help="just print a summary of uninstallable packages") (self.options, self.args) = parser.parse_args() # integrity checks if self.options.nuninst_cache and self.options.print_uninst: self.__log("nuninst_cache and print_uninst are mutually exclusive!", type="E") sys.exit(1) # if the configuration file exists, than read it and set the additional options elif not os.path.isfile(self.options.config): self.__log("Unable to read the configuration file (%s), exiting!" % self.options.config, type="E") sys.exit(1) # minimum days for unstable-testing transition and the list of hints # are handled as an ad-hoc case self.MINDAYS = {} self.HINTS = {'command-line': self.HINTS_ALL} for k, v in [map(string.strip,r.split('=', 1)) for r in file(self.options.config) if '=' in r and not r.strip().startswith('#')]: if k.startswith("MINDAYS_"): self.MINDAYS[k.split("_")[1].lower()] = int(v) elif k.startswith("HINTS_"): self.HINTS[k.split("_")[1].lower()] = \ reduce(lambda x,y: x+y, [hasattr(self, "HINTS_" + i) and getattr(self, "HINTS_" + i) or (i,) for i in v.split()]) elif not hasattr(self.options, k.lower()) or \ not getattr(self.options, k.lower()): setattr(self.options, k.lower(), v) # Sort the architecture list allarches = sorted(self.options.architectures.split()) arches = [x for x in allarches if x in self.options.nobreakall_arches.split()] arches += [x for x in allarches if x not in arches and x not in self.options.fucked_arches.split()] arches += [x for x in allarches if x not in arches and x not in self.options.break_arches.split()] arches += [x for x in allarches if x not in arches and x not in self.options.new_arches.split()] arches += [x for x in allarches if x not in arches] self.options.architectures = arches self.options.smooth_updates = self.options.smooth_updates.split() def __log(self, msg, type="I"): """Print info messages according to verbosity level An easy-and-simple log method which prints messages to the standard output. The type parameter controls the urgency of the message, and can be equal to `I' for `Information', `W' for `Warning' and `E' for `Error'. Warnings and errors are always printed, and information is printed only if the verbose logging is enabled. """ if self.options.verbose or type in ("E", "W"): print "%s: [%s] - %s" % (type, time.asctime(), msg) # Data reading/writing methods # ---------------------------- def build_systems(self, arch=None): for a in self.options.architectures: if arch and a != arch: continue packages = {} binaries = self.binaries['testing'][arch][0].copy() for k in binaries: packages[k] = binaries[k][:] if packages[k][PROVIDES]: packages[k][PROVIDES] = ", ".join(packages[k][PROVIDES]) else: packages[k][PROVIDES] = None self.systems[a] = buildSystem(a, packages) def read_sources(self, basedir): """Read the list of source packages from the specified directory The source packages are read from the `Sources' file within the directory specified as `basedir' parameter. Considering the large amount of memory needed, not all the fields are loaded in memory. The available fields are Version, Maintainer and Section. The method returns a list where every item represents a source package as a dictionary. """ sources = {} filename = os.path.join(basedir, "Sources") self.__log("Loading source packages from %s" % filename) try: Packages = apt_pkg.TagFile(open(filename)) get_field = Packages.section.get step = Packages.step except AttributeError: Packages = apt_pkg.ParseTagFile(open(filename)) get_field = Packages.Section.get step = Packages.Step while step(): pkg = get_field('Package') ver = get_field('Version') # There may be multiple versions of the source package # (in unstable) if some architectures have out-of-date # binaries. We only ever consider the source with the # largest version for migration. if pkg in sources and apt_pkg.VersionCompare(sources[pkg][0], ver) > 0: continue sources[pkg] = [ver, get_field('Section'), [], get_field('Maintainer'), False, ] return sources def read_binaries(self, basedir, distribution, arch): """Read the list of binary packages from the specified directory The binary packages are read from the `Packages_${arch}' files within the directory specified as `basedir' parameter, replacing ${arch} with the value of the arch parameter. Considering the large amount of memory needed, not all the fields are loaded in memory. The available fields are Version, Source, Pre-Depends, Depends, Conflicts, Provides and Architecture. After reading the packages, reverse dependencies are computed and saved in the `rdepends' keys, and the `Provides' field is used to populate the virtual packages list. The dependencies are parsed with the apt.pkg.ParseDepends method, and they are stored both as the format of its return value and text. The method returns a tuple. The first element is a list where every item represents a binary package as a dictionary; the second element is a dictionary which maps virtual packages to real packages that provide them. """ packages = {} provides = {} sources = self.sources filename = os.path.join(basedir, "Packages_%s" % arch) self.__log("Loading binary packages from %s" % filename) try: Packages = apt_pkg.TagFile(open(filename)) get_field = Packages.section.get step = Packages.step except AttributeError: Packages = apt_pkg.ParseTagFile(open(filename)) get_field = Packages.Section.get step = Packages.Step while step(): pkg = get_field('Package') version = get_field('Version') # There may be multiple versions of any arch:all packages # (in unstable) if some architectures have out-of-date # binaries. We only ever consider the package with the # largest version for migration. if pkg in packages and apt_pkg.VersionCompare(packages[pkg][0], version) > 0: continue final_conflicts_list = [] conflicts = get_field('Conflicts') if conflicts: final_conflicts_list.append(conflicts) breaks = get_field('Breaks') if breaks: final_conflicts_list.append(breaks) dpkg = [version, get_field('Section'), pkg, version, get_field('Architecture'), get_field('Pre-Depends'), get_field('Depends'), ', '.join(final_conflicts_list) or None, get_field('Provides'), [], [], ] # retrieve the name and the version of the source package source = get_field('Source') if source: dpkg[SOURCE] = source.split(" ")[0] if "(" in source: dpkg[SOURCEVER] = source[source.find("(")+1:source.find(")")] # if the source package is available in the distribution, then register this binary package if dpkg[SOURCE] in sources[distribution]: sources[distribution][dpkg[SOURCE]][BINARIES].append(pkg + "/" + arch) # if the source package doesn't exist, create a fake one else: sources[distribution][dpkg[SOURCE]] = [dpkg[SOURCEVER], 'faux', [pkg + "/" + arch], None, True] # register virtual packages and real packages that provide them if dpkg[PROVIDES]: parts = map(string.strip, dpkg[PROVIDES].split(",")) for p in parts: if p not in provides: provides[p] = [] provides[p].append(pkg) dpkg[PROVIDES] = parts else: dpkg[PROVIDES] = [] # add the resulting dictionary to the package list packages[pkg] = dpkg # loop again on the list of packages to register reverse dependencies and conflicts register_reverses = self.register_reverses for pkg in packages: register_reverses(pkg, packages, provides, check_doubles=False) # return a tuple with the list of real and virtual packages return (packages, provides) def register_reverses(self, pkg, packages, provides, check_doubles=True, parse_depends=apt_pkg.ParseDepends): """Register reverse dependencies and conflicts for the specified package This method registers the reverse dependencies and conflicts for a given package using `packages` as the list of packages and `provides` as the list of virtual packages. The method has an optional parameter parse_depends which is there just for performance reasons and is not meant to be overwritten. """ # register the list of the dependencies for the depending packages dependencies = [] if packages[pkg][DEPENDS]: dependencies.extend(parse_depends(packages[pkg][DEPENDS])) if packages[pkg][PREDEPENDS]: dependencies.extend(parse_depends(packages[pkg][PREDEPENDS])) # go through the list for p in dependencies: for a in p: # register real packages if a[0] in packages and (not check_doubles or pkg not in packages[a[0]][RDEPENDS]): packages[a[0]][RDEPENDS].append(pkg) # register packages which provide a virtual package elif a[0] in provides: for i in provides.get(a[0]): if i not in packages: continue if not check_doubles or pkg not in packages[i][RDEPENDS]: packages[i][RDEPENDS].append(pkg) # register the list of the conflicts for the conflicting packages if packages[pkg][CONFLICTS]: for p in parse_depends(packages[pkg][CONFLICTS]): for a in p: # register real packages if a[0] in packages and (not check_doubles or pkg not in packages[a[0]][RCONFLICTS]): packages[a[0]][RCONFLICTS].append(pkg) # register packages which provide a virtual package elif a[0] in provides: for i in provides[a[0]]: if i not in packages: continue if not check_doubles or pkg not in packages[i][RCONFLICTS]: packages[i][RCONFLICTS].append(pkg) def read_bugs(self, basedir): """Read the release critial bug summary from the specified directory The RC bug summaries are read from the `BugsV' file within the directory specified in the `basedir' parameter. The file contains rows with the format: [,...] The method returns a dictionary where the key is the binary package name and the value is the list of open RC bugs for it. """ bugs = {} filename = os.path.join(basedir, "BugsV") self.__log("Loading RC bugs data from %s" % filename) for line in open(filename): l = line.split() if len(l) != 2: self.__log("Malformed line found in line %s" % (line), type='W') continue pkg = l[0] bugs.setdefault(pkg, []) bugs[pkg] += l[1].split(",") return bugs def write_bugs(self, basedir, bugs): """Write the release critical bug summary to the specified directory For a more detailed explanation of the format, please check the method read_bugs. """ filename = os.path.join(basedir, "BugsV") self.