mirror of
https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/britney/+git/britney2-ubuntu
synced 2025-03-10 02:41:10 +00:00
Partially revert commit ac66e311 which caused packages with unsatisfiable dependencies to only get rejected if they were not in testing. In Ubuntu we always want to block those.
3068 lines
140 KiB
Python
Executable File
3068 lines
140 KiB
Python
Executable File
#!/usr/bin/python3 -u
|
|
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
|
|
|
|
# Copyright (C) 2001-2008 Anthony Towns <ajt@debian.org>
|
|
# Andreas Barth <aba@debian.org>
|
|
# Fabio Tranchitella <kobold@debian.org>
|
|
# Copyright (C) 2010-2013 Adam D. Barratt <adsb@debian.org>
|
|
|
|
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
|
|
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
|
|
# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
|
|
# (at your option) any later version.
|
|
|
|
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
|
|
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
|
|
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
|
|
# GNU General Public License for more details.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
= Introduction =
|
|
|
|
This is the Debian testing updater script, also known as "Britney".
|
|
|
|
Packages are usually installed into the `testing' distribution after
|
|
they have undergone some degree of testing in unstable. The goal of
|
|
this software is to do this task in a smart way, allowing testing
|
|
to always be fully installable and close to being a release candidate.
|
|
|
|
Britney's source code is split between two different but related tasks:
|
|
the first one is the generation of the update excuses, while the
|
|
second tries to update testing with the valid candidates; first
|
|
each package alone, then larger and even larger sets of packages
|
|
together. Each try is accepted if testing is not more uninstallable
|
|
after the update than before.
|
|
|
|
= Data Loading =
|
|
|
|
In order to analyze the entire Debian distribution, Britney needs to
|
|
load in memory the whole archive: this means more than 10.000 packages
|
|
for twelve architectures, as well as the dependency interconnections
|
|
between them. For this reason, the memory requirements for running this
|
|
software are quite high and at least 1 gigabyte of RAM should be available.
|
|
|
|
Britney loads the source packages from the `Sources' file and the binary
|
|
packages from the `Packages_${arch}' files, where ${arch} is substituted
|
|
with the supported architectures. While loading the data, the software
|
|
analyzes the dependencies and builds a directed weighted graph in memory
|
|
with all the interconnections between the packages (see Britney.read_sources
|
|
and Britney.read_binaries).
|
|
|
|
Other than source and binary packages, Britney loads the following data:
|
|
|
|
* BugsV, which contains the list of release-critical bugs for a given
|
|
version of a source or binary package (see RCBugPolicy.read_bugs).
|
|
|
|
* Dates, which contains the date of the upload of a given version
|
|
of a source package (see Britney.read_dates).
|
|
|
|
* Urgencies, which contains the urgency of the upload of a given
|
|
version of a source package (see AgePolicy._read_urgencies).
|
|
|
|
* Hints, which contains lists of commands which modify the standard behaviour
|
|
of Britney (see Britney.read_hints).
|
|
|
|
For a more detailed explanation about the format of these files, please read
|
|
the documentation of the related methods. The exact meaning of them will be
|
|
instead explained in the chapter "Excuses Generation".
|
|
|
|
= Excuses =
|
|
|
|
An excuse is a detailed explanation of why a package can or cannot
|
|
be updated in the testing distribution from a newer package in
|
|
another distribution (like for example unstable). The main purpose
|
|
of the excuses is to be written in an HTML file which will be
|
|
published over HTTP. The maintainers will be able to parse it manually
|
|
or automatically to find the explanation of why their packages have
|
|
been updated or not.
|
|
|
|
== Excuses generation ==
|
|
|
|
These are the steps (with references to method names) that Britney
|
|
does for the generation of the update excuses.
|
|
|
|
* If a source package is available in testing but it is not
|
|
present in unstable and no binary packages in unstable are
|
|
built from it, then it is marked for removal.
|
|
|
|
* Every source package in unstable and testing-proposed-updates,
|
|
if already present in testing, is checked for binary-NMUs, new
|
|
or dropped binary packages in all the supported architectures
|
|
(see Britney.should_upgrade_srcarch). The steps to detect if an
|
|
upgrade is needed are:
|
|
|
|
1. If there is a `remove' hint for the source package, the package
|
|
is ignored: it will be removed and not updated.
|
|
|
|
2. For every binary package built from the new source, it checks
|
|
for unsatisfied dependencies, new binary packages and updated
|
|
binary packages (binNMU), excluding the architecture-independent
|
|
ones, and packages not built from the same source.
|
|
|
|
3. For every binary package built from the old source, it checks
|
|
if it is still built from the new source; if this is not true
|
|
and the package is not architecture-independent, the script
|
|
removes it from testing.
|
|
|
|
4. Finally, if there is something worth doing (eg. a new or updated
|
|
binary package) and nothing wrong it marks the source package
|
|
as "Valid candidate", or "Not considered" if there is something
|
|
wrong which prevented the update.
|
|
|
|
* Every source package in unstable and testing-proposed-updates is
|
|
checked for upgrade (see Britney.should_upgrade_src). The steps
|
|
to detect if an upgrade is needed are:
|
|
|
|
1. If the source package in testing is more recent the new one
|
|
is ignored.
|
|
|
|
2. If the source package doesn't exist (is fake), which means that
|
|
a binary package refers to it but it is not present in the
|
|
`Sources' file, the new one is ignored.
|
|
|
|
3. If the package doesn't exist in testing, the urgency of the
|
|
upload is ignored and set to the default (actually `low').
|
|
|
|
4. If there is a `remove' hint for the source package, the package
|
|
is ignored: it will be removed and not updated.
|
|
|
|
5. If there is a `block' hint for the source package without an
|
|
`unblock` hint or a `block-all source`, the package is ignored.
|
|
|
|
6. If there is a `block-udeb' hint for the source package, it will
|
|
have the same effect as `block', but may only be cancelled by
|
|
a subsequent `unblock-udeb' hint.
|
|
|
|
7. If the suite is unstable, the update can go ahead only if the
|
|
upload happened more than the minimum days specified by the
|
|
urgency of the upload; if this is not true, the package is
|
|
ignored as `too-young'. Note that the urgency is sticky, meaning
|
|
that the highest urgency uploaded since the previous testing
|
|
transition is taken into account.
|
|
|
|
8. If the suite is unstable, all the architecture-dependent binary
|
|
packages and the architecture-independent ones for the `nobreakall'
|
|
architectures have to be built from the source we are considering.
|
|
If this is not true, then these are called `out-of-date'
|
|
architectures and the package is ignored.
|
|
|
|
9. The source package must have at least one binary package, otherwise
|
|
it is ignored.
