#!/usr/bin/python3 -u # -*- coding: utf-8 -*- # Copyright (C) 2001-2008 Anthony Towns # Andreas Barth # Fabio Tranchitella # Copyright (C) 2010-2013 Adam D. Barratt # This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify # it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by # the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or # (at your option) any later version. # This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, # but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of # MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the # GNU General Public License for more details. """ = Introduction = This is the Debian testing updater script, also known as "Britney". Packages are usually installed into the `testing' distribution after they have undergone some degree of testing in unstable. The goal of this software is to do this task in a smart way, allowing testing to always be fully installable and close to being a release candidate. Britney's source code is split between two different but related tasks: the first one is the generation of the update excuses, while the second tries to update testing with the valid candidates; first each package alone, then larger and even larger sets of packages together. Each try is accepted if testing is not more uninstallable after the update than before. = Data Loading = In order to analyze the entire Debian distribution, Britney needs to load in memory the whole archive: this means more than 10.000 packages for twelve architectures, as well as the dependency interconnections between them. For this reason, the memory requirements for running this software are quite high and at least 1 gigabyte of RAM should be available. Britney loads the source packages from the `Sources' file and the binary packages from the `Packages_${arch}' files, where ${arch} is substituted with the supported architectures. While loading the data, the software analyzes the dependencies and builds a directed weighted graph in memory with all the interconnections between the packages (see Britney.read_sources and Britney.read_binaries). Other than source and binary packages, Britney loads the following data: * BugsV, which contains the list of release-critical bugs for a given version of a source or binary package (see Britney.read_bugs). * Dates, which contains the date of the upload of a given version of a source package (see Britney.read_dates). * Urgencies, which contains the urgency of the upload of a given version of a source package (see Britney.read_urgencies). * Hints, which contains lists of commands which modify the standard behaviour of Britney (see Britney.read_hints). For a more detailed explanation about the format of these files, please read the documentation of the related methods. The exact meaning of them will be instead explained in the chapter "Excuses Generation". = Excuses = An excuse is a detailed explanation of why a package can or cannot be updated in the testing distribution from a newer package in another distribution (like for example unstable). The main purpose of the excuses is to be written in an HTML file which will be published over HTTP. The maintainers will be able to parse it manually or automatically to find the explanation of why their packages have been updated or not. == Excuses generation == These are the steps (with references to method names) that Britney does for the generation of the update excuses. * If a source package is available in testing but it is not present in unstable and no binary packages in unstable are built from it, then it is marked for removal. * Every source package in unstable and testing-proposed-updates, if already present in testing, is checked for binary-NMUs, new or dropped binary packages in all the supported architectures (see Britney.should_upgrade_srcarch). The steps to detect if an upgrade is needed are: 1. If there is a `remove' hint for the source package, the package is ignored: it will be removed and not updated. 2. For every binary package built from the new source, it checks for unsatisfied dependencies, new binary packages and updated binary packages (binNMU), excluding the architecture-independent ones, and packages not built from the same source. 3. For every binary package built from the old source, it checks if it is still built from the new source; if this is not true and the package is not architecture-independent, the script removes it from testing. 4. Finally, if there is something worth doing (eg. a new or updated binary package) and nothing wrong it marks the source package as "Valid candidate", or "Not considered" if there is something wrong which prevented the update. * Every source package in unstable and testing-proposed-updates is checked for upgrade (see Britney.should_upgrade_src). The steps to detect if an upgrade is needed are: 1. If the source package in testing is more recent the new one is ignored. 2. If the source package doesn't exist (is fake), which means that a binary package refers to it but it is not present in the `Sources' file, the new one is ignored. 3. If the package doesn't exist in testing, the urgency of the upload is ignored and set to the default (actually `low'). 4. If there is a `remove' hint for the source package, the package is ignored: it will be removed and not updated. 5. If there is a `block' hint for the source package without an `unblock` hint or a `block-all source`, the package is ignored. 6. If there is a `block-udeb' hint for the source package, it will have the same effect as `block', but may only be cancelled by a subsequent `unblock-udeb' hint. 7. If the suite is unstable, the update can go ahead only if the upload happened more than the minimum days specified by the urgency of the upload; if this is not true, the package is ignored as `too-young'. Note that the urgency is sticky, meaning that the highest urgency uploaded since the previous testing transition is taken into account. 8. If the suite is unstable, all the architecture-dependent binary packages and the architecture-independent ones for the `nobreakall' architectures have to be built from the source we are considering. If this is not true, then these are called `out-of-date' architectures and the package is ignored. 9. The source package must have at least one binary package, otherwise it is ignored. 10. If the suite is unstable, the new source package must have no release critical bugs which do not also apply to the testing one. If this is not true, the package is ignored as `buggy'. 11. If there is a `force' hint for the source package, then it is updated even if it is marked as ignored from the previous steps. 12. If the suite is {testing-,}proposed-updates, the source package can be updated only if there is an explicit approval for it. Unless a `force' hint exists, the new package must also be available on all of the architectures for which it has binary packages in testing. 13. If the package will be ignored, mark it as "Valid candidate", otherwise mark it as "Not considered". * The list of `remove' hints is processed: if the requested source package is not already being updated or removed and the version actually in testing is the same specified with the `remove' hint, it is marked for removal. * The excuses are sorted by the number of days from the last upload (days-old) and by name. * A list of unconsidered excuses (for which the package is not upgraded) is built. Using this list, all of the excuses depending on them are marked as invalid "impossible dependencies". * The excuses are written in an HTML file. """ from __future__ import print_function import os import sys import time import optparse import apt_pkg from collections import defaultdict from functools import reduce from itertools import chain, product from operator import attrgetter from urllib.parse import quote from installability.builder import InstallabilityTesterBuilder from excuse import Excuse from migrationitem import MigrationItem from hints import HintCollection from britney_util import (old_libraries_format, undo_changes, compute_reverse_tree, read_nuninst, write_nuninst, write_heidi, eval_uninst, newly_uninst, make_migrationitem, write_excuses, write_heidi_delta, write_controlfiles, old_libraries, is_nuninst_asgood_generous, clone_nuninst) from consts import (VERSION, SECTION, BINARIES, MAINTAINER, FAKESRC, SOURCE, SOURCEVER, ARCHITECTURE, DEPENDS, CONFLICTS, PROVIDES, MULTIARCH, ESSENTIAL) __author__ = 'Fabio Tranchitella and the Debian Release Team' __version__ = '2.0' # NB: ESSENTIAL deliberately skipped as the 2011 and 2012 # parts of the live-data tests require it (britney merges # this field correctly from the unstable version where # available) check_field_name = dict((globals()[fn], fn) for fn in ( "SOURCE SOURCEVER ARCHITECTURE MULTIARCH" + " DEPENDS CONFLICTS PROVIDES" ).split() ) check_fields = sorted(check_field_name) class Britney(object): """Britney, the Debian testing updater script This is the script that updates the testing distribution. It is executed each day after the installation of the updated packages. It generates the `Packages' files for the testing distribution, but it does so in an intelligent manner; it tries to avoid any inconsistency and to use only non-buggy packages. For more documentation on this script, please read the Developers Reference. """ HINTS_HELPERS = ("easy", "hint", "remove", "block", "block-udeb", "unblock", "unblock-udeb", "approve") HINTS_STANDARD = ("urgent", "age-days") + HINTS_HELPERS HINTS_ALL = ("force", "force-hint", "block-all") + HINTS_STANDARD def __init__(self): """Class constructor This method initializes and populates the data lists, which contain all the information needed by the other methods of the class. """ # britney's "day" begins at 3pm self.date_now = int(((time.time() / (60*60)) - 15) / 24) # parse the command line arguments self.__parse_arguments() MigrationItem.set_architectures(self.options.architectures) # initialize the apt_pkg back-end apt_pkg.init() self.sources = {} self.binaries = {} self.all_selected = [] try: self.hints = self.read_hints(self.options.hintsdir) except AttributeError: self.hints = self.read_hints(self.options.unstable) if self.options.nuninst_cache: self.__log("Not building the list of non-installable packages, as requested", type="I") if self.options.print_uninst: print('* summary') print('\n'.join('%4d %s' % (len(nuninst[x]), x) for x in self.options.architectures)) return self.all_binaries = {} # read the source and binary packages for the involved distributions self.sources['testing'] = self.read_sources(self.options.testing) self.sources['unstable'] = self.read_sources(self.options.unstable) self.sources['tpu'] = self.read_sources(self.options.tpu) if hasattr(self.options, 'pu'): self.sources['pu'] = self.read_sources(self.options.pu) else: self.sources['pu'] = {} self.binaries['testing'] = {} self.binaries['unstable'] = {} self.binaries['tpu'] = {} self.binaries['pu'] = {} for arch in self.options.architectures: self.binaries['testing'][arch] = self.read_binaries(self.options.testing, "testing", arch) self.binaries['unstable'][arch] = self.read_binaries(self.options.unstable, "unstable", arch) self.binaries['tpu'][arch] = self.read_binaries(self.options.tpu, "tpu", arch) if hasattr(self.options, 'pu'): self.binaries['pu'][arch] = self.read_binaries(self.options.pu, "pu", arch) else: # _build_installability_tester relies on it being # properly initialised, so insert two empty dicts # here. self.binaries['pu'][arch] = ({}, {}) self.__log("Compiling Installability tester", type="I") self._build_installability_tester(self.options.architectures) if not self.options.nuninst_cache: self.__log("Building the list of non-installable packages for the full archive", type="I") nuninst = {} self._inst_tester.compute_testing_installability() for arch in self.options.architectures: self.__log("> Checking for non-installable packages for architecture %s" % arch, type="I") result = self.get_nuninst(arch, build=True) nuninst.update(result) self.__log("> Found %d non-installable packages" % len(nuninst[arch]), type="I") if self.options.print_uninst: self.nuninst_arch_report(nuninst, arch) if self.options.print_uninst: print('* summary') print('\n'.join(map(lambda x: '%4d %s' % (len(nuninst[x]), x), self.options.architectures))) return else: write_nuninst(self.options.noninst_status, nuninst) stats = self._inst_tester.compute_stats() self.__log("> Installability tester statistics (per architecture)", type="I") for arch in self.options.architectures: arch_stat = stats[arch] self.__log("> %s" % arch, type="I") for stat in arch_stat.stat_summary(): self.