__log("Writing RC bugs data to %s" % filename) f = open(filename, 'w') for pkg in sorted(bugs.keys()): if not bugs[pkg]: continue f.write("%s %s\n" % (pkg, ','.join(bugs[pkg]))) f.close() def __maxver(self, pkg, dist): """Return the maximum version for a given package name This method returns None if the specified source package is not available in the `dist' distribution. If the package exists, then it returns the maximum version between the source package and its binary packages. """ maxver = None if pkg in self.sources[dist]: maxver = self.sources[dist][pkg][VERSION] for arch in self.options.architectures: if pkg not in self.binaries[dist][arch][0]: continue pkgv = self.binaries[dist][arch][0][pkg][VERSION] if maxver == None or apt_pkg.VersionCompare(pkgv, maxver) > 0: maxver = pkgv return maxver def normalize_bugs(self): """Normalize the release critical bug summaries for testing and unstable The method doesn't return any value: it directly modifies the object attribute `bugs'. """ # loop on all the package names from testing and unstable bug summaries for pkg in set(self.bugs['testing'].keys() + self.bugs['unstable'].keys()): # make sure that the key is present in both dictionaries if pkg not in self.bugs['testing']: self.bugs['testing'][pkg] = [] elif pkg not in self.bugs['unstable']: self.bugs['unstable'][pkg] = [] if pkg.startswith("src:"): pkg = pkg[4:] # retrieve the maximum version of the package in testing: maxvert = self.__maxver(pkg, 'testing') # if the package is not available in testing, then reset # the list of RC bugs if maxvert == None: self.bugs['testing'][pkg] = [] def read_dates(self, basedir): """Read the upload date for the packages from the specified directory The upload dates are read from the `Dates' file within the directory specified as `basedir' parameter. The file contains rows with the format: The dates are expressed as days starting from the 1970-01-01. The method returns a dictionary where the key is the binary package name and the value is a tuple with two items, the version and the date. """ dates = {} filename = os.path.join(basedir, "Dates") self.__log("Loading upload data from %s" % filename) for line in open(filename): l = line.split() if len(l) != 3: continue try: dates[l[0]] = (l[1], int(l[2])) except ValueError: self.__log("Dates, unable to parse \"%s\"" % line, type="E") return dates def write_dates(self, basedir, dates): """Write the upload date for the packages to the specified directory For a more detailed explanation of the format, please check the method read_dates. """ filename = os.path.join(basedir, "Dates") self.__log("Writing upload data to %s" % filename) f = open(filename, 'w') for pkg in sorted(dates.keys()): f.write("%s %s %d\n" % ((pkg,) + dates[pkg])) f.close() def read_urgencies(self, basedir): """Read the upload urgency of the packages from the specified directory The upload urgencies are read from the `Urgency' file within the directory specified as `basedir' parameter. The file contains rows with the format: The method returns a dictionary where the key is the binary package name and the value is the greatest urgency from the versions of the package that are higher then the testing one. """ urgencies = {} filename = os.path.join(basedir, "Urgency") self.__log("Loading upload urgencies from %s" % filename) for line in open(filename): l = line.split() if len(l) != 3: continue # read the minimum days associated with the urgencies urgency_old = urgencies.get(l[0], self.options.default_urgency) mindays_old = self.MINDAYS.get(urgency_old, self.MINDAYS[self.options.default_urgency]) mindays_new = self.MINDAYS.get(l[2], self.MINDAYS[self.options.default_urgency]) # if the new urgency is lower (so the min days are higher), do nothing if mindays_old <= mindays_new: continue # if the package exists in testing and it is more recent, do nothing tsrcv = self.sources['testing'].get(l[0], None) if tsrcv and apt_pkg.VersionCompare(tsrcv[VERSION], l[1]) >= 0: continue # if the package doesn't exist in unstable or it is older, do nothing usrcv = self.sources['unstable'].get(l[0], None) if not usrcv or apt_pkg.VersionCompare(usrcv[VERSION], l[1]) < 0: continue # update the urgency for the package urgencies[l[0]] = l[2] return urgencies def read_hints(self, basedir): """Read the hint commands from the specified directory The hint commands are read from the files contained in the `Hints' directory within the directory specified as `basedir' parameter. The names of the files have to be the same as the authorized users for the hints. The file contains rows with the format: [/] The method returns a dictionary where the key is the command, and the value is the list of affected packages. """ hints = dict([(k,[]) for k in self.HINTS_ALL]) for who in self.HINTS.keys(): if who == 'command-line': lines = self.options.hints and self.options.hints.split(';') or () else: filename = os.path.join(basedir, "Hints", who) if not os.path.isfile(filename): self.__log("Cannot read hints list from %s, no such file!" % filename, type="E") continue self.__log("Loading hints list from %s" % filename) lines = open(filename) for line in lines: line = line.strip() if line == "": continue l = line.split() if l[0] == 'finished': break elif l[0] not in self.HINTS[who]: continue elif l[0] in ["easy", "hint", "force-hint"]: hints[l[0]].append((who, [k.rsplit("/", 1) for k in l if "/" in k])) elif l[0] in ["block-all"]: hints[l[0]].extend([(y, who) for y in l[1:]]) elif l[0] in ["block", "block-udeb"]: hints[l[0]].extend([(y, who) for y in l[1:]]) elif l[0] in ["age-days"] and len(l) >= 3 and l[1].isdigit(): days = l[1] tmp = [tuple([who] + k.rsplit("/", 1)) for k in l[2:] if "/" in k] hints[l[0]].extend([(p, (v, h, days)) for h, p, v in tmp]) elif l[0] in ["remove", "approve", "unblock", "unblock-udeb", "force", "urgent"]: hints[l[0]].extend([(k.rsplit("/", 1)[0], (k.rsplit("/", 1)[1], who)) for k in l if "/" in k]) for x in ["approve", "block", "block-all", "block-udeb", "unblock", "unblock-udeb", "force", "urgent", "remove", "age-days"]: z = {} for a, b in hints[x]: if z.has_key(a) and z[a] != b: if x in ['unblock', 'unblock-udeb']: if apt_pkg.VersionCompare(z[a][0], b[0]) < 0: # This hint is for a newer version, so discard the old one self.__log("Overriding %s[%s] = %s with %s" % (x, a, z[a], b), type="W") else: # This hint is for an older version, so ignore it in favour of the new one self.__log("Ignoring %s[%s] = %s, %s is higher or equal" % (x, a, b, z[a]), type="W") continue else: self.__log("Overriding %s[%s] = %s with %s" % (x, a, z[a], b), type="W") z[a] = b hints[x] = z # Sanity check the hints hash if len(hints["block"]) == 0 and len(hints["block-udeb"]) == 0: self.__log("WARNING: No block hints at all, not even udeb ones!", type="W") # A (t-)p-u approval overrides an unstable block for p in hints["approve"]: hints["unblock"][p] = hints["approve"][p] return hints def write_heidi(self, filename): """Write the output HeidiResult This method write the output for Heidi, which contains all the binary packages and the source packages in the form: source """ self.__log("Writing Heidi results to %s" % filename) f = open(filename, 'w') # local copies sources = self.sources['testing'] # write binary packages for arch in sorted(self.options.architectures): binaries = self.binaries['testing'][arch][0] for pkg_name in sorted(binaries): pkg = binaries[pkg_name] pkgv = pkg[VERSION] pkgarch = pkg[ARCHITECTURE] or 'all' pkgsec = pkg[SECTION] or 'faux' f.write('%s %s %s %s\n' % (pkg_name, pkgv, pkgarch, pkgsec)) # write sources for src_name in sorted(sources): src = sources[src_name] srcv = src[VERSION] srcsec = src[SECTION] or 'unknown' f.write('%s %s source %s\n' % (src_name, srcv, srcsec)) f.close() def write_controlfiles(self, basedir, suite): """Write the control files This method writes the control files for the binary packages of all the architectures and for the source packages. """ sources = self.sources[suite] self.__log("Writing new %s control files to %s" % (suite, basedir)) for arch in self.options.architectures: filename = os.path.join(basedir, 'Packages_%s' % arch) f = open(filename, 'w') binaries = self.binaries[suite][arch][0] for pkg in binaries: output = "Package: %s\n" % pkg for key, k in ((SECTION, 'Section'), (ARCHITECTURE, 'Architecture'), (SOURCE, 'Source'), (VERSION, 'Version'), (PREDEPENDS, 'Pre-Depends'), (DEPENDS, 'Depends'), (PROVIDES, 'Provides'), (CONFLICTS, 'Conflicts')): if not binaries[pkg][key]: continue if key == SOURCE: if binaries[pkg][SOURCE] == pkg: if binaries[pkg][SOURCEVER] != binaries[pkg][VERSION]: source = binaries[pkg][SOURCE] + " (" + binaries[pkg][SOURCEVER] + ")" else: continue else: if binaries[pkg][SOURCEVER] != binaries[pkg][VERSION]: source = binaries[pkg][SOURCE] + " (" + binaries[pkg][SOURCEVER] + ")" else: source = binaries[pkg][SOURCE] output += (k + ": " + source + "\n") if sources[binaries[pkg][SOURCE]][MAINTAINER]: output += ("Maintainer: " + sources[binaries[pkg][SOURCE]][MAINTAINER] + "\n") elif key == PROVIDES: if len(binaries[pkg][key]) > 0: output += (k + ": " + ", ".join(binaries[pkg][key]) + "\n") else: output += (k + ": " + binaries[pkg][key] + "\n") f.write(output + "\n") f.close() filename = os.path.join(basedir, 'Sources') f = open(filename, 'w') for src in sources: output = "Package: %s\n" % src for key, k in ((VERSION, 'Version'), (SECTION, 'Section'), (MAINTAINER, 'Maintainer')): if not sources[src][key]: continue output += (k + ": " + sources[src][key] + "\n") f.write(output + "\n") f.close() def write_nuninst(self, nuninst): """Write the non-installable report""" f = open(self.options.noninst_status, 'w') f.write("Built on: " + time.strftime("%Y.%m.%d %H:%M:%S %z", time.gmtime(time.time())) + "\n") f.write("Last update: " + time.strftime("%Y.%m.%d %H:%M:%S %z", time.gmtime(time.time())) + "\n\n") f.write("".join([k + ": " + " ".join(nuninst[k]) + "\n" for k in nuninst])) f.close() def read_nuninst(self): """Read the non-installable report""" f = open(self.options.noninst_status) nuninst = {} for r in f: if ":" not in r: continue arch, packages = r.strip().split(":", 1) if arch.split("+", 1)[0] in self.options.architectures: nuninst[arch] = set(packages.split()) return nuninst # Utility methods for package analysis # ------------------------------------ def same_source(self, sv1, sv2): """Check if two version numbers are built from the same source This method returns a boolean value which is true if the two version numbers specified as parameters are built from the same source. The main use of this code is to detect binary-NMU. """ if sv1 == sv2: return 1 m = re.match(r'^(.*)\+b\d+$', sv1) if m: sv1 = m.group(1) m = re.match(r'^(.