#!/usr/bin/python2.7 -u # -*- coding: utf-8 -*- # Copyright (C) 2001-2008 Anthony Towns # Andreas Barth # Fabio Tranchitella # Copyright (C) 2010-2013 Adam D. Barratt # This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify # it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by # the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or # (at your option) any later version. # This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, # but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of # MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the # GNU General Public License for more details. """ = Introdution = This is the Debian testing updater script, also known as "Britney". Packages are usually installed into the `testing' distribution after they have undergone some degree of testing in unstable. The goal of this software is to do this task in a smart way, allowing testing to always be fully installable and close to being a release candidate. Britney's source code is split between two different but related tasks: the first one is the generation of the update excuses, while the second tries to update testing with the valid candidates; first each package alone, then larger and even larger sets of packages together. Each try is accepted if testing is not more uninstallable after the update than before. = Data Loading = In order to analyze the entire Debian distribution, Britney needs to load in memory the whole archive: this means more than 10.000 packages for twelve architectures, as well as the dependency interconnections between them. For this reason, the memory requirements for running this software are quite high and at least 1 gigabyte of RAM should be available. Britney loads the source packages from the `Sources' file and the binary packages from the `Packages_${arch}' files, where ${arch} is substituted with the supported architectures. While loading the data, the software analyzes the dependencies and builds a directed weighted graph in memory with all the interconnections between the packages (see Britney.read_sources and Britney.read_binaries). Other than source and binary packages, Britney loads the following data: * BugsV, which contains the list of release-critical bugs for a given version of a source or binary package (see Britney.read_bugs). * Dates, which contains the date of the upload of a given version of a source package (see Britney.read_dates). * Urgencies, which contains the urgency of the upload of a given version of a source package (see Britney.read_urgencies). * Hints, which contains lists of commands which modify the standard behaviour of Britney (see Britney.read_hints). For a more detailed explanation about the format of these files, please read the documentation of the related methods. The exact meaning of them will be instead explained in the chapter "Excuses Generation". = Excuses = An excuse is a detailed explanation of why a package can or cannot be updated in the testing distribution from a newer package in another distribution (like for example unstable). The main purpose of the excuses is to be written in an HTML file which will be published over HTTP. The maintainers will be able to parse it manually or automatically to find the explanation of why their packages have been updated or not. == Excuses generation == These are the steps (with references to method names) that Britney does for the generation of the update excuses. * If a source package is available in testing but it is not present in unstable and no binary packages in unstable are built from it, then it is marked for removal. * Every source package in unstable and testing-proposed-updates, if already present in testing, is checked for binary-NMUs, new or dropped binary packages in all the supported architectures (see Britney.should_upgrade_srcarch). The steps to detect if an upgrade is needed are: 1. If there is a `remove' hint for the source package, the package is ignored: it will be removed and not updated. 2. For every binary package built from the new source, it checks for unsatisfied dependencies, new binary packages and updated binary packages (binNMU), excluding the architecture-independent ones, and packages not built from the same source. 3. For every binary package built from the old source, it checks if it is still built from the new source; if this is not true and the package is not architecture-independent, the script removes it from testing. 4. Finally, if there is something worth doing (eg. a new or updated binary package) and nothing wrong it marks the source package as "Valid candidate", or "Not considered" if there is something wrong which prevented the update. * Every source package in unstable and testing-proposed-updates is checked for upgrade (see Britney.should_upgrade_src). The steps to detect if an upgrade is needed are: 1. If the source package in testing is more recent the new one is ignored. 2. If the source package doesn't exist (is fake), which means that a binary package refers to it but it is not present in the `Sources' file, the new one is ignored. 3. If the package doesn't exist in testing, the urgency of the upload is ignored and set to the default (actually `low'). 4. If there is a `remove' hint for the source package, the package is ignored: it will be removed and not updated. 5. If there is a `block' hint for the source package without an `unblock` hint or a `block-all source`, the package is ignored. 6. If there is a `block-udeb' hint for the source package, it will have the same effect as `block', but may only be cancelled by a subsequent `unblock-udeb' hint. 7. If the suite is unstable, the update can go ahead only if the upload happened more than the minimum days specified by the urgency of the upload; if this is not true, the package is ignored as `too-young'. Note that the urgency is sticky, meaning that the highest urgency uploaded since the previous testing transition is taken into account. 8. If the suite is unstable, all the architecture-dependent binary packages and the architecture-independent ones for the `nobreakall' architectures have to be built from the source we are considering. If this is not true, then these are called `out-of-date' architectures and the package is ignored. 9. The source package must have at least one binary package, otherwise it is ignored. 10. If the suite is unstable, the new source package must have no release critical bugs which do not also apply to the testing one. If this is not true, the package is ignored as `buggy'. 11. If there is a `force' hint for the source package, then it is updated even if it is marked as ignored from the previous steps. 12. If the suite is {testing-,}proposed-updates, the source package can be updated only if there is an explicit approval for it. Unless a `force' hint exists, the new package must also be available on all of the architectures for which it has binary packages in testing. 13. If the package will be ignored, mark it as "Valid candidate", otherwise mark it as "Not considered". * The list of `remove' hints is processed: if the requested source package is not already being updated or removed and the version actually in testing is the same specified with the `remove' hint, it is marked for removal. * The excuses are sorted by the number of days from the last upload (days-old) and by name. * A list of unconsidered excuses (for which the package is not upgraded) is built. Using this list, all of the excuses depending on them are marked as invalid "impossible dependencies". * The excuses are written in an HTML file. """ import os import sys import string import time import optparse import urllib import apt_pkg from functools import reduce, partial from itertools import chain, ifilter, product from operator import attrgetter if __name__ == '__main__': # Check if there is a python-search dir for this version of # python. If so, use the britney module for that. mdir = os.path.dirname(sys.argv[0]) if sys.version_info[0] == 3: python_dir = "python3" else: python_dir = "python2.%d" % (sys.version_info[1]) idir = os.path.join(mdir, python_dir) if os.path.isdir(idir): print "N: Loading from %s" % python_dir # Insert in front (else current dir is before it, which makes # it useless). sys.path.insert(0, idir) from installability.builder import InstallabilityTesterBuilder from excuse import Excuse from migrationitem import MigrationItem from hints import HintCollection from britney_util import (old_libraries_format, same_source, undo_changes, register_reverses, compute_reverse_tree, read_nuninst, write_nuninst, write_heidi, eval_uninst, newly_uninst, make_migrationitem, write_excuses, write_heidi_delta, write_controlfiles, old_libraries) from consts import (VERSION, SECTION, BINARIES, MAINTAINER, FAKESRC, SOURCE, SOURCEVER, ARCHITECTURE, DEPENDS, CONFLICTS, PROVIDES, RDEPENDS, RCONFLICTS, MULTIARCH, ESSENTIAL) __author__ = 'Fabio Tranchitella and the Debian Release Team' __version__ = '2.0' class Britney(object): """Britney, the Debian testing updater script This is the script that updates the testing distribution. It is executed each day after the installation of the updated packages. It generates the `Packages' files for the testing distribution, but it does so in an intelligent manner; it tries to avoid any inconsistency and to use only non-buggy packages. For more documentation on this script, please read the Developers Reference. """ HINTS_HELPERS = ("easy", "hint", "remove", "block", "block-udeb", "unblock", "unblock-udeb", "approve") HINTS_STANDARD = ("urgent", "age-days") + HINTS_HELPERS HINTS_ALL = ("force", "force-hint", "block-all") + HINTS_STANDARD def __init__(self): """Class constructor This method initializes and populates the data lists, which contain all the information needed by the other methods of the class. """ # britney's "day" begins at 3pm self.date_now = int(((time.time() / (60*60)) - 15) / 24) # parse the command line arguments self.__parse_arguments() MigrationItem.set_architectures(self.options.architectures) # initialize the apt_pkg back-end apt_pkg.init() self.sources = {} self.binaries = {} self.all_selected = [] try: self.hints = self.read_hints(self.options.hintsdir) except AttributeError: self.hints = self.read_hints(self.options.unstable) if self.options.nuninst_cache: self.__log("Not building the list of non-installable packages, as requested", type="I") if self.options.print_uninst: print '* summary' print '\n'.join(map(lambda x: '%4d %s' % (len(nuninst[x]), x), self.options.architectures)) return # read the source and binary packages for the involved distributions if 'testing' not in self.sources: self.sources['testing'] = self.read_sources(self.options.testing) self.sources['unstable'] = self.read_sources(self.options.unstable) self.sources['tpu'] = self.read_sources(self.options.tpu) if hasattr(self.options, 'pu'): self.sources['pu'] = self.read_sources(self.options.pu) else: self.sources['pu'] = {} if 'testing' not in self.binaries: self.binaries['testing'] = {} self.binaries['unstable'] = {} self.binaries['tpu'] = {} self.binaries['pu'] = {} for arch in self.options.architectures: if arch not in self.binaries['testing']: self.binaries['testing'][arch] = self.read_binaries(self.options.testing, "testing", arch) self.binaries['unstable'][arch] = self.read_binaries(self.options.unstable, "unstable", arch) self.binaries['tpu'][arch] = self.read_binaries(self.options.tpu, "tpu", arch) if hasattr(self.options, 'pu'): self.binaries['pu'][arch] = self.read_binaries(self.options.pu, "pu", arch) else: # _build_installability_tester relies it being # properly initialised, so insert two empty dicts # here. self.binaries['pu'][arch] = ({}, {}) self._build_installability_tester(self.options.architectures) if not self.options.nuninst_cache: self.__log("Building the list of non-installable packages for the full archive", type="I") nuninst = {} self._inst_tester.compute_testing_installability() for arch in self.options.architectures: self.__log("> Checking for non-installable packages for architecture %s" % arch, type="I") result = self.get_nuninst(arch, build=True) nuninst.update(result) self.