|
|
|
|
10. If the suite is unstable, the new source package must have no
|
|
release critical bugs which do not also apply to the testing
|
|
one. If this is not true, the package is ignored as `buggy'.
|
|
|
|
11. If there is a `force' hint for the source package, then it is
|
|
updated even if it is marked as ignored from the previous steps.
|
|
|
|
12. If the suite is {testing-,}proposed-updates, the source package can
|
|
be updated only if there is an explicit approval for it. Unless
|
|
a `force' hint exists, the new package must also be available
|
|
on all of the architectures for which it has binary packages in
|
|
testing.
|
|
|
|
13. If the package will be ignored, mark it as "Valid candidate",
|
|
otherwise mark it as "Not considered".
|
|
|
|
* The list of `remove' hints is processed: if the requested source
|
|
package is not already being updated or removed and the version
|
|
actually in testing is the same specified with the `remove' hint,
|
|
it is marked for removal.
|
|
|
|
* The excuses are sorted by the number of days from the last upload
|
|
(days-old) and by name.
|
|
|
|
* A list of unconsidered excuses (for which the package is not upgraded)
|
|
is built. Using this list, all of the excuses depending on them are
|
|
marked as invalid "impossible dependencies".
|
|
|
|
* The excuses are written in an HTML file.
|
|
"""
|
|
from __future__ import print_function
|
|
|
|
import os
|
|
import sys
|
|
import time
|
|
import optparse
|
|
|
|
import apt_pkg
|
|
|
|
from collections import defaultdict, namedtuple
|
|
from functools import reduce
|
|
from itertools import product
|
|
from operator import attrgetter
|
|
|
|
from urllib.parse import quote
|
|
|
|
from installability.builder import InstallabilityTesterBuilder
|
|
from excuse import Excuse
|
|
from migrationitem import MigrationItem
|
|
from hints import HintParser
|
|
from britney_util import (old_libraries_format, undo_changes,
|
|
compute_reverse_tree, possibly_compressed,
|
|
read_nuninst, write_nuninst, write_heidi,
|
|
eval_uninst, newly_uninst, make_migrationitem,
|
|
write_excuses, write_heidi_delta, write_controlfiles,
|
|
old_libraries, is_nuninst_asgood_generous,
|
|
clone_nuninst, check_installability,
|
|
create_provides_map,
|
|
)
|
|
from policies.policy import AgePolicy, RCBugPolicy, PolicyVerdict
|
|
|
|
# Check the "check_field_name" reflection before removing an import here.
|
|
from consts import (SOURCE, SOURCEVER, ARCHITECTURE, CONFLICTS, DEPENDS,
|
|
PROVIDES, MULTIARCH)
|
|
|
|
__author__ = 'Fabio Tranchitella and the Debian Release Team'
|
|
__version__ = '2.0'
|
|
|
|
# NB: ESSENTIAL deliberately skipped as the 2011 and 2012
|
|
# parts of the live-data tests require it (britney merges
|
|
# this field correctly from the unstable version where
|
|
# available)
|
|
check_field_name = dict((globals()[fn], fn) for fn in
|
|
(
|
|
"SOURCE SOURCEVER ARCHITECTURE MULTIARCH" +
|
|
" DEPENDS CONFLICTS PROVIDES"
|
|
).split()
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
check_fields = sorted(check_field_name)
|
|
|
|
|
|
class SourcePackage(object):
|
|
|
|
__slots__ = ['version', 'section', 'binaries', 'maintainer', 'is_fakesrc']
|
|
|
|
def __init__(self, version, section, binaries, maintainer, is_fakesrc):
|
|
self.version = version
|
|
self.section = section
|
|
self.binaries = binaries
|
|
self.maintainer = maintainer
|
|
self.is_fakesrc = is_fakesrc
|
|
|
|
def __getitem__(self, item):
|
|
return getattr(self, self.__slots__[item])
|
|
|
|
BinaryPackageId = namedtuple('BinaryPackageId', [
|
|
'package_name',
|
|
'version',
|
|
'architecture',
|
|
])
|
|
|
|
BinaryPackage = namedtuple('BinaryPackage', [
|
|
'version',
|
|
'section',
|
|
'source',
|
|
'source_version',
|
|
'architecture',
|
|
'multi_arch',
|
|
'depends',
|
|
'conflicts',
|
|
'provides',
|
|
'is_essential',
|
|
'pkg_id',
|
|
])
|
|
|
|
class Britney(object):
|
|
"""Britney, the Debian testing updater script
|
|
|
|
This is the script that updates the testing distribution. It is executed
|
|
each day after the installation of the updated packages. It generates the
|
|
`Packages' files for the testing distribution, but it does so in an
|
|
intelligent manner; it tries to avoid any inconsistency and to use only
|
|
non-buggy packages.
|
|
|
|
For more documentation on this script, please read the Developers Reference.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
HINTS_HELPERS = ("easy", "hint", "remove", "block", "block-udeb", "unblock", "unblock-udeb", "approve", "remark")
|
|
HINTS_STANDARD = ("urgent", "age-days") + HINTS_HELPERS
|
|
# ALL = {"force", "force-hint", "block-all"} | HINTS_STANDARD | registered policy hints (not covered above)
|
|
HINTS_ALL = ('ALL')
|
|
|
|
def __init__(self):
|
|
"""Class constructor
|
|
|
|
This method initializes and populates the data lists, which contain all
|
|
the information needed by the other methods of the class.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
# parse the command line arguments
|
|
self.policies = []
|
|
self._hint_parser = HintParser(self)
|
|
self.__parse_arguments()
|
|
MigrationItem.set_architectures(self.options.architectures)
|
|
|
|
# initialize the apt_pkg back-end
|
|
apt_pkg.init()
|
|
self.sources = {}
|
|
self.binaries = {}
|
|
self.all_selected = []
|
|
self.excuses = {}
|
|
|
|
try:
|
|
self.read_hints(self.options.hintsdir)
|
|
except AttributeError:
|
|
self.read_hints(os.path.join(self.options.unstable, 'Hints'))
|
|
|
|
if self.options.nuninst_cache:
|
|
self.log("Not building the list of non-installable packages, as requested", type="I")
|
|
if self.options.print_uninst:
|
|
print('* summary')
|
|
print('\n'.join('%4d %s' % (len(nuninst[x]), x) for x in self.options.architectures))
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
self.all_binaries = {}
|
|
# read the source and binary packages for the involved distributions
|
|
self.sources['testing'] = self.read_sources(self.options.testing)
|
|
self.sources['unstable'] = self.read_sources(self.options.unstable)
|
|
for suite in ('tpu', 'pu'):
|
|
if hasattr(self.options, suite):
|
|
self.sources[suite] = self.read_sources(getattr(self.options, suite))
|
|
else:
|
|
self.sources[suite] = {}
|
|
|
|
self.binaries['testing'] = {}
|
|
self.binaries['unstable'] = {}
|
|
self.binaries['tpu'] = {}
|
|
self.binaries['pu'] = {}
|
|
|
|
self.binaries['unstable'] = self.read_binaries(self.options.unstable, "unstable", self.options.architectures)
|
|
for suite in ('tpu', 'pu'):
|
|
if hasattr(self.options, suite):
|
|
self.binaries[suite] = self.read_binaries(getattr(self.options, suite), suite, self.options.architectures)
|
|
else:
|
|
# _build_installability_tester relies on this being
|
|
# properly initialised, so insert two empty dicts
|
|
# here.
|
|
for arch in self.options.architectures:
|
|
self.binaries[suite][arch] = ({}, {})
|
|
# Load testing last as some live-data tests have more complete information in
|
|
# unstable
|
|
self.binaries['testing'] = self.read_binaries(self.options.testing, "testing", self.options.architectures)
|
|
|
|
try:
|
|
constraints_file = os.path.join(self.options.static_input_dir, 'constraints')
|
|
faux_packages = os.path.join(self.options.static_input_dir, 'faux-packages')
|
|
except AttributeError:
|
|
self.log("The static_input_dir option is not set", type='I')
|
|
constraints_file = None
|
|
faux_packages = None
|
|
if faux_packages is not None and os.path.exists(faux_packages):
|
|
self.log("Loading faux packages from %s" % faux_packages, type='I')
|
|
self._load_faux_packages(faux_packages)
|
|
elif faux_packages is not None:
|
|
self.log("No Faux packages as %s does not exist" % faux_packages, type='I')
|
|
|
|
if constraints_file is not None and os.path.exists(constraints_file):
|
|
self.log("Loading constraints from %s" % constraints_file, type='I')
|
|
self.constraints = self._load_constraints(constraints_file)
|
|
else:
|
|
if constraints_file is not None:
|
|
self.log("No constraints as %s does not exist" % constraints_file, type='I')
|
|
self.constraints = {
|
|
'keep-installable': [],
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
self.log("Compiling Installability tester", type="I")
|
|
self._build_installability_tester(self.options.architectures)
|
|
|
|
if not self.options.nuninst_cache:
|
|
self.log("Building the list of non-installable packages for the full archive", type="I")
|
|
nuninst = {}
|
|
self._inst_tester.compute_testing_installability()
|
|
for arch in self.options.architectures:
|
|
self.log("> Checking for non-installable packages for architecture %s" % arch, type="I")
|
|
result = self.get_nuninst(arch, build=True)
|
|
nuninst.update(result)
|
|
self.log("> Found %d non-installable packages" % len(nuninst[arch]), type="I")
|
|
if self.options.print_uninst:
|
|
self.nuninst_arch_report(nuninst, arch)
|
|
|
|
if self.options.print_uninst:
|
|
print('* summary')
|
|
print('\n'.join(map(lambda x: '%4d %s' % (len(nuninst[x]), x), self.options.architectures)))
|
|
return
|
|
else:
|
|
write_nuninst(self.options.noninst_status, nuninst)
|
|
|
|
stats = self._inst_tester.compute_stats()
|
|
self.log("> Installability tester statistics (per architecture)", type="I")
|
|
for arch in self.options.architectures:
|
|
arch_stat = stats[arch]
|
|
self.log("> %s" % arch, type="I")
|
|
for stat in arch_stat.stat_summary():
|
|
self.log("> - %s" % stat, type="I")
|
|
|
|
for policy in self.policies:
|
|
policy.hints = self.hints
|
|
policy.initialise(self)
|
|
|
|
def merge_pkg_entries(self, package, parch, pkg_entry1, pkg_entry2,
|
|
check_fields=check_fields, check_field_name=check_field_name):
|
|
bad = []
|
|
for f in check_fields:
|
|
if pkg_entry1[f] != pkg_entry2[f]:
|
|
bad.append((f, pkg_entry1[f], pkg_entry2[f]))
|
|
|
|
if bad:
|
|
self.log("Mismatch found %s %s %s differs" % (
|
|
package, pkg_entry1.version, parch), type="E")
|
|
for f, v1, v2 in bad:
|
|
self.log(" ... %s %s != %s" % (check_field_name[f], v1, v2))
|
|
raise ValueError("Invalid data set")
|
|
|
|
# Merge ESSENTIAL if necessary
|
|
assert pkg_entry1.is_essential or not pkg_entry2.is_essential
|
|
|
|
def __parse_arguments(self):
|
|
"""Parse the command line arguments
|
|
|
|
This method parses and initializes the command line arguments.
|
|
While doing so, it preprocesses some of the options to be converted
|
|
in a suitable form for the other methods of the class.
|
|
"""
|
|
# initialize the parser
|
|
parser = optparse.OptionParser(version="%prog")
|
|
parser.add_option("-v", "", action="count", dest="verbose", help="enable verbose output")
|
|
parser.add_option("-c", "--config", action="store", dest="config", default="/etc/britney.conf",
|
|
help="path for the configuration file")
|
|
parser.add_option("", "--architectures", action="store", dest="architectures", default=None,
|
|
help="override architectures from configuration file")
|
|
parser.add_option("", "--actions", action="store", dest="actions", default=None,
|
|
help="override the list of actions to be performed")
|
|
parser.add_option("", "--hints", action="store", dest="hints", default=None,
|
|
help="additional hints, separated by semicolons")
|
|
parser.add_option("", "--hint-tester", action="store_true", dest="hint_tester", default=None,
|
|
help="provide a command line interface to test hints")
|
|
parser.add_option("", "--dry-run", action="store_true", dest="dry_run", default=False,
|
|
help="disable all outputs to the testing directory")
|
|
parser.add_option("", "--control-files", action="store_true", dest="control_files", default=False,
|
|
help="enable control files generation")
|
|
parser.add_option("", "--nuninst-cache", action="store_true", dest="nuninst_cache", default=False,
|
|
help="do not build the non-installability status, use the cache from file")
|
|
parser.add_option("", "--print-uninst", action="store_true", dest="print_uninst", default=False,
|
|
help="just print a summary of uninstallable packages")
|
|
parser.add_option("", "--components", action="store", dest="components",
|
|
help="Sources/Packages are laid out by components listed (, sep)")
|
|
(self.options, self.args) = parser.parse_args()
|
|
|
|
# integrity checks
|
|
if self.options.nuninst_cache and self.options.print_uninst:
|
|
self.log("nuninst_cache and print_uninst are mutually exclusive!", type="E")
|
|
sys.exit(1)
|
|
# if the configuration file exists, then read it and set the additional options
|
|
elif not os.path.isfile(self.options.config):
|
|
self.log("Unable to read the configuration file (%s), exiting!" % self.options.config, type="E")
|
|
sys.exit(1)
|
|
|
|
# minimum days for unstable-testing transition and the list of hints
|
|
# are handled as an ad-hoc case
|
|
MINDAYS = {}
|
|
|
|
self.HINTS = {'command-line': self.HINTS_ALL}
|
|
with open(self.options.config, encoding='utf-8') as config:
|
|
for line in config:
|
|
if '=' in line and not line.strip().startswith('#'):
|
|
k, v = line.split('=', 1)
|
|
k = k.strip()
|
|
v = v.strip()
|
|
if k.startswith("MINDAYS_"):
|
|
MINDAYS[k.split("_")[1].lower()] = int(v)
|
|
elif k.startswith("HINTS_"):
|
|
self.HINTS[k.split("_")[1].lower()] = \
|
|
reduce(lambda x,y: x+y, [hasattr(self, "HINTS_" + i) and getattr(self, "HINTS_" + i) or (i,) for i in v.split()])
|
|
elif not hasattr(self.options, k.lower()) or \
|
|
not getattr(self.options, k.lower()):
|
|
setattr(self.options, k.lower(), v)
|
|
|
|
if getattr(self.options, "components", None):
|
|
self.options.components = [s.strip() for s in self.options.components.split(",")]
|
|
else:
|
|
self.options.components = None
|
|
|
|
if self.options.control_files and self.options.components:
|
|
# We cannot regenerate the control files correctly when reading from an
|
|
# actual mirror (we don't which package goes in what component etc.).
|
|
self.log("Cannot use --control-files with mirror-layout (components)!", type="E")
|
|
sys.exit(1)
|
|
|
|
if not hasattr(self.options, "heidi_delta_output"):
|
|
self.options.heidi_delta_output = self.options.heidi_output + "Delta"
|
|
|
|
self.options.nobreakall_arches = self.options.nobreakall_arches.split()
|
|
self.options.outofsync_arches = self.options.outofsync_arches.split()
|
|
self.options.break_arches = self.options.break_arches.split()
|
|
self.options.new_arches = self.options.new_arches.split()
|
|
|
|
# Sort the architecture list
|
|
allarches = sorted(self.options.architectures.split())
|
|
arches = [x for x in allarches if x in self.options.nobreakall_arches]
|
|
arches += [x for x in allarches if x not in arches and x not in self.options.outofsync_arches]
|
|
arches += [x for x in allarches if x not in arches and x not in self.options.break_arches]
|
|
arches += [x for x in allarches if x not in arches and x not in self.options.new_arches]
|
|
arches += [x for x in allarches if x not in arches]
|
|
self.options.architectures = [sys.intern(arch) for arch in arches]
|
|
self.options.smooth_updates = self.options.smooth_updates.split()
|
|
|
|
if not hasattr(self.options, 'ignore_cruft') or \
|
|
self.options.ignore_cruft == "0":
|
|
self.options.ignore_cruft = False
|
|
|
|
self.policies.append(AgePolicy(self.options, MINDAYS))
|
|
self.policies.append(RCBugPolicy(self.options))
|
|
|
|
for policy in self.policies:
|
|
policy.register_hints(self._hint_parser)
|
|
|
|
@property
|
|
def hints(self):
|
|
return self._hint_parser.hints
|
|
|
|
def log(self, msg, type="I"):
|
|
"""Print info messages according to verbosity level
|
|
|
|
An easy-and-simple log method which prints messages to the standard
|
|
output. The type parameter controls the urgency of the message, and
|
|
can be equal to `I' for `Information', `W' for `Warning' and `E' for
|
|
`Error'. Warnings and errors are always printed, and information is
|
|
printed only if verbose logging is enabled.
|
|
"""
|
|
if self.options.verbose or type in ("E", "W"):
|
|
print("%s: [%s] - %s" % (type, time.asctime(), msg))
|
|
|
|
def _load_faux_packages(self, faux_packages_file):
|
|
"""Loads fake packages
|
|
|
|
In rare cases, it is useful to create a "fake" package that can be used to satisfy
|
|
dependencies. This is usually needed for packages that are not shipped directly
|
|
on this mirror but is a prerequisite for using this mirror (e.g. some vendors provide
|
|
non-distributable "setup" packages and contrib/non-free packages depend on these).
|
|
|
|
:param faux_packages_file: Path to the file containing the fake package definitions
|
|
"""
|
|
tag_file = apt_pkg.TagFile(faux_packages_file)
|
|
get_field = tag_file.section.get
|
|
step = tag_file.step
|
|
no = 0
|
|
|
|
while step():
|
|
no += 1
|
|
pkg_name = get_field('Package', None)
|
|
if pkg_name is None:
|
|
raise ValueError("Missing Package field in paragraph %d (file %s)" % (no, faux_packages_file))
|
|
pkg_name = sys.intern(pkg_name)
|
|
version = sys.intern(get_field('Version', '1.0-1'))
|
|
provides_raw = get_field('Provides')
|
|
archs_raw = get_field('Architecture', None)
|
|
component = get_field('Component', 'non-free')
|
|
if archs_raw:
|
|
archs = archs_raw.split()
|
|
else:
|
|
archs = self.options.architectures
|
|
faux_section = 'faux'
|
|
if component != 'main':
|
|
faux_section = "%s/faux" % component
|
|
src_data = SourcePackage(version,
|
|
sys.intern(faux_section),
|
|
[],
|
|
None,
|
|
True,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.sources['testing'][pkg_name] = src_data
|
|
self.sources['unstable'][pkg_name] = src_data
|
|
|
|
for arch in archs:
|
|
pkg_id = BinaryPackageId(pkg_name, version, arch)
|
|
if provides_raw:
|
|
provides = self._parse_provides(pkg_id, provides_raw)
|
|
else:
|
|
provides = []
|
|
bin_data = BinaryPackage(version,
|
|
faux_section,
|
|
pkg_name,
|
|
version,
|
|
arch,
|
|
get_field('Multi-Arch'),
|
|
None,
|
|
None,
|
|
provides,
|
|
False,
|
|
pkg_id,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
src_data.binaries.append(pkg_id)
|
|
self.binaries['testing'][arch][0][pkg_name] = bin_data
|
|
self.binaries['unstable'][arch][0][pkg_name] = bin_data
|
|
self.all_binaries[pkg_id] = bin_data
|
|
|
|
def _load_constraints(self, constraints_file):
|
|
"""Loads configurable constraints
|
|
|
|
The constraints file can contain extra rules that Britney should attempt
|
|
to satisfy. Examples can be "keep package X in testing and ensure it is
|
|
installable".