*)\+b\d+$', sv2) if m: sv2 = m.group(1) if sv1 == sv2: return 1 return 0 def get_dependency_solvers(self, block, arch, distribution, excluded=[], strict=False): """Find the packages which satisfy a dependency block This method returns the list of packages which satisfy a dependency block (as returned by apt_pkg.ParseDepends) for the given architecture and distribution. It returns a tuple with two items: the first is a boolean which is True if the dependency is satisfied, the second is the list of the solving packages. """ packages = [] # local copies for better performances binaries = self.binaries[distribution][arch] # for every package, version and operation in the block for name, version, op in block: # look for the package in unstable if name not in excluded and name in binaries[0]: package = binaries[0][name] # check the versioned dependency (if present) if op == '' and version == '' or apt_pkg.CheckDep(package[VERSION], op, version): packages.append(name) # look for the package in the virtual packages list and loop on them for prov in binaries[1].get(name, []): if prov in excluded or \ prov not in binaries[0]: continue package = binaries[0][prov] # check the versioned dependency (if present) # TODO: this is forbidden by the debian policy, which says that versioned # dependencies on virtual packages are never satisfied. The old britney # does it and we have to go with it, but at least a warning should be raised. if op == '' and version == '' or not strict and apt_pkg.CheckDep(package[VERSION], op, version): packages.append(prov) return (len(packages) > 0, packages) def excuse_unsat_deps(self, pkg, src, arch, suite, excuse, excluded=[]): """Find unsatisfied dependencies for a binary package This method analyzes the dependencies of the binary package specified by the parameter `pkg', built from the source package `src', for the architecture `arch' within the suite `suite'. If the dependency can't be satisfied in testing and/or unstable, it updates the excuse passed as parameter. The dependency fields checked are Pre-Depends and Depends. """ # retrieve the binary package from the specified suite and arch binary_u = self.binaries[suite][arch][0][pkg] # local copies for better performances parse_depends = apt_pkg.ParseDepends get_dependency_solvers = self.get_dependency_solvers strict = True # not self.options.compatible # analyze the dependency fields (if present) for type_key, type in ((PREDEPENDS, 'Pre-Depends'), (DEPENDS, 'Depends')): if not binary_u[type_key]: continue # for every block of dependency (which is formed as conjunction of disconjunction) for block, block_txt in zip(parse_depends(binary_u[type_key]), binary_u[type_key].split(',')): # if the block is satisfied in testing, then skip the block solved, packages = get_dependency_solvers(block, arch, 'testing', excluded, strict=strict) if solved: for p in packages: if p not in self.binaries[suite][arch][0]: continue excuse.add_sane_dep(self.binaries[suite][arch][0][p][SOURCE]) continue # check if the block can be satisfied in unstable, and list the solving packages solved, packages = get_dependency_solvers(block, arch, suite, [], strict=strict) packages = [self.binaries[suite][arch][0][p][SOURCE] for p in packages] # if the dependency can be satisfied by the same source package, skip the block: # obviously both binary packages will enter testing together if src in packages: continue # if no package can satisfy the dependency, add this information to the excuse if len(packages) == 0: excuse.addhtml("%s/%s unsatisfiable %s: %s" % (pkg, arch, type, block_txt.strip())) if arch not in self.options.break_arches.split(): excuse.add_unsat_dep(arch) continue # for the solving packages, update the excuse to add the dependencies for p in packages: if arch not in self.options.break_arches.split(): excuse.add_dep(p, arch) else: excuse.add_break_dep(p, arch) return True # Package analysis methods # ------------------------ def should_remove_source(self, pkg): """Check if a source package should be removed from testing This method checks if a source package should be removed from the testing distribution; this happens if the source package is not present in the unstable distribution anymore. It returns True if the package can be removed, False otherwise. In the former case, a new excuse is appended to the the object attribute excuses. """ # if the source package is available in unstable, then do nothing if pkg in self.sources['unstable']: return False # otherwise, add a new excuse for its removal and return True src = self.sources['testing'][pkg] excuse = Excuse("-" + pkg) excuse.set_vers(src[VERSION], None) src[MAINTAINER] and excuse.set_maint(src[MAINTAINER].strip()) src[SECTION] and excuse.set_section(src[SECTION].strip()) # if the package is blocked, skip it if self.hints['block'].has_key('-' + pkg): excuse.addhtml("Not touching package, as requested by %s (contact debian-release " "if update is needed)" % self.hints['block']['-' + pkg]) excuse.addhtml("Not considered") self.excuses.append(excuse) return False excuse.addhtml("Valid candidate") self.excuses.append(excuse) return True def should_upgrade_srcarch(self, src, arch, suite): """Check if a binary package should be upgraded This method checks if a binary package should be upgraded; this can happen also if the binary package is a binary-NMU for the given arch. The analysis is performed for the source package specified by the `src' parameter, checking the architecture `arch' for the distribution `suite'. It returns False if the given package doesn't need to be upgraded, True otherwise. In the former case, a new excuse is appended to the the object attribute excuses. """ # retrieve the source packages for testing and suite source_t = self.sources['testing'][src] source_u = self.sources[suite][src] # build the common part of the excuse, which will be filled by the code below ref = "%s/%s%s" % (src, arch, suite != 'unstable' and "_" + suite or "") excuse = Excuse(ref) excuse.set_vers(source_t[VERSION], source_t[VERSION]) source_u[MAINTAINER] and excuse.set_maint(source_u[MAINTAINER].strip()) source_u[SECTION] and excuse.set_section(source_u[SECTION].strip()) # if there is a `remove' hint and the requested version is the same as the # version in testing, then stop here and return False if src in self.hints["remove"] and \ self.same_source(source_t[VERSION], self.hints["remove"][src][0]): excuse.addhtml("Removal request by %s" % (self.hints["remove"][src][1])) excuse.addhtml("Trying to remove package, not update it") excuse.addhtml("Not considered") self.excuses.append(excuse) return False # the starting point is that there is nothing wrong and nothing worth doing anywrongver = False anyworthdoing = False # for every binary package produced by this source in unstable for this architecture for pkg in sorted(filter(lambda x: x.endswith("/" + arch), source_u[BINARIES]), key=lambda x: x.split("/")[0]): pkg_name = pkg.split("/")[0] # retrieve the testing (if present) and unstable corresponding binary packages binary_t = pkg in source_t[BINARIES] and self.binaries['testing'][arch][0][pkg_name] or None binary_u = self.binaries[suite][arch][0][pkg_name] # this is the source version for the new binary package pkgsv = self.binaries[suite][arch][0][pkg_name][SOURCEVER] # if the new binary package is architecture-independent, then skip it if binary_u[ARCHITECTURE] == 'all': excuse.addhtml("Ignoring %s %s (from %s) as it is arch: all" % (pkg_name, binary_u[VERSION], pkgsv)) continue # if the new binary package is not from the same source as the testing one, then skip it if not self.same_source(source_t[VERSION], pkgsv): anywrongver = True excuse.addhtml("From wrong source: %s %s (%s not %s)" % (pkg_name, binary_u[VERSION], pkgsv, source_t[VERSION])) break # find unsatisfied dependencies for the new binary package self.excuse_unsat_deps(pkg_name, src, arch, suite, excuse) # if the binary is not present in testing, then it is a new binary; # in this case, there is something worth doing if not binary_t: excuse.addhtml("New binary: %s (%s)" % (pkg_name, binary_u[VERSION])) anyworthdoing = True continue # at this point, the binary package is present in testing, so we can compare # the versions of the packages ... vcompare = apt_pkg.VersionCompare(binary_t[VERSION], binary_u[VERSION]) # ... if updating would mean downgrading, then stop here: there is something wrong if vcompare > 0: anywrongver = True excuse.addhtml("Not downgrading: %s (%s to %s)" % (pkg_name, binary_t[VERSION], binary_u[VERSION])) break # ... if updating would mean upgrading, then there is something worth doing elif vcompare < 0: excuse.addhtml("Updated binary: %s (%s to %s)" % (pkg_name, binary_t[VERSION], binary_u[VERSION])) anyworthdoing = True # if there is nothing wrong and there is something worth doing or the source # package is not fake, then check what packages should be removed if not anywrongver and (anyworthdoing or not self.sources[suite][src][FAKESRC]): srcv = self.sources[suite][src][VERSION] ssrc = self.same_source(source_t[VERSION], srcv) # for every binary package produced by this source in testing for this architecture for pkg in sorted([x.split("/")[0] for x in self.sources['testing'][src][BINARIES] if x.endswith("/"+arch)]): # if the package is architecture-independent, then ignore it if self.binaries['testing'][arch][0][pkg][ARCHITECTURE] == 'all': excuse.addhtml("Ignoring removal of %s as it is arch: all" % (pkg)) continue # if the package is not produced by the new source package, then remove it from testing if pkg not in self.binaries[suite][arch][0]: tpkgv = self.binaries['testing'][arch][0][pkg][VERSION] excuse.addhtml("Removed binary: %s %s" % (pkg, tpkgv)) if ssrc: anyworthdoing = True # if there is nothing wrong and there is something worth doing, this is a valid candidate if not anywrongver and anyworthdoing: excuse.addhtml("Valid candidate") self.excuses.append(excuse) return True # else if there is something worth doing (but something wrong, too) this package won't be considered elif anyworthdoing: excuse.addhtml("Not considered") self.excuses.append(excuse) # otherwise, return False return False def should_upgrade_src(self, src, suite): """Check if source package should be upgraded This method checks if a source package should be upgraded. The analysis is performed for the source package specified by the `src' parameter, checking the architecture `arch' for the distribution `suite'. It returns False if the given package doesn't need to be upgraded, True otherwise. In the former case, a new excuse is appended to the object attribute excuses. """ # retrieve the source packages for testing (if available) and suite source_u = self.sources[suite][src] if src in self.sources['testing']: source_t = self.sources['testing'][src] # if testing and unstable have the same version, then this is a candidate for binary-NMUs only if apt_pkg.VersionCompare(source_t[VERSION], source_u[VERSION]) == 0: return False else: source_t = None # build the common part of the excuse, which will be filled by the code below ref = "%s%s" % (src, suite != 'unstable' and "_" + suite or "") excuse = Excuse(ref) excuse.set_vers(source_t and source_t[VERSION] or None, source_u[VERSION]) source_u[MAINTAINER] and excuse.set_maint(source_u[MAINTAINER].strip()) source_u[SECTION] and