__log("> Found %d non-installable packages" % len(nuninst[arch]), type="I") if self.options.print_uninst: self.nuninst_arch_report(nuninst, arch) if self.options.print_uninst: print '* summary' print '\n'.join(map(lambda x: '%4d %s' % (len(nuninst[x]), x), self.options.architectures)) return else: write_nuninst(self.options.noninst_status, nuninst) # read the release-critical bug summaries for testing and unstable self.bugs = {'unstable': self.read_bugs(self.options.unstable), 'testing': self.read_bugs(self.options.testing),} self.normalize_bugs() # read additional data self.dates = self.read_dates(self.options.testing) self.urgencies = self.read_urgencies(self.options.testing) self.excuses = [] self.dependencies = {} def __parse_arguments(self): """Parse the command line arguments This method parses and initializes the command line arguments. While doing so, it preprocesses some of the options to be converted in a suitable form for the other methods of the class. """ # initialize the parser parser = optparse.OptionParser(version="%prog") parser.add_option("-v", "", action="count", dest="verbose", help="enable verbose output") parser.add_option("-c", "--config", action="store", dest="config", default="/etc/britney.conf", help="path for the configuration file") parser.add_option("", "--architectures", action="store", dest="architectures", default=None, help="override architectures from configuration file") parser.add_option("", "--actions", action="store", dest="actions", default=None, help="override the list of actions to be performed") parser.add_option("", "--hints", action="store", dest="hints", default=None, help="additional hints, separated by semicolons") parser.add_option("", "--hint-tester", action="store_true", dest="hint_tester", default=None, help="provide a command line interface to test hints") parser.add_option("", "--dry-run", action="store_true", dest="dry_run", default=False, help="disable all outputs to the testing directory") parser.add_option("", "--control-files", action="store_true", dest="control_files", default=False, help="enable control files generation") parser.add_option("", "--nuninst-cache", action="store_true", dest="nuninst_cache", default=False, help="do not build the non-installability status, use the cache from file") parser.add_option("", "--print-uninst", action="store_true", dest="print_uninst", default=False, help="just print a summary of uninstallable packages") (self.options, self.args) = parser.parse_args() # integrity checks if self.options.nuninst_cache and self.options.print_uninst: self.__log("nuninst_cache and print_uninst are mutually exclusive!", type="E") sys.exit(1) # if the configuration file exists, than read it and set the additional options elif not os.path.isfile(self.options.config): self.__log("Unable to read the configuration file (%s), exiting!" % self.options.config, type="E") sys.exit(1) # minimum days for unstable-testing transition and the list of hints # are handled as an ad-hoc case self.MINDAYS = {} self.HINTS = {'command-line': self.HINTS_ALL} for k, v in [map(string.strip,r.split('=', 1)) for r in file(self.options.config) if '=' in r and not r.strip().startswith('#')]: if k.startswith("MINDAYS_"): self.MINDAYS[k.split("_")[1].lower()] = int(v) elif k.startswith("HINTS_"): self.HINTS[k.split("_")[1].lower()] = \ reduce(lambda x,y: x+y, [hasattr(self, "HINTS_" + i) and getattr(self, "HINTS_" + i) or (i,) for i in v.split()]) elif not hasattr(self.options, k.lower()) or \ not getattr(self.options, k.lower()): setattr(self.options, k.lower(), v) if not hasattr(self.options, "heidi_delta_output"): self.options.heidi_delta_output = self.options.heidi_output + "Delta" # Sort the architecture list allarches = sorted(self.options.architectures.split()) arches = [x for x in allarches if x in self.options.nobreakall_arches.split()] arches += [x for x in allarches if x not in arches and x not in self.options.fucked_arches.split()] arches += [x for x in allarches if x not in arches and x not in self.options.break_arches.split()] arches += [x for x in allarches if x not in arches and x not in self.options.new_arches.split()] arches += [x for x in allarches if x not in arches] self.options.architectures = map(intern, arches) self.options.smooth_updates = self.options.smooth_updates.split() def __log(self, msg, type="I"): """Print info messages according to verbosity level An easy-and-simple log method which prints messages to the standard output. The type parameter controls the urgency of the message, and can be equal to `I' for `Information', `W' for `Warning' and `E' for `Error'. Warnings and errors are always printed, and information is printed only if verbose logging is enabled. """ if self.options.verbose or type in ("E", "W"): print "%s: [%s] - %s" % (type, time.asctime(), msg) def _build_installability_tester(self, archs): """Create the installability tester""" solvers = self.get_dependency_solvers binaries = self.binaries builder = InstallabilityTesterBuilder() for (dist, arch) in product(binaries, archs): testing = (dist == 'testing') for pkgname in binaries[dist][arch][0]: pkgdata = binaries[dist][arch][0][pkgname] version = pkgdata[VERSION] t = (pkgname, version, arch) essential = pkgdata[ESSENTIAL] if not builder.add_binary(t, essential=essential, in_testing=testing): continue depends = [] conflicts = [] possible_dep_ranges = {} # We do not differ between depends and pre-depends if pkgdata[DEPENDS]: depends.extend(apt_pkg.parse_depends(pkgdata[DEPENDS], False)) if pkgdata[CONFLICTS]: conflicts = apt_pkg.parse_depends(pkgdata[CONFLICTS], False) with builder.relation_builder(t) as relations: for (al, dep) in [(depends, True), \ (conflicts, False)]: for block in al: sat = set() for dep_dist in binaries: (_, pkgs) = solvers(block, arch, dep_dist) for p in pkgs: # version and arch is already interned, but solvers use # the package name extracted from the field and is therefore # not interned. pdata = binaries[dep_dist][arch][0][p] pt = (intern(p), pdata[VERSION], arch) if dep: sat.add(pt) elif t != pt: # if t satisfies its own # conflicts relation, then it # is using §7.6.2 relations.add_breaks(pt) if dep: if len(block) != 1: relations.add_dependency_clause(sat) else: # This dependency might be a part # of a version-range a la: # # Depends: pkg-a (>= 1), # pkg-a (<< 2~) # # In such a case we want to reduce # that to a single clause for # efficiency. # # In theory, it could also happen # with "non-minimal" dependencies # a la: # # Depends: pkg-a, pkg-a (>= 1) # # But dpkg is known to fix that up # at build time, so we will # probably only see "ranges" here. key = block[0][0] if key in possible_dep_ranges: possible_dep_ranges[key] &= sat else: possible_dep_ranges[key] = sat if dep: for clause in possible_dep_ranges.itervalues(): relations.add_dependency_clause(clause) self._inst_tester = builder.build() # Data reading/writing methods # ---------------------------- def read_sources(self, basedir, intern=intern): """Read the list of source packages from the specified directory The source packages are read from the `Sources' file within the directory specified as `basedir' parameter. Considering the large amount of memory needed, not all the fields are loaded in memory. The available fields are Version, Maintainer and Section. The method returns a list where every item represents a source package as a dictionary. """ sources = {} filename = os.path.join(basedir, "Sources") self.__log("Loading source packages from %s" % filename) Packages = apt_pkg.TagFile(open(filename)) get_field = Packages.section.get step = Packages.step while step(): if get_field('Extra-Source-Only', 'no') == 'yes': # Ignore sources only referenced by Built-Using continue pkg = get_field('Package') ver = get_field('Version') # There may be multiple versions of the source package # (in unstable) if some architectures have out-of-date # binaries. We only ever consider the source with the # largest version for migration. if pkg in sources and apt_pkg.version_compare(sources[pkg][0], ver) > 0: continue sources[intern(pkg)] = [intern(ver), intern(get_field('Section')), [], get_field('Maintainer'), False, ] return sources def read_binaries(self, basedir, distribution, arch, intern=intern): """Read the list of binary packages from the specified directory The binary packages are read from the `Packages_${arch}' files within the directory specified as `basedir' parameter, replacing ${arch} with the value of the arch parameter. Considering the large amount of memory needed, not all the fields are loaded in memory. The available fields are Version, Source, Multi-Arch, Depends, Conflicts, Provides and Architecture. After reading the packages, reverse dependencies are computed and saved in the `rdepends' keys, and the `Provides' field is used to populate the virtual packages list. The dependencies are parsed with the apt_pkg.parse_depends method, and they are stored both as the format of its return value and text. The method returns a tuple. The first element is a list where every item represents a binary package as a dictionary; the second element is a dictionary which maps virtual packages to real packages that provide them. """ packages = {} provides = {} sources = self.sources filename = os.path.join(basedir, "Packages_%s" % arch) self.__log("Loading binary packages from %s" % filename) Packages = apt_pkg.TagFile(open(filename)) get_field = Packages.section.get step = Packages.step while step(): pkg = get_field('Package') version = get_field('Version') # There may be multiple versions of any arch:all packages # (in unstable) if some architectures have out-of-date # binaries. We only ever consider the package with the # largest version for migration. if pkg in packages and apt_pkg.version_compare(packages[pkg][0], version) > 0: continue pkg = intern(pkg) version = intern(version) # Merge Pre-Depends with Depends and Conflicts with # Breaks. Britney is not interested in the "finer # semantical differences" of these fields anyway. pdeps = get_field('Pre-Depends') deps = get_field('Depends') if deps and pdeps: deps = pdeps + ', ' + deps elif pdeps: deps = pdeps ess = False if get_field('Essential', 'no') == 'yes': ess = True final_conflicts_list = [] conflicts = get_field('Conflicts') if conflicts: final_conflicts_list.append(conflicts) breaks = get_field('Breaks') if breaks: final_conflicts_list.append(breaks) dpkg = [version, intern(get_field('Section')), pkg, version, intern(get_field('Architecture')), get_field('Multi-Arch'), deps, ', '.join(final_conflicts_list) or None, get_field('Provides'), [], [], ess, ] # retrieve the name and the version of the source package source = get_field('Source') if source: dpkg[SOURCE] = intern(source.split(" ")[0]) if "(" in source: dpkg[SOURCEVER] = intern(source[source.find("(")+1:source.find(")")]) pkgarch = "%s/%s" % (pkg,arch) # if the source package is available in the distribution, then register this binary package if dpkg[SOURCE] in sources[distribution]: # There may be multiple versions of any arch:all packages # (in unstable) if some architectures have out-of-date # binaries. We only want to include the package in the # source -> binary mapping once. It doesn't matter which # of the versions we include as only the package name and # architecture are recorded. if pkgarch not in sources[distribution][dpkg[SOURCE]][BINARIES]: sources[distribution][dpkg[SOURCE]][BINARIES].append(pkgarch) # if the source package doesn't exist, create a fake one else: sources[distribution][dpkg[SOURCE]] = [dpkg[SOURCEVER], 'faux', [pkgarch], None, True] # register virtual packages and real packages that provide them if dpkg[PROVIDES]: parts = map(string.strip, dpkg[PROVIDES].split(",")) for p in parts: if p not in provides: provides[p] = [] provides[p].append(pkg) dpkg[PROVIDES] = parts else: dpkg[PROVIDES] = [] # add the resulting dictionary to the package list packages[pkg] = dpkg # loop again on the list of packages to register reverse dependencies and conflicts register_reverses(packages, provides, check_doubles=False) # return a tuple with the list of real and virtual packages return (packages, provides) def read_bugs(self, basedir): """Read the release critial bug summary from the specified directory The RC bug summaries are read from the `BugsV' file within the directory specified in the `basedir' parameter. The file contains rows with the format: [,...] The method returns a dictionary where the key is the binary package name and the value is the list of open RC bugs for it. """ bugs = {} filename = os.path.join(basedir, "BugsV") self.