|
|
|
|
:param constraints_file: Path to the file containing the constraints
|
|
"""
|
|
tag_file = apt_pkg.TagFile(constraints_file)
|
|
get_field = tag_file.section.get
|
|
step = tag_file.step
|
|
no = 0
|
|
faux_version = sys.intern('1')
|
|
faux_section = sys.intern('faux')
|
|
keep_installable = []
|
|
constraints = {
|
|
'keep-installable': keep_installable
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
while step():
|
|
no += 1
|
|
pkg_name = get_field('Fake-Package-Name', None)
|
|
if pkg_name is None:
|
|
raise ValueError("Missing Fake-Package-Name field in paragraph %d (file %s)" % (no, constraints_file))
|
|
pkg_name = sys.intern(pkg_name)
|
|
|
|
def mandatory_field(x):
|
|
v = get_field(x, None)
|
|
if v is None:
|
|
raise ValueError("Missing %s field for %s (file %s)" % (x, pkg_name, constraints_file))
|
|
return v
|
|
|
|
constraint = mandatory_field('Constraint')
|
|
if constraint not in {'present-and-installable'}:
|
|
raise ValueError("Unsupported constraint %s for %s (file %s)" % (constraint, pkg_name, constraints_file))
|
|
|
|
self.log(" - constraint %s" % pkg_name, type='I')
|
|
|
|
pkg_list = [x.strip() for x in mandatory_field('Package-List').split("\n") if x.strip() != '' and not x.strip().startswith("#")]
|
|
src_data = SourcePackage(faux_version,
|
|
faux_section,
|
|
[],
|
|
None,
|
|
True,
|
|
)
|
|
self.sources['testing'][pkg_name] = src_data
|
|
self.sources['unstable'][pkg_name] = src_data
|
|
keep_installable.append(pkg_name)
|
|
for arch in self.options.architectures:
|
|
deps = []
|
|
for pkg_spec in pkg_list:
|
|
s = pkg_spec.split(None, 1)
|
|
if len(s) == 1:
|
|
deps.append(s[0])
|
|
else:
|
|
pkg, arch_res = s
|
|
if not (arch_res.startswith('[') and arch_res.endswith(']')):
|
|
raise ValueError("Invalid arch-restriction on %s - should be [arch1 arch2] (for %s file %s)"
|
|
% (pkg, pkg_name, constraints_file))
|
|
arch_res = arch_res[1:-1].split()
|
|
if not arch_res:
|
|
msg = "Empty arch-restriction for %s: Uses comma or negation (for %s file %s)"
|
|
raise ValueError(msg % (pkg, pkg_name, constraints_file))
|
|
for a in arch_res:
|
|
if a == arch:
|
|
deps.append(pkg)
|
|
elif ',' in a or '!' in a:
|
|
msg = "Invalid arch-restriction for %s: Uses comma or negation (for %s file %s)"
|
|
raise ValueError(msg % (pkg, pkg_name, constraints_file))
|
|
pkg_id = BinaryPackageId(pkg_name, faux_version, arch)
|
|
bin_data = BinaryPackage(faux_version,
|
|
faux_section,
|
|
pkg_name,
|
|
faux_version,
|
|
arch,
|
|
'no',
|
|
', '.join(deps),
|
|
None,
|
|
[],
|
|
False,
|
|
pkg_id,
|
|
)
|
|
src_data.binaries.append(pkg_id)
|
|
self.binaries['testing'][arch][0][pkg_name] = bin_data
|
|
self.binaries['unstable'][arch][0][pkg_name] = bin_data
|
|
self.all_binaries[pkg_id] = bin_data
|
|
|
|
return constraints
|
|
|
|
def _build_installability_tester(self, archs):
|
|
"""Create the installability tester"""
|
|
|
|
solvers = self.get_dependency_solvers
|
|
binaries = self.binaries
|
|
builder = InstallabilityTesterBuilder()
|
|
|
|
for (dist, arch) in product(binaries, archs):
|
|
testing = (dist == 'testing')
|
|
for pkgname in binaries[dist][arch][0]:
|
|
pkgdata = binaries[dist][arch][0][pkgname]
|
|
pkg_id = pkgdata.pkg_id
|
|
if not builder.add_binary(pkg_id, essential=pkgdata.is_essential,
|
|
in_testing=testing):
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
depends = []
|
|
conflicts = []
|
|
possible_dep_ranges = {}
|
|
|
|
# We do not differentiate between depends and pre-depends
|
|
if pkgdata.depends:
|
|
depends.extend(self._parse_depends(pkgdata.depends))
|
|
|
|
if pkgdata.conflicts:
|
|
conflicts = self._parse_depends(pkgdata.conflicts)
|
|
|
|
with builder.relation_builder(pkg_id) as relations:
|
|
|
|
for (al, dep) in [(depends, True), \
|
|
(conflicts, False)]:
|
|
|
|
for block in al:
|
|
sat = set()
|
|
|
|
for dep_dist in binaries:
|
|
dep_packages_s_a = binaries[dep_dist][arch]
|
|
pkgs = solvers(block, dep_packages_s_a)
|
|
for p in pkgs:
|
|
# version and arch is already interned, but solvers use
|
|
# the package name extracted from the field and it is therefore
|
|
# not interned.
|
|
pdata = dep_packages_s_a[0][p]
|
|
dep_pkg_id = pdata.pkg_id
|
|
if dep:
|
|
sat.add(dep_pkg_id)
|
|
elif pkg_id != dep_pkg_id:
|
|
# if t satisfies its own
|
|
# conflicts relation, then it
|
|
# is using §7.6.2
|
|
relations.add_breaks(dep_pkg_id)
|
|
if dep:
|
|
if len(block) != 1:
|
|
relations.add_dependency_clause(sat)
|
|
else:
|
|
# This dependency might be a part
|
|
# of a version-range a la:
|
|
#
|
|
# Depends: pkg-a (>= 1),
|
|
# pkg-a (<< 2~)
|
|
#
|
|
# In such a case we want to reduce
|
|
# that to a single clause for
|
|
# efficiency.
|
|
#
|
|
# In theory, it could also happen
|
|
# with "non-minimal" dependencies
|
|
# a la:
|
|
#
|
|
# Depends: pkg-a, pkg-a (>= 1)
|
|
#
|
|
# But dpkg is known to fix that up
|
|
# at build time, so we will
|
|
# probably only see "ranges" here.
|
|
key = block[0][0]
|
|
if key in possible_dep_ranges:
|
|
possible_dep_ranges[key] &= sat
|
|
else:
|
|
possible_dep_ranges[key] = sat
|
|
|
|
if dep:
|
|
for clause in possible_dep_ranges.values():
|
|
relations.add_dependency_clause(clause)
|
|
|
|
self._inst_tester = builder.build()
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Data reading/writing methods
|
|
# ----------------------------
|
|
|
|
def _parse_depends(self, dep_str):
|
|
"""Parse a dependency string into a list of triples
|
|
|
|
This is like apt_pkg.parse_depends but filters out :any and :native
|
|
Multi-Arch prefixes. We don't use apt_pkg.parse_depends(dep_str, True)
|
|
as that would also filter out arch specific dependencies like :amd64.