__log("> - %s" % stat, type="I") # read the release-critical bug summaries for testing and unstable self.bugs = {'unstable': self.read_bugs(self.options.unstable), 'testing': self.read_bugs(self.options.testing),} self.normalize_bugs() # read additional data self.dates = self.read_dates(self.options.testing) self.urgencies = self.read_urgencies(self.options.testing) self.excuses = [] def merge_pkg_entries(self, package, parch, pkg_entry1, pkg_entry2, check_fields=check_fields, check_field_name=check_field_name): bad = [] for f in check_fields: if pkg_entry1[f] != pkg_entry2[f]: bad.append((f, pkg_entry1[f], pkg_entry2[f])) if bad: self.__log("Mismatch found %s %s %s differs" % ( package, pkg_entry1[VERSION], parch), type="E") for f, v1, v2 in bad: self.__log(" ... %s %s != %s" % (check_field_name[f], v1, v2)) raise ValueError("Invalid data set") # Merge ESSENTIAL if necessary if pkg_entry2[ESSENTIAL]: pkg_entry1[ESSENTIAL] = True def __parse_arguments(self): """Parse the command line arguments This method parses and initializes the command line arguments. While doing so, it preprocesses some of the options to be converted in a suitable form for the other methods of the class. """ # initialize the parser parser = optparse.OptionParser(version="%prog") parser.add_option("-v", "", action="count", dest="verbose", help="enable verbose output") parser.add_option("-c", "--config", action="store", dest="config", default="/etc/britney.conf", help="path for the configuration file") parser.add_option("", "--architectures", action="store", dest="architectures", default=None, help="override architectures from configuration file") parser.add_option("", "--actions", action="store", dest="actions", default=None, help="override the list of actions to be performed") parser.add_option("", "--hints", action="store", dest="hints", default=None, help="additional hints, separated by semicolons") parser.add_option("", "--hint-tester", action="store_true", dest="hint_tester", default=None, help="provide a command line interface to test hints") parser.add_option("", "--dry-run", action="store_true", dest="dry_run", default=False, help="disable all outputs to the testing directory") parser.add_option("", "--control-files", action="store_true", dest="control_files", default=False, help="enable control files generation") parser.add_option("", "--nuninst-cache", action="store_true", dest="nuninst_cache", default=False, help="do not build the non-installability status, use the cache from file") parser.add_option("", "--print-uninst", action="store_true", dest="print_uninst", default=False, help="just print a summary of uninstallable packages") (self.options, self.args) = parser.parse_args() # integrity checks if self.options.nuninst_cache and self.options.print_uninst: self.__log("nuninst_cache and print_uninst are mutually exclusive!", type="E") sys.exit(1) # if the configuration file exists, then read it and set the additional options elif not os.path.isfile(self.options.config): self.__log("Unable to read the configuration file (%s), exiting!" % self.options.config, type="E") sys.exit(1) # minimum days for unstable-testing transition and the list of hints # are handled as an ad-hoc case self.MINDAYS = {} self.HINTS = {'command-line': self.HINTS_ALL} with open(self.options.config, encoding='utf-8') as config: for line in config: if '=' in line and not line.strip().startswith('#'): k, v = line.split('=', 1) k = k.strip() v = v.strip() if k.startswith("MINDAYS_"): self.MINDAYS[k.split("_")[1].lower()] = int(v) elif k.startswith("HINTS_"): self.HINTS[k.split("_")[1].lower()] = \ reduce(lambda x,y: x+y, [hasattr(self, "HINTS_" + i) and getattr(self, "HINTS_" + i) or (i,) for i in v.split()]) elif not hasattr(self.options, k.lower()) or \ not getattr(self.options, k.lower()): setattr(self.options, k.lower(), v) if not hasattr(self.options, "heidi_delta_output"): self.options.heidi_delta_output = self.options.heidi_output + "Delta" self.options.nobreakall_arches = self.options.nobreakall_arches.split() self.options.fucked_arches = self.options.fucked_arches.split() self.options.break_arches = self.options.break_arches.split() self.options.new_arches = self.options.new_arches.split() # Sort the architecture list allarches = sorted(self.options.architectures.split()) arches = [x for x in allarches if x in self.options.nobreakall_arches] arches += [x for x in allarches if x not in arches and x not in self.options.fucked_arches] arches += [x for x in allarches if x not in arches and x not in self.options.break_arches] arches += [x for x in allarches if x not in arches and x not in self.options.new_arches] arches += [x for x in allarches if x not in arches] self.options.architectures = [sys.intern(arch) for arch in arches] self.options.smooth_updates = self.options.smooth_updates.split() if not hasattr(self.options, 'ignore_cruft') or \ self.options.ignore_cruft == "0": self.options.ignore_cruft = False def __log(self, msg, type="I"): """Print info messages according to verbosity level An easy-and-simple log method which prints messages to the standard output. The type parameter controls the urgency of the message, and can be equal to `I' for `Information', `W' for `Warning' and `E' for `Error'. Warnings and errors are always printed, and information is printed only if verbose logging is enabled. """ if self.options.verbose or type in ("E", "W"): print("%s: [%s] - %s" % (type, time.asctime(), msg)) def _build_installability_tester(self, archs): """Create the installability tester""" solvers = self.get_dependency_solvers binaries = self.binaries builder = InstallabilityTesterBuilder() for (dist, arch) in product(binaries, archs): testing = (dist == 'testing') for pkgname in binaries[dist][arch][0]: pkgdata = binaries[dist][arch][0][pkgname] version = pkgdata[VERSION] t = (pkgname, version, arch) essential = pkgdata[ESSENTIAL] if not builder.add_binary(t, essential=essential, in_testing=testing): continue depends = [] conflicts = [] possible_dep_ranges = {} # We do not differentiate between depends and pre-depends if pkgdata[DEPENDS]: depends.extend(apt_pkg.parse_depends(pkgdata[DEPENDS], False)) if pkgdata[CONFLICTS]: conflicts = apt_pkg.parse_depends(pkgdata[CONFLICTS], False) with builder.relation_builder(t) as relations: for (al, dep) in [(depends, True), \ (conflicts, False)]: for block in al: sat = set() for dep_dist in binaries: dep_packages_s_a = binaries[dep_dist][arch] pkgs = solvers(block, dep_packages_s_a) for p in pkgs: # version and arch is already interned, but solvers use # the package name extracted from the field and it is therefore # not interned. pdata = dep_packages_s_a[0][p] pt = (sys.intern(p), pdata[VERSION], arch) if dep: sat.add(pt) elif t != pt: # if t satisfies its own # conflicts relation, then it # is using §7.6.2 relations.add_breaks(pt) if dep: if len(block) != 1: relations.add_dependency_clause(sat) else: # This dependency might be a part # of a version-range a la: # # Depends: pkg-a (>= 1), # pkg-a (<< 2~) # # In such a case we want to reduce # that to a single clause for # efficiency. # # In theory, it could also happen # with "non-minimal" dependencies # a la: # # Depends: pkg-a, pkg-a (>= 1) # # But dpkg is known to fix that up # at build time, so we will # probably only see "ranges" here. key = block[0][0] if key in possible_dep_ranges: possible_dep_ranges[key] &= sat else: possible_dep_ranges[key] = sat if dep: for clause in possible_dep_ranges.values(): relations.add_dependency_clause(clause) self._inst_tester = builder.build() # Data reading/writing methods # ---------------------------- def read_sources(self, basedir, intern=sys.intern): """Read the list of source packages from the specified directory The source packages are read from the `Sources' file within the directory specified as `basedir' parameter. Considering the large amount of memory needed, not all the fields are loaded in memory. The available fields are Version, Maintainer and Section. The method returns a list where every item represents a source package as a dictionary. """ sources = {} filename = os.path.join(basedir, "Sources") self.__log("Loading source packages from %s" % filename) with open(filename, encoding='utf-8') as f: Packages = apt_pkg.TagFile(f) get_field = Packages.section.get step = Packages.step while step(): if get_field('Extra-Source-Only', 'no') == 'yes': # Ignore sources only referenced by Built-Using continue pkg = get_field('Package') ver = get_field('Version') # There may be multiple versions of the source package # (in unstable) if some architectures have out-of-date # binaries. We only ever consider the source with the # largest version for migration. if pkg in sources and apt_pkg.version_compare(sources[pkg][0], ver) > 0: continue sources[intern(pkg)] = [intern(ver), intern(get_field('Section')), [], get_field('Maintainer'), False, ] return sources def read_binaries(self, basedir, distribution, arch, intern=sys.intern): """Read the list of binary packages from the specified directory The binary packages are read from the `Packages_${arch}' files within the directory specified as `basedir' parameter, replacing ${arch} with the value of the arch parameter. Considering the large amount of memory needed, not all the fields are loaded in memory. The available fields are Version, Source, Multi-Arch, Depends, Conflicts, Provides and Architecture. After reading the packages, reverse dependencies are computed and saved in the `rdepends' keys, and the `Provides' field is used to populate the virtual packages list. The dependencies are parsed with the apt_pkg.parse_depends method, and they are stored both as the format of its return value and text. The method returns a tuple. The first element is a list where every item represents a binary package as a dictionary; the second element is a dictionary which maps virtual packages to real packages that provide them. """ packages = {} provides = defaultdict(set) sources = self.sources all_binaries = self.all_binaries filename = os.path.join(basedir, "Packages_%s" % arch) self.__log("Loading binary packages from %s" % filename) with open(filename, encoding='utf-8') as f: Packages = apt_pkg.TagFile(f) get_field = Packages.section.get step = Packages.step while step(): pkg = get_field('Package') version = get_field('Version') # There may be multiple versions of any arch:all packages # (in unstable) if some architectures have out-of-date # binaries. We only ever consider the package with the # largest version for migration. if pkg in packages and apt_pkg.version_compare(packages[pkg][0], version) > 0: continue pkg = intern(pkg) version = intern(version) pkg_id = (pkg, version, arch) # Merge Pre-Depends with Depends and Conflicts with # Breaks. Britney is not interested in the "finer # semantic differences" of these fields anyway. pdeps = get_field('Pre-Depends') deps = get_field('Depends') if deps and pdeps: deps = pdeps + ', ' + deps elif pdeps: deps = pdeps ess = False if get_field('Essential', 'no') == 'yes': ess = True final_conflicts_list = [] conflicts = get_field('Conflicts') if conflicts: final_conflicts_list.append(conflicts) breaks = get_field('Breaks') if breaks: final_conflicts_list.append(breaks) dpkg = [version, intern(get_field('Section')), pkg, version, intern(get_field('Architecture')), get_field('Multi-Arch'), deps, ', '.join(final_conflicts_list) or None, get_field('Provides'), ess, ] # retrieve the name and the version of the source package source = get_field('Source') if source: dpkg[SOURCE] = intern(source.split(" ")[0]) if "(" in source: dpkg[SOURCEVER] = intern(source[source.find("(")+1:source.find(")")]) # if the source package is available in the distribution, then register this binary package if dpkg[SOURCE] in sources[distribution]: # There may be multiple versions of any arch:all packages # (in unstable) if some architectures have out-of-date # binaries. We only want to include the package in the # source -> binary mapping once. It doesn't matter which # of the versions we include as only the package name and # architecture are recorded. if pkg_id not in sources[distribution][dpkg[SOURCE]][BINARIES]: sources[distribution][dpkg[SOURCE]][BINARIES].append(pkg_id) # if the source package doesn't exist, create a fake one else: sources[distribution][dpkg[SOURCE]] = [dpkg[SOURCEVER], 'faux', [pkg_id], None, True] # register virtual packages and real packages that provide them if dpkg[PROVIDES]: parts = apt_pkg.parse_depends(dpkg[PROVIDES], False) nprov = [] for or_clause in parts: if len(or_clause) != 1: msg = "Ignoring invalid provides in %s: Alternatives [%s]" % (str(pkg_id), str(or_clause)) self.__log(msg, type='W') continue for part in or_clause: provided, provided_version, op = part if op != '' and op != '=': msg = "Ignoring invalid provides in %s: %s (%s %s)" % (str(pkg_id), provided, op, version) self.