__log("Loading RC bugs data from %s" % filename) for line in open(filename): l = line.split() if len(l) != 2: self.__log("Malformed line found in line %s" % (line), type='W') continue pkg = l[0] bugs.setdefault(pkg, []) bugs[pkg] += l[1].split(",") return bugs def __maxver(self, pkg, dist): """Return the maximum version for a given package name This method returns None if the specified source package is not available in the `dist' distribution. If the package exists, then it returns the maximum version between the source package and its binary packages. """ maxver = None if pkg in self.sources[dist]: maxver = self.sources[dist][pkg][VERSION] for arch in self.options.architectures: if pkg not in self.binaries[dist][arch][0]: continue pkgv = self.binaries[dist][arch][0][pkg][VERSION] if maxver == None or apt_pkg.version_compare(pkgv, maxver) > 0: maxver = pkgv return maxver def normalize_bugs(self): """Normalize the release critical bug summaries for testing and unstable The method doesn't return any value: it directly modifies the object attribute `bugs'. """ # loop on all the package names from testing and unstable bug summaries for pkg in set(chain(self.bugs['testing'], self.bugs['unstable'])): # make sure that the key is present in both dictionaries if pkg not in self.bugs['testing']: self.bugs['testing'][pkg] = [] elif pkg not in self.bugs['unstable']: self.bugs['unstable'][pkg] = [] if pkg.startswith("src:"): pkg = pkg[4:] # retrieve the maximum version of the package in testing: maxvert = self.__maxver(pkg, 'testing') # if the package is not available in testing, then reset # the list of RC bugs if maxvert == None: self.bugs['testing'][pkg] = [] def read_dates(self, basedir): """Read the upload date for the packages from the specified directory The upload dates are read from the `Dates' file within the directory specified as `basedir' parameter. The file contains rows with the format: The dates are expressed as the number of days from 1970-01-01. The method returns a dictionary where the key is the binary package name and the value is a tuple with two items, the version and the date. """ dates = {} filename = os.path.join(basedir, "Dates") self.__log("Loading upload data from %s" % filename) for line in open(filename): l = line.split() if len(l) != 3: continue try: dates[l[0]] = (l[1], int(l[2])) except ValueError: self.__log("Dates, unable to parse \"%s\"" % line, type="E") return dates def write_dates(self, basedir, dates): """Write the upload date for the packages to the specified directory For a more detailed explanation of the format, please check the method read_dates. """ filename = os.path.join(basedir, "Dates") self.__log("Writing upload data to %s" % filename) f = open(filename, 'w') for pkg in sorted(dates): f.write("%s %s %d\n" % ((pkg,) + dates[pkg])) f.close() def read_urgencies(self, basedir): """Read the upload urgency of the packages from the specified directory The upload urgencies are read from the `Urgency' file within the directory specified as `basedir' parameter. The file contains rows with the format: The method returns a dictionary where the key is the binary package name and the value is the greatest urgency from the versions of the package that are higher then the testing one. """ urgencies = {} filename = os.path.join(basedir, "Urgency") self.__log("Loading upload urgencies from %s" % filename) for line in open(filename): l = line.split() if len(l) != 3: continue # read the minimum days associated with the urgencies urgency_old = urgencies.get(l[0], None) mindays_old = self.MINDAYS.get(urgency_old, sys.maxint) mindays_new = self.MINDAYS.get(l[2], self.MINDAYS[self.options.default_urgency]) # if the new urgency is lower (so the min days are higher), do nothing if mindays_old <= mindays_new: continue # if the package exists in testing and it is more recent, do nothing tsrcv = self.sources['testing'].get(l[0], None) if tsrcv and apt_pkg.version_compare(tsrcv[VERSION], l[1]) >= 0: continue # if the package doesn't exist in unstable or it is older, do nothing usrcv = self.sources['unstable'].get(l[0], None) if not usrcv or apt_pkg.version_compare(usrcv[VERSION], l[1]) < 0: continue # update the urgency for the package urgencies[l[0]] = l[2] return urgencies def read_hints(self, basedir): """Read the hint commands from the specified directory The hint commands are read from the files contained in the `Hints' directory within the directory specified as `basedir' parameter. The names of the files have to be the same as the authorized users for the hints. The file contains rows with the format: [/] The method returns a dictionary where the key is the command, and the value is the list of affected packages. """ hints = HintCollection() for who in self.HINTS.keys(): if who == 'command-line': lines = self.options.hints and self.options.hints.split(';') or () else: filename = os.path.join(basedir, "Hints", who) if not os.path.isfile(filename): self.__log("Cannot read hints list from %s, no such file!" % filename, type="E") continue self.__log("Loading hints list from %s" % filename) lines = open(filename) for line in lines: line = line.strip() if line == "": continue l = line.split() if l[0] == 'finished': break elif l[0] not in self.HINTS[who]: continue elif len(l) == 1: # All current hints require at least one argument self.__log("Malformed hint found in %s: '%s'" % (filename, line), type="W") elif l[0] in ["approve", "block", "block-all", "block-udeb", "unblock", "unblock-udeb", "force", "urgent", "remove"]: if l[0] == 'approve': l[0] = 'unblock' for package in l[1:]: hints.add_hint('%s %s' % (l[0], package), who) elif l[0] in ["age-days"]: for package in l[2:]: hints.add_hint('%s %s %s' % (l[0], l[1], package), who) else: hints.add_hint(l, who) for x in ["block", "block-all", "block-udeb", "unblock", "unblock-udeb", "force", "urgent", "remove", "age-days"]: z = {} for hint in hints[x]: package = hint.package key = (hint, hint.user) if package in z and z[package] != key: hint2 = z[package][0] if x in ['unblock', 'unblock-udeb']: if apt_pkg.version_compare(hint2.version, hint.version) < 0: # This hint is for a newer version, so discard the old one self.__log("Overriding %s[%s] = ('%s', '%s') with ('%s', '%s')" % (x, package, hint2.version, hint2.user, hint.version, hint.user), type="W") hint2.set_active(False) else: # This hint is for an older version, so ignore it in favour of the new one self.__log("Ignoring %s[%s] = ('%s', '%s'), ('%s', '%s') is higher or equal" % (x, package, hint.version, hint.user, hint2.version, hint2.user), type="W") hint.set_active(False) else: self.__log("Overriding %s[%s] = ('%s', '%s', '%s') with ('%s', '%s', '%s')" % (x, package, hint2.version, hint2.user, hint2.days, hint.version, hint.user, hint.days), type="W") hint2.set_active(False) z[package] = key # Sanity check the hints hash if len(hints["block"]) == 0 and len(hints["block-udeb"]) == 0: self.__log("WARNING: No block hints at all, not even udeb ones!", type="W") return hints # Utility methods for package analysis # ------------------------------------ def get_dependency_solvers(self, block, arch, distribution): """Find the packages which satisfy a dependency block This method returns the list of packages which satisfy a dependency block (as returned by apt_pkg.parse_depends) for the given architecture and distribution. It returns a tuple with two items: the first is a boolean which is True if the dependency is satisfied, the second is the list of the solving packages. """ packages = [] # local copies for better performances binaries = self.binaries[distribution][arch] # for every package, version and operation in the block for name, version, op in block: if ":" in name: name, archqual = name.split(":", 1) else: archqual = None # look for the package in unstable if name in binaries[0]: package = binaries[0][name] # check the versioned dependency and architecture qualifier # (if present) if (op == '' and version == '') or apt_pkg.check_dep(package[VERSION], op, version): if archqual is None or (archqual == 'any' and package[MULTIARCH] == 'allowed'): packages.append(name) # look for the package in the virtual packages list and loop on them for prov in binaries[1].get(name, []): if prov not in binaries[0]: continue package = binaries[0][prov] # A provides only satisfies: # - an unversioned dependency (per Policy Manual §7.5) # - a dependency without an architecture qualifier # (per analysis of apt code) if op == '' and version == '' and archqual is None: packages.append(prov) return (len(packages) > 0, packages) def excuse_unsat_deps(self, pkg, src, arch, suite, excuse): """Find unsatisfied dependencies for a binary package This method analyzes the dependencies of the binary package specified by the parameter `pkg', built from the source package `src', for the architecture `arch' within the suite `suite'. If the dependency can't be satisfied in testing and/or unstable, it updates the excuse passed as parameter. """ # retrieve the binary package from the specified suite and arch binary_u = self.binaries[suite][arch][0][pkg] # local copies for better performance parse_depends = apt_pkg.parse_depends get_dependency_solvers = self.get_dependency_solvers # analyze the dependency fields (if present) if not binary_u[DEPENDS]: return deps = binary_u[DEPENDS] # for every dependency block (formed as conjunction of disjunction) for block, block_txt in zip(parse_depends(deps, False), deps.split(',')): # if the block is satisfied in testing, then skip the block solved, packages = get_dependency_solvers(block, arch, 'testing') if solved: for p in packages: if p not in self.binaries[suite][arch][0]: continue excuse.add_sane_dep(self.binaries[suite][arch][0][p][SOURCE]) continue # check if the block can be satisfied in unstable, and list the solving packages solved, packages = get_dependency_solvers(block, arch, suite) packages = [self.binaries[suite][arch][0][p][SOURCE] for p in packages] # if the dependency can be satisfied by the same source package, skip the block: # obviously both binary packages will enter testing together if src in packages: continue # if no package can satisfy the dependency, add this information to the excuse if len(packages) == 0: excuse.addhtml("%s/%s unsatisfiable Depends: %s" % (pkg, arch, block_txt.strip())) excuse.addreason("depends"); continue # for the solving packages, update the excuse to add the dependencies for p in packages: if arch not in self.options.break_arches.split(): if p in self.sources['testing'] and self.sources['testing'][p][VERSION] == self.sources[suite][p][VERSION]: excuse.add_dep("%s/%s" % (p, arch), arch) else: excuse.add_dep(p, arch) else: excuse.add_break_dep(p, arch) # Package analysis methods # ------------------------ def should_remove_source(self, pkg): """Check if a source package should be removed from testing This method checks if a source package should be removed from the testing distribution; this happens if the source package is not present in the unstable distribution anymore. It returns True if the package can be removed, False otherwise. In the former case, a new excuse is appended to the object attribute excuses. """ # if the source package is available in unstable, then do nothing if pkg in self.sources['unstable']: return False # otherwise, add a new excuse for its removal and return True src = self.sources['testing'][pkg] excuse = Excuse("-" + pkg) excuse.addhtml("Package not in unstable, will try to remove") excuse.addreason("remove") excuse.set_vers(src[VERSION], None) src[MAINTAINER] and excuse.set_maint(src[MAINTAINER].strip()) src[SECTION] and excuse.set_section(src[SECTION].strip()) # if the package is blocked, skip it for hint in self.hints.search('block', package=pkg, removal=True): excuse.addhtml("Not touching package, as requested by %s (contact debian-release " "if update is needed)" % hint.user) excuse.addhtml("Not considered") excuse.addreason("block") self.excuses.append(excuse) return False excuse.is_valid = True self.excuses.append(excuse) return True def should_upgrade_srcarch(self, src, arch, suite, same_source=same_source): """Check if a set of binary packages