|
|
"""
|
|
res = apt_pkg.parse_depends(dep_str, False)
|
|
filtered = []
|
|
for or_clause in res:
|
|
filtered.append([(p.replace(':any', '').replace(':native', ''), v, r) for (p, v, r) in or_clause])
|
|
return filtered
|
|
|
|
def _read_sources_file(self, filename, sources=None, intern=sys.intern):
|
|
if sources is None:
|
|
sources = {}
|
|
|
|
self.log("Loading source packages from %s" % filename)
|
|
|
|
Packages = apt_pkg.TagFile(filename)
|
|
get_field = Packages.section.get
|
|
step = Packages.step
|
|
|
|
while step():
|
|
if get_field('Extra-Source-Only', 'no') == 'yes':
|
|
# Ignore sources only referenced by Built-Using
|
|
continue
|
|
pkg = get_field('Package')
|
|
ver = get_field('Version')
|
|
# There may be multiple versions of the source package
|
|
# (in unstable) if some architectures have out-of-date
|
|
# binaries. We only ever consider the source with the
|
|
# largest version for migration.
|
|
if pkg in sources and apt_pkg.version_compare(sources[pkg][0], ver) > 0:
|
|
continue
|
|
maint = get_field('Maintainer')
|
|
if maint:
|
|
maint = intern(maint.strip())
|
|
section = get_field('Section')
|
|
if section:
|
|
section = intern(section.strip())
|
|
sources[intern(pkg)] = SourcePackage(intern(ver),
|
|
section,
|
|
[],
|
|
maint,
|
|
False,
|
|
)
|
|
return sources
|
|
|
|
def read_sources(self, basedir):
|
|
"""Read the list of source packages from the specified directory
|
|
|
|
The source packages are read from the `Sources' file within the
|
|
directory specified as `basedir' parameter. Considering the
|
|
large amount of memory needed, not all the fields are loaded
|
|
in memory. The available fields are Version, Maintainer and Section.
|
|
|
|
The method returns a list where every item represents a source
|
|
package as a dictionary.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
if self.options.components:
|
|
sources = {}
|
|
for component in self.options.components:
|
|
filename = os.path.join(basedir, component, "source", "Sources")
|
|
filename = possibly_compressed(filename)
|
|
self._read_sources_file(filename, sources)
|
|
else:
|
|
filename = os.path.join(basedir, "Sources")
|
|
sources = self._read_sources_file(filename)
|
|
|
|
return sources
|
|
|
|
def _parse_provides(self, pkg_id, provides_raw):
|
|
parts = self._parse_depends(provides_raw)
|
|
nprov = []
|
|
for or_clause in parts:
|
|
if len(or_clause) != 1:
|
|
msg = "Ignoring invalid provides in %s: Alternatives [%s]" % (str(pkg_id), str(or_clause))
|
|
self.log(msg, type='W')
|
|
continue
|
|
for part in or_clause:
|
|
provided, provided_version, op = part
|
|
if op != '' and op != '=':
|
|
msg = "Ignoring invalid provides in %s: %s (%s %s)" % (str(pkg_id), provided, op, provided_version)
|
|
self.log(msg, type='W')
|
|
continue
|
|
provided = sys.intern(provided)
|
|
provided_version = sys.intern(provided_version)
|
|
part = (provided, provided_version, sys.intern(op))
|
|
nprov.append(part)
|
|
return nprov
|
|
|
|
def _read_packages_file(self, filename, arch, srcdist, packages=None, intern=sys.intern):
|
|
self.log("Loading binary packages from %s" % filename)
|
|
|
|
if packages is None:
|
|
packages = {}
|
|
|
|
all_binaries = self.all_binaries
|
|
|
|
Packages = apt_pkg.TagFile(filename)
|
|
get_field = Packages.section.get
|
|
step = Packages.step
|
|
|
|
while step():
|
|
pkg = get_field('Package')
|
|
version = get_field('Version')
|
|
|
|
# There may be multiple versions of any arch:all packages
|
|
# (in unstable) if some architectures have out-of-date
|
|
# binaries. We only ever consider the package with the
|
|
# largest version for migration.
|
|
pkg = intern(pkg)
|
|
version = intern(version)
|
|
pkg_id = BinaryPackageId(pkg, version, arch)
|
|
|
|
if pkg in packages:
|
|
old_pkg_data = packages[pkg]
|
|
if apt_pkg.version_compare(old_pkg_data.version, version) > 0:
|
|
continue
|
|
old_pkg_id = old_pkg_data.pkg_id
|
|
old_src_binaries = srcdist[old_pkg_data[SOURCE]].binaries
|
|
old_src_binaries.remove(old_pkg_id)
|
|
# This may seem weird at first glance, but the current code rely
|
|
# on this behaviour to avoid issues like #709460. Admittedly it
|
|
# is a special case, but Britney will attempt to remove the
|
|
# arch:all packages without this. Even then, this particular
|
|
# stop-gap relies on the packages files being sorted by name
|
|
# and the version, so it is not particularly resilient.
|
|
if pkg_id not in old_src_binaries:
|
|
old_src_binaries.append(pkg_id)