__log(msg, type='W') continue provided = intern(provided) provided_version = intern(provided_version) part = (provided, provided_version, intern(op)) provides[provided].add((pkg, provided_version)) nprov.append(part) dpkg[PROVIDES] = nprov else: dpkg[PROVIDES] = [] # add the resulting dictionary to the package list packages[pkg] = dpkg if pkg_id in all_binaries: self.merge_pkg_entries(pkg, arch, all_binaries[pkg_id], dpkg) else: all_binaries[pkg_id] = dpkg # return a tuple with the list of real and virtual packages return (packages, provides) def read_bugs(self, basedir): """Read the release critical bug summary from the specified directory The RC bug summaries are read from the `BugsV' file within the directory specified in the `basedir' parameter. The file contains rows with the format: [,...] The method returns a dictionary where the key is the binary package name and the value is the list of open RC bugs for it. """ bugs = defaultdict(list) filename = os.path.join(basedir, "BugsV") self.__log("Loading RC bugs data from %s" % filename) for line in open(filename, encoding='ascii'): l = line.split() if len(l) != 2: self.__log("Malformed line found in line %s" % (line), type='W') continue pkg = l[0] bugs[pkg] += l[1].split(",") return bugs def __maxver(self, pkg, dist): """Return the maximum version for a given package name This method returns None if the specified source package is not available in the `dist' distribution. If the package exists, then it returns the maximum version between the source package and its binary packages. """ maxver = None if pkg in self.sources[dist]: maxver = self.sources[dist][pkg][VERSION] for arch in self.options.architectures: if pkg not in self.binaries[dist][arch][0]: continue pkgv = self.binaries[dist][arch][0][pkg][VERSION] if maxver is None or apt_pkg.version_compare(pkgv, maxver) > 0: maxver = pkgv return maxver def normalize_bugs(self): """Normalize the release critical bug summaries for testing and unstable The method doesn't return any value: it directly modifies the object attribute `bugs'. """ # loop on all the package names from testing and unstable bug summaries for pkg in set(chain(self.bugs['testing'], self.bugs['unstable'])): # make sure that the key is present in both dictionaries if pkg not in self.bugs['testing']: self.bugs['testing'][pkg] = [] elif pkg not in self.bugs['unstable']: self.bugs['unstable'][pkg] = [] if pkg.startswith("src:"): pkg = pkg[4:] # retrieve the maximum version of the package in testing: maxvert = self.__maxver(pkg, 'testing') # if the package is not available in testing, then reset # the list of RC bugs if maxvert is None: self.bugs['testing'][pkg] = [] def read_dates(self, basedir): """Read the upload date for the packages from the specified directory The upload dates are read from the `Dates' file within the directory specified as `basedir' parameter. The file contains rows with the format: The dates are expressed as the number of days from 1970-01-01. The method returns a dictionary where the key is the binary package name and the value is a tuple with two items, the version and the date. """ dates = {} filename = os.path.join(basedir, "Dates") self.__log("Loading upload data from %s" % filename) for line in open(filename, encoding='ascii'): l = line.split() if len(l) != 3: continue try: dates[l[0]] = (l[1], int(l[2])) except ValueError: self.__log("Dates, unable to parse \"%s\"" % line, type="E") return dates def write_dates(self, basedir, dates): """Write the upload date for the packages to the specified directory For a more detailed explanation of the format, please check the method read_dates. """ filename = os.path.join(basedir, "Dates") self.__log("Writing upload data to %s" % filename) with open(filename, 'w', encoding='utf-8') as f: for pkg in sorted(dates): f.write("%s %s %d\n" % ((pkg,) + dates[pkg])) def read_urgencies(self, basedir): """Read the upload urgency of the packages from the specified directory The upload urgencies are read from the `Urgency' file within the directory specified as `basedir' parameter. The file contains rows with the format: The method returns a dictionary where the key is the binary package name and the value is the greatest urgency from the versions of the package that are higher then the testing one. """ urgencies = {} filename = os.path.join(basedir, "Urgency") self.__log("Loading upload urgencies from %s" % filename) for line in open(filename, errors='surrogateescape', encoding='ascii'): l = line.split() if len(l) != 3: continue # read the minimum days associated with the urgencies urgency_old = urgencies.get(l[0], None) mindays_old = self.MINDAYS.get(urgency_old, 1000) mindays_new = self.MINDAYS.get(l[2], self.MINDAYS[self.options.default_urgency]) # if the new urgency is lower (so the min days are higher), do nothing if mindays_old <= mindays_new: continue # if the package exists in testing and it is more recent, do nothing tsrcv = self.sources['testing'].get(l[0], None) if tsrcv and apt_pkg.version_compare(tsrcv[VERSION], l[1]) >= 0: continue # if the package doesn't exist in unstable or it is older, do nothing usrcv = self.sources['unstable'].get(l[0], None) if not usrcv or apt_pkg.version_compare(usrcv[VERSION], l[1]) < 0: continue # update the urgency for the package urgencies[l[0]] = l[2] return urgencies def read_hints(self, basedir): """Read the hint commands from the specified directory The hint commands are read from the files contained in the `Hints' directory within the directory specified as `basedir' parameter. The names of the files have to be the same as the authorized users for the hints. The file contains rows with the format: [/] The method returns a dictionary where the key is the command, and the value is the list of affected packages. """ hints = HintCollection() for who in self.HINTS.keys(): if who == 'command-line': lines = self.options.hints and self.options.hints.split(';') or () filename = '' else: filename = os.path.join(basedir, "Hints", who) if not os.path.isfile(filename): self.__log("Cannot read hints list from %s, no such file!" % filename, type="E") continue self.__log("Loading hints list from %s" % filename) with open(filename, encoding='utf-8') as f: lines = f.readlines() for line in lines: line = line.strip() if line == "": continue l = line.split() if l[0] == 'finished': break if l[0] == 'remark': # Ignore "no-op" hint, the sole purpose of which is to be # found by hint grep (and show up in "d"'s # output). continue elif l[0] not in self.HINTS[who]: continue elif len(l) == 1: # All current hints require at least one argument self.__log("Malformed hint found in %s: '%s'" % (filename, line), type="W") elif l[0] in ["approve", "block", "block-all", "block-udeb", "unblock", "unblock-udeb", "force", "urgent", "remove"]: if l[0] == 'approve': l[0] = 'unblock' for package in l[1:]: hints.add_hint('%s %s' % (l[0], package), who) elif l[0] in ["age-days"]: for package in l[2:]: hints.add_hint('%s %s %s' % (l[0], l[1], package), who) else: hints.add_hint(l, who) for x in ["block", "block-all", "block-udeb", "unblock", "unblock-udeb", "force", "urgent", "remove", "age-days"]: z = {} for hint in hints[x]: package = hint.package key = (hint, hint.user) if package in z and z[package] != key: hint2 = z[package][0] if x in ['unblock', 'unblock-udeb']: if apt_pkg.version_compare(hint2.version, hint.version) < 0: # This hint is for a newer version, so discard the old one self.__log("Overriding %s[%s] = ('%s', '%s') with ('%s', '%s')" % (x, package, hint2.version, hint2.user, hint.version, hint.user), type="W") hint2.set_active(False) else: # This hint is for an older version, so ignore it in favour of the new one self.__log("Ignoring %s[%s] = ('%s', '%s'), ('%s', '%s') is higher or equal" % (x, package, hint.version, hint.user, hint2.version, hint2.user), type="W") hint.set_active(False) else: self.__log("Overriding %s[%s] = ('%s', '%s', '%s') with ('%s', '%s', '%s')" % (x, package, hint2.version, hint2.user, hint2.days, hint.version, hint.user, hint.days), type="W") hint2.set_active(False) z[package] = key # Sanity check the hints hash if len(hints["block"]) == 0 and len(hints["block-udeb"]) == 0: self.__log("WARNING: No block hints at all, not even udeb ones!", type="W") return hints # Utility methods for package analysis # ------------------------------------ def get_dependency_solvers(self, block, packages_s_a, empty_set=frozenset()): """Find the packages which satisfy a dependency block This method returns the list of packages which satisfy a dependency block (as returned by apt_pkg.parse_depends) in a package table for a given suite and architecture (a la self.binaries[suite][arch]) It returns a tuple with two items: the first is a boolean which is True if the dependency is satisfied, the second is the list of the solving packages. """ packages = [] binaries_s_a, provides_s_a = packages_s_a # for every package, version and operation in the block for name, version, op in block: if ":" in name: name, archqual = name.split(":", 1) else: archqual = None # look for the package in unstable if name in binaries_s_a: package = binaries_s_a[name] # check the versioned dependency and architecture qualifier # (if present) if (op == '' and version == '') or apt_pkg.check_dep(package[VERSION], op, version): if archqual is None or (archqual == 'any' and package[MULTIARCH] == 'allowed'): packages.append(name) # look for the package in the virtual packages list and loop on them for prov, prov_version in provides_s_a.get(name, empty_set): assert prov in binaries_s_a # A provides only satisfies: # - an unversioned dependency (per Policy Manual §7.5) # - a dependency without an architecture qualifier # (per analysis of apt code) if archqual is not None: # Punt on this case - these days, APT and dpkg might actually agree on # this. continue if (op == '' and version == '') or \ (prov_version != '' and apt_pkg.check_dep(prov_version, op, version)): packages.append(prov) return packages def excuse_unsat_deps(self, pkg, src, arch, suite, excuse): """Find unsatisfied dependencies for a binary package This method analyzes the dependencies of the binary package specified by the parameter `pkg', built from the source package `src', for the architecture `arch' within the suite `suite'. If the dependency can't be satisfied in testing and/or unstable, it updates the excuse passed as parameter. """ # retrieve the binary package from the specified suite and arch package_s_a = self.binaries[suite][arch] package_t_a = self.binaries['testing'][arch] binary_u = package_s_a[0][pkg] # local copies for better performance parse_depends = apt_pkg.parse_depends get_dependency_solvers = self.get_dependency_solvers # analyze the dependency fields (if present) if not binary_u[DEPENDS]: return deps = binary_u[DEPENDS] # for every dependency block (formed as conjunction of disjunction) for block, block_txt in zip(parse_depends(deps, False), deps.split(',')): # if the block is satisfied in testing, then skip the block packages = get_dependency_solvers(block, package_t_a) if packages: for p in packages: if p not in package_s_a[0]: continue excuse.add_sane_dep(package_s_a[0][p][SOURCE]) continue # check if the block can be satisfied in the source suite, and list the solving packages packages = get_dependency_solvers(block, package_s_a) packages = [package_s_a[0][p][SOURCE] for p in packages] # if the dependency can be satisfied by the same source package, skip the block: # obviously both binary packages will enter testing together if src in packages: continue # if no package can satisfy the dependency, add this information to the excuse if not packages: excuse.addhtml("%s/%s unsatisfiable Depends: %s" % (pkg, arch, block_txt.strip())) excuse.addreason("depends") continue # for the solving packages, update the excuse to add the dependencies for p in packages: if arch not in self.options.break_arches: if p in self.sources['testing'] and self.sources['testing'][p][VERSION] == self.sources[suite][p][VERSION]: excuse.add_dep("%s/%s" % (p, arch), arch) else: excuse.add_dep(p, arch) else: excuse.add_break_dep(p, arch) # Package analysis methods # ------------------------ def should_remove_source(self, pkg): """Check if a source package should be removed from testing This method checks if a source package should be removed from the testing distribution; this happens if the source package is not present in the unstable distribution anymore. It returns True if the package can be removed, False otherwise. In the former case, a new excuse is appended to the object attribute excuses. """ # if the source package is available in unstable, then do nothing if pkg in self.sources['unstable']: return False # otherwise, add a new excuse for its removal src = self.sources['testing'][pkg] excuse = Excuse("-" + pkg) excuse.addhtml("Package not in unstable, will try to remove") excuse.addreason("remove") excuse.set_vers(src[VERSION], None) src[MAINTAINER] and excuse.set_maint(src[MAINTAINER].strip()) src[SECTION] and excuse.set_section(src[SECTION].strip()) # if the package is blocked, skip it for hint in self.hints.search('block', package=pkg, removal=True): excuse.addhtml("Not touching package, as requested by %s " "(check https://release.debian.org/testing/freeze_policy.html if update is needed)" % hint.user) excuse.addhtml("Not considered") excuse.addreason("block") self.excuses.append(excuse) return False excuse.is_valid = True self.excuses.append(excuse) return True def should_upgrade_srcarch(self, src, arch, suite): """Check if a set of binary packages should be upgraded This method checks if the binary packages produced by the source package on the given architecture should be upgraded; this can happen also if the migration is a binary-NMU for the given arch. It returns False if the given packages don't need to be upgraded, True otherwise. In the former case, a new excuse is appended to the object attribute excuses. """ # retrieve the source packages for testing and suite source_t = self.sources['testing'][src] source_u = self.sources[suite][src] # build the common part of the excuse, which will be filled by the code below ref = "%s/%s%s" % (src, arch, suite != 'unstable' and "_" + suite or "") excuse = Excuse(ref) excuse.set_vers(source_t[VERSION], source_t[VERSION]) source_u[MAINTAINER] and excuse.set_maint(source_u[MAINTAINER].strip()) source_u[SECTION] and excuse.set_section(source_u[SECTION].strip()) # if there is a `remove' hint and the requested version is the same as the # version in testing, then stop here and return False # (as a side effect, a removal may generate such excuses for both the source # package and its binary packages on each architecture) for hint in [x for x in self.hints.search('remove', package=src) if source_t[VERSION] == x.version]: excuse.addhtml("Removal request by %s" % (hint.user)) excuse.addhtml("Trying to remove package, not update it") excuse.addhtml("Not considered") excuse.addreason("remove") self.excuses.append(excuse) return False # the starting point is that there is nothing wrong and nothing worth doing anywrongver = False anyworthdoing = False packages_t_a = self.binaries['testing'][arch][0] packages_s_a = self.binaries[suite][arch][0] # for every binary package produced by this source in unstable for this architecture for pkg_id in sorted(x for x in source_u[BINARIES] if x[2] == arch): pkg_name = pkg_id[0] # retrieve the testing (if present) and unstable corresponding binary packages binary_t = pkg_name in packages_t_a and packages_t_a[pkg_name] or None binary_u = packages_s_a[pkg_name] # this is the source version for the new binary package pkgsv = binary_u[SOURCEVER] # if the new binary package is architecture-independent, then skip it if binary_u[ARCHITECTURE] == 'all': excuse.addhtml("Ignoring %s %s (from %s) as it is arch: all" % (pkg_name, binary_u[VERSION], pkgsv)) continue # if the new binary package is not from the same source as the testing one, then skip it # this implies that this binary migration is part of a source migration if source_u[VERSION] == pkgsv and source_t[VERSION] != pkgsv: anywrongver = True excuse.addhtml("From wrong source: %s %s (%s not %s)" % (pkg_name, binary_u[VERSION], pkgsv, source_t[VERSION])) continue # cruft in unstable if source_u[VERSION] != pkgsv and source_t[VERSION] != pkgsv: if self.options.ignore_cruft: excuse.addhtml("Old cruft: %s %s (but ignoring cruft, so nevermind)" % (pkg_name, pkgsv)) else: anywrongver = True excuse.addhtml("Old cruft: %s %s" % (pkg_name, pkgsv)) continue # if the source package has been updated in unstable and this is a binary migration, skip it # (the binaries are now out-of-date) if source_t[VERSION] == pkgsv and source_t[VERSION] != source_u[VERSION]: anywrongver = True excuse.addhtml("From wrong source: %s %s (%s not %s)" % (pkg_name, binary_u[VERSION], pkgsv, source_u[VERSION])) continue # find unsatisfied dependencies for the new binary package self.excuse_unsat_deps(pkg_name, src, arch, suite, excuse) # if the binary is not present in testing, then it is a new binary; # in this case, there is something worth doing if not binary_t: excuse.addhtml("New binary: %s (%s)" % (pkg_name, binary_u[VERSION])) anyworthdoing = True continue # at this point, the binary package is present in testing, so we can compare # the versions of the packages ... vcompare = apt_pkg.version_compare(binary_t[VERSION], binary_u[VERSION]) # ... if updating would mean downgrading, then stop here: there is something wrong if vcompare > 0: anywrongver = True excuse.addhtml("Not downgrading: %s (%s to %s)" % (pkg_name, binary_t[VERSION], binary_u[VERSION])) break # ... if updating would mean upgrading, then there is something worth doing elif vcompare < 0: excuse.addhtml("Updated binary: %s (%s to %s)" % (pkg_name, binary_t[VERSION], binary_u[VERSION])) anyworthdoing = True # if there is nothing wrong and there is something worth doing or the source # package is not fake, then check what packages should be removed if not anywrongver and (anyworthdoing or not source_u[FAKESRC]): srcv = source_u[VERSION] ssrc = source_t[VERSION] == srcv # if this is a binary-only migration via *pu, we never want to try # removing binary packages if not (ssrc and suite != 'unstable'): # for every binary package produced by this source in testing for this architecture _, _, smoothbins = self._compute_groups(src, "unstable", arch, False) for pkg_id in sorted(x for x in source_t[BINARIES] if x[2] == arch): pkg = pkg_id[0] # if the package is architecture-independent, then ignore it tpkg_data = packages_t_a[pkg] if tpkg_data[ARCHITECTURE] == 'all': excuse.addhtml("Ignoring removal of %s as it is arch: all" % (pkg)) continue # if the package is not produced by the new source package, then remove it from testing if pkg not in packages_s_a: excuse.addhtml("Removed binary: %s %s" % (pkg, tpkg_data[VERSION])) # the removed binary is only interesting if this is a binary-only migration, # as otherwise the updated source will already cause the binary packages # to be updated if ssrc: # Special-case, if the binary is a candidate for a smooth update, we do not consider # it "interesting" on its own. This case happens quite often with smooth updatable # packages, where the old binary "survives" a full run because it still has # reverse dependencies. if pkg_id not in smoothbins: anyworthdoing = True # if there is nothing wrong and there is something worth doing, this is a valid candidate if not anywrongver and anyworthdoing: excuse.is_valid = True self.excuses.append(excuse) return True # else if there is something worth doing (but something wrong, too) this package won't be considered elif anyworthdoing: excuse.addhtml("Not considered") self.excuses.append(excuse) # otherwise, return False return False def should_upgrade_src(self, src, suite): """Check if source package should be upgraded This method checks if a source package should be upgraded. The analysis is performed for the source package specified by the `src' parameter, for the distribution `suite'. It returns False if the given package doesn't need to be upgraded, True otherwise. In the former case, a new excuse is appended to the object attribute excuses. """ # retrieve the source packages for testing (if available) and suite source_u = self.sources[suite][src] if src in self.sources['testing']: source_t = self.sources['testing'][src] # if testing and unstable have the same version, then this is a candidate for binary-NMUs only if apt_pkg.version_compare(source_t[VERSION], source_u[VERSION]) == 0: return False else: source_t = None # build the common part of the excuse, which will be filled by the code below ref = "%s%s" % (src, suite != 'unstable' and "_" + suite or "") excuse = Excuse(ref) excuse.set_vers(source_t and source_t[VERSION] or None, source_u[VERSION]) source_u[MAINTAINER] and excuse.set_maint(source_u[MAINTAINER].strip()) source_u[SECTION] and excuse.set_section(source_u[SECTION].strip()) # the starting point is that we will update the candidate update_candidate = True # if the version in unstable is older, then stop here with a warning in the excuse and return False if source_t and apt_pkg.version_compare(source_u[VERSION], source_t[VERSION]) < 0: excuse.addhtml("ALERT: %s is newer in testing (%s %s)" % (src, source_t[VERSION], source_u[VERSION])) self.excuses.append(excuse) excuse.addreason("newerintesting") return False # check if the source package really exists or if it is a fake one if source_u[FAKESRC]: excuse.addhtml("%s source package doesn't exist" % (src)) update_candidate = False # retrieve the urgency for the upload, ignoring it if this is a NEW package (not present in testing) urgency = self.urgencies.get(src, self.options.default_urgency) if not source_t: if self.MINDAYS[urgency] < self.MINDAYS[self.options.default_urgency]: excuse.addhtml("Ignoring %s urgency setting for NEW package" % (urgency)) urgency = self.options.default_urgency # if there is a `remove' hint and the requested version is the same as the # version in testing, then stop here and return False for item in self.hints.search('remove', package=src): if source_t and source_t[VERSION] == item.version or \ source_u[VERSION] == item.version: excuse.addhtml("Removal request by %s" % (item.user)) excuse.addhtml("Trying to remove package, not update it") excuse.addreason("remove") update_candidate = False # check if there is a `block' or `block-udeb' hint for this package, or a `block-all source' hint blocked = {} for hint in self.hints.search(package=src): if hint.type == 'block': blocked['block'] = hint if hint.type == 'block-udeb': blocked['block-udeb'] = hint for hint in self.hints.search(type='block-all', package='source'): blocked.setdefault('block', hint) if suite in ['pu', 'tpu']: blocked['block'] = '%s-block' % (suite) # if the source is blocked, then look for an `unblock' hint; the unblock request # is processed only if the specified version is correct. If a package is blocked # by `block-udeb', then `unblock-udeb' must be present to cancel it. for block_cmd in blocked: unblock_cmd = "un" + block_cmd unblocks = self.hints.search(unblock_cmd, package=src) if unblocks and unblocks[0].version is not None and unblocks[0].version == source_u[VERSION]: if suite == 'unstable' or block_cmd == 'block-udeb': excuse.addhtml("Ignoring %s request by %s, due to %s request by %s" % (block_cmd, blocked[block_cmd].user, unblock_cmd, unblocks[0].user)) else: excuse.addhtml("Approved by %s" % (unblocks[0].user)) else: if unblocks: if unblocks[0].version is None: excuse.addhtml("%s request by %s ignored due to missing version" % (unblock_cmd.capitalize(), unblocks[0].user)) else: excuse.addhtml("%s request by %s ignored due to version mismatch: %s" % (unblock_cmd.capitalize(), unblocks[0].user, unblocks[0].version)) if suite == 'unstable' or block_cmd == 'block-udeb': tooltip = "check https://release.debian.org/testing/freeze_policy.html if update is needed" # redirect people to d-i RM for udeb things: if block_cmd == 'block-udeb': tooltip = "please contact the d-i release manager if an update is needed" excuse.addhtml("Not touching package due to %s request by %s (%s)" % (block_cmd, blocked[block_cmd].user, tooltip)) excuse.addreason("block") else: excuse.addhtml("NEEDS APPROVAL BY RM") excuse.addreason("block") update_candidate = False # if the suite is unstable, then we have to check the urgency and the minimum days of # permanence in unstable before updating testing; if the source package is too young, # the check fails and we set update_candidate to False to block the update; consider # the age-days hint, if specified for the package if suite == 'unstable': if src not in self.dates: self.dates[src] = (source_u[VERSION], self.date_now) elif self.dates[src][0] != source_u[VERSION]: self.dates[src] = (source_u[VERSION], self.date_now) days_old = self.date_now - self.dates[src][1] min_days = self.MINDAYS[urgency] for age_days_hint in [x for x in self.hints.search('age-days', package=src) if source_u[VERSION] == x.version]: excuse.addhtml("Overriding age needed from %d days to %d by %s" % (min_days, int(age_days_hint.days), age_days_hint.user)) min_days = int(age_days_hint.days) excuse.setdaysold(days_old, min_days) if days_old < min_days: urgent_hints = [x for x in self.hints.search('urgent', package=src) if source_u[VERSION] == x.version] if urgent_hints: excuse.addhtml("Too young, but urgency pushed by %s" % (urgent_hints[0].user)) else: update_candidate = False excuse.addreason("age") all_binaries = self.all_binaries if suite in ('pu', 'tpu') and source_t: # o-o-d(ish) checks for (t-)p-u # This only makes sense if the package is actually in testing. for arch in self.options.architectures: # if the package in testing has no binaries on this # architecture, it can't be out-of-date if not any(x for x in source_t[BINARIES] if x[2] == arch and all_binaries[x][ARCHITECTURE] != 'all'): continue # if the (t-)p-u package has produced any binaries on # this architecture then we assume it's ok. this allows for # uploads to (t-)p-u which intentionally drop binary # packages if any(x for x in self.binaries[suite][arch][0].values() \ if x[SOURCE] == src and x[SOURCEVER] == source_u[VERSION] and \ x[ARCHITECTURE] != 'all'): continue if suite == 'tpu': base = 'testing' else: base = 'stable' text = "Not yet built on %s (relative to testing)" % (quote(arch), quote(src), quote(source_u[VERSION]), base, arch) if arch in self.options.fucked_arches: text = text + " (but %s isn't keeping up, so never mind)" % (arch) else: update_candidate = False excuse.addreason("arch") excuse.addreason("arch-%s" % arch) excuse.addreason("build-arch") excuse.addreason("build-arch-%s" % arch) excuse.addhtml(text) # at this point, we check the status of the builds on all the supported architectures # to catch the out-of-date ones pkgs = {src: ["source"]} for arch in self.options.architectures: oodbins = {} uptodatebins = False # for every binary package produced by this source in the suite for this architecture for pkg_id in sorted(x for x in source_u[BINARIES] if x[2] == arch): pkg = pkg_id[0] if pkg not in pkgs: pkgs[pkg] = [] pkgs[pkg].append(arch) # retrieve the binary package and its source version binary_u = all_binaries[pkg_id] pkgsv = binary_u[SOURCEVER] # if it wasn't built by the same source, it is out-of-date # if there is at least one binary on this arch which is # up-to-date, there is a build on this arch if source_u[VERSION] != pkgsv: if pkgsv not in oodbins: oodbins[pkgsv] = [] oodbins[pkgsv].append(pkg) continue else: # if the binary is arch all, it doesn't count as # up-to-date for this arch if binary_u[ARCHITECTURE] == arch: uptodatebins = True # if the package is architecture-dependent or the current arch is `nobreakall' # find unsatisfied dependencies for the binary package if binary_u[ARCHITECTURE] != 'all' or arch in self.options.nobreakall_arches: self.excuse_unsat_deps(pkg, src, arch, suite, excuse) # if there are out-of-date packages, warn about them in the excuse and set update_candidate # to False to block the update; if the architecture where the package is out-of-date is # in the `fucked_arches' list, then do not block the update if oodbins: oodtxt = "" for v in oodbins.keys(): if oodtxt: oodtxt = oodtxt + "; " oodtxt = oodtxt + "%s (from %s)" % \ (", ".join(sorted(oodbins[v])), quote(arch), quote(src), quote(v), v) if uptodatebins: text = "old binaries left on %s: %s" % \ (quote(arch), quote(src), quote(source_u[VERSION]), arch, oodtxt) else: text = "missing build on %s: %s" % \ (quote(arch), quote(src), quote(source_u[VERSION]), arch, oodtxt) if arch in self.options.fucked_arches: text = text + " (but %s isn't keeping up, so nevermind)" % (arch) else: if uptodatebins: excuse.addreason("cruft-arch") excuse.addreason("cruft-arch-%s" % arch) if self.options.ignore_cruft: text = text + " (but ignoring cruft, so nevermind)" else: update_candidate = False excuse.addreason("arch") excuse.addreason("arch-%s" % arch) else: update_candidate = False excuse.addreason("arch") excuse.addreason("arch-%s" % arch) excuse.addreason("build-arch") excuse.addreason("build-arch-%s" % arch) if self.date_now != self.dates[src][1]: excuse.addhtml(text) # if the source package has no binaries, set update_candidate to False to block the update if not source_u[BINARIES]: excuse.addhtml("%s has no binaries on any arch" % src) excuse.addreason("no-binaries") update_candidate = False # if the suite is unstable, then we have to check the release-critical bug lists before # updating testing; if the unstable package has RC bugs that do not apply to the testing # one, the check fails and we set update_candidate to False to block the update if suite == 'unstable': for pkg in pkgs: bugs_t = [] bugs_u = [] if pkg in self.bugs['testing']: bugs_t.extend(self.bugs['testing'][pkg]) if pkg in self.bugs['unstable']: bugs_u.extend(self.bugs['unstable'][pkg]) if 'source' in pkgs[pkg]: spkg = "src:%s" % (pkg) if spkg in self.bugs['testing']: bugs_t.extend(self.bugs['testing'][spkg]) if spkg in self.bugs['unstable']: bugs_u.extend(self.bugs['unstable'][spkg]) new_bugs = sorted(set(bugs_u).difference(bugs_t)) old_bugs = sorted(set(bugs_t).difference(bugs_u)) excuse.setbugs(old_bugs,new_bugs) if len(new_bugs) > 0: excuse.addhtml("%s (%s) has new bugs!" % (pkg, ", ".join(pkgs[pkg]), quote(pkg))) excuse.addhtml("Updating %s introduces new bugs: %s" % (pkg, ", ".join( ["#%s" % (quote(a), a) for a in new_bugs]))) update_candidate = False excuse.addreason("buggy") if len(old_bugs) > 0: excuse.addhtml("Updating %s fixes old bugs: %s" % (pkg, ", ".join( ["#%s" % (quote(a), a) for a in old_bugs]))) if len(old_bugs) > len(new_bugs) and len(new_bugs) > 0: excuse.addhtml("%s introduces new bugs, so still ignored (even " "though it fixes more than it introduces, whine at debian-release)" % pkg) # check if there is a `force' hint for this package, which allows it to go in even if it is not updateable forces = [x for x in self.hints.search('force', package=src) if source_u[VERSION] == x.version] if forces: excuse.dontinvalidate = True if not update_candidate and forces: excuse.addhtml("Should ignore, but forced by %s" % (forces[0].user)) excuse.force() update_candidate = True # if the package can be updated, it is a valid candidate if update_candidate: excuse.is_valid = True # else it won't be considered else: # TODO excuse.addhtml("Not considered") self.excuses.append(excuse) return update_candidate def reversed_exc_deps(self): """Reverse the excuses dependencies This method returns a dictionary where the keys are the package names and the values are the excuse names which depend on it. """ res = defaultdict(list) for exc in self.excuses: for d in exc.deps: res[d].append(exc.name) return res def invalidate_excuses(self, valid, invalid): """Invalidate impossible excuses This method invalidates the impossible excuses, which depend on invalid excuses. The two parameters contains the list of `valid' and `invalid' excuses. """ # build a lookup-by-name map exclookup = {e.name: e for e in self.excuses} # build the reverse dependencies revdeps = self.reversed_exc_deps() # loop on the invalid excuses i = 0 while i < len(invalid): # if there is no reverse dependency, skip the item if invalid[i] not in revdeps: i += 1 continue # if the dependency can be satisfied by a testing-proposed-updates excuse, skip the item if (invalid[i] + "_tpu") in valid: i += 1 continue # loop on the reverse dependencies for x in revdeps[invalid[i]]: # if the item is valid and it is marked as `dontinvalidate', skip the item if x in valid and exclookup[x].dontinvalidate: continue # otherwise, invalidate the dependency and mark as invalidated and # remove the depending excuses exclookup[x].invalidate_dep(invalid[i]) if x in valid: p = valid.index(x) invalid.append(valid.pop(p)) exclookup[x].addhtml("Invalidated by dependency") exclookup[x].addhtml("Not considered") exclookup[x].addreason("depends") exclookup[x].is_valid = False i = i + 1 def write_excuses(self): """Produce and write the update excuses This method handles the update excuses generation: the packages are looked at to determine whether they are valid candidates. For the details of this procedure, please refer to the module docstring. """ self.__log("Update Excuses generation started", type="I") # list of local methods and variables (for better performance) sources = self.sources architectures = self.options.architectures should_remove_source = self.should_remove_source should_upgrade_srcarch = self.should_upgrade_srcarch should_upgrade_src = self.should_upgrade_src # this list will contain the packages which are valid candidates; # if a package is going to be removed, it will have a "-" prefix upgrade_me = [] self.excuses = [] # for every source package in testing, check if it should be removed for pkg in sources['testing']: if should_remove_source(pkg): upgrade_me.append("-" + pkg) # for every source package in unstable check if it should be upgraded for pkg in sources['unstable']: if sources['unstable'][pkg][FAKESRC]: continue # if the source package is already present in testing, # check if it should be upgraded for every binary package if pkg in sources['testing'] and not sources['testing'][pkg][FAKESRC]: for arch in architectures: if should_upgrade_srcarch(pkg, arch, 'unstable'): upgrade_me.append("%s/%s" % (pkg, arch)) # check if the source package should be upgraded if should_upgrade_src(pkg, 'unstable'): upgrade_me.append(pkg) # for every source package in *-proposed-updates, check if it should be upgraded for suite in ['pu', 'tpu']: for pkg in sources[suite]: # if the source package is already present in testing, # check if it should be upgraded for every binary package if pkg in sources['testing']: for arch in architectures: if should_upgrade_srcarch(pkg, arch, suite): upgrade_me.append("%s/%s_%s" % (pkg, arch, suite)) # check if the source package should be upgraded if should_upgrade_src(pkg, suite): upgrade_me.append("%s_%s" % (pkg, suite)) # process the `remove' hints, if the given package is not yet in upgrade_me for item in self.hints['remove']: src = item.package if src in upgrade_me: continue if ("-"+src) in upgrade_me: continue if src not in sources['testing']: continue # check if the version specified in the hint is the same as the considered package tsrcv = sources['testing'][src][VERSION] if tsrcv != item.version: continue # add the removal of the package to upgrade_me and build a new excuse upgrade_me.append("-%s" % (src)) excuse = Excuse("-%s" % (src)) excuse.set_vers(tsrcv, None) excuse.addhtml("Removal request by %s" % (item.user)) excuse.addhtml("Package is broken, will try to remove") excuse.addreason("remove") self.excuses.append(excuse) # sort the excuses by daysold and name self.excuses.sort(key=lambda x: x.sortkey()) # extract the not considered packages, which are in the excuses but not in upgrade_me unconsidered = [e.name for e in self.excuses if e.name not in upgrade_me] # invalidate impossible excuses for e in self.excuses: # parts[0] == package name # parts[1] == optional architecture parts = e.name.split('/') for d in e.deps: ok = False # source -> source dependency; both packages must have # valid excuses if d in upgrade_me or d in unconsidered: ok = True # if the excuse is for a binNMU, also consider d/$arch as a # valid excuse elif len(parts) == 2: bd = '%s/%s' % (d, parts[1]) if bd in upgrade_me or bd in unconsidered: ok = True # if the excuse is for a source package, check each of the # architectures on which the excuse lists a dependency on d, # and consider the excuse valid if it is possible on each # architecture else: arch_ok = True for arch in e.deps[d]: bd = '%s/%s' % (d, arch) if bd not in upgrade_me and bd not in unconsidered: arch_ok = False break if arch_ok: ok = True if not ok: e.addhtml("Impossible dependency: %s -> %s" % (e.name, d)) e.addreason("depends") self.invalidate_excuses(upgrade_me, unconsidered) # sort the list of candidates self.upgrade_me = sorted( make_migrationitem(x, self.sources) for x in upgrade_me ) # write excuses to the output file if not self.options.dry_run: self.__log("> Writing Excuses to %s" % self.options.excuses_output, type="I") write_excuses(self.excuses, self.options.excuses_output, output_format="legacy-html") if hasattr(self.options, 'excuses_yaml_output'): self.__log("> Writing YAML Excuses to %s" % self.options.excuses_yaml_output, type="I") write_excuses(self.excuses, self.options.excuses_yaml_output, output_format="yaml") self.