should be upgraded This method checks if the binary packages produced by the source package on the given architecture should be upgraded; this can happen also if the migration is a binary-NMU for the given arch. It returns False if the given packages don't need to be upgraded, True otherwise. In the former case, a new excuse is appended to the object attribute excuses. same_source is an optimization to avoid "load global". """ # retrieve the source packages for testing and suite source_t = self.sources['testing'][src] source_u = self.sources[suite][src] # build the common part of the excuse, which will be filled by the code below ref = "%s/%s%s" % (src, arch, suite != 'unstable' and "_" + suite or "") excuse = Excuse(ref) excuse.set_vers(source_t[VERSION], source_t[VERSION]) source_u[MAINTAINER] and excuse.set_maint(source_u[MAINTAINER].strip()) source_u[SECTION] and excuse.set_section(source_u[SECTION].strip()) # if there is a `remove' hint and the requested version is the same as the # version in testing, then stop here and return False # (as a side effect, a removal may generate such excuses for both the source # package and its binary packages on each architecture) for hint in [ x for x in self.hints.search('remove', package=src) if same_source(source_t[VERSION], x.version) ]: excuse.addhtml("Removal request by %s" % (hint.user)) excuse.addhtml("Trying to remove package, not update it") excuse.addhtml("Not considered") excuse.addreason("remove") self.excuses.append(excuse) return False # the starting point is that there is nothing wrong and nothing worth doing anywrongver = False anyworthdoing = False # for every binary package produced by this source in unstable for this architecture for pkg in sorted(ifilter(lambda x: x.endswith("/" + arch), source_u[BINARIES]), key=lambda x: x.split("/")[0]): pkg_name = pkg.split("/")[0] # retrieve the testing (if present) and unstable corresponding binary packages binary_t = pkg in source_t[BINARIES] and self.binaries['testing'][arch][0][pkg_name] or None binary_u = self.binaries[suite][arch][0][pkg_name] # this is the source version for the new binary package pkgsv = self.binaries[suite][arch][0][pkg_name][SOURCEVER] # if the new binary package is architecture-independent, then skip it if binary_u[ARCHITECTURE] == 'all': excuse.addhtml("Ignoring %s %s (from %s) as it is arch: all" % (pkg_name, binary_u[VERSION], pkgsv)) continue # if the new binary package is not from the same source as the testing one, then skip it # this implies that this binary migration is part of a source migration if not same_source(source_t[VERSION], pkgsv): anywrongver = True excuse.addhtml("From wrong source: %s %s (%s not %s)" % (pkg_name, binary_u[VERSION], pkgsv, source_t[VERSION])) break # if the source package has been updated in unstable and this is a binary migration, skip it # (the binaries are now out-of-date) if same_source(source_t[VERSION], pkgsv) and source_t[VERSION] != source_u[VERSION]: anywrongver = True excuse.addhtml("From wrong source: %s %s (%s not %s)" % (pkg_name, binary_u[VERSION], pkgsv, source_u[VERSION])) break # find unsatisfied dependencies for the new binary package self.excuse_unsat_deps(pkg_name, src, arch, suite, excuse) # if the binary is not present in testing, then it is a new binary; # in this case, there is something worth doing if not binary_t: excuse.addhtml("New binary: %s (%s)" % (pkg_name, binary_u[VERSION])) anyworthdoing = True continue # at this point, the binary package is present in testing, so we can compare # the versions of the packages ... vcompare = apt_pkg.version_compare(binary_t[VERSION], binary_u[VERSION]) # ... if updating would mean downgrading, then stop here: there is something wrong if vcompare > 0: anywrongver = True excuse.addhtml("Not downgrading: %s (%s to %s)" % (pkg_name, binary_t[VERSION], binary_u[VERSION])) break # ... if updating would mean upgrading, then there is something worth doing elif vcompare < 0: excuse.addhtml("Updated binary: %s (%s to %s)" % (pkg_name, binary_t[VERSION], binary_u[VERSION])) anyworthdoing = True # if there is nothing wrong and there is something worth doing or the source # package is not fake, then check what packages should be removed if not anywrongver and (anyworthdoing or not self.sources[suite][src][FAKESRC]): srcv = self.sources[suite][src][VERSION] ssrc = same_source(source_t[VERSION], srcv) # if this is a binary-only migration via *pu, we never want to try # removing binary packages if not (ssrc and suite != 'unstable'): # for every binary package produced by this source in testing for this architecture source_data = self.sources['testing'][src] _, _, smoothbins = self._compute_groups(src, "unstable", arch, False) for pkg in sorted(x.split("/")[0] for x in source_data[BINARIES] if x.endswith("/"+arch)): # if the package is architecture-independent, then ignore it tpkg_data = self.binaries['testing'][arch][0][pkg] if tpkg_data[ARCHITECTURE] == 'all': excuse.addhtml("Ignoring removal of %s as it is arch: all" % (pkg)) continue # if the package is not produced by the new source package, then remove it from testing if pkg not in self.binaries[suite][arch][0]: excuse.addhtml("Removed binary: %s %s" % (pkg, tpkg_data[VERSION])) # the removed binary is only interesting if this is a binary-only migration, # as otherwise the updated source will already cause the binary packages # to be updated if ssrc: # Special-case, if the binary is a candidate for a smooth update, we do not consider # it "interesting" on its own. This case happens quite often with smooth updatable # packages, where the old binary "survives" a full run because it still has # reverse dependencies. name = (pkg, tpkg_data[VERSION], tpkg_data[ARCHITECTURE]) if name not in smoothbins: anyworthdoing = True # if there is nothing wrong and there is something worth doing, this is a valid candidate if not anywrongver and anyworthdoing: excuse.is_valid = True self.excuses.append(excuse) return True # else if there is something worth doing (but something wrong, too) this package won't be considered elif anyworthdoing: excuse.addhtml("Not considered") self.excuses.append(excuse) # otherwise, return False return False def should_upgrade_src(self, src, suite, same_source=same_source): """Check if source package should be upgraded This method checks if a source package should be upgraded. The analysis is performed for the source package specified by the `src' parameter, for the distribution `suite'. It returns False if the given package doesn't need to be upgraded, True otherwise. In the former case, a new excuse is appended to the object attribute excuses. same_source is an opt to avoid "load global". """ # retrieve the source packages for testing (if available) and suite source_u = self.sources[suite][src] if src in self.sources['testing']: source_t = self.sources['testing'][src] # if testing and unstable have the same version, then this is a candidate for binary-NMUs only if apt_pkg.version_compare(source_t[VERSION], source_u[VERSION]) == 0: return False else: source_t = None # build the common part of the excuse, which will be filled by the code below ref = "%s%s" % (src, suite != 'unstable' and "_" + suite or "") excuse = Excuse(ref) excuse.set_vers(source_t and source_t[VERSION] or None, source_u[VERSION]) source_u[MAINTAINER] and excuse.set_maint(source_u[MAINTAINER].strip()) source_u[SECTION] and excuse.set_section(source_u[SECTION].strip()) # the starting point is that we will update the candidate update_candidate = True # if the version in unstable is older, then stop here with a warning in the excuse and return False if source_t and apt_pkg.version_compare(source_u[VERSION], source_t[VERSION]) < 0: excuse.addhtml("ALERT: %s is newer in testing (%s %s)" % (src, source_t[VERSION], source_u[VERSION])) self.excuses.append(excuse) excuse.addreason("newerintesting"); return False # check if the source package really exists or if it is a fake one if source_u[FAKESRC]: excuse.addhtml("%s source package doesn't exist" % (src)) update_candidate = False # retrieve the urgency for the upload, ignoring it if this is a NEW package (not present in testing) urgency = self.urgencies.get(src, self.options.default_urgency) if not source_t: if self.MINDAYS[urgency] < self.MINDAYS[self.options.default_urgency]: excuse.addhtml("Ignoring %s urgency setting for NEW package" % (urgency)) urgency = self.options.default_urgency # if there is a `remove' hint and the requested version is the same as the # version in testing, then stop here and return False for item in self.hints.search('remove', package=src): if source_t and same_source(source_t[VERSION], item.version) or \ same_source(source_u[VERSION], item.version): excuse.addhtml("Removal request by %s" % (item.user)) excuse.addhtml("Trying to remove package, not update it") excuse.addreason("remove") update_candidate = False # check if there is a `block' or `block-udeb' hint for this package, or a `block-all source' hint blocked = {} for hint in self.hints.search(package=src): if hint.type == 'block': blocked['block'] = hint if hint.type == 'block-udeb': blocked['block-udeb'] = hint for hint in self.hints.search(type='block-all', package='source'): blocked.setdefault('block', hint) if suite in ['pu', 'tpu']: blocked['block'] = '%s-block' % (suite) # if the source is blocked, then look for an `unblock' hint; the unblock request # is processed only if the specified version is correct. If a package is blocked # by `block-udeb', then `unblock-udeb' must be present to cancel it. for block_cmd in blocked: unblock_cmd = "un" + block_cmd unblocks = self.hints.search(unblock_cmd, package=src) if unblocks and unblocks[0].version is not None and same_source(unblocks[0].version, source_u[VERSION]): if suite == 'unstable' or block_cmd == 'block-udeb': excuse.addhtml("Ignoring %s request by %s, due to %s request by %s" % (block_cmd, blocked[block_cmd].user, unblock_cmd, unblocks[0].user)) else: excuse.addhtml("Approved by %s" % (unblocks[0].user)) else: if unblocks: if unblocks[0].version is None: excuse.addhtml("%s request by %s ignored due to missing version" % (unblock_cmd.capitalize(), unblocks[0].user)) else: excuse.addhtml("%s request by %s ignored due to version mismatch: %s" % (unblock_cmd.capitalize(), unblocks[0].user, unblocks[0].version)) if suite == 'unstable' or block_cmd == 'block-udeb': excuse.addhtml("Not touching package due to %s request by %s (contact debian-release if update is needed)" % (block_cmd, blocked[block_cmd].user)) excuse.addreason("block") else: excuse.addhtml("NEEDS APPROVAL BY RM") excuse.addreason("block") update_candidate = False # if the suite is unstable, then we have to check the urgency and the minimum days of # permanence in unstable before updating testing; if the source package is too young, # the check fails and we set update_candidate to False to block the update; consider # the age-days hint, if specified for the package if suite == 'unstable': if src not in self.dates: self.dates[src] = (source_u[VERSION], self.date_now) elif not same_source(self.dates[src][0], source_u[VERSION]): self.dates[src] = (source_u[VERSION], self.date_now) days_old = self.date_now - self.dates[src][1] min_days = self.MINDAYS[urgency] for age_days_hint in [ x for x in self.hints.search('age-days', package=src) if \ same_source(source_u[VERSION], x.version) ]: excuse.addhtml("Overriding age needed from %d days to %d by %s" % (min_days, int(age_days_hint.days), age_days_hint.user)) min_days = int(age_days_hint.days) excuse.setdaysold(days_old, min_days) if days_old < min_days: urgent_hints = [ x for x in self.hints.search('urgent', package=src) if \ same_source(source_u[VERSION], x.version) ] if urgent_hints: excuse.addhtml("Too young, but urgency pushed by %s" % (urgent_hints[0].user)) else: update_candidate = False excuse.addreason("age") if suite in ['pu', 'tpu']: # o-o-d(ish) checks for (t-)p-u for arch in self.options.architectures: if src not in self.sources["testing"]: continue # if the package in testing has no binaries on this # architecture, it can't be out-of-date if not any(x for x in self.sources["testing"][src][BINARIES] if x.endswith("/"+arch) and self.binaries["testing"][arch][0][x.split("/")[0]][ARCHITECTURE] != 'all'): continue # if the (t-)p-u package has