excuse.set_section(source_u[SECTION].strip()) # the starting point is that we will update the candidate update_candidate = True # if the version in unstable is older, then stop here with a warning in the excuse and return False if source_t and apt_pkg.VersionCompare(source_u[VERSION], source_t[VERSION]) < 0: excuse.addhtml("ALERT: %s is newer in testing (%s %s)" % (src, source_t[VERSION], source_u[VERSION])) self.excuses.append(excuse) return False # check if the source package really exists or if it is a fake one if source_u[FAKESRC]: excuse.addhtml("%s source package doesn't exist" % (src)) update_candidate = False # retrieve the urgency for the upload, ignoring it if this is a NEW package (not present in testing) urgency = self.urgencies.get(src, self.options.default_urgency) if not source_t and urgency != self.options.default_urgency: excuse.addhtml("Ignoring %s urgency setting for NEW package" % (urgency)) urgency = self.options.default_urgency # if there is a `remove' hint and the requested version is the same as the # version in testing, then stop here and return False if src in self.hints["remove"]: if source_t and self.same_source(source_t[VERSION], self.hints['remove'][src][0]) or \ self.same_source(source_u[VERSION], self.hints['remove'][src][0]): excuse.addhtml("Removal request by %s" % (self.hints["remove"][src][1])) excuse.addhtml("Trying to remove package, not update it") update_candidate = False # check if there is a `block' or `block-udeb' hint for this package, or a `block-all source' hint blocked = {} if src in self.hints["block"]: blocked["block"] = self.hints["block"][src] elif 'source' in self.hints["block-all"]: blocked["block"] = self.hints["block-all"]["source"] if src in self.hints["block-udeb"]: blocked["block-udeb"] = self.hints["block-udeb"][src] # if the source is blocked, then look for an `unblock' hint; the unblock request # is processed only if the specified version is correct. If a package is blocked # by `block-udeb', then `unblock-udeb' must be present to cancel it. for block_cmd in blocked: unblock_cmd = "un" + block_cmd unblock = self.hints[unblock_cmd].get(src,(None,None)) if unblock[0] != None and self.same_source(unblock[0], source_u[VERSION]): excuse.addhtml("Ignoring %s request by %s, due to %s request by %s" % (block_cmd, blocked[block_cmd], unblock_cmd, self.hints[unblock_cmd][src][1])) else: if unblock[0] != None: excuse.addhtml("%s request by %s ignored due to version mismatch: %s" % (unblock_cmd.capitalize(), self.hints[unblock_cmd][src][1], self.hints[unblock_cmd][src][0])) excuse.addhtml("Not touching package due to %s request by %s (contact debian-release if update is needed)" % (block_cmd, blocked[block_cmd])) update_candidate = False # if the suite is unstable, then we have to check the urgency and the minimum days of # permanence in unstable before updating testing; if the source package is too young, # the check fails and we set update_candidate to False to block the update; consider # the age-days hint, if specified for the package if suite == 'unstable': if src not in self.dates: self.dates[src] = (source_u[VERSION], self.date_now) elif not self.same_source(self.dates[src][0], source_u[VERSION]): self.dates[src] = (source_u[VERSION], self.date_now) days_old = self.date_now - self.dates[src][1] min_days = self.MINDAYS[urgency] age_days_hint = self.hints["age-days"].get(src) if age_days_hint is not None and (age_days_hint[0] == "-" or \ self.same_source(source_u[VERSION], age_days_hint[0])): excuse.addhtml("Overriding age needed from %d days to %d by %s" % (min_days, int(self.hints["age-days"][src][2]), self.hints["age-days"][src][1])) min_days = int(self.hints["age-days"][src][2]) excuse.setdaysold(days_old, min_days) if days_old < min_days: if src in self.hints["urgent"] and self.same_source(source_u[VERSION], self.hints["urgent"][src][0]): excuse.addhtml("Too young, but urgency pushed by %s" % (self.hints["urgent"][src][1])) else: update_candidate = False if suite in ['pu', 'tpu']: # o-o-d(ish) checks for (t-)p-u for arch in self.options.architectures: # If the package isn't in testing or the testing # package produces no packages on this architecture, # then it can't be out-of-date. We assume that if # the (t-)p-u package has produced any binaries for # this architecture then it is ok if not src in self.sources["testing"] or \ (len([x for x in self.sources["testing"][src][BINARIES] if x.endswith("/"+arch) and self.binaries["testing"][arch][0][x.split("/")[0]][ARCHITECTURE] != 'all' ]) == 0) or \ (len([x for x in self.sources[suite][src][BINARIES] if x.endswith("/"+arch) and self.binaries[suite][arch][0][x.split("/")[0]][ARCHITECTURE] != 'all' ]) > 0): continue if suite == 'tpu': base = 'testing' else: base = 'stable' text = "Not yet built on %s (relative to testing)" % (urllib.quote(arch), urllib.quote(src), urllib.quote(source_u[VERSION]), arch, base) if arch in self.options.fucked_arches.split(): text = text + " (but %s isn't keeping up, so never mind)" % (arch) else: update_candidate = False excuse.addhtml(text) # at this point, we check the status of the builds on all the supported architectures # to catch the out-of-date ones pkgs = {src: ["source"]} for arch in self.options.architectures: oodbins = {} # for every binary package produced by this source in the suite for this architecture for pkg in sorted([x.split("/")[0] for x in self.sources[suite][src][BINARIES] if x.endswith("/"+arch)]): if pkg not in pkgs: pkgs[pkg] = [] pkgs[pkg].append(arch) # retrieve the binary package and its source version binary_u = self.binaries[suite][arch][0][pkg] pkgsv = binary_u[SOURCEVER] # if it wasn't built by the same source, it is out-of-date if not self.same_source(source_u[VERSION], pkgsv): if pkgsv not in oodbins: oodbins[pkgsv] = [] oodbins[pkgsv].append(pkg) continue # if the package is architecture-dependent or the current arch is `nobreakall' # find unsatisfied dependencies for the binary package if binary_u[ARCHITECTURE] != 'all' or arch in self.options.nobreakall_arches.split(): self.excuse_unsat_deps(pkg, src, arch, suite, excuse) # if there are out-of-date packages, warn about them in the excuse and set update_candidate # to False to block the update; if the architecture where the package is out-of-date is # in the `fucked_arches' list, then do not block the update if oodbins: oodtxt = "" for v in oodbins.keys(): if oodtxt: oodtxt = oodtxt + "; " oodtxt = oodtxt + "%s (from %s)" % \ (", ".join(sorted(oodbins[v])), urllib.quote(arch), urllib.quote(src), urllib.quote(v), v) text = "out of date on %s: %s" % \ (urllib.quote(arch), urllib.quote(src), urllib.quote(source_u[VERSION]), arch, oodtxt) if arch in self.options.fucked_arches.split(): text = text + " (but %s isn't keeping up, so nevermind)" % (arch) else: update_candidate = False if self.date_now != self.dates[src][1]: excuse.addhtml(text) # if the source package has no binaries, set update_candidate to False to block the update if len(self.sources[suite][src][BINARIES]) == 0: excuse.addhtml("%s has no binaries on any arch" % src) update_candidate = False # if the suite is unstable, then we have to check the release-critical bug lists before # updating testing; if the unstable package has RC bugs that do not apply to the testing # one, the check fails and we set update_candidate to False to block the update if suite == 'unstable': for pkg in pkgs.keys(): bugs_t = [] bugs_u = [] if self.bugs['testing'].has_key(pkg): bugs_t.extend(self.bugs['testing'][pkg]) if self.bugs['unstable'].has_key(pkg): bugs_u.extend(self.bugs['unstable'][pkg]) if 'source' in pkgs[pkg]: spkg = "src:%s" % (pkg) if self.bugs['testing'].has_key(spkg): bugs_t.extend(self.bugs['testing'][spkg]) if self.bugs['unstable'].has_key(spkg): bugs_u.extend(self.bugs['unstable'][spkg]) new_bugs = sorted(set(bugs_u).difference(bugs_t)) old_bugs = sorted(set(bugs_t).difference(bugs_u)) if len(new_bugs) > 0: excuse.addhtml("%s (%s) has new bugs!" % (pkg, ", ".join(pkgs[pkg]), urllib.quote(pkg))) excuse.addhtml("Updating %s introduces new bugs: %s" % (pkg, ", ".join( ["#%s" % (urllib.quote(a), a) for a in new_bugs]))) update_candidate = False if len(old_bugs) > 0: excuse.addhtml("Updating %s fixes old bugs: %s" % (pkg, ", ".join( ["#%s" % (urllib.quote(a), a) for a in old_bugs]))) if len(old_bugs) > len(new_bugs) and len(new_bugs) > 0: excuse.addhtml("%s introduces new bugs, so still ignored (even " "though it fixes more than it introduces, whine at debian-release)" % pkg) # check if there is a `force' hint for this package, which allows it to go in even if it is not updateable if src in self.hints["force"] and self.same_source(source_u[VERSION], self.hints["force"][src][0]): excuse.dontinvalidate = 1 if not update_candidate and src in self.hints["force"] and \ self.same_source(source_u[VERSION], self.hints["force"][src][0]): excuse.addhtml("Should ignore, but forced by %s" % (self.hints["force"][src][1])) update_candidate = True # if the suite is *-proposed-updates, the package needs an explicit approval in order to go in if suite in ['tpu', 'pu']: if src in self.hints["approve"] and \ self.same_source(source_u[VERSION], self.hints["approve"][src][0]): excuse.addhtml("Approved by %s" % self.hints["approve"][src][1]) else: excuse.addhtml("NEEDS APPROVAL BY RM") update_candidate = False # if the package can be updated, it is a valid candidate if update_candidate: excuse.addhtml("Valid candidate") # else it won't be considered else: excuse.addhtml("Not considered") self.excuses.append(excuse) return update_candidate def reversed_exc_deps(self): """Reverse the excuses dependencies This method returns a dictionary where the keys are the package names and the values are the excuse names which depend on it. """ res = {} for exc in self.excuses: for d in exc.deps: if d not in res: res[d] = [] res[d].append(exc.name) return res def invalidate_excuses(self, valid, invalid): """Invalidate impossible excuses This method invalidates the impossible excuses, which depend on invalid excuses. The two parameters contains the list of `valid' and `invalid' excuses. """ # build a lookup-by-name map exclookup = {} for e in self.excuses: exclookup[e.name] = e # build the reverse dependencies revdeps = self.reversed_exc_deps() # loop on the invalid excuses i = 0 while i < len(invalid): # if there is no reverse dependency, skip the item if invalid[i] not in revdeps: i += 1 continue # if the dependency can be satisfied by a testing-proposed-updates excuse, skip the item if (invalid[i] + "_tpu") in valid: i += 1 continue # loop on the reverse dependencies for x in revdeps[invalid[i]]: # if the item is valid and it is marked as `dontinvalidate', skip the item if x in valid and exclookup[x].dontinvalidate: continue # otherwise, invalidate the dependency and mark as invalidated and # remove the depending excuses exclookup[x].invalidate_dep(invalid[i]) if x in valid: p = valid.index(x) invalid.append(valid.pop(p)) exclookup[x].addhtml("Invalidated by dependency") exclookup[x].addhtml("Not considered") i = i + 1 def write_excuses(self): """Produce and write the update excuses This method handles the update excuses generation: the packages are looked at to determine whether they are valid candidates. For the details of this procedure, please refer to the module docstring. """ self.