__log("Update Excuses generation completed", type="I") # Upgrade run # ----------- def get_nuninst(self, requested_arch=None, build=False): """Return the uninstallability statistic for all the architectures To calculate the uninstallability counters, the method checks the installability of all the packages for all the architectures, and tracks dependencies in a recursive way. The architecture independent packages are checked only for the `nobreakall` architectures. It returns a dictionary with the architectures as keys and the list of uninstallable packages as values. NB: If build is False, requested_arch is ignored. """ # if we are not asked to build the nuninst, read it from the cache if not build: return read_nuninst(self.options.noninst_status, self.options.architectures) nuninst = {} # local copies for better performance binaries = self.binaries['testing'] inst_tester = self._inst_tester # for all the architectures for arch in self.options.architectures: if requested_arch and arch != requested_arch: continue # if it is in the nobreakall ones, check arch-independent packages too check_archall = arch in self.options.nobreakall_arches # check all the packages for this architecture nuninst[arch] = set() for pkg_name in binaries[arch][0]: pkgdata = binaries[arch][0][pkg_name] pkg_id = (pkg_name, pkgdata[VERSION], arch) r = inst_tester.is_installable(pkg_id) if not r: nuninst[arch].add(pkg_name) # if they are not required, remove architecture-independent packages nuninst[arch + "+all"] = nuninst[arch].copy() if not check_archall: for pkg in nuninst[arch + "+all"]: bpkg = binaries[arch][0][pkg] if bpkg[ARCHITECTURE] == 'all': nuninst[arch].remove(pkg) # return the dictionary with the results return nuninst def eval_nuninst(self, nuninst, original=None): """Return a string which represents the uninstallability counters This method returns a string which represents the uninstallability counters reading the uninstallability statistics `nuninst` and, if present, merging the results with the `original` one. An example of the output string is: 1+2: i-0:a-0:a-0:h-0:i-1:m-0:m-0:p-0:a-0:m-0:s-2:s-0 where the first part is the number of broken packages in non-break architectures + the total number of broken packages for all the architectures. """ res = [] total = 0 totalbreak = 0 for arch in self.options.architectures: if arch in nuninst: n = len(nuninst[arch]) elif original and arch in original: n = len(original[arch]) else: continue if arch in self.options.break_arches: totalbreak = totalbreak + n else: total = total + n res.append("%s-%d" % (arch[0], n)) return "%d+%d: %s" % (total, totalbreak, ":".join(res)) def _compute_groups(self, source_name, suite, migration_architecture, is_removal, allow_smooth_updates=True, removals=frozenset()): """Compute the groups of binaries being migrated by item This method will compute the binaries that will be added, replaced in testing and which of them are smooth updatable. Parameters: * "source_name" is the name of the source package, whose binaries are migrating. * "suite" is the suite from which the binaries are migrating. [Same as item.suite, where available] * "migration_architecture" is the architecture determines architecture of the migrating binaries (can be "source" for a "source"-migration, meaning all binaries regardless of architecture). [Same as item.architecture, where available] * "is_removal" is a boolean determining if this is a removal or not [Same as item.is_removal, where available] * "allow_smooth_updates" is a boolean determing whether smooth- updates are permitted in this migration. When set to False, the "smoothbins" return value will always be the empty set. Any value that would have been there will now be in "rms" instead. (defaults: True) * "removals" is a set of binaries that is assumed to be removed at the same time as this migration (e.g. in the same "easy"-hint). This may affect what if some binaries are smooth updated or not. (defaults: empty-set) - Binaries must be given as ("package-name", "version", "architecture") tuples. Returns a tuple (adds, rms, smoothbins). "adds" is a set of binaries that will updated in or appear after the migration. "rms" is a set of binaries that are not smooth-updatable (or binaries that could be, but there is no reason to let them be smooth updated). "smoothbins" is set of binaries that are to be smooth-updated. Each "binary" in "adds", "rms" and "smoothbins" will be a tuple of ("package-name", "version", "architecture") and are thus tuples suitable for passing on to the InstallabilityTester. Unlike doop_source, this will not modify any data structure. """ # local copies for better performances sources = self.sources binaries_t = self.binaries['testing'] inst_tester = self._inst_tester adds = set() rms = set() smoothbins = set() # remove all binary packages (if the source already exists) if migration_architecture == 'source' or not is_removal: if source_name in sources['testing']: source_data = sources['testing'][source_name] bins = [] check = set() # remove all the binaries # first, build a list of eligible binaries for pkg_id in source_data[BINARIES]: binary, _, parch = pkg_id if (migration_architecture != 'source' and parch != migration_architecture): continue # Work around #815995 if migration_architecture == 'source' and is_removal and binary not in binaries_t[parch][0]: continue # Do not include hijacked binaries if binaries_t[parch][0][binary][SOURCE] != source_name: continue bins.append(pkg_id) for pkg_id in bins: binary, _, parch = pkg_id # if a smooth update is possible for the package, skip it if allow_smooth_updates and suite == 'unstable' and \ binary not in self.binaries[suite][parch][0] and \ ('ALL' in self.options.smooth_updates or \ binaries_t[parch][0][binary][SECTION] in self.options.smooth_updates): # if the package has reverse-dependencies which are # built from other sources, it's a valid candidate for # a smooth update. if not, it may still be a valid # candidate if one if its r-deps is itself a candidate, # so note it for checking later rdeps = set(inst_tester.reverse_dependencies_of(pkg_id)) # We ignore all binaries listed in "removals" as we # assume they will leave at the same time as the # given package. rdeps.difference_update(removals, bins) smooth_update_it = False if inst_tester.any_of_these_are_in_testing(rdeps): combined = set(smoothbins) combined.add(pkg_id) for rdep in rdeps: for dep_clause in inst_tester.dependencies_of(rdep): if dep_clause <= combined: smooth_update_it = True break if smooth_update_it: smoothbins = combined else: check.add(pkg_id) # check whether we should perform a smooth update for # packages which are candidates but do not have r-deps # outside of the current source while 1: found_any = False for pkg_id in check: rdeps = inst_tester.reverse_dependencies_of(pkg_id) if not rdeps.isdisjoint(smoothbins): smoothbins.add(pkg_id) found_any = True if not found_any: break check = [x for x in check if x not in smoothbins] # remove all the binaries which aren't being smooth updated for pkg_id in (pkg_id for pkg_id in bins if pkg_id not in smoothbins): binary, version, parch = pkg_id # if this is a binary migration from *pu, only the arch:any # packages will be present. ideally dak would also populate # the arch-indep packages, but as that's not the case we # must keep them around; they will not be re-added by the # migration so will end up missing from testing if migration_architecture != 'source' and \ suite != 'unstable' and \ binaries_t[parch][0][binary][ARCHITECTURE] == 'all': continue else: rms.add(pkg_id) # single binary removal; used for clearing up after smooth # updates but not supported as a manual hint elif source_name in binaries_t[migration_architecture][0]: version = binaries_t[migration_architecture][0][source_name][VERSION] rms.add((source_name, version, migration_architecture)) # add the new binary packages (if we are not removing) if not is_removal: source_data = sources[suite][source_name] for pkg_id in source_data[BINARIES]: binary, _, parch = pkg_id if migration_architecture not in ['source', parch]: continue if self.binaries[suite][parch][0][binary][SOURCE] != source_name: # This binary package has been hijacked by some other source. # So don't add it as part of this update. # # Also, if this isn't a source update, don't remove # the package that's been hijacked if it's present. if migration_architecture != 'source': for rm_b, rm_v, rm_p in list(rms): if (rm_b, rm_p) == (binary, parch): rms.remove((rm_b, rm_v, rm_p)) continue # Don't add the binary if it is old cruft that is no longer in testing if (parch not in self.options.fucked_arches and source_data[VERSION] != self.binaries[suite][parch][0][binary][SOURCEVER] and binary not in binaries_t[parch][0]): continue adds.add(pkg_id) return (adds, rms, smoothbins) def doop_source(self, item, hint_undo=None, removals=frozenset()): """Apply a change to the testing distribution as requested by `pkg` An optional list of undo actions related to packages processed earlier in a hint may be passed in `hint_undo`. An optional set of binaries may be passed in "removals". Binaries listed in this set will be assumed to be removed at the same time as the "item" will migrate. This may change what binaries will be smooth-updated. - Binaries in this set must be ("package-name", "version", "architecture") tuples. This method applies the changes required by the action `item` tracking them so it will be possible to revert them. The method returns a tuple containing a set of packages affected by the change (as (name, arch)-tuples) and the dictionary undo which can be used to rollback the changes. """ undo = {'binaries': {}, 'sources': {}, 'virtual': {}, 'nvirtual': []} affected = set() # local copies for better performance sources = self.sources packages_t = self.binaries['testing'] inst_tester = self._inst_tester eqv_set = set() updates, rms, _ = self._compute_groups(item.package, item.suite, item.architecture, item.is_removal, removals=removals) #print("+++ %s" % (sorted(updates))) #print("--- %s" % (sorted(rms))) # remove all binary packages (if the source already exists) if item.architecture == 'source' or not item.is_removal: if item.package in sources['testing']: source = sources['testing'][item.package] eqv_table = {} for binary, version, parch in rms: key = (binary, parch) eqv_table[key] = version for p1 in updates: binary, _, parch = p1 key = (binary, parch) old_version = eqv_table.get(key) if old_version is not None: p2 = (binary, old_version, parch) if inst_tester.are_equivalent(p1, p2): eqv_set.add(key) # remove all the binaries which aren't being smooth updated for rm_pkg_id in rms: binary, version, parch = rm_pkg_id p = binary + "/" + parch binaries_t_a, provides_t_a = packages_t[parch] pkey = (binary, parch) pkg_data = binaries_t_a[binary] # save the old binary for undo undo['binaries'][p] = rm_pkg_id if pkey not in eqv_set: # all the reverse dependencies are affected by # the change affected.update(inst_tester.reverse_dependencies_of(rm_pkg_id)) affected.update(inst_tester.negative_dependencies_of(rm_pkg_id)) # remove the provided virtual packages for j, prov_version, _ in pkg_data[PROVIDES]: key = j + "/" + parch if key not in undo['virtual']: undo['virtual'][key] = provides_t_a[j].copy() provides_t_a[j].remove((binary, prov_version)) if not provides_t_a[j]: del provides_t_a[j] # finally, remove the binary package del binaries_t_a[binary] inst_tester.remove_testing_binary(rm_pkg_id) # remove the source package if item.architecture == 'source': undo['sources'][item.package] = source del sources['testing'][item.package] else: # the package didn't exist, so we mark it as to-be-removed in case of undo undo['sources']['-' + item.package] = True # single binary removal; used for clearing up after smooth # updates but not supported as a manual hint elif item.package in packages_t[item.architecture][0]: binaries_t_a = packages_t[item.architecture][0] version = binaries_t_a[item.package][VERSION] pkg_id = (item.package, version, item.architecture) undo['binaries'][item.package + "/" + item.architecture] = pkg_id affected.add(pkg_id) affected.update(inst_tester.reverse_dependencies_of(pkg_id)) del binaries_t_a[item.package] inst_tester.remove_testing_binary(pkg_id) # add the new binary packages (if we are not removing) if not item.is_removal: packages_s = self.binaries[item.suite] for updated_pkg_id in updates: binary, new_version, parch = updated_pkg_id p = "%s/%s" % (binary, parch) key = (binary, parch) binaries_t_a, provides_t_a = packages_t[parch] equivalent_replacement = key in eqv_set # obviously, added/modified packages are affected if not equivalent_replacement and updated_pkg_id not in affected: affected.add(updated_pkg_id) # if the binary already exists in testing, it is currently # built by another source package. we therefore remove the # version built by the other source package, after marking # all of its reverse dependencies as affected if binary in binaries_t_a: old_pkg_data = binaries_t_a[binary] old_version = old_pkg_data[VERSION] old_pkg_id = (binary, old_version, parch) # save the old binary package undo['binaries'][p] = old_pkg_id if not equivalent_replacement: # all the reverse dependencies are affected by # the change affected.update(inst_tester.reverse_dependencies_of(old_pkg_id)) # all the reverse conflicts