produced any binaries on # this architecture then we assume it's ok. this allows for # uploads to (t-)p-u which intentionally drop binary # packages if any(x for x in self.binaries[suite][arch][0].values() \ if x[SOURCE] == src and x[SOURCEVER] == source_u[VERSION] and \ x[ARCHITECTURE] != 'all'): continue if suite == 'tpu': base = 'testing' else: base = 'stable' text = "Not yet built on %s (relative to testing)" % (urllib.quote(arch), urllib.quote(src), urllib.quote(source_u[VERSION]), base, arch) if arch in self.options.fucked_arches.split(): text = text + " (but %s isn't keeping up, so never mind)" % (arch) else: update_candidate = False excuse.addreason("arch") excuse.addreason("arch-%s" % arch) excuse.addhtml(text) # at this point, we check the status of the builds on all the supported architectures # to catch the out-of-date ones pkgs = {src: ["source"]} for arch in self.options.architectures: oodbins = {} # for every binary package produced by this source in the suite for this architecture for pkg in sorted(x.split("/")[0] for x in self.sources[suite][src][BINARIES] if x.endswith("/"+arch)): if pkg not in pkgs: pkgs[pkg] = [] pkgs[pkg].append(arch) # retrieve the binary package and its source version binary_u = self.binaries[suite][arch][0][pkg] pkgsv = binary_u[SOURCEVER] # if it wasn't built by the same source, it is out-of-date if not same_source(source_u[VERSION], pkgsv): if pkgsv not in oodbins: oodbins[pkgsv] = [] oodbins[pkgsv].append(pkg) continue # if the package is architecture-dependent or the current arch is `nobreakall' # find unsatisfied dependencies for the binary package if binary_u[ARCHITECTURE] != 'all' or arch in self.options.nobreakall_arches.split(): self.excuse_unsat_deps(pkg, src, arch, suite, excuse) # if there are out-of-date packages, warn about them in the excuse and set update_candidate # to False to block the update; if the architecture where the package is out-of-date is # in the `fucked_arches' list, then do not block the update if oodbins: oodtxt = "" for v in oodbins.keys(): if oodtxt: oodtxt = oodtxt + "; " oodtxt = oodtxt + "%s (from %s)" % \ (", ".join(sorted(oodbins[v])), urllib.quote(arch), urllib.quote(src), urllib.quote(v), v) text = "out of date on %s: %s" % \ (urllib.quote(arch), urllib.quote(src), urllib.quote(source_u[VERSION]), arch, oodtxt) if arch in self.options.fucked_arches.split(): text = text + " (but %s isn't keeping up, so nevermind)" % (arch) else: update_candidate = False excuse.addreason("arch") excuse.addreason("arch-%s" % arch) if self.date_now != self.dates[src][1]: excuse.addhtml(text) # if the source package has no binaries, set update_candidate to False to block the update if len(self.sources[suite][src][BINARIES]) == 0: excuse.addhtml("%s has no binaries on any arch" % src) excuse.addreason("no-binaries") update_candidate = False # if the suite is unstable, then we have to check the release-critical bug lists before # updating testing; if the unstable package has RC bugs that do not apply to the testing # one, the check fails and we set update_candidate to False to block the update if suite == 'unstable': for pkg in pkgs: bugs_t = [] bugs_u = [] if pkg in self.bugs['testing']: bugs_t.extend(self.bugs['testing'][pkg]) if pkg in self.bugs['unstable']: bugs_u.extend(self.bugs['unstable'][pkg]) if 'source' in pkgs[pkg]: spkg = "src:%s" % (pkg) if spkg in self.bugs['testing']: bugs_t.extend(self.bugs['testing'][spkg]) if spkg in self.bugs['unstable']: bugs_u.extend(self.bugs['unstable'][spkg]) new_bugs = sorted(set(bugs_u).difference(bugs_t)) old_bugs = sorted(set(bugs_t).difference(bugs_u)) excuse.setbugs(old_bugs,new_bugs) if len(new_bugs) > 0: excuse.addhtml("%s (%s) has new bugs!" % (pkg, ", ".join(pkgs[pkg]), urllib.quote(pkg))) excuse.addhtml("Updating %s introduces new bugs: %s" % (pkg, ", ".join( ["#%s" % (urllib.quote(a), a) for a in new_bugs]))) update_candidate = False excuse.addreason("buggy") if len(old_bugs) > 0: excuse.addhtml("Updating %s fixes old bugs: %s" % (pkg, ", ".join( ["#%s" % (urllib.quote(a), a) for a in old_bugs]))) if len(old_bugs) > len(new_bugs) and len(new_bugs) > 0: excuse.addhtml("%s introduces new bugs, so still ignored (even " "though it fixes more than it introduces, whine at debian-release)" % pkg) # check if there is a `force' hint for this package, which allows it to go in even if it is not updateable forces = [ x for x in self.hints.search('force', package=src) if same_source(source_u[VERSION], x.version) ] if forces: excuse.dontinvalidate = True if not update_candidate and forces: excuse.addhtml("Should ignore, but forced by %s" % (forces[0].user)) excuse.force() update_candidate = True # if the package can be updated, it is a valid candidate if update_candidate: excuse.is_valid = True # else it won't be considered else: # TODO excuse.addhtml("Not considered") self.excuses.append(excuse) return update_candidate def reversed_exc_deps(self): """Reverse the excuses dependencies This method returns a dictionary where the keys are the package names and the values are the excuse names which depend on it. """ res = {} for exc in self.excuses: for d in exc.deps: if d not in res: res[d] = [] res[d].append(exc.name) return res def invalidate_excuses(self, valid, invalid): """Invalidate impossible excuses This method invalidates the impossible excuses, which depend on invalid excuses. The two parameters contains the list of `valid' and `invalid' excuses. """ # build a lookup-by-name map exclookup = {} for e in self.excuses: exclookup[e.name] = e # build the reverse dependencies revdeps = self.reversed_exc_deps() # loop on the invalid excuses i = 0 while i < len(invalid): # if there is no reverse dependency, skip the item if invalid[i] not in revdeps: i += 1 continue # if the dependency can be satisfied by a testing-proposed-updates excuse, skip the item if (invalid[i] + "_tpu") in valid: i += 1 continue # loop on the reverse dependencies for x in revdeps[invalid[i]]: # if the item is valid and it is marked as `dontinvalidate', skip the item if x in valid and exclookup[x].dontinvalidate: continue # otherwise, invalidate the dependency and mark as invalidated and # remove the depending excuses exclookup[x].invalidate_dep(invalid[i]) if x in valid: p = valid.index(x) invalid.append(valid.pop(p)) exclookup[x].addhtml("Invalidated by dependency") exclookup[x].addhtml("Not considered") exclookup[x].addreason("depends") exclookup[x].is_valid = False i = i + 1 def write_excuses(self, same_source=same_source): """Produce and write the update excuses This method handles the update excuses generation: the packages are looked at to determine whether they are valid candidates. For the details of this procedure, please refer to the module docstring. same_source is an opt to avoid "load global". """ self.__log("Update Excuses generation started", type="I") # list of local methods and variables (for better performance) sources = self.sources architectures = self.options.architectures should_remove_source = self.should_remove_source should_upgrade_srcarch = self.should_upgrade_srcarch should_upgrade_src = self.should_upgrade_src # this list will contain the packages which are valid candidates; # if a package is going to be removed, it will have a "-" prefix upgrade_me = [] self.excuses = [] # for every source package in testing, check if it should be removed for pkg in sources['testing']: if should_remove_source(pkg): upgrade_me.append("-" + pkg) # for every source package in unstable check if it should be upgraded for pkg in sources['unstable']: if sources['unstable'][pkg][FAKESRC]: continue # if the source package is already present in testing, # check if it should be upgraded for every binary package if pkg in sources['testing'] and not sources['testing'][pkg][FAKESRC]: for arch in architectures: if should_upgrade_srcarch(pkg, arch, 'unstable'): upgrade_me.append("%s/%s" % (pkg, arch)) # check if the source package should be upgraded if should_upgrade_src(pkg, 'unstable'): upgrade_me.append(pkg) # for every source package in *-proposed-updates, check if it should be upgraded for suite in ['pu', 'tpu']: for pkg in sources[suite]: # if the source package is already present in testing, # check if it should be upgraded for every binary package if pkg in sources['testing']: for arch in architectures: if should_upgrade_srcarch(pkg, arch, suite): upgrade_me.append("%s/%s_%s" % (pkg, arch, suite)) # check if the source package should be upgraded if should_upgrade_src(pkg, suite): upgrade_me.append("%s_%s" % (pkg, suite)) # process the `remove' hints, if the given package is not yet in upgrade_me for item in self.hints['remove']: src = item.package if src in upgrade_me: continue if ("-"+src) in upgrade_me: continue if src not in sources['testing']: continue # check if the version specified in the hint is the same as the considered package tsrcv = sources['testing'][src][VERSION] if not same_source(tsrcv, item.version): continue # add the removal of the package to upgrade_me and build a new excuse upgrade_me.append("-%s" % (src)) excuse = Excuse("-%s" % (src)) excuse.set_vers(tsrcv, None) excuse.addhtml("Removal request by %s" % (item.user)) excuse.addhtml("Package is broken, will try to remove") excuse.addreason("remove") self.excuses.append(excuse) # sort the excuses by daysold and name self.excuses.sort(key=attrgetter('daysold', 'name')) # extract the not considered packages, which are in the excuses but not in upgrade_me unconsidered = [e.name for e in self.excuses if e.name not in upgrade_me] # invalidate impossible excuses for e in self.excuses: # parts[0] == package name # parts[1] == optional architecture parts = e.name.split('/') for d in e.deps: ok = False # source -> source dependency; both packages must have # valid excuses if d in upgrade_me or d in unconsidered: ok = True # if the excuse is for a binNMU, also consider d/$arch as a # valid excuse elif len(parts) == 2: bd = '%s/%s' % (d, parts[1]) if bd in upgrade_me or bd in unconsidered: ok = True # if the excuse is for a source package, check each of the # architectures on which the excuse lists a dependency on d, # and consider the excuse valid if it is possible on each # architecture else: arch_ok = True for arch in e.deps[d]: bd = '%s/%s' % (d, arch) if bd not in upgrade_me and bd not in unconsidered: arch_ok = False break if arch_ok: ok = True if not ok: e.addhtml("Impossible dependency: %s -> %s" % (e.name, d)) e.addreason("depends") self.invalidate_excuses(upgrade_me, unconsidered) # sort the list of candidates self.upgrade_me = sorted( make_migrationitem(x, self.sources) for x in upgrade_me ) # write excuses to the output file if not self.options.dry_run: self.__log("> Writing Excuses to %s" % self.options.excuses_output, type="I") write_excuses(self.excuses, self.options.excuses_output, output_format="legacy-html") if hasattr(self.options, 'excuses_yaml_output'): self.__log("> Writing YAML Excuses to %s" % self.options.excuses_yaml_output, type="I") write_excuses(self.excuses, self.options.excuses_yaml_output, output_format="yaml") self.