__log("Update Excuses generation started", type="I") # list of local methods and variables (for better performance) sources = self.sources architectures = self.options.architectures should_remove_source = self.should_remove_source should_upgrade_srcarch = self.should_upgrade_srcarch should_upgrade_src = self.should_upgrade_src # this list will contain the packages which are valid candidates; # if a package is going to be removed, it will have a "-" prefix upgrade_me = [] # for every source package in testing, check if it should be removed for pkg in sources['testing']: if should_remove_source(pkg): upgrade_me.append("-" + pkg) # for every source package in unstable check if it should be upgraded for pkg in sources['unstable']: if sources['unstable'][pkg][FAKESRC]: continue # if the source package is already present in testing, # check if it should be upgraded for every binary package if pkg in sources['testing'] and not sources['testing'][pkg][FAKESRC]: for arch in architectures: if should_upgrade_srcarch(pkg, arch, 'unstable'): upgrade_me.append("%s/%s" % (pkg, arch)) # check if the source package should be upgraded if should_upgrade_src(pkg, 'unstable'): upgrade_me.append(pkg) # for every source package in *-proposed-updates, check if it should be upgraded for suite in ['pu', 'tpu']: for pkg in sources[suite]: # if the source package is already present in testing, # check if it should be upgraded for every binary package if pkg in sources['testing']: for arch in architectures: if should_upgrade_srcarch(pkg, arch, suite): upgrade_me.append("%s/%s_%s" % (pkg, arch, suite)) # check if the source package should be upgraded if should_upgrade_src(pkg, suite): upgrade_me.append("%s_%s" % (pkg, suite)) # process the `remove' hints, if the given package is not yet in upgrade_me for src in self.hints["remove"].keys(): if src in upgrade_me: continue if ("-"+src) in upgrade_me: continue if src not in sources['testing']: continue # check if the version specified in the hint is the same as the considered package tsrcv = sources['testing'][src][VERSION] if not self.same_source(tsrcv, self.hints["remove"][src][0]): continue # add the removal of the package to upgrade_me and build a new excuse upgrade_me.append("-%s" % (src)) excuse = Excuse("-%s" % (src)) excuse.set_vers(tsrcv, None) excuse.addhtml("Removal request by %s" % (self.hints["remove"][src][1])) excuse.addhtml("Package is broken, will try to remove") self.excuses.append(excuse) # sort the excuses by daysold and name self.excuses.sort(lambda x, y: cmp(x.daysold, y.daysold) or cmp(x.name, y.name)) # extract the not considered packages, which are in the excuses but not in upgrade_me unconsidered = [e.name for e in self.excuses if e.name not in upgrade_me] # invalidate impossible excuses for e in self.excuses: # parts[0] == package name # parts[1] == optional architecture parts = e.name.split('/') for d in e.deps: ok = False # source -> source dependency; both packages must have # valid excuses if d in upgrade_me or d in unconsidered: ok = True # if the excuse is for a binNMU, also consider d/$arch as a # valid excuse elif len(parts) == 2: bd = '%s/%s' % (d, parts[1]) if bd in upgrade_me or bd in unconsidered: ok = True # if the excuse is for a source package, check each of the # architectures on which the excuse lists a dependency on d, # and consider the excuse valid if it is possible on each # architecture else: arch_ok = True for arch in e.deps[d]: bd = '%s/%s' % (d, arch) if bd not in upgrade_me and bd not in unconsidered: arch_ok = False break if arch_ok: ok = True if not ok: e.addhtml("Impossible dependency: %s -> %s" % (e.name, d)) self.invalidate_excuses(upgrade_me, unconsidered) # sort the list of candidates self.upgrade_me = sorted(upgrade_me) # write excuses to the output file if not self.options.dry_run: self.__log("> Writing Excuses to %s" % self.options.excuses_output, type="I") f = open(self.options.excuses_output, 'w') f.write("\n") f.write("excuses...") f.write("\n") f.write("

Generated: " + time.strftime("%Y.%m.%d %H:%M:%S %z", time.gmtime(time.time())) + "

\n") f.write("
    \n") for e in self.excuses: f.write("
  • %s" % e.html()) f.write("
\n") f.close() self.__log("Update Excuses generation completed", type="I") # Upgrade run # ----------- def newlyuninst(self, nuold, nunew): """Return a nuninst statstic with only new uninstallable packages This method subtracts the uninstallable packages of the statistic `nunew` from the statistic `nuold`. It returns a dictionary with the architectures as keys and the list of uninstallable packages as values. """ res = {} for arch in nuold: if arch not in nunew: continue res[arch] = [x for x in nunew[arch] if x not in nuold[arch]] return res def get_nuninst(self, requested_arch=None, build=False): """Return the uninstallability statistic for all the architectures To calculate the uninstallability counters, the method checks the installability of all the packages for all the architectures, and tracks dependencies in a recursive way. The architecture independent packages are checked only for the `nobreakall` architectures. It returns a dictionary with the architectures as keys and the list of uninstallable packages as values. """ # if we are not asked to build the nuninst, read it from the cache if not build: return self.read_nuninst() nuninst = {} # local copies for better performance binaries = self.binaries['testing'] systems = self.systems # for all the architectures for arch in self.options.architectures: if requested_arch and arch != requested_arch: continue # if it is in the nobreakall ones, check arch-independent packages too if arch not in self.options.nobreakall_arches.split(): skip_archall = True else: skip_archall = False # check all the packages for this architecture, calling add_nuninst if a new # uninstallable package is found nuninst[arch] = set() for pkg_name in binaries[arch][0]: r = systems[arch].is_installable(pkg_name) if not r: nuninst[arch].add(pkg_name) # if they are not required, remove architecture-independent packages nuninst[arch + "+all"] = nuninst[arch].copy() if skip_archall: for pkg in nuninst[arch + "+all"]: bpkg = binaries[arch][0][pkg] if bpkg[ARCHITECTURE] == 'all': nuninst[arch].remove(pkg) # return the dictionary with the results return nuninst def eval_nuninst(self, nuninst, original=None): """Return a string which represents the uninstallability counters This method returns a string which represents the uninstallability counters reading the uninstallability statistics `nuninst` and, if present, merging the results with the `original` one. An example of the output string is: 1+2: i-0:a-0:a-0:h-0:i-1:m-0:m-0:p-0:a-0:m-0:s-2:s-0 where the first part is the number of broken packages in non-break architectures + the total number of broken packages for all the architectures. """ res = [] total = 0 totalbreak = 0 for arch in self.options.architectures: if arch in nuninst: n = len(nuninst[arch]) elif original and arch in original: n = len(original[arch]) else: continue if arch in self.options.break_arches.split(): totalbreak = totalbreak + n else: total = total + n res.append("%s-%d" % (arch[0], n)) return "%d+%d: %s" % (total, totalbreak, ":".join(res)) def eval_uninst(self, nuninst): """Return a string which represents the uninstallable packages This method returns a string which represents the uninstallable packages reading the uninstallability statistics `nuninst`. An example of the output string is: * i386: broken-pkg1, broken-pkg2 """ parts = [] for arch in self.options.architectures: if arch in nuninst and len(nuninst[arch]) > 0: parts.append(" * %s: %s\n" % (arch,", ".join(sorted(nuninst[arch])))) return "".join(parts) def is_nuninst_asgood_generous(self, old, new): diff = 0 for arch in self.options.architectures: if arch in self.options.break_arches.split(): continue diff = diff + (len(new[arch]) - len(old[arch])) return diff <= 0 def doop_source(self, pkg, hint_undo=[]): """Apply a change to the testing distribution as requested by `pkg` An optional list of undo actions related to packages processed earlier in a hint may be passed in `hint_undo`. This method applies the changes required by the action `pkg` tracking them so it will be possible to revert them. The method returns a list of the package name, the suite where the package comes from, the list of packages affected by the change and the dictionary undo which can be used to rollback the changes. """ undo = {'binaries': {}, 'sources': {}, 'virtual': {}, 'nvirtual': []} affected = [] arch = None # local copies for better performances sources = self.sources binaries = self.binaries['testing'] # removal of single-arch binary package = "-/" if pkg[0] == "-" and "/" in pkg: pkg_name, arch = pkg.split("/") pkg_name = pkg_name[1:] suite = "testing" # arch = "/", elif "/" in pkg: pkg_name, arch = pkg.split("/") if arch.endswith("_tpu") or arch.endswith("_pu"): arch, suite = arch.split("_") else: suite = "unstable" # removal of source packages = "-", elif pkg[0] == "-": pkg_name = pkg[1:] suite = "testing" # testing-proposed-updates = "_tpu" # proposed-updates = "_pu" elif pkg.endswith("_tpu") or pkg.endswith("_pu"): pkg_name, suite = pkg.rsplit("_") # normal update of source packages = "" else: pkg_name = pkg suite = "unstable" # remove all binary packages (if the source already exists) if not (arch and pkg[0] == '-'): if pkg_name in sources['testing']: source = sources['testing'][pkg_name] bins = [] check = [] smoothbins = [] # remove all the binaries # first, build a list of eligible binaries for p in source[BINARIES]: binary, parch = p.split("/") if arch and parch != arch: continue # do not remove binaries which have been hijacked by other sources if binaries[parch][0][binary][SOURCE] != pkg_name: continue bins.append(p) for p in bins: binary, parch = p.split("/") # if a smooth update is possible for the package, skip it if not self.options.compatible and suite == 'unstable' and \ binary not in