affected.update(inst_tester.negative_dependencies_of(old_pkg_id)) inst_tester.remove_testing_binary(old_pkg_id) elif hint_undo: # the binary isn't in testing, but it may have been at # the start of the current hint and have been removed # by an earlier migration. if that's the case then we # will have a record of the older instance of the binary # in the undo information. we can use that to ensure # that the reverse dependencies of the older binary # package are also checked. # reverse dependencies built from this source can be # ignored as their reverse trees are already handled # by this function for (tundo, tpkg) in hint_undo: if p in tundo['binaries']: tpkg_id = tundo['binaries'][p] affected.update(inst_tester.reverse_dependencies_of(tpkg_id)) # add/update the binary package from the source suite new_pkg_data = packages_s[parch][0][binary] binaries_t_a[binary] = new_pkg_data inst_tester.add_testing_binary(updated_pkg_id) # register new provided packages for j, prov_version, _ in new_pkg_data[PROVIDES]: key = j + "/" + parch if j not in provides_t_a: undo['nvirtual'].append(key) provides_t_a[j] = set() elif key not in undo['virtual']: undo['virtual'][key] = provides_t_a[j].copy() provides_t_a[j].add((binary, prov_version)) if not equivalent_replacement: # all the reverse dependencies are affected by the change affected.add(updated_pkg_id) affected.update(inst_tester.reverse_dependencies_of(updated_pkg_id)) affected.update(inst_tester.negative_dependencies_of(updated_pkg_id)) # add/update the source package if item.architecture == 'source': sources['testing'][item.package] = sources[item.suite][item.package] # Also include the transitive rdeps of the packages found so far compute_reverse_tree(inst_tester, affected) # return the package name, the suite, the list of affected packages and the undo dictionary return (affected, undo) def _check_packages(self, binaries, arch, affected, check_archall, nuninst): broken = nuninst[arch + "+all"] to_check = [] # broken packages (first round) for pkg_id in (x for x in affected if x[2] == arch): name, version, parch = pkg_id if name not in binaries[parch][0]: continue pkgdata = binaries[parch][0][name] if version != pkgdata[VERSION]: # Not the version in testing right now, ignore continue actual_arch = pkgdata[ARCHITECTURE] nuninst_arch = None # only check arch:all packages if requested if check_archall or actual_arch != 'all': nuninst_arch = nuninst[parch] elif actual_arch == 'all': nuninst[parch].discard(name) self._installability_test(name, pkg_id, broken, to_check, nuninst_arch) # We have always overshot the affected set, so to_check does not # contain anything new. assert affected.issuperset(to_check) def try_migration(self, actions, nuninst_now, lundo=None, automatic_revert=True): is_accepted = True affected_architectures = set() item = actions packages_t = self.binaries['testing'] nobreakall_arches = self.options.nobreakall_arches new_arches = self.options.new_arches break_arches = self.options.break_arches arch = None if len(actions) == 1: item = actions[0] # apply the changes affected, undo = self.doop_source(item, hint_undo=lundo) undo_list = [(undo, item)] if item.architecture == 'source': affected_architectures = set(self.options.architectures) else: affected_architectures.add(item.architecture) else: undo_list = [] removals = set() affected = set() for item in actions: _, rms, _ = self._compute_groups(item.package, item.suite, item.architecture, item.is_removal, allow_smooth_updates=False) removals.update(rms) affected_architectures.add(item.architecture) if 'source' in affected_architectures: affected_architectures = set(self.options.architectures) for item in actions: item_affected, undo = self.doop_source(item, hint_undo=lundo, removals=removals) affected.update(item_affected) undo_list.append((undo, item)) # Copy nuninst_comp - we have to deep clone affected # architectures. # NB: We do this *after* updating testing as we have to filter out # removed binaries. Otherwise, uninstallable binaries that were # removed by the item would still be counted. nuninst_after = clone_nuninst(nuninst_now, packages_t, affected_architectures) # check the affected packages on all the architectures for arch in affected_architectures: check_archall = arch in nobreakall_arches self._check_packages(packages_t, arch, affected, check_archall, nuninst_after) # if the uninstallability counter is worse than before, break the loop if automatic_revert and len(nuninst_after[arch]) > len(nuninst_now[arch]): # ... except for a few special cases if (item.architecture != 'source' and arch not in new_arches) or \ (arch not in break_arches): is_accepted = False break # check if the action improved the uninstallability counters if not is_accepted and automatic_revert: undo_copy = list(reversed(undo_list)) undo_changes(undo_copy, self._inst_tester, self.sources, self.binaries, self.all_binaries) return (is_accepted, nuninst_after, undo_list, arch) def iter_packages(self, packages, selected, nuninst=None, lundo=None): """Iter on the list of actions and apply them one-by-one This method applies the changes from `packages` to testing, checking the uninstallability counters for every action performed. If the action does not improve them, it is reverted. The method returns the new uninstallability counters and the remaining actions if the final result is successful, otherwise (None, []). """ group_info = {} maybe_rescheduled = packages changed = True for y in sorted((y for y in packages), key=attrgetter('uvname')): updates, rms, _ = self._compute_groups(y.package, y.suite, y.architecture, y.is_removal) result = (y, frozenset(updates), frozenset(rms)) group_info[y] = result if selected is None: selected = [] if nuninst: nuninst_orig = nuninst else: nuninst_orig = self.nuninst_orig nuninst_last_accepted = nuninst_orig self.output_write("recur: [] %s %d/0\n" % (",".join(x.uvname for x in selected), len(packages))) while changed: changed = False groups = {group_info[x] for x in maybe_rescheduled} worklist = self._inst_tester.solve_groups(groups) maybe_rescheduled = [] worklist.reverse() while worklist: comp = worklist.pop() comp_name = ' '.join(item.uvname for item in comp) self.output_write("trying: %s\n" % comp_name) accepted, nuninst_after, comp_undo, failed_arch = self.try_migration(comp, nuninst_last_accepted, lundo) if accepted: selected.extend(comp) changed = True if lundo is not None: lundo.extend(comp_undo) self.output_write("accepted: %s\n" % comp_name) self.output_write(" ori: %s\n" % (self.eval_nuninst(nuninst_orig))) self.output_write(" pre: %s\n" % (self.eval_nuninst(nuninst_last_accepted))) self.output_write(" now: %s\n" % (self.eval_nuninst(nuninst_after))) if len(selected) <= 20: self.output_write(" all: %s\n" % (" ".join(x.uvname for x in selected))) else: self.output_write(" most: (%d) .. %s\n" % (len(selected), " ".join(x.uvname for x in selected[-20:]))) nuninst_last_accepted = nuninst_after else: broken = sorted(b for b in nuninst_after[failed_arch] if b not in nuninst_last_accepted[failed_arch]) compare_nuninst = None if any(item for item in comp if item.architecture != 'source'): compare_nuninst = nuninst_last_accepted # NB: try_migration already reverted this for us, so just print the results and move on self.output_write("skipped: %s (%d, %d)\n" % (comp_name, len(maybe_rescheduled), len(worklist))) self.output_write(" got: %s\n" % (self.eval_nuninst(nuninst_after, compare_nuninst))) self.output_write(" * %s: %s\n" % (failed_arch, ", ".join(broken))) if len(comp) > 1: self.output_write(" - splitting the component into single items and retrying them\n") worklist.extend([item] for item in comp) else: maybe_rescheduled.append(comp[0]) self.output_write(" finish: [%s]\n" % ",".join( x.uvname for x in selected )) self.output_write("endloop: %s\n" % (self.eval_nuninst(self.nuninst_orig))) self.output_write(" now: %s\n" % (self.eval_nuninst(nuninst_last_accepted))) self.output_write(eval_uninst(self.options.architectures, newly_uninst(self.nuninst_orig, nuninst_last_accepted))) self.output_write("\n") return (nuninst_last_accepted, maybe_rescheduled) def do_all(self, hinttype=None, init=None, actions=None): """Testing update runner This method tries to update testing checking the uninstallability counters before and after the actions to decide if the update was successful or not. """ selected = [] if actions: upgrade_me = actions[:] else: upgrade_me = self.upgrade_me[:] nuninst_start = self.nuninst_orig # these are special parameters for hints processing force = False recurse = True lundo = None nuninst_end = None better = True extra = [] if hinttype == "easy" or hinttype == "force-hint": force = hinttype == "force-hint" recurse = False # if we have a list of initial packages, check them if init: if not force: lundo = [] for x in init: if x not in upgrade_me: self.output_write("failed: %s is not a valid candidate (or it already migrated)\n" % (x.uvname)) return None selected.append(x) upgrade_me.remove(x) self.output_write("start: %s\n" % self.eval_nuninst(nuninst_start)) if not force: self.output_write("orig: %s\n" % self.eval_nuninst(nuninst_start)) if init: # init => a hint (e.g. "easy") - so do the hint run (better, nuninst_end, undo_list, _) = self.try_migration(selected, self.nuninst_orig, lundo=lundo, automatic_revert=False) if force: # Force implies "unconditionally better" better = True if lundo is not None: lundo.extend(undo_list) if recurse: # Ensure upgrade_me and selected do not overlap, if we # follow-up with a recurse ("hint"-hint). upgrade_me = [x for x in upgrade_me if x not in set(selected)] if recurse: # Either the main run or the recursive run of a "hint"-hint. (nuninst_end, extra) = self.iter_packages(upgrade_me, selected, nuninst=nuninst_end, lundo=lundo) nuninst_end_str = self.eval_nuninst(nuninst_end) if not recurse: # easy or force-hint if force: self.output_write("orig: %s\n" % nuninst_end_str) self.output_write("easy: %s\n" % nuninst_end_str) if not force: self.output_write(eval_uninst(self.options.architectures, newly_uninst(nuninst_start, nuninst_end)) + "\n") if not force: break_arches = set(self.options.break_arches) if all(x.architecture in break_arches for x in selected): # If we only migrated items from break-arches, then we # do not allow any regressions on these architectures. # This usually only happens with hints break_arches = set() better = is_nuninst_asgood_generous(self.options.architectures, self.nuninst_orig, nuninst_end, break_arches) if better: # Result accepted either by force or by being better than the original result. if recurse: self.output_write("Apparently successful\n") self.output_write("final: %s\n" % ",".join(sorted( x.uvname for x in selected ))) self.output_write("start: %s\n" % self.eval_nuninst(nuninst_start)) if not force: self.output_write(" orig: %s\n" % self.eval_nuninst(self.nuninst_orig)) else: self.output_write(" orig: %s\n" % nuninst_end_str) self.output_write(" end: %s\n" % nuninst_end_str) if force: self.output_write("force breaks:\n") self.output_write(eval_uninst(self.options.architectures, newly_uninst(nuninst_start, nuninst_end)) + "\n") self.output_write("SUCCESS (%d/%d)\n" % (len(actions or self.upgrade_me), len(extra))) self.nuninst_orig = nuninst_end self.all_selected += selected if not actions: if recurse: self.upgrade_me = extra else: self.upgrade_me = [x for x in self.upgrade_me if x not in set(selected)] else: self.output_write("FAILED\n") if not lundo: return lundo.reverse() undo_changes(lundo, self._inst_tester, self.sources, self.binaries, self.all_binaries) def assert_nuninst_is_correct(self): self.__log("> Update complete - Verifying non-installability counters", type="I") cached_nuninst = self.nuninst_orig self._inst_tester.compute_testing_installability() computed_nuninst = self.get_nuninst(build=True) if cached_nuninst != computed_nuninst: self.__log("==================== NUNINST OUT OF SYNC =========================", type="E") for arch in self.options.architectures: expected_nuninst = set(cached_nuninst[arch]) actual_nuninst = set(computed_nuninst[arch]) false_negatives = actual_nuninst - expected_nuninst false_positives = expected_nuninst - actual_nuninst if false_negatives: self.__log(" %s - unnoticed nuninst: %s" % (arch, str(false_negatives)), type="E") if false_positives: self.__log(" %s - invalid nuninst: %s" % (arch, str(false_positives)), type="E") self.__log(" %s - actual nuninst: %s" % (arch, str(actual_nuninst)), type="I") self.__log("==================== NUNINST OUT OF SYNC =========================", type="E") raise AssertionError("NUNINST OUT OF SYNC") self.__log("> All non-installability counters are ok", type="I") def upgrade_testing(self): """Upgrade testing using the unstable packages This method tries to upgrade testing using the packages from unstable. Before running the do_all method, it tries the easy and force-hint commands. """ self.