|
|
|
|
# Merge Pre-Depends with Depends and Conflicts with
|
|
# Breaks. Britney is not interested in the "finer
|
|
# semantic differences" of these fields anyway.
|
|
pdeps = get_field('Pre-Depends')
|
|
deps = get_field('Depends')
|
|
if deps and pdeps:
|
|
deps = pdeps + ', ' + deps
|
|
elif pdeps:
|
|
deps = pdeps
|
|
|
|
ess = False
|
|
if get_field('Essential', 'no') == 'yes':
|
|
ess = True
|
|
|
|
final_conflicts_list = []
|
|
conflicts = get_field('Conflicts')
|
|
if conflicts:
|
|
final_conflicts_list.append(conflicts)
|
|
breaks = get_field('Breaks')
|
|
if breaks:
|
|
final_conflicts_list.append(breaks)
|
|
|
|
source = pkg
|
|
source_version = version
|
|
# retrieve the name and the version of the source package
|
|
source_raw = get_field('Source')
|
|
if source_raw:
|
|
source = intern(source_raw.split(" ")[0])
|
|
if "(" in source_raw:
|
|
source_version = intern(source_raw[source_raw.find("(")+1:source_raw.find(")")])
|
|
|
|
provides_raw = get_field('Provides')
|
|
if provides_raw:
|
|
provides = self._parse_provides(pkg_id, provides_raw)
|
|
else:
|
|
provides = []
|
|
|
|
dpkg = BinaryPackage(version,
|
|
intern(get_field('Section')),
|
|
source,
|
|
source_version,
|
|
intern(get_field('Architecture')),
|
|
get_field('Multi-Arch'),
|
|
deps,
|
|
', '.join(final_conflicts_list) or None,
|
|
provides,
|
|
ess,
|
|
pkg_id,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# if the source package is available in the distribution, then register this binary package
|
|
if source in srcdist:
|
|
# There may be multiple versions of any arch:all packages
|
|
# (in unstable) if some architectures have out-of-date
|
|
# binaries. We only want to include the package in the
|
|
# source -> binary mapping once. It doesn't matter which
|
|
# of the versions we include as only the package name and
|
|
# architecture are recorded.
|
|
if pkg_id not in srcdist[source].binaries:
|
|
srcdist[source].binaries.append(pkg_id)
|
|
# if the source package doesn't exist, create a fake one
|
|
else:
|
|
srcdist[source] = SourcePackage(source_version, 'faux', [pkg_id], None, True)
|
|
|
|
# add the resulting dictionary to the package list
|
|
packages[pkg] = dpkg
|
|
if pkg_id in all_binaries:
|
|
self.merge_pkg_entries(pkg, arch, all_binaries[pkg_id], dpkg)
|
|
else:
|
|
all_binaries[pkg_id] = dpkg
|
|
|
|
# add the resulting dictionary to the package list
|
|
packages[pkg] = dpkg
|
|
|
|
return packages
|
|
|
|
def read_binaries(self, basedir, distribution, architectures):
|
|
"""Read the list of binary packages from the specified directory
|
|
|
|
This method reads all the binary packages for a given distribution,
|
|
which is expected to be in the directory denoted by the "base_dir"
|
|
parameter.
|
|
|
|
If the "components" config parameter is set, the directory should
|
|
be the "suite" directory of a local mirror (i.e. the one containing
|
|
the "InRelease" file). Otherwise, Britney will read the packages
|
|
information from all the "Packages_${arch}" files referenced by
|
|
the "architectures" parameter.
|
|
|
|
Considering the
|
|
large amount of memory needed, not all the fields are loaded
|
|
in memory. The available fields are Version, Source, Multi-Arch,
|
|
Depends, Conflicts, Provides and Architecture.
|
|
|
|
The `Provides' field is used to populate the virtual packages list.
|
|
|
|
The method returns a dict mapping an architecture name to a 2-element
|
|
tuple. The first element in the tuple is a map from binary package
|
|
names to "BinaryPackage" objects; the second element is a dictionary
|
|
which maps virtual packages to real packages that provide them.
|
|
"""
|
|
arch2packages = {}
|
|
|
|
if self.options.components:
|
|
for arch in architectures:
|
|
packages = {}
|
|
for component in self.options.components:
|
|
binary_dir = "binary-%s" % arch
|
|
filename = os.path.join(basedir,
|
|
component,
|
|
binary_dir,
|
|
'Packages')
|
|
try:
|
|
filename = possibly_compressed(filename)
|
|
except FileNotFoundError:
|
|
if arch not in self.options.new_arches:
|
|
raise
|
|
self.log("Ignoring missing file for new arch %s: %s" % (arch, filename))
|
|
continue
|
|
udeb_filename = os.path.join(basedir,
|
|
component,
|
|
"debian-installer",
|
|
binary_dir,
|
|
"Packages")
|
|
# We assume the udeb Packages file is present if the
|
|
# regular one is present
|
|
udeb_filename = possibly_compressed(udeb_filename)
|
|
self._read_packages_file(filename,
|
|
arch,
|
|
self.sources[distribution],
|
|
packages)
|
|
self._read_packages_file(udeb_filename,
|
|
arch,
|
|
self.sources[distribution],
|
|
packages)
|
|
# create provides
|
|
provides = create_provides_map(packages)
|
|
arch2packages[arch] = (packages, provides)
|
|
else:
|
|
for arch in architectures:
|
|
filename = os.path.join(basedir, "Packages_%s" % arch)
|
|
packages = self._read_packages_file(filename,
|
|
arch,
|
|
self.sources[distribution])
|
|
provides = create_provides_map(packages)
|
|
arch2packages[arch] = (packages, provides)
|
|
|
|
return arch2packages
|
|
|
|
def read_hints(self, hintsdir):
|
|
"""Read the hint commands from the specified directory
|
|
|
|
The hint commands are read from the files contained in the directory
|
|
specified by the `hintsdir' parameter.
|
|
The names of the files have to be the same as the authorized users
|
|
for the hints.
|
|
|
|
The file contains rows with the format:
|
|
|
|
<command> <package-name>[/<version>]
|
|
|
|
The method returns a dictionary where the key is the command, and
|
|
the value is the list of affected packages.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
for who in self.HINTS.keys():
|
|
if who == 'command-line':
|
|
lines = self.options.hints and self.options.hints.split(';') or ()
|
|
filename = '<cmd-line>'
|
|
self._hint_parser.parse_hints(who, self.HINTS[who], filename, lines)
|
|
else:
|
|
filename = os.path.join(hintsdir, who)
|
|
if not os.path.isfile(filename):
|
|
self.log("Cannot read hints list from %s, no such file!" % filename, type="E")
|
|
continue
|
|
self.log("Loading hints list from %s" % filename)
|
|
with open(filename, encoding='utf-8') as f:
|
|
self._hint_parser.parse_hints(who, self.HINTS[who], filename, f)
|
|
|
|
hints = self._hint_parser.hints
|
|
|
|
for x in ["block", "block-all", "block-udeb", "unblock", "unblock-udeb", "force", "urgent", "remove", "age-days"]:
|
|
z = {}
|
|
for hint in hints[x]:
|
|
package = hint.package
|
|
key = (hint, hint.user)
|
|
if package in z and z[package] != key:
|
|
hint2 = z[package][0]
|
|
if x in ['unblock', 'unblock-udeb']:
|
|
if apt_pkg.version_compare(hint2.version, hint.version) < 0:
|
|
# This hint is for a newer version, so discard the old one
|
|
self.log("Overriding %s[%s] = ('%s', '%s') with ('%s', '%s')" %
|
|
(x, package, hint2.version, hint2.user, hint.version, hint.user), type="W")
|
|
hint2.set_active(False)
|
|
else:
|
|
# This hint is for an older version, so ignore it in favour of the new one
|
|
self.log("Ignoring %s[%s] = ('%s', '%s'), ('%s', '%s') is higher or equal" %
|
|
(x, package, hint.version, hint.user, hint2.version, hint2.user), type="W")
|
|
hint.set_active(False)
|
|
else:
|
|
self.log("Overriding %s[%s] = ('%s', '%s', '%s') with ('%s', '%s', '%s')" %
|
|
(x, package, hint2.version, hint2.user, hint2.days,
|
|
hint.version, hint.user, hint.days), type="W")
|
|
hint2.set_active(False)
|
|
|
|
z[package] = key
|
|
|
|
# Sanity check the hints hash
|
|
if len(hints["block"]) == 0 and len(hints["block-udeb"]) == 0:
|
|
self.log("WARNING: No block hints at all, not even udeb ones!", type="W")
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Utility methods for package analysis
|
|
# ------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
def get_dependency_solvers(self, block, packages_s_a, empty_set=frozenset()):
|
|
"""Find the packages which satisfy a dependency block
|
|
|
|
This method returns the list of packages which satisfy a dependency
|
|
block (as returned by self._parse_depends) in a package table
|
|
for a given suite and architecture (a la self.binaries[suite][arch])
|
|
|
|
It returns a tuple with two items: the first is a boolean which is
|
|
True if the dependency is satisfied, the second is the list of the
|
|
solving packages.