self.binaries[suite][parch][0] and \ ('ALL' in self.options.smooth_updates or \ binaries[parch][0][binary][SECTION] in self.options.smooth_updates): # if the package has reverse-dependencies which are # built from other sources, it's a valid candidate for # a smooth update. if not, it may still be a valid # candidate if one if its r-deps is itself a candidate, # so note it for checking later rdeps = binaries[parch][0][binary][RDEPENDS] if len([x for x in rdeps if x not in [y.split("/")[0] for y in bins]]) > 0: smoothbins.append(p) else: check.append(p) # check whether we should perform a smooth update for # packages which are candidates but do not have r-deps # outside of the current source for p in check: binary, parch = p.split("/") rdeps = [ bin for bin in binaries[parch][0][binary][RDEPENDS] \ if bin in [y.split("/")[0] for y in smoothbins] ] if len(rdeps) > 0: smoothbins.append(p) # remove all the binaries which aren't being smooth updated for p in [ bin for bin in bins if bin not in smoothbins ]: binary, parch = p.split("/") # save the old binary for undo undo['binaries'][p] = binaries[parch][0][binary] # all the reverse dependencies are affected by the change affected.extend( [ (x, parch) for x in \ self.get_reverse_tree(binary, parch, 'testing') ] ) affected = list(set(affected)) # remove the provided virtual packages for j in binaries[parch][0][binary][PROVIDES]: key = j + "/" + parch if key not in undo['virtual']: undo['virtual'][key] = binaries[parch][1][j][:] binaries[parch][1][j].remove(binary) if len(binaries[parch][1][j]) == 0: del binaries[parch][1][j] # finally, remove the binary package del binaries[parch][0][binary] self.systems[parch].remove_binary(binary) # remove the source package if not arch: undo['sources'][pkg_name] = source del sources['testing'][pkg_name] else: # the package didn't exist, so we mark it as to-be-removed in case of undo undo['sources']['-' + pkg_name] = True # single binary removal elif pkg_name in binaries[arch][0]: undo['binaries'][pkg_name + "/" + arch] = binaries[arch][0][pkg_name] affected.extend( [ (x, arch) for x in \ self.get_reverse_tree(pkg_name, arch, 'testing') ] ) affected = list(set(affected)) del binaries[arch][0][pkg_name] self.systems[arch].remove_binary(pkg_name) # add the new binary packages (if we are not removing) if pkg[0] != "-": source = sources[suite][pkg_name] for p in source[BINARIES]: binary, parch = p.split("/") if arch and parch != arch: continue key = (binary, parch) # obviously, added/modified packages are affected if key not in affected: affected.append(key) # if the binary already exists (built from another source) if binary in binaries[parch][0]: # save the old binary package undo['binaries'][p] = binaries[parch][0][binary] # all the reverse dependencies are affected by the change affected.extend( [ (x, parch) for x in \ self.get_reverse_tree(binary, parch, 'testing') ] ) affected = list(set(affected)) # all the reverse conflicts and their dependency tree are affected by the change for j in binaries[parch][0][binary][RCONFLICTS]: key = (j, parch) if key not in affected: affected.append(key) for p in self.get_full_tree(j, parch, 'testing'): key = (p, parch) if key not in affected: affected.append(key) self.systems[parch].remove_binary(binary) else: # if the binary was previously built by a different # source package in testing, all of the reverse # dependencies of the old binary are affected. # reverse dependencies built from this source can be # ignored as their reverse trees are already handled # by this function # XXX: and the reverse conflict tree? for (tundo, tpkg, tpkg_name, tsuite) in hint_undo: if p in tundo['binaries']: for rdep in tundo['binaries'][p][RDEPENDS]: if rdep in binaries[parch][0] and rdep not in source[BINARIES]: affected.append( (rdep, parch) ) affected.extend( [ (x, parch) for x in \ self.get_reverse_tree(rdep, parch, 'testing') ] ) affected = list(set(affected)) # add/update the binary package binaries[parch][0][binary] = self.binaries[suite][parch][0][binary] self.systems[parch].add_binary(binary, binaries[parch][0][binary][:PROVIDES] + \ [", ".join(binaries[parch][0][binary][PROVIDES]) or None]) # register new provided packages for j in binaries[parch][0][binary][PROVIDES]: key = j + "/" + parch if j not in binaries[parch][1]: undo['nvirtual'].append(key) binaries[parch][1][j] = [] elif key not in undo['virtual']: undo['virtual'][key] = binaries[parch][1][j][:] binaries[parch][1][j].append(binary) # all the reverse dependencies are affected by the change affected.extend( [ (x, parch) for x in \ self.get_reverse_tree(binary, parch, 'testing') ] ) affected = list(set(affected)) # register reverse dependencies and conflicts for the new binary packages for p in source[BINARIES]: binary, parch = p.split("/") if arch and parch != arch: continue self.register_reverses(binary, binaries[parch][0] , binaries[parch][1]) # add/update the source package if not arch: sources['testing'][pkg_name] = sources[suite][pkg_name] # return the package name, the suite, the list of affected packages and the undo dictionary return (pkg_name, suite, affected, undo) def get_reverse_tree(self, pkg, arch, suite): packages = [] binaries = self.binaries[suite][arch][0] rev_deps = set(binaries[pkg][RDEPENDS]) seen = set() while len(rev_deps) > 0: # mark all of the current iteration of packages as affected packages.extend( [ x for x in rev_deps ] ) # and as processed seen |= rev_deps # generate the next iteration, which is the reverse-dependencies of # the current iteration new_rev_deps = [ binaries[x][RDEPENDS] for x in rev_deps \ if x in binaries ] # flatten the list-of-lists, filtering out already handled packages # in the process rev_deps = set([ package for sublist in new_rev_deps \ for package in sublist if package not in seen ]) # remove duplicates from the list of affected packages packages = list(set(packages)) return packages def get_full_tree(self, pkg, arch, suite): """Calculate the full dependency tree for the given package This method returns the full dependency tree for the package `pkg`, inside the `arch` architecture for the suite `suite`. """ packages = [pkg] binaries = self.binaries[suite][arch][0] if pkg in binaries: l = n = 0 while len(packages) > l: l = len(packages) for p in packages[n:]: packages.extend([x for x in binaries[p][RDEPENDS] if x not in packages and x in binaries]) n = l return packages else: return [] def iter_packages(self, packages, selected, hint=False, nuninst=None): """Iter on the list of actions and apply them one-by-one This method applies the changes from `packages` to testing, checking the uninstallability counters for every action performed. If the action does not improve them, it is reverted. The method returns the new uninstallability counters and the remaining actions if the final result is successful, otherwise (None, None). """ extra = [] deferred = [] skipped = [] mark_passed = False position = len(packages) if nuninst: nuninst_comp = nuninst.copy() else: nuninst_comp = self.nuninst_orig.copy() # local copies for better performance binaries = self.binaries['testing'] sources = self.sources systems = self.systems architectures = self.options.architectures nobreakall_arches = self.options.nobreakall_arches.split() new_arches = self.options.new_arches.split() break_arches = self.options.break_arches.split() dependencies = self.dependencies compatible = self.options.compatible # pre-process a hint batch pre_process = {} if selected and hint: for pkg in selected: pkg_name, suite, affected, undo = self.doop_source(pkg) pre_process[pkg] = (pkg_name, suite, affected, undo) lundo = [] if not hint: self.output_write("recur: [%s] %s %d/%d\n" % ("", ",".join(selected), len(packages), len(extra))) # loop on the packages (or better, actions) while packages: pkg = packages.pop(0) # this is the marker for the first loop if not compatible and not mark_passed and position < 0: mark_passed = True packages.extend(deferred) del deferred else: position -= 1 # defer packages if their dependency has been already skipped if not compatible and not mark_passed: defer = False for p in dependencies.get(pkg, []): if p in skipped: deferred.append(pkg) skipped.append(pkg) defer = True break if defer: continue if not hint: self.output_write("trying: %s\n" % (pkg)) better = True nuninst = {} # apply the changes if pkg in pre_process: pkg_name, suite, affected, undo = pre_process[pkg] else: pkg_name, suite, affected, undo = self.doop_source(pkg, lundo) if hint: lundo.append((undo, pkg, pkg_name, suite)) # check the affected packages on all the architectures for arch in ("/" in pkg and (pkg.split("/")[1].split("_")[0],) or architectures): if arch not in nobreakall_arches: skip_archall = True else: skip_archall = False nuninst[arch] = set([x for x in nuninst_comp[arch] if x in binaries[arch][0]]) nuninst[arch + "+all"] = set([x for x in nuninst_comp[arch + "+all"] if x in binaries[arch][0]]) broken = nuninst[arch + "+all"] to_check = [] # broken packages (first round) for p in [x[0] for x in affected if x[1] == arch]: if p not in binaries[arch][0]: continue r = systems[arch].is_installable(p) if not r: if p not in broken: to_check.append(p) broken.add(p) if not (skip_archall and binaries[arch][0][p][ARCHITECTURE] == 'all'): if p not in nuninst[arch]: nuninst[arch].add(p) else: if p in broken: to_check.append(p) broken.remove(p) if not (skip_archall and binaries[arch][0][p][ARCHITECTURE] == 'all'): # if the package was previously arch:all and uninstallable # and has moved to being architecture-dependent, becoming # installable in the process then it will not be in the # architecture-dependent uninstallability set; therefore, # don't try removing it if p in nuninst[arch]: nuninst[arch].remove(p) # broken packages (second round, reverse dependencies of the first round) while to_check: j = to_check.pop(0) if j not in binaries[arch][0]: continue for p in binaries[arch][0][j][RDEPENDS]: if p in broken or p not in binaries[arch][0]: continue r = systems[arch].is_installable(p) if not r: if p not in broken: broken.add(p) to_check.append(p) if not (skip_archall and binaries[arch][0][p][ARCHITECTURE] == 'all'): if p not in nuninst[arch]: nuninst[arch].add(p) else: if p in broken: broken.remove(p) to_check.append(p) if not (skip_archall and binaries[arch][0][p][ARCHITECTURE] == 'all'): # if the package was previously arch:all and uninstallable # and has moved to being architecture-dependent, becoming # installable in the process then it will not be in the # architecture-dependent uninstallability set; therefore, # don't try removing it if p in nuninst[arch]: nuninst[arch].remove(p) # if we are