__log("Update Excuses generation completed", type="I") # Upgrade run # ----------- def get_nuninst(self, requested_arch=None, build=False): """Return the uninstallability statistic for all the architectures To calculate the uninstallability counters, the method checks the installability of all the packages for all the architectures, and tracks dependencies in a recursive way. The architecture independent packages are checked only for the `nobreakall` architectures. It returns a dictionary with the architectures as keys and the list of uninstallable packages as values. NB: If build is False, requested_arch is ignored. """ # if we are not asked to build the nuninst, read it from the cache if not build: return read_nuninst(self.options.noninst_status, self.options.architectures) nuninst = {} # local copies for better performance binaries = self.binaries['testing'] inst_tester = self._inst_tester # for all the architectures for arch in self.options.architectures: if requested_arch and arch != requested_arch: continue # if it is in the nobreakall ones, check arch-independent packages too if arch not in self.options.nobreakall_arches.split(): skip_archall = True else: skip_archall = False # check all the packages for this architecture, calling add_nuninst if a new # uninstallable package is found nuninst[arch] = set() for pkg_name in binaries[arch][0]: pkgdata = binaries[arch][0][pkg_name] r = inst_tester.is_installable(pkg_name, pkgdata[VERSION], arch) if not r: nuninst[arch].add(pkg_name) # if they are not required, remove architecture-independent packages nuninst[arch + "+all"] = nuninst[arch].copy() if skip_archall: for pkg in nuninst[arch + "+all"]: bpkg = binaries[arch][0][pkg] if bpkg[ARCHITECTURE] == 'all': nuninst[arch].remove(pkg) # return the dictionary with the results return nuninst def eval_nuninst(self, nuninst, original=None): """Return a string which represents the uninstallability counters This method returns a string which represents the uninstallability counters reading the uninstallability statistics `nuninst` and, if present, merging the results with the `original` one. An example of the output string is: 1+2: i-0:a-0:a-0:h-0:i-1:m-0:m-0:p-0:a-0:m-0:s-2:s-0 where the first part is the number of broken packages in non-break architectures + the total number of broken packages for all the architectures. """ res = [] total = 0 totalbreak = 0 for arch in self.options.architectures: if arch in nuninst: n = len(nuninst[arch]) elif original and arch in original: n = len(original[arch]) else: continue if arch in self.options.break_arches.split(): totalbreak = totalbreak + n else: total = total + n res.append("%s-%d" % (arch[0], n)) return "%d+%d: %s" % (total, totalbreak, ":".join(res)) def is_nuninst_asgood_generous(self, old, new): diff = 0 for arch in self.options.architectures: if arch in self.options.break_arches.split(): continue diff = diff + (len(new[arch]) - len(old[arch])) return diff <= 0 def _compute_groups(self, source_name, suite, migration_architecture, is_removal, include_hijacked=False, allow_smooth_updates=True, removals=frozenset()): """Compute the groups of binaries being migrated by item This method will compute the binaries that will be added, replaced in testing and which of them are smooth updatable. Parameters: * "source_name" is the name of the source package, whose binaries are migrating. * "suite" is the suite from which the binaries are migrating. [Same as item.suite, where available] * "migration_architecture" is the architecture determines architecture of the migrating binaries (can be "source" for a "source"-migration, meaning all binaries regardless of architecture). [Same as item.architecture, where available] * "is_removal" is a boolean determining if this is a removal or not [Same as item.is_removal, where available] * "include_hijacked" determines whether hijacked binaries should be included in results or not. (defaults: False) * "allow_smooth_updates" is a boolean determing whether smooth- updates are permitted in this migration. When set to False, the "smoothbins" return value will always be the empty set. Any value that would have been there will now be in "rms" instead. (defaults: True) * "removals" is a set of binaries that is assumed to be removed at the same time as this migration (e.g. in the same "easy"-hint). This may affect what if some binaries are smooth updated or not. (defaults: empty-set) - Binaries must be given as ("package-name", "version", "architecture") tuples. Returns a tuple (adds, rms, smoothbins). "adds" is a set of binaries that will updated in or appear after the migration. "rms" is a set of binaries that are not smooth-updatable (or binaries that could be, but there is no reason to let them be smooth updated). "smoothbins" is set of binaries that are to be smooth-updated. Each "binary" in "adds", "rms" and "smoothbins" will be a tuple of ("package-name", "version", "architecture") and are thus tuples suitable for passing on to the InstallabilityTester. Pre-Conditions: The source package must be in testing and this should only be used when considering to do an upgrade migration from the input suite. (e.g. do not use this for removals). Unlike doop_source, this will not modify any data structure. """ # local copies for better performances sources = self.sources binaries_t = self.binaries['testing'] adds = set() rms = set() smoothbins = {} # remove all binary packages (if the source already exists) if migration_architecture == 'source' or not is_removal: if source_name in sources['testing']: source_data = sources['testing'][source_name] bins = [] check = {} # remove all the binaries # first, build a list of eligible binaries for p in source_data[BINARIES]: binary, parch = p.split("/") if (migration_architecture != 'source' and parch != migration_architecture): continue if (not include_hijacked and binaries_t[parch][0][binary][SOURCE] != source_name): continue bins.append(p) for p in bins: binary, parch = p.split("/") # if a smooth update is possible for the package, skip it if allow_smooth_updates and suite == 'unstable' and \ binary not in self.binaries[suite][parch][0] and \ ('ALL' in self.options.smooth_updates or \ binaries_t[parch][0][binary][SECTION] in self.options.smooth_updates): # if the package has reverse-dependencies which are # built from other sources, it's a valid candidate for # a smooth update. if not, it may still be a valid # candidate if one if its r-deps is itself a candidate, # so note it for checking later bin_data = binaries_t[parch][0][binary] rdeps = bin_data[RDEPENDS] # the list of reverse-dependencies may be outdated # if, for example, we're processing a hint and # a new version of one of the apparent reverse-dependencies # migrated earlier in the hint. walk the list to make # sure that at least one of the entries is still # valid rrdeps = [x for x in rdeps if x not in [y.split("/")[0] for y in bins]] if rrdeps: for dep in rrdeps: if dep in binaries_t[parch][0]: bin = binaries_t[parch][0][dep] deps = [] # If the package is being removed # together with dep, then it is # not a reason to smooth update # the binary t = (dep, bin[VERSION], parch) if t in removals: continue if bin[DEPENDS] is not None: deps.extend(apt_pkg.parse_depends(bin[DEPENDS], False)) if any(binary == entry[0] for deplist in deps for entry in deplist): smoothbins[p] = (binary, bin_data[VERSION], parch) break else: check[p] = (binary, bin_data[VERSION], parch) # check whether we should perform a smooth update for # packages which are candidates but do not have r-deps # outside of the current source for p in check: ptuple = check[p] binary, _, parch = ptuple rdeps = [ bin for bin in binaries_t[parch][0][binary][RDEPENDS] \ if bin in [y[0] for y in smoothbins.itervalues()] ] if rdeps: smoothbins[p] = ptuple # remove all the binaries which aren't being smooth updated for p in ( bin for bin in bins if bin not in smoothbins ): binary, parch = p.split("/") version = binaries_t[parch][0][binary][VERSION] rms.add((binary, version, parch)) # single binary removal; used for clearing up after smooth # updates but not supported as a manual hint elif source_name in binaries_t[migration_architecture][0]: version = binaries_t[migration_architecture][0][source_name][VERSION] rms.add((source_name, version, migration_architecture)) # add the new binary packages (if we are not removing) if not is_removal: source_data = sources[suite][source_name] for p in source_data[BINARIES]: binary, parch = p.split("/") if migration_architecture not in ['source', parch]: continue version = self.binaries[suite][parch][0][binary][VERSION] adds.add((binary, version, parch)) return (adds, rms, set(smoothbins.itervalues())) def doop_source(self, item, hint_undo=[], removals=frozenset()): """Apply a change to the testing distribution as requested by `pkg` An optional list of undo actions related to packages processed earlier in a hint may be passed in `hint_undo`. An optional set of binaries may be passed in "removals". Binaries listed in this set will be assumined to be removed at the same time as the "item" will migrate. This may change what binaries will be smooth-updated. - Binaries in this set must be ("package-name", "version", "architecture") tuples. This method applies the changes required by the action `item` tracking them so it will be possible to revert them. The method returns a list of the package name, the suite where the package comes from, the set of packages affected by the change and the dictionary undo which can be used to rollback the changes. """ undo = {'binaries': {}, 'sources': {}, 'virtual': {}, 'nvirtual': []} affected = set() # local copies for better performances sources = self.sources binaries = self.binaries['testing'] get_reverse_tree = partial(compute_reverse_tree, self.binaries["testing"]) # remove all binary packages (if the source already exists) if item.architecture == 'source' or not item.is_removal: if item.package in sources['testing']: source = sources['testing'][item.package] _, bins, _ = self._compute_groups(item.package, item.suite, item.architecture, item.is_removal, removals=removals) # remove all the binaries which aren't being smooth updated for bin_data in bins: binary, _, parch = bin_data p = binary + "/" + parch # save the old binary for undo undo['binaries'][p] = binaries[parch][0][binary] # all the reverse dependencies are affected by the change affected.update(get_reverse_tree(binary, parch)) # remove the provided virtual packages for j in binaries[parch][0][binary][PROVIDES]: key = j + "/" + parch if key not in undo['virtual']: undo['virtual'][key] = binaries[parch][1][j][:] binaries[parch][1][j].remove(binary) if len(binaries[parch][1][j]) == 0: del binaries[parch][1][j] # finally, remove the binary package version = binaries[parch][0][binary][VERSION] del binaries[parch][0][binary] self._inst_tester.remove_testing_binary(binary, version, parch) # remove the source package if item.architecture == 'source': undo['sources'][item.package] = source del sources['testing'][item.package] else: # the package didn't exist, so we mark it as to-be-removed in case of undo undo['sources']['-' + item.package] = True # single binary removal; used for clearing up after smooth # updates but not supported as a manual hint elif item.package in binaries[item.architecture][0]: undo['binaries'][item.package + "/" + item.architecture] = binaries[item.architecture][0][item.package] affected.update(get_reverse_tree(item.package, item.architecture)) version = binaries[item.architecture][0][item.package][VERSION] del binaries[item.architecture][0][item.package] self._inst_tester.remove_testing_binary(item.package, version, item.architecture) # add the new binary packages (if we are not removing) if not item.is_removal: source = sources[item.suite][item.package] for p in source[BINARIES]: binary, parch = p.split("/") if item.architecture not in ['source', parch]: continue key = (binary, parch) # obviously, added/modified packages are affected if key not in affected: affected.add(key) # if the binary already exists in testing, it is currently # built by another source package. we therefore remove the # version built by the other source package, after marking # all of its reverse dependencies as affected if binary in binaries[parch][0]: # save the old binary package undo['binaries'][p] = binaries[parch][0][binary] # all the reverse dependencies are affected by the change affected.update(get_reverse_tree(binary, parch)) # all the reverse conflicts and their dependency tree are affected by the change for j in binaries[parch][0][binary][RCONFLICTS]: affected.update(get_reverse_tree(j, parch)) version = binaries[parch][0][binary][VERSION] self._inst_tester.remove_testing_binary(binary, version, parch) else: # the binary isn't in testing, but it may have been at # the start of the current hint and have been removed # by an earlier migration. if that's the case then we # will have a record of the older instance of the binary # in the undo information. we can use that to ensure # that the reverse dependencies of the older binary # package are also checked. # reverse dependencies built from this source can be # ignored as their reverse trees are already handled # by this function # XXX: and the reverse conflict tree? for (tundo, tpkg) in hint_undo: if p in tundo['binaries']: for rdep in tundo['binaries'][p][RDEPENDS]: if rdep in binaries[parch][0] and rdep not in source[BINARIES]: affected.update(get_reverse_tree(rdep, parch)) # add/update the binary package