|
|
"""
|
|
packages = []
|
|
binaries_s_a, provides_s_a = packages_s_a
|
|
|
|
# for every package, version and operation in the block
|
|
for name, version, op in block:
|
|
if ":" in name:
|
|
name, archqual = name.split(":", 1)
|
|
else:
|
|
archqual = None
|
|
|
|
# look for the package in unstable
|
|
if name in binaries_s_a:
|
|
package = binaries_s_a[name]
|
|
# check the versioned dependency and architecture qualifier
|
|
# (if present)
|
|
if (op == '' and version == '') or apt_pkg.check_dep(package.version, op, version):
|
|
if archqual is None or (archqual == 'any' and package.multi_arch == 'allowed'):
|
|
packages.append(name)
|
|
|
|
# look for the package in the virtual packages list and loop on them
|
|
for prov, prov_version in provides_s_a.get(name, empty_set):
|
|
assert prov in binaries_s_a
|
|
# A provides only satisfies:
|
|
# - an unversioned dependency (per Policy Manual §7.5)
|
|
# - a dependency without an architecture qualifier
|
|
# (per analysis of apt code)
|
|
if archqual is not None:
|
|
# Punt on this case - these days, APT and dpkg might actually agree on
|
|
# this.
|
|
continue
|
|
if (op == '' and version == '') or \
|
|
(prov_version != '' and apt_pkg.check_dep(prov_version, op, version)):
|
|
packages.append(prov)
|
|
|
|
return packages
|
|
|
|
|
|
def excuse_unsat_deps(self, pkg, src, arch, suite, excuse):
|
|
"""Find unsatisfied dependencies for a binary package
|
|
|
|
This method analyzes the dependencies of the binary package specified
|
|
by the parameter `pkg', built from the source package `src', for the
|
|
architecture `arch' within the suite `suite'. If the dependency can't
|
|
be satisfied in testing and/or unstable, it updates the excuse passed
|
|
as parameter.
|
|
"""
|
|
# retrieve the binary package from the specified suite and arch
|
|
packages_s_a = self.binaries[suite][arch]
|
|
packages_t_a = self.binaries['testing'][arch]
|
|
binaries_s_a = packages_s_a[0]
|
|
binary_u = binaries_s_a[pkg]
|
|
|
|
# local copies for better performance
|
|
parse_depends = self._parse_depends
|
|
get_dependency_solvers = self.get_dependency_solvers
|
|
|
|
# analyze the dependency fields (if present)
|
|
deps = binary_u.depends
|
|
if not deps:
|
|
return True
|
|
is_all_ok = True
|
|
|
|
|
|
# for every dependency block (formed as conjunction of disjunction)
|
|
for block, block_txt in zip(parse_depends(deps), deps.split(',')):
|
|
# if the block is satisfied in testing, then skip the block
|
|
packages = get_dependency_solvers(block, packages_t_a)
|
|
if packages:
|
|
for p in packages:
|
|
if p not in binaries_s_a:
|
|
continue
|
|
excuse.add_sane_dep(binaries_s_a[p].source)
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
# check if the block can be satisfied in the source suite, and list the solving packages
|
|
packages = get_dependency_solvers(block, packages_s_a)
|
|
packages = [packages_s_a[0][p].source for p in packages]
|
|
|
|
# if the dependency can be satisfied by the same source package, skip the block:
|
|
# obviously both binary packages will enter testing together
|
|
if src in packages: continue
|
|
|
|
# if no package can satisfy the dependency, add this information to the excuse
|
|
if not packages:
|
|
excuse.addhtml("%s/%s unsatisfiable Depends: %s" % (pkg, arch, block_txt.strip()))
|
|
excuse.addreason("depends")
|
|
if arch not in self.options.break_arches:
|
|
is_all_ok = False
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
# for the solving packages, update the excuse to add the dependencies
|
|
for p in packages:
|
|
if arch not in self.options.break_arches:
|
|
if p in self.sources['testing'] and self.sources['testing'][p].version == self.sources[suite][p].version:
|
|
excuse.add_dep("%s/%s" % (p, arch), arch)
|
|
else:
|
|
excuse.add_dep(p, arch)
|
|
else:
|
|
excuse.add_break_dep(p, arch)
|
|
return is_all_ok
|
|
|
|
# Package analysis methods
|
|
# ------------------------
|
|
|
|
def should_remove_source(self, pkg):
|
|
"""Check if a source package should be removed from testing
|
|
|
|
This method checks if a source package should be removed from the
|
|
testing distribution; this happens if the source package is not
|
|
present in the unstable distribution anymore.
|
|
|
|
It returns True if the package can be removed, False otherwise.
|
|
In the former case, a new excuse is appended to the object
|
|
attribute excuses.
|
|
"""
|
|
# if the source package is available in unstable, then do nothing
|
|
if pkg in self.sources['unstable']:
|
|
return False
|
|
# otherwise, add a new excuse for its removal
|
|
src = self.sources['testing'][pkg]
|
|
excuse = Excuse("-" + pkg)
|
|
excuse.addhtml("Package not in unstable, will try to remove")
|
|
excuse.set