__log("Starting the upgrade test", type="I") self.output_write("Generated on: %s\n" % (time.strftime("%Y.%m.%d %H:%M:%S %z", time.gmtime(time.time())))) self.output_write("Arch order is: %s\n" % ", ".join(self.options.architectures)) self.__log("> Calculating current uninstallability counters", type="I") self.nuninst_orig = self.get_nuninst() # nuninst_orig may get updated during the upgrade process self.nuninst_orig_save = self.get_nuninst() if not self.options.actions: # process `easy' hints for x in self.hints['easy']: self.do_hint("easy", x.user, x.packages) # process `force-hint' hints for x in self.hints["force-hint"]: self.do_hint("force-hint", x.user, x.packages) # run the first round of the upgrade # - do separate runs for break arches allpackages = [] normpackages = self.upgrade_me[:] archpackages = {} for a in self.options.break_arches: archpackages[a] = [p for p in normpackages if p.architecture == a] normpackages = [p for p in normpackages if p not in archpackages[a]] self.upgrade_me = normpackages self.output_write("info: main run\n") self.do_all() allpackages += self.upgrade_me for a in self.options.break_arches: backup = self.options.break_arches self.options.break_arches = " ".join(x for x in self.options.break_arches if x != a) self.upgrade_me = archpackages[a] self.output_write("info: broken arch run for %s\n" % (a)) self.do_all() allpackages += self.upgrade_me self.options.break_arches = backup self.upgrade_me = allpackages if self.options.actions: self.printuninstchange() return # process `hint' hints hintcnt = 0 for x in self.hints["hint"][:50]: if hintcnt > 50: self.output_write("Skipping remaining hints...") break if self.do_hint("hint", x.user, x.packages): hintcnt += 1 # run the auto hinter self.auto_hinter() # obsolete source packages # a package is obsolete if none of the binary packages in testing # are built by it self.__log("> Removing obsolete source packages from testing", type="I") # local copies for performance sources = self.sources['testing'] binaries = self.binaries['testing'] used = set(binaries[arch][0][binary][SOURCE] for arch in binaries for binary in binaries[arch][0] ) removals = [ MigrationItem("-%s/%s" % (source, sources[source][VERSION])) for source in sources if source not in used ] if len(removals) > 0: self.output_write("Removing obsolete source packages from testing (%d):\n" % (len(removals))) self.do_all(actions=removals) # smooth updates if self.options.smooth_updates: self.__log("> Removing old packages left in testing from smooth updates", type="I") removals = old_libraries(self.sources, self.binaries, self.options.fucked_arches) if removals: self.output_write("Removing packages left in testing for smooth updates (%d):\n%s" % \ (len(removals), old_libraries_format(removals))) self.do_all(actions=removals) removals = old_libraries(self.sources, self.binaries, self.options.fucked_arches) else: removals = () self.output_write("List of old libraries in testing (%d):\n%s" % \ (len(removals), old_libraries_format(removals))) self.assert_nuninst_is_correct() # output files if not self.options.dry_run: # re-write control files if self.options.control_files: self.__log("Writing new testing control files to %s" % self.options.testing) write_controlfiles(self.sources, self.binaries, 'testing', self.options.testing) # write dates try: self.write_dates(self.options.outputdir, self.dates) except AttributeError: self.write_dates(self.options.testing, self.dates) # write HeidiResult self.__log("Writing Heidi results to %s" % self.options.heidi_output) write_heidi(self.options.heidi_output, self.sources["testing"], self.binaries["testing"]) self.__log("Writing delta to %s" % self.options.heidi_delta_output) write_heidi_delta(self.options.heidi_delta_output, self.all_selected) self.printuninstchange() self.__log("Test completed!", type="I") def printuninstchange(self): self.__log("Checking for newly uninstallable packages", type="I") text = eval_uninst(self.options.architectures, newly_uninst( self.nuninst_orig_save, self.nuninst_orig)) if text != '': self.output_write("\nNewly uninstallable packages in testing:\n%s" % \ (text)) def hint_tester(self): """Run a command line interface to test hints This method provides a command line interface for the release team to try hints and evaluate the results. """ self.__log("> Calculating current uninstallability counters", type="I") self.nuninst_orig = self.get_nuninst() self.nuninst_orig_save = self.get_nuninst() import readline from completer import Completer histfile = os.path.expanduser('~/.britney2_history') if os.path.exists(histfile): readline.read_history_file(histfile) readline.parse_and_bind('tab: complete') readline.set_completer(Completer(self).completer) # Package names can contain "-" and we use "/" in our presentation of them as well, # so ensure readline does not split on these characters. readline.set_completer_delims(readline.get_completer_delims().replace('-', '').replace('/', '')) while True: # read the command from the command line try: user_input = input('britney> ').lower().split() except EOFError: print("") break except KeyboardInterrupt: print("") continue # quit the hint tester if user_input and user_input[0] in ('quit', 'exit'): break elif user_input and user_input[0] in ('remove', 'approve', 'urgent', 'age-days', 'block', 'block-udeb', 'unblock', 'unblock-udeb', 'block-all', 'force'): self.hints.add_hint(' '.join(user_input), 'hint-tester') self.write_excuses() # run a hint elif user_input and user_input[0] in ('easy', 'hint', 'force-hint'): try: self.do_hint(user_input[0], 'hint-tester', [k.rsplit("/", 1) for k in user_input[1:] if "/" in k]) self.printuninstchange() except KeyboardInterrupt: continue try: readline.write_history_file(histfile) except IOError as e: self.__log("Could not write %s: %s" % (histfile, e), type="W") def do_hint(self, hinttype, who, pkgvers): """Process hints This method process `easy`, `hint` and `force-hint` hints. If the requested version is not in unstable, then the hint is skipped. """ if isinstance(pkgvers[0], tuple) or isinstance(pkgvers[0], list): _pkgvers = [ MigrationItem('%s/%s' % (p, v)) for (p,v) in pkgvers ] else: _pkgvers = pkgvers self.__log("> Processing '%s' hint from %s" % (hinttype, who), type="I") self.output_write("Trying %s from %s: %s\n" % (hinttype, who, " ".join("%s/%s" % (x.uvname, x.version) for x in _pkgvers))) ok = True # loop on the requested packages and versions for idx in range(len(_pkgvers)): pkg = _pkgvers[idx] # skip removal requests if pkg.is_removal: continue inunstable = pkg.package in self.sources['unstable'] rightversion = inunstable and (apt_pkg.version_compare(self.sources['unstable'][pkg.package][VERSION], pkg.version) == 0) if pkg.suite == 'unstable' and not rightversion: for suite in ['pu', 'tpu']: if pkg.package in self.sources[suite] and apt_pkg.version_compare(self.sources[suite][pkg.package][VERSION], pkg.version) == 0: pkg.suite = suite _pkgvers[idx] = pkg break # handle *-proposed-updates if pkg.suite in ['pu', 'tpu']: if pkg.package not in self.sources[pkg.suite]: continue if apt_pkg.version_compare(self.sources[pkg.suite][pkg.package][VERSION], pkg.version) != 0: self.output_write(" Version mismatch, %s %s != %s\n" % (pkg.package, pkg.version, self.sources[pkg.suite][pkg.package][VERSION])) ok = False # does the package exist in unstable? elif not inunstable: self.output_write(" Source %s has no version in unstable\n" % pkg.package) ok = False elif not rightversion: self.output_write(" Version mismatch, %s %s != %s\n" % (pkg.package, pkg.version, self.sources['unstable'][pkg.package][VERSION])) ok = False if not ok: self.output_write("Not using hint\n") return False self.do_all(hinttype, _pkgvers) return True def auto_hinter(self): """Auto-generate "easy" hints. This method attempts to generate "easy" hints for sets of packages which must migrate together. Beginning with a package which does not depend on any other package (in terms of excuses), a list of dependencies and reverse dependencies is recursively created. Once all such lists have been generated, any which are subsets of other lists are ignored in favour of the larger lists. The remaining lists are then attempted in turn as "easy" hints. We also try to auto hint circular dependencies analyzing the update excuses relationships. If they build a circular dependency, which we already know as not-working with the standard do_all algorithm, try to `easy` them. """ self.__log("> Processing hints from the auto hinter", type="I") # consider only excuses which are valid candidates valid_excuses = frozenset(y.uvname for y in self.upgrade_me) excuses = dict((x.name, x) for x in self.excuses if x.name in valid_excuses) excuses_deps = dict((name, set(excuse.deps)) for name, excuse in excuses.items()) sources_t = self.sources['testing'] def find_related(e, hint, circular_first=False): if e not in excuses: return False excuse = excuses[e] if e in sources_t and sources_t[e][VERSION] == excuse.ver[1]: return True if not circular_first: hint[e] = excuse.ver[1] if not excuse.deps: return hint for p in excuse.deps: if p in hint: continue if not find_related(p, hint): return False return hint # loop on them candidates = [] mincands = [] seen_hints = set() for e in excuses: excuse = excuses[e] if e in sources_t and sources_t[e][VERSION] == excuse.ver[1]: continue if excuse.deps: hint = find_related(e, {}, True) if isinstance(hint, dict) and e in hint: h = frozenset(hint.items()) if h not in seen_hints: candidates.append(h) seen_hints.add(h) else: items = [(e, excuse.ver[1])] orig_size = 1 looped = False seen_items = set() seen_items.update(items) for item, ver in items: # excuses which depend on "item" or are depended on by it new_items = [(x, excuses[x].ver[1]) for x in excuses if \ (item in excuses_deps[x] or x in excuses_deps[item]) \ and (x, excuses[x].ver[1]) not in seen_items] items.extend(new_items) seen_items.update(new_items) if not looped and len(items) > 1: orig_size = len(items) h = frozenset(seen_items) if h not in seen_hints: mincands.append(h) seen_hints.add(h) looped = True if len(items) != orig_size: h = frozenset(seen_items) if h != mincands[-1] and h not in seen_hints: candidates.append(h) seen_hints.add(h) for l in [ candidates, mincands ]: for hint in l: self.do_hint("easy", "autohinter", [ MigrationItem("%s/%s" % (x[0], x[1])) for x in sorted(hint) ]) def nuninst_arch_report(self, nuninst, arch): """Print a report of uninstallable packages for one architecture.""" all = defaultdict(set) for p in nuninst[arch]: pkg = self.binaries['testing'][arch][0][p] all[(pkg[SOURCE], pkg[SOURCEVER])].add(p) print('* %s' % arch) for (src, ver), pkgs in sorted(all.items()): print(' %s (%s): %s' % (src, ver, ' '.join(sorted(pkgs)))) print() def output_write(self, msg): """Simple wrapper for output writing""" print(msg, end='') self.__output.write(msg) def main(self): """Main method This is the entry point for the class: it includes the list of calls for the member methods which will produce the output files. """ # if running in --print-uninst mode, quit if self.options.print_uninst: return # if no actions are provided, build the excuses and sort them elif not self.options.actions: self.write_excuses() # otherwise, use the actions provided by the command line else: self.upgrade_me = self.options.actions.split() with open(self.options.upgrade_output, 'w', encoding='utf-8') as f: self.__output = f # run the hint tester if self.options.hint_tester: self.hint_tester() # run the upgrade test else: self.upgrade_testing() self.__log('> Stats from the installability tester', type="I") for stat in self._inst_tester.stats.stats(): self.__log('> %s' % stat, type="I") def _installability_test(self, pkg_name, pkg_id, broken, to_check, nuninst_arch): """Test for installability of a package on an architecture (pkg_name, pkg_version, pkg_arch) is the package to check. broken is the set of broken packages. If p changes installability (e.g. goes from uninstallable to installable), broken will be updated accordingly. Furthermore, p will be added to "to_check" for futher processing. If nuninst_arch is not None then it also updated in the same way as broken is. """ r = self._inst_tester.is_installable(pkg_id) if not r: # not installable if pkg_name not in broken: broken.add(pkg_name) to_check.append(pkg_id) if nuninst_arch is not None and pkg_name not in nuninst_arch: nuninst_arch.add(pkg_name) else: if pkg_name in broken: to_check.append(pkg_id) broken.remove(pkg_name) if nuninst_arch is not None and pkg_name in nuninst_arch: nuninst_arch.remove(pkg_name) if __name__ == '__main__': Britney().main()