binaries[parch][0][binary] = self.binaries[item.suite][parch][0][binary] version = binaries[parch][0][binary][VERSION] self._inst_tester.add_testing_binary(binary, version, parch) # register new provided packages for j in binaries[parch][0][binary][PROVIDES]: key = j + "/" + parch if j not in binaries[parch][1]: undo['nvirtual'].append(key) binaries[parch][1][j] = [] elif key not in undo['virtual']: undo['virtual'][key] = binaries[parch][1][j][:] binaries[parch][1][j].append(binary) # all the reverse dependencies are affected by the change affected.update(get_reverse_tree(binary, parch)) # register reverse dependencies and conflicts for the new binary packages if item.architecture == 'source': pkg_iter = (p.split("/")[0] for p in source[BINARIES]) else: ext = "/" + item.architecture pkg_iter = (p.split("/")[0] for p in source[BINARIES] if p.endswith(ext)) register_reverses(binaries[parch][0], binaries[parch][1], iterator=pkg_iter) # add/update the source package if item.architecture == 'source': sources['testing'][item.package] = sources[item.suite][item.package] # return the package name, the suite, the list of affected packages and the undo dictionary return (item, affected, undo) def _check_packages(self, binaries, arch, affected, skip_archall, nuninst): broken = nuninst[arch + "+all"] to_check = [] # broken packages (first round) for p in (x[0] for x in affected if x[1] == arch): if p not in binaries[arch][0]: continue pkgdata = binaries[arch][0][p] version = pkgdata[VERSION] parch = pkgdata[ARCHITECTURE] nuninst_arch = None if not (skip_archall and parch == 'all'): nuninst_arch = nuninst[arch] self._installability_test(p, version, arch, broken, to_check, nuninst_arch) # broken packages (second round, reverse dependencies of the first round) while to_check: j = to_check.pop(0) if j not in binaries[arch][0]: continue for p in binaries[arch][0][j][RDEPENDS]: if p in broken or p not in binaries[arch][0]: continue pkgdata = binaries[arch][0][p] version = pkgdata[VERSION] parch = pkgdata[ARCHITECTURE] nuninst_arch = None if not (skip_archall and parch == 'all'): nuninst_arch = nuninst[arch] self._installability_test(p, version, arch, broken, to_check, nuninst_arch) def iter_packages(self, packages, selected, hint=False, nuninst=None, lundo=None): """Iter on the list of actions and apply them one-by-one This method applies the changes from `packages` to testing, checking the uninstallability counters for every action performed. If the action does not improve them, it is reverted. The method returns the new uninstallability counters and the remaining actions if the final result is successful, otherwise (None, None). """ extra = [] deferred = [] skipped = [] mark_passed = False position = len(packages) if nuninst: nuninst_comp = nuninst.copy() else: nuninst_comp = self.nuninst_orig.copy() # local copies for better performance binaries = self.binaries['testing'] sources = self.sources architectures = self.options.architectures nobreakall_arches = self.options.nobreakall_arches.split() new_arches = self.options.new_arches.split() break_arches = self.options.break_arches.split() dependencies = self.dependencies check_packages = partial(self._check_packages, binaries) # pre-process a hint batch pre_process = {} if selected and hint: removals = set() for item in selected: _, rms, _ = self._compute_groups(item.package, item.suite, item.architecture, item.is_removal, allow_smooth_updates=False) removals.update(rms) for package in selected: pkg, affected, undo = self.doop_source(package, removals=removals) pre_process[package] = (pkg, affected, undo) if lundo is None: lundo = [] if not hint: self.output_write("recur: [%s] %s %d/%d\n" % ("", ",".join(x.uvname for x in selected), len(packages), len(extra))) # loop on the packages (or better, actions) while packages: pkg = packages.pop(0) # this is the marker for the first loop if not mark_passed and position < 0: mark_passed = True packages.extend(deferred) del deferred else: position -= 1 # defer packages if their dependency has been already skipped if not mark_passed: defer = False for p in dependencies.get(pkg, []): if p in skipped: deferred.append(make_migrationitem(pkg, self.sources)) skipped.append(make_migrationitem(pkg, self.sources)) defer = True break if defer: continue if not hint: self.output_write("trying: %s\n" % (pkg.uvname)) better = True nuninst = {} # apply the changes if pkg in pre_process: item, affected, undo = pre_process[pkg] else: item, affected, undo = self.doop_source(pkg, lundo) if hint: lundo.append((undo, item)) # check the affected packages on all the architectures for arch in (item.architecture == 'source' and architectures or (item.architecture,)): if arch not in nobreakall_arches: skip_archall = True else: skip_archall = False nuninst[arch] = set(x for x in nuninst_comp[arch] if x in binaries[arch][0]) nuninst[arch + "+all"] = set(x for x in nuninst_comp[arch + "+all"] if x in binaries[arch][0]) check_packages(arch, affected, skip_archall, nuninst) # if we are processing hints, go ahead if hint: nuninst_comp[arch] = nuninst[arch] nuninst_comp[arch + "+all"] = nuninst[arch + "+all"] continue # if the uninstallability counter is worse than before, break the loop if ((item.architecture != 'source' and arch not in new_arches) or \ (arch not in break_arches)) and len(nuninst[arch]) > len(nuninst_comp[arch]): better = False break # if we are processing hints or the package is already accepted, go ahead if hint or item in selected: continue # check if the action improved the uninstallability counters if better: lundo.append((undo, item)) selected.append(pkg) packages.extend(extra) extra = [] self.output_write("accepted: %s\n" % (pkg.uvname)) self.output_write(" ori: %s\n" % (self.eval_nuninst(self.nuninst_orig))) self.output_write(" pre: %s\n" % (self.eval_nuninst(nuninst_comp))) self.output_write(" now: %s\n" % (self.eval_nuninst(nuninst, nuninst_comp))) if len(selected) <= 20: self.output_write(" all: %s\n" % (" ".join( x.uvname for x in selected ))) else: self.output_write(" most: (%d) .. %s\n" % (len(selected), " ".join(x.uvname for x in selected[-20:]))) for k in nuninst: nuninst_comp[k] = nuninst[k] else: self.output_write("skipped: %s (%d <- %d)\n" % (pkg.uvname, len(extra), len(packages))) self.output_write(" got: %s\n" % (self.eval_nuninst(nuninst, pkg.architecture != 'source' and nuninst_comp or None))) self.output_write(" * %s: %s\n" % (arch, ", ".join(sorted(b for b in nuninst[arch] if b not in nuninst_comp[arch])))) extra.append(item) if not mark_passed: skipped.append(item) single_undo = [(undo, item)] # (local-scope) binaries is actually self.binaries["testing"] so we cannot use it here. undo_changes(single_undo, self._inst_tester, sources, self.binaries) # if we are processing hints, return now if hint: return (nuninst_comp, []) self.output_write(" finish: [%s]\n" % ",".join( x.uvname for x in selected )) self.output_write("endloop: %s\n" % (self.eval_nuninst(self.nuninst_orig))) self.output_write(" now: %s\n" % (self.eval_nuninst(nuninst_comp))) self.output_write(eval_uninst(self.options.architectures, newly_uninst(self.nuninst_orig, nuninst_comp))) self.output_write("\n") return (nuninst_comp, extra) def do_all(self, hinttype=None, init=None, actions=None): """Testing update runner This method tries to update testing checking the uninstallability counters before and after the actions to decide if the update was successful or not. """ selected = [] if actions: upgrade_me = actions[:] else: upgrade_me = self.upgrade_me[:] nuninst_start = self.nuninst_orig # these are special parameters for hints processing force = False recurse = True lundo = None nuninst_end = None if hinttype == "easy" or hinttype == "force-hint": force = hinttype == "force-hint" recurse = False # if we have a list of initial packages, check them if init: if not force: lundo = [] self.output_write("leading: %s\n" % (",".join( x.uvname for x in init ))) for x in init: if x not in upgrade_me: self.output_write("failed: %s\n" % (x.uvname)) return None selected.append(x) upgrade_me.remove(x) self.output_write("start: %s\n" % self.eval_nuninst(nuninst_start)) if not force: self.output_write("orig: %s\n" % self.eval_nuninst(nuninst_start)) if init: # init => a hint (e.g. "easy") - so do the hint run (nuninst_end, extra) = self.iter_packages(init, selected, hint=True, lundo=lundo) if recurse: # Either the main run or the recursive run of a "hint"-hint. (nuninst_end, extra) = self.iter_packages(upgrade_me, selected, nuninst=nuninst_end, lundo=lundo) nuninst_end_str = self.eval_nuninst(nuninst_end) if not recurse: # easy or force-hint if force: self.output_write("orig: %s\n" % nuninst_end_str) self.output_write("easy: %s\n" % nuninst_end_str) if not force: self.output_write(eval_uninst(self.options.architectures, newly_uninst(nuninst_start, nuninst_end)) + "\n") if force or self.is_nuninst_asgood_generous(self.nuninst_orig, nuninst_end): # Result accepted either by force or by being better than the original result. if recurse: self.output_write("Apparently successful\n") self.output_write("final: %s\n" % ",".join(sorted( x.uvname for x in selected ))) self.output_write("start: %s\n" % self.eval_nuninst(nuninst_start)) if not force: self.output_write(" orig: %s\n" % self.eval_nuninst(self.nuninst_orig)) else: self.output_write(" orig: %s\n" % nuninst_end_str) self.output_write(" end: %s\n" % nuninst_end_str) if force: self.output_write("force breaks:\n") self.output_write(eval_uninst(self.options.architectures, newly_uninst(nuninst_start, nuninst_end)) + "\n") self.output_write("SUCCESS (%d/%d)\n" % (len(actions or self.upgrade_me), len(extra))) self.nuninst_orig = nuninst_end self.all_selected += selected if not actions: if recurse: self.upgrade_me = sorted(extra) else: self.upgrade_me = [x for x in self.upgrade_me if x not in selected] self.sort_actions() else: self.output_write("FAILED\n") if not lundo: return lundo.reverse() undo_changes(lundo, self._inst_tester, self.sources, self.binaries) def upgrade_testing(self): """Upgrade testing using the unstable packages This method tries to upgrade testing using the packages from unstable. Before running the do_all method, it tries the easy and force-hint commands. """ self.__log("Starting the upgrade test", type="I") self.output_write("Generated on: %s\n" % (time.strftime("%Y.%m.%d %H:%M:%S %z", time.gmtime(time.time())))) self.output_write("Arch order is: %s\n" % ", ".join(self.options.architectures)) self.__log("> Calculating current uninstallability counters", type="I") self.nuninst_orig = self.get_nuninst() # nuninst_orig may get updated during the upgrade process self.nuninst_orig_save = self.get_nuninst() if not self.options.actions: # process `easy' hints for x in self.hints['easy']: self.do_hint("easy", x.user, x.packages) # process `force-hint' hints for x in self.hints["force-hint"]: self.do_hint("force-hint", x.user, x.packages) # run the first round of the upgrade # - do separate runs for break arches allpackages = [] normpackages = self.upgrade_me[:] archpackages = {} for a in self.options.break_arches.split(): archpackages[a] = [p for p in normpackages if p.architecture == a] normpackages = [p for p in normpackages if p not in archpackages[a]] self.upgrade_me = normpackages self.output_write("info: main run\n") self.do_all() allpackages += self.upgrade_me for a in self.options.break_arches.split(): backup = self.options.break_arches self.options.break_arches = " ".join(x for x in self.options.break_arches.split() if x != a) self.upgrade_me = archpackages[a] self.output_write("info: broken arch run for %s\n" % (a)) self.do_all() allpackages += self.upgrade_me self.options.break_arches = backup self.upgrade_me = allpackages if self.options.actions: self.printuninstchange() return # process `hint' hints hintcnt = 0 for x in self.hints["hint"][:50]: if hintcnt > 50: self.output_write("Skipping remaining hints...") break if self.do_hint("hint", x.user, x.packages): hintcnt += 1 # run the auto hinter self.auto_hinter() # obsolete source packages # a package is obsolete if none of the binary packages in testing # are built by it self.