processing hints, go ahead if hint: nuninst_comp[arch] = nuninst[arch] nuninst_comp[arch + "+all"] = nuninst[arch + "+all"] continue # if the uninstallability counter is worse than before, break the loop if (("/" in pkg and arch not in new_arches) or \ (arch not in break_arches)) and len(nuninst[arch]) > len(nuninst_comp[arch]): better = False break # if we are processing hints or the package is already accepted, go ahead if hint or pkg in selected: continue # check if the action improved the uninstallability counters if better: lundo.append((undo, pkg, pkg_name, suite)) selected.append(pkg) packages.extend(extra) extra = [] self.output_write("accepted: %s\n" % (pkg)) self.output_write(" ori: %s\n" % (self.eval_nuninst(self.nuninst_orig))) self.output_write(" pre: %s\n" % (self.eval_nuninst(nuninst_comp))) self.output_write(" now: %s\n" % (self.eval_nuninst(nuninst, nuninst_comp))) if len(selected) <= 20: self.output_write(" all: %s\n" % (" ".join(selected))) else: self.output_write(" most: (%d) .. %s\n" % (len(selected), " ".join(selected[-20:]))) for k in nuninst: nuninst_comp[k] = nuninst[k] else: self.output_write("skipped: %s (%d <- %d)\n" % (pkg, len(extra), len(packages))) self.output_write(" got: %s\n" % (self.eval_nuninst(nuninst, "/" in pkg and nuninst_comp or None))) self.output_write(" * %s: %s\n" % (arch, ", ".join(sorted([b for b in nuninst[arch] if b not in nuninst_comp[arch]])))) extra.append(pkg) if not mark_passed: skipped.append(pkg) # undo the changes (source) for k in undo['sources'].keys(): if k[0] == '-': del sources['testing'][k[1:]] else: sources['testing'][k] = undo['sources'][k] # undo the changes (new binaries) if pkg[0] != '-' and pkg_name in sources[suite]: for p in sources[suite][pkg_name][BINARIES]: binary, arch = p.split("/") if '/' not in pkg or pkg.endswith("/%s" % (arch)) or pkg.endswith("/%s_tpu" % (arch)) or pkg.endswith("/%s_pu" % (arch)): del binaries[arch][0][binary] self.systems[arch].remove_binary(binary) # undo the changes (binaries) for p in undo['binaries'].keys(): binary, arch = p.split("/") if binary[0] == "-": del binaries[arch][0][binary[1:]] self.systems[arch].remove_binary(binary[1:]) else: binaries[arch][0][binary] = undo['binaries'][p] self.systems[arch].remove_binary(binary) self.systems[arch].add_binary(binary, binaries[arch][0][binary][:PROVIDES] + \ [", ".join(binaries[arch][0][binary][PROVIDES]) or None]) # undo the changes (virtual packages) for p in undo['nvirtual']: j, arch = p.split("/") del binaries[arch][1][j] for p in undo['virtual']: j, arch = p.split("/") if j[0] == '-': del binaries[arch][1][j[1:]] else: binaries[arch][1][j] = undo['virtual'][p] # if we are processing hints, return now if hint: return (nuninst_comp, [], lundo) self.output_write(" finish: [%s]\n" % ",".join(selected)) self.output_write("endloop: %s\n" % (self.eval_nuninst(self.nuninst_orig))) self.output_write(" now: %s\n" % (self.eval_nuninst(nuninst_comp))) self.output_write(self.eval_uninst(self.newlyuninst(self.nuninst_orig, nuninst_comp))) self.output_write("\n") return (nuninst_comp, extra, lundo) def do_all(self, maxdepth=0, init=None, actions=None): """Testing update runner This method tries to update testing checking the uninstallability counters before and after the actions to decide if the update was successful or not. """ selected = [] if actions: upgrade_me = actions[:] else: upgrade_me = self.upgrade_me[:] nuninst_start = self.nuninst_orig # these are special parameters for hints processing undo = False force = False earlyabort = False if maxdepth == "easy" or maxdepth < 0: force = maxdepth < 0 earlyabort = True maxdepth = 0 # if we have a list of initial packages, check them if init: self.output_write("leading: %s\n" % (",".join(init))) for x in init: if x not in upgrade_me: self.output_write("failed: %s\n" % (x)) return None selected.append(x) upgrade_me.remove(x) self.output_write("start: %s\n" % self.eval_nuninst(nuninst_start)) if not force: self.output_write("orig: %s\n" % self.eval_nuninst(nuninst_start)) if earlyabort: extra = upgrade_me[:] (nuninst_end, extra, lundo) = self.iter_packages(init, selected, hint=True) undo = True if force: self.output_write("orig: %s\n" % self.eval_nuninst(nuninst_end)) self.output_write("easy: %s\n" % (self.eval_nuninst(nuninst_end))) if not force: self.output_write(self.eval_uninst(self.newlyuninst(nuninst_start, nuninst_end)) + "\n") if not force and not self.is_nuninst_asgood_generous(self.nuninst_orig, nuninst_end): nuninst_end, extra = None, None else: lundo = [] if init: (nuninst_end, extra, tundo) = self.iter_packages(init, selected, hint=True) lundo.extend(tundo) undo = True else: nuninst_end = None (nuninst_end, extra, tundo) = self.iter_packages(upgrade_me, selected, nuninst=nuninst_end) lundo.extend(tundo) if not self.is_nuninst_asgood_generous(self.nuninst_orig, nuninst_end): nuninst_end, extra = None, None if nuninst_end: if not force and not earlyabort: self.output_write("Apparently successful\n") self.output_write("final: %s\n" % ",".join(sorted(selected))) self.output_write("start: %s\n" % self.eval_nuninst(nuninst_start)) if not force: self.output_write(" orig: %s\n" % self.eval_nuninst(self.nuninst_orig)) else: self.output_write(" orig: %s\n" % self.eval_nuninst(nuninst_end)) self.output_write(" end: %s\n" % self.eval_nuninst(nuninst_end)) if force: self.output_write("force breaks:\n") self.output_write(self.eval_uninst(self.newlyuninst(nuninst_start, nuninst_end)) + "\n") self.output_write("SUCCESS (%d/%d)\n" % (len(actions or self.upgrade_me), len(extra))) self.nuninst_orig = nuninst_end if not actions: if not earlyabort: self.upgrade_me = sorted(extra) else: self.upgrade_me = [x for x in self.upgrade_me if x not in selected] if not self.options.compatible: self.sort_actions() else: self.output_write("FAILED\n") if not undo: return # undo all the changes for (undo, pkg, pkg_name, suite) in lundo: # undo the changes (source) for k in undo['sources'].keys(): if k[0] == '-': del self.sources['testing'][k[1:]] else: self.sources['testing'][k] = undo['sources'][k] for (undo, pkg, pkg_name, suite) in lundo: # undo the changes (new binaries) if pkg[0] != '-' and pkg_name in self.sources[suite]: for p in self.sources[suite][pkg_name][BINARIES]: binary, arch = p.split("/") if '/' not in pkg or pkg.endswith("/%s" % (arch)) or pkg.endswith("/%s_tpu" % (arch)) or pkg.endswith("/%s_pu" % (arch)): del self.binaries['testing'][arch][0][binary] self.systems[arch].remove_binary(binary) for (undo, pkg, pkg_name, suite) in lundo: # undo the changes (binaries) for p in undo['binaries'].keys(): binary, arch = p.split("/") if binary[0] == "-": del self.binaries['testing'][arch][0][binary[1:]] self.systems[arch].remove_binary(binary[1:]) else: binaries = self.binaries['testing'][arch][0] binaries[binary] = undo['binaries'][p] self.systems[arch].remove_binary(binary) self.systems[arch].add_binary(binary, binaries[binary][:PROVIDES] + \ [", ".join(binaries[binary][PROVIDES]) or None]) for (undo, pkg, pkg_name, suite) in lundo: # undo the changes (virtual packages) for p in undo['nvirtual']: j, arch = p.split("/") del self.binaries['testing'][arch][1][j] for p in undo['virtual']: j, arch = p.split("/") if j[0] == '-': del self.binaries['testing'][arch][1][j[1:]] else: self.binaries['testing'][arch][1][j] = undo['virtual'][p] def upgrade_testing(self): """Upgrade testing using the unstable packages This method tries to upgrade testing using the packages from unstable. Before running the do_all method, it tries the easy and force-hint commands. """ self.__log("Starting the upgrade test", type="I") self.output_write("Generated on: %s\n" % (time.strftime("%Y.%m.%d %H:%M:%S %z", time.gmtime(time.time())))) self.output_write("Arch order is: %s\n" % ", ".join(self.options.architectures)) self.__log("> Calculating current uninstallability counters", type="I") self.nuninst_orig = self.get_nuninst() # nuninst_orig may get updated during the upgrade process self.nuninst_orig_save = self.get_nuninst() if not self.options.actions: # process `easy' hints for x in self.hints['easy']: self.do_hint("easy", x[0], x[1]) # process `force-hint' hints for x in self.hints["force-hint"]: self.do_hint("force-hint", x[0], x[1]) # run the first round of the upgrade self.__log("> First loop on the packages with depth = 0", type="I") # separate runs for break arches allpackages = [] normpackages = self.upgrade_me[:] archpackages = {} for a in self.options.break_arches.split(): archpackages[a] = [p for p in normpackages if p.endswith("/" + a) or p.endswith("/" + a + "_tpu") or p.endswith("/" + a + "_pu")] normpackages = [p for p in normpackages if p not in archpackages[a]] self.upgrade_me = normpackages self.output_write("info: main run\n") self.do_all() allpackages += self.upgrade_me for a in self.options.break_arches.split(): backup = self.options.break_arches self.options.break_arches = " ".join([x for x in self.options.break_arches.split() if x != a]) self.upgrade_me = archpackages[a] self.output_write("info: broken arch run for %s\n" % (a)) self.do_all() allpackages += self.upgrade_me self.options.break_arches = backup self.upgrade_me = allpackages if self.options.actions: self.printuninstchange() return # process `hint' hints hintcnt = 0 for x in self.hints["hint"][:50]: if hintcnt > 50: self.output_write("Skipping remaining hints...") break if self.do_hint("hint", x[0], x[1]): hintcnt += 1 # run the auto hinter if not self.options.compatible or self.options.autohinter: self.auto_hinter() # smooth updates if not self.options.compatible and len(self.options.smooth_updates) > 0: self.__log("> Removing old packages left in testing from smooth updates", type="I") removals = self.old_libraries() if len(removals) > 0: self.output_write("Removing packages left in testing for smooth updates (%d):\n%s" % \ (len(removals), self.old_libraries_format(removals))) self.do_all(actions=removals) removals = self.old_libraries() else: removals = () if not self.options.compatible: self.output_write("List of old libraries in testing (%d):\n%s" % \ (len(removals), self.old_libraries_format(removals))) # output files if not self.options.dry_run: # re-write control files if self.options.control_files: self.write_controlfiles(self.options.testing, 'testing') # write dates self.write_dates(self.options.testing, self.dates) # write HeidiResult self.write_heidi(self.options.heidi_output) self.printuninstchange() self.__log("Test completed!", type="I") def printuninstchange(self): self.__log("Checking for newly uninstallable packages", type="I") text = self.eval_uninst(self.newlyuninst( self.nuninst_orig_save, self.nuninst_orig)) if text != '': self.output_write("\nNewly uninstallable packages in testing:\n%s" % \ (text)) def generate_package_list(self): # list of local methods and variables (for better performance) sources = self.sources architectures = self.options.architectures should_remove_source = self.should_remove_source should_upgrade_srcarch = self.should_upgrade_srcarch should_upgrade_src = self.should_upgrade_src # this list will contain the packages which are valid candidates; # if a package is going to be removed, it will have a "-" prefix upgrade_me = [] # for every source package in testing, check if it should be removed for pkg in sources['testing']: if should_remove_source(pkg): upgrade_me.append("-" + pkg) # for every source package in unstable check if it should be upgraded for pkg in sources['unstable']: if sources['unstable'][pkg][FAKESRC]: continue # if the source package is already present in testing, # check if it should be upgraded for every binary package if pkg in sources['testing'] and not sources['testing'][pkg][FAKESRC]: for arch in architectures: if should_upgrade_srcarch(pkg, arch, 'unstable'): upgrade_me.append("%s/%s/%s" % (pkg, arch, sources['unstable'][pkg][VERSION])) # check if the source package should be upgraded if should_upgrade_src(pkg, 'unstable'): upgrade_me.append("%s/%s" % (pkg, sources['unstable'][pkg][VERSION])) # for every source package in *-proposed-updates, check if it should be upgraded for suite in ['pu', 'tpu']: for pkg in sources[suite]: # if the source package is already present in testing, # check if it should be upgraded for every binary package if pkg in sources['testing']: for arch in architectures: if should_upgrade_srcarch(pkg, arch, suite): upgrade_me.append("%s/%s_%s" % (pkg, arch, suite)) # check if the source package should be upgraded if should_upgrade_src(pkg, suite): upgrade_me.append("%s_%s" % (pkg, suite)) return upgrade_me def hint_tester(self): """Run a command line interface to test hints This method provides a command line interface for the release team to try hints and evaluate the results. """ self.__log("> Calculating current uninstallability counters", type="I") self.nuninst_orig = self.get_nuninst() self.nuninst_orig_save = self.get_nuninst() import readline from completer import Completer histfile = os.path.expanduser('~/.britney2_history') if os.path.exists(histfile): readline.read_history_file(histfile) readline.parse_and_bind('tab: complete') readline.set_completer(Completer(self).completer) # Package names can contain "-" and we use "/" in our presentation of them as well, # so ensure readline does not split on these characters. readline.set_completer_delims(readline.get_completer_delims().replace('-', '').replace('/', '')) while True: # read the command from the command line try: input = raw_input('britney> ').lower().split() except EOFError: print "" break except KeyboardInterrupt: print "" continue # quit the hint tester if input and input[0] in ('quit', 'exit'): break # run a hint elif input and input[0] in ('easy', 'hint', 'force-hint'): try: self.do_hint(input[0], 'hint-tester', [k.rsplit("/", 1) for k in input[1:] if "/" in k]) self.printuninstchange() except KeyboardInterrupt: continue try: readline.write_history_file(histfile) except IOError, e: self.__log("Could not write %s: %s" % (histfile, e), type="W") def do_hint(self, type, who, pkgvers): """Process hints This method process `easy`, `hint` and `force-hint` hints. If the requested version is not in unstable, then the hint is skipped. """ hintinfo = {"easy": "easy", "hint": 0, "force-hint": -1,} self.__log("> Processing '%s' hint from %s" % (type, who), type="I") self.output_write("Trying %s from %s: %s\n" % (type, who, " ".join( ["%s/%s" % (p,v) for (p,v) in pkgvers]))) ok = True # loop on the requested packages and versions for pkg, v in pkgvers: # remove architecture if "/" in pkg: pkg = pkg[:pkg.find("/")] # skip removal requests if pkg[0] == "-": continue # handle *-proposed-updates elif pkg.endswith("_tpu") or pkg.endswith("_pu"): pkg, suite = pkg.rsplit("_") if pkg not in self.sources[suite]: continue if apt_pkg.VersionCompare(self.sources[suite][pkg][VERSION], v) != 0: self.output_write(" Version mismatch, %s %s != %s\n" % (pkg, v, self.sources[suite][pkg][VERSION])) ok = False # does the package exist in unstable? elif pkg not in self.sources['unstable']: self.output_write(" Source %s has no version in unstable\n" % pkg) ok = False elif apt_pkg.VersionCompare(self.sources['unstable'][pkg][VERSION], v) != 0: self.output_write(" Version mismatch, %s %s != %s\n" % (pkg, v, self.sources['unstable'][pkg][VERSION])) ok = False if not ok: self.output_write("Not using hint\n") return False self.do_all(hintinfo[type], map(operator.itemgetter(0), pkgvers)) return True def sort_actions(self): """Sort actions in a smart way This method sorts the list of actions in a smart way. In detail, it uses as the base sort the number of days the excuse is old, then reorders packages so the ones with most reverse dependencies are at the end of the loop. If an action depends on another one, it is put after it. """ upgrade_me = [x.name for x in self.excuses if x.name in self.upgrade_me] for e in self.excuses: if e.name not in upgrade_me: continue # try removes at the end of the loop elif e.name[0] == '-': upgrade_me.remove(e.name) upgrade_me.append(e.name) # otherwise, put it in a good position checking its dependencies else: pos = [] udeps = [upgrade_me.index(x) for x in e.deps if x in upgrade_me and x != e.name] if len(udeps) > 0: pos.append(max(udeps)) sdeps = [upgrade_me.index(x) for x in e.sane_deps if x in upgrade_me and x != e.name] if len(sdeps) > 0: pos.append(min(sdeps)) if len(pos) == 0: continue upgrade_me.remove(e.name) upgrade_me.insert(max(pos)+1, e.name) self.dependencies[e.name] = e.deps # replace the list of actions with the new one self.upgrade_me = upgrade_me def auto_hinter(self): """Auto-generate "easy" hints. This method attempts to generate "easy" hints for sets of packages which must migrate together. Beginning with a package which does not depend on any other package (in terms of excuses), a list of dependencies and reverse dependencies is recursively created. Once all such lists have been generated, any which are subsets of other lists are ignored in favour of the larger lists. The remaining lists are then attempted in turn as "easy" hints. We also try to auto hint circular dependencies analyzing the update excuses relationships. If they build a circular dependency, which we already know as not-working with the standard do_all algorithm, try to `easy` them. """ self.__log("> Processing hints from the auto hinter", type="I") # consider only excuses which are valid candidates excuses = dict([(x.name, x) for x in self.excuses if x.name in self.upgrade_me]) def find_related(e, hint, circular_first=False): if e not in excuses: return False excuse = excuses[e] if e in self.sources['testing'] and self.sources['testing'][e][VERSION] == excuse.ver[1]: return True if not circular_first: hint[e] = excuse.ver[1] if len(excuse.deps) == 0: return hint for p in excuse.deps: if p in hint: continue if not find_related(p, hint): return False return hint # loop on them candidates = [] mincands = [] for e in excuses: excuse = excuses[e] if e in self.sources['testing'] and self.sources['testing'][e][VERSION] == excuse.ver[1]: continue if len(excuse.deps) > 0: hint = find_related(e, {}, True) if isinstance(hint, dict) and e in hint and hint not in candidates: candidates.append(hint.items()) else: items = [ (e, excuse.ver[1]) ] looped = False for item, ver in items: # excuses which depend on "item" or are depended on by it items.extend( [ (x, excuses[x].ver[1]) for x in excuses if \ (item in excuses[x].deps or x in excuses[item].deps) \ and (x, excuses[x].ver[1]) not in items ] ) if not looped and len(items) > 1: mincands.append(items[:]) looped = True if len(items) > 1: candidates.append(items) for l in [ candidates, mincands ]: to_skip = [] for i in range(len(l)): for j in range(i+1, len(l)): if i in to_skip or j in to_skip: # we already know this list isn't interesting continue elif frozenset(l[i]) >= frozenset(l[j]): # j is a subset of i; ignore it to_skip.append(j) elif frozenset(l[i]) <= frozenset(l[j]): # i is a subset of j; ignore it to_skip.append(i) for i in range(len(l)): if i not in to_skip: self.do_hint("easy", "autohinter", l[i]) def old_libraries(self): """Detect old libraries left in testing for smooth transitions This method detects old libraries which are in testing but no longer built from the source package: they are still there because other packages still depend on them, but they should be removed as soon as possible. """ sources = self.sources['testing'] testing = self.binaries['testing'] unstable = self.binaries['unstable'] removals = [] for arch in self.options.architectures: for pkg_name in testing[arch][0]: pkg = testing[arch][0][pkg_name] if pkg_name not in unstable[arch][0] and \ not self.same_source(sources[pkg[SOURCE]][VERSION], pkg[SOURCEVER]): removals.append("-" + pkg_name + "/" + arch) return removals def old_libraries_format(self, libs): """Format old libraries in a smart table""" libraries = {} for i in libs: pkg, arch = i.split("/") pkg = pkg[1:] if pkg in libraries: libraries[pkg].append(arch) else: libraries[pkg] = [arch] return "\n".join([" " + k + ": " + " ".join(libraries[k]) for k in libraries]) + "\n" def nuninst_arch_report(self, nuninst, arch): """Print a report of uninstallable packages for one architecture.""" all = {} for p in nuninst[arch]: pkg = self.binaries['testing'][arch][0][p] all.setdefault((pkg[SOURCE], pkg[SOURCEVER]), set()).add(p) print '* %s' % (arch,) for (src, ver), pkgs in sorted(all.items()): print ' %s (%s): %s' % (src, ver, ' '.join(sorted(pkgs))) print def output_write(self, msg): """Simple wrapper for output writing""" print msg, self.__output.write(msg) def main(self): """Main method This is the entry point for the class: it includes the list of calls for the member methods which will produce the output files. """ # if running in --print-uninst mode, quit if self.options.print_uninst: return # if no actions are provided, build the excuses and sort them elif not self.options.actions: self.write_excuses() if not self.options.compatible: self.sort_actions() # otherwise, use the actions provided by the command line else: self.upgrade_me = self.options.actions.split() self.__output = open(self.options.upgrade_output, 'w') # run the hint tester if self.options.hint_tester: self.hint_tester() # run the upgrade test else: self.upgrade_testing() self.__output.close() if __name__ == '__main__': Britney().main()