__log("> Removing obsolete source packages from testing", type="I") removals = [] # local copies for performance sources = self.sources['testing'] binaries = self.binaries['testing'] used = set(binaries[arch][0][binary][SOURCE] for arch in binaries for binary in binaries[arch][0] ) removals = [ MigrationItem("-%s/%s" % (source, sources[source][VERSION])) for source in sources if source not in used ] if len(removals) > 0: self.output_write("Removing obsolete source packages from testing (%d):\n" % (len(removals))) self.do_all(actions=removals) # smooth updates if self.options.smooth_updates: self.__log("> Removing old packages left in testing from smooth updates", type="I") removals = old_libraries(self.sources, self.binaries) if removals: self.output_write("Removing packages left in testing for smooth updates (%d):\n%s" % \ (len(removals), old_libraries_format(removals))) self.do_all(actions=removals) removals = old_libraries(self.sources, self.binaries) else: removals = () self.output_write("List of old libraries in testing (%d):\n%s" % \ (len(removals), old_libraries_format(removals))) # output files if not self.options.dry_run: # re-write control files if self.options.control_files: self.__log("Writing new testing control files to %s" % self.options.testing) write_controlfiles(self.sources, self.binaries, 'testing', self.options.testing) # write dates try: self.write_dates(self.options.outputdir, self.dates) except AttributeError: self.write_dates(self.options.testing, self.dates) # write HeidiResult self.__log("Writing Heidi results to %s" % self.options.heidi_output) write_heidi(self.options.heidi_output, self.sources["testing"], self.binaries["testing"]) self.__log("Writing delta to %s" % self.options.heidi_delta_output) write_heidi_delta(self.options.heidi_delta_output, self.all_selected) self.printuninstchange() self.__log("Test completed!", type="I") def printuninstchange(self): self.__log("Checking for newly uninstallable packages", type="I") text = eval_uninst(self.options.architectures, newly_uninst( self.nuninst_orig_save, self.nuninst_orig)) if text != '': self.output_write("\nNewly uninstallable packages in testing:\n%s" % \ (text)) def hint_tester(self): """Run a command line interface to test hints This method provides a command line interface for the release team to try hints and evaluate the results. """ self.__log("> Calculating current uninstallability counters", type="I") self.nuninst_orig = self.get_nuninst() self.nuninst_orig_save = self.get_nuninst() import readline from completer import Completer histfile = os.path.expanduser('~/.britney2_history') if os.path.exists(histfile): readline.read_history_file(histfile) readline.parse_and_bind('tab: complete') readline.set_completer(Completer(self).completer) # Package names can contain "-" and we use "/" in our presentation of them as well, # so ensure readline does not split on these characters. readline.set_completer_delims(readline.get_completer_delims().replace('-', '').replace('/', '')) while True: # read the command from the command line try: input = raw_input('britney> ').lower().split() except EOFError: print "" break except KeyboardInterrupt: print "" continue # quit the hint tester if input and input[0] in ('quit', 'exit'): break elif input and input[0] in ('remove', 'approve', 'urgent', 'age-days', 'block', 'block-udeb', 'unblock', 'unblock-udeb', 'block-all', 'force'): self.hints.add_hint(' '.join(input), 'hint-tester') self.write_excuses() # run a hint elif input and input[0] in ('easy', 'hint', 'force-hint'): try: self.do_hint(input[0], 'hint-tester', [k.rsplit("/", 1) for k in input[1:] if "/" in k]) self.printuninstchange() except KeyboardInterrupt: continue try: readline.write_history_file(histfile) except IOError, e: self.__log("Could not write %s: %s" % (histfile, e), type="W") def do_hint(self, hinttype, who, pkgvers): """Process hints This method process `easy`, `hint` and `force-hint` hints. If the requested version is not in unstable, then the hint is skipped. """ if isinstance(pkgvers[0], tuple) or isinstance(pkgvers[0], list): _pkgvers = [ MigrationItem('%s/%s' % (p, v)) for (p,v) in pkgvers ] else: _pkgvers = pkgvers self.__log("> Processing '%s' hint from %s" % (hinttype, who), type="I") self.output_write("Trying %s from %s: %s\n" % (hinttype, who, " ".join( ["%s/%s" % (x.uvname, x.version) for x in _pkgvers]))) ok = True # loop on the requested packages and versions for idx in range(len(_pkgvers)): pkg = _pkgvers[idx] # skip removal requests if pkg.is_removal: continue inunstable = pkg.package in self.sources['unstable'] rightversion = inunstable and (apt_pkg.version_compare(self.sources['unstable'][pkg.package][VERSION], pkg.version) == 0) if pkg.suite == 'unstable' and not rightversion: for suite in ['pu', 'tpu']: if pkg.package in self.sources[suite] and apt_pkg.version_compare(self.sources[suite][pkg.package][VERSION], pkg.version) == 0: pkg.suite = suite _pkgvers[idx] = pkg break # handle *-proposed-updates if pkg.suite in ['pu', 'tpu']: if pkg.package not in self.sources[pkg.suite]: continue if apt_pkg.version_compare(self.sources[pkg.suite][pkg.package][VERSION], pkg.version) != 0: self.output_write(" Version mismatch, %s %s != %s\n" % (pkg.package, pkg.version, self.sources[pkg.suite][pkg.package][VERSION])) ok = False # does the package exist in unstable? elif not inunstable: self.output_write(" Source %s has no version in unstable\n" % pkg.package) ok = False elif not rightversion: self.output_write(" Version mismatch, %s %s != %s\n" % (pkg.package, pkg.version, self.sources['unstable'][pkg.package][VERSION])) ok = False if not ok: self.output_write("Not using hint\n") return False self.do_all(hinttype, _pkgvers) return True def sort_actions(self): """Sort actions in a smart way This method sorts the list of actions in a smart way. In detail, it uses as the base sort the number of days the excuse is old, then reorders packages so the ones with most reverse dependencies are at the end of the loop. If an action depends on another one, it is put after it. """ upgrade_me = [x.name for x in self.excuses if x.name in [y.uvname for y in self.upgrade_me]] for e in self.excuses: if e.name not in upgrade_me: continue # try removes at the end of the loop elif e.name[0] == '-': upgrade_me.remove(e.name) upgrade_me.append(e.name) # otherwise, put it in a good position checking its dependencies else: pos = [] udeps = [upgrade_me.index(x) for x in e.deps if x in upgrade_me and x != e.name] if len(udeps) > 0: pos.append(max(udeps)) sdeps = [upgrade_me.index(x) for x in e.sane_deps if x in upgrade_me and x != e.name] if len(sdeps) > 0: pos.append(min(sdeps)) if len(pos) == 0: continue upgrade_me.remove(e.name) upgrade_me.insert(max(pos)+1, e.name) self.dependencies[e.name] = e.deps # replace the list of actions with the new one self.upgrade_me = [ make_migrationitem(x, self.sources) for x in upgrade_me ] def auto_hinter(self): """Auto-generate "easy" hints. This method attempts to generate "easy" hints for sets of packages which must migrate together. Beginning with a package which does not depend on any other package (in terms of excuses), a list of dependencies and reverse dependencies is recursively created. Once all such lists have been generated, any which are subsets of other lists are ignored in favour of the larger lists. The remaining lists are then attempted in turn as "easy" hints. We also try to auto hint circular dependencies analyzing the update excuses relationships. If they build a circular dependency, which we already know as not-working with the standard do_all algorithm, try to `easy` them. """ self.__log("> Processing hints from the auto hinter [Partial-ordering]", type="I") # consider only excuses which are valid candidates excuses = dict((x.name, x) for x in self.excuses if x.name in [y.uvname for y in self.upgrade_me]) sources_t = self.sources['testing'] groups = set() for y in sorted((y for y in self.upgrade_me if y.uvname in excuses), key=attrgetter('uvname')): if y.is_removal and y.package not in sources_t: # Already removed continue if not y.is_removal: excuse = excuses[y.uvname] if y.architecture == 'source' and y.uvname in sources_t and sources_t[y.uvname][VERSION] == excuse.ver[1]: # Already migrated continue adds, rms, _ = self._compute_groups(y.package, y.suite, y.architecture, y.is_removal, include_hijacked=True) groups.add((y, frozenset(adds), frozenset(rms))) for comp in self._inst_tester.solve_groups(groups): if len(comp) > 1: self.do_hint("easy", "autohinter", comp) self.__log("> Processing hints from the auto hinter [Original]", type="I") def find_related(e, hint, circular_first=False): if e not in excuses: return False excuse = excuses[e] if e in self.sources['testing'] and self.sources['testing'][e][VERSION] == excuse.ver[1]: return True if not circular_first: hint[e] = excuse.ver[1] if len(excuse.deps) == 0: return hint for p in excuse.deps: if p in hint: continue if not find_related(p, hint): return False return hint # loop on them candidates = [] mincands = [] for e in excuses: excuse = excuses[e] if e in self.sources['testing'] and self.sources['testing'][e][VERSION] == excuse.ver[1]: continue if len(excuse.deps) > 0: hint = find_related(e, {}, True) if isinstance(hint, dict) and e in hint and hint not in candidates: candidates.append(hint.items()) else: items = [ (e, excuse.ver[1]) ] looped = False for item, ver in items: # excuses which depend on "item" or are depended on by it items.extend( (x, excuses[x].ver[1]) for x in excuses if \ (item in excuses[x].deps or x in excuses[item].deps) \ and (x, excuses[x].ver[1]) not in items ) if not looped and len(items) > 1: mincands.append(items[:]) looped = True if len(items) > 1 and frozenset(items) != frozenset(mincands[-1]): candidates.append(items) for l in [ candidates, mincands ]: to_skip = [] for i in range(len(l)): for j in range(i+1, len(l)): if i in to_skip or j in to_skip: # we already know this list isn't interesting continue elif frozenset(l[i]) >= frozenset(l[j]): # j is a subset of i; ignore it to_skip.append(j) elif frozenset(l[i]) <= frozenset(l[j]): # i is a subset of j; ignore it to_skip.append(i) for i in range(len(l)): if i not in to_skip: self.do_hint("easy", "autohinter", [ MigrationItem("%s/%s" % (x[0], x[1])) for x in l[i] ]) def nuninst_arch_report(self, nuninst, arch): """Print a report of uninstallable packages for one architecture.""" all = {} for p in nuninst[arch]: pkg = self.binaries['testing'][arch][0][p] all.setdefault((pkg[SOURCE], pkg[SOURCEVER]), set()).add(p) print '* %s' % (arch,) for (src, ver), pkgs in sorted(all.iteritems()): print ' %s (%s): %s' % (src, ver, ' '.join(sorted(pkgs))) print def output_write(self, msg): """Simple wrapper for output writing""" print msg, self.__output.write(msg) def main(self): """Main method This is the entry point for the class: it includes the list of calls for the member methods which will produce the output files. """ # if running in --print-uninst mode, quit if self.options.print_uninst: return # if no actions are provided, build the excuses and sort them elif not self.options.actions: self.write_excuses() self.sort_actions() # otherwise, use the actions provided by the command line else: self.upgrade_me = self.options.actions.split() self.__output = open(self.options.upgrade_output, 'w') # run the hint tester if self.options.hint_tester: self.hint_tester() # run the upgrade test else: self.upgrade_testing() self.__output.close() def _installability_test(self, pkg_name, pkg_version, pkg_arch, broken, to_check, nuninst_arch): """Test for installability of a package on an architecture (pkg_name, pkg_version, pkg_arch) is the package to check. broken is the set of broken packages. If p changes installability (e.g. goes from uninstallable to installable), broken will be updated accordingly. Furthermore, p will be added to "to_check" for futher processing. If nuninst_arch is not None then it also updated in the same way as broken is. """ r = self._inst_tester.is_installable(pkg_name, pkg_version, pkg_arch) if not r: # not installable if pkg_name not in broken: broken.add(pkg_name) to_check.append(pkg_name) if nuninst_arch is not None and pkg_name not in nuninst_arch: nuninst_arch.add(pkg_name) else: if pkg_name in broken: to_check.append(pkg_name) broken.remove(pkg_name) if nuninst_arch is not None and pkg_name in nuninst_arch: nuninst_arch.remove(pkg_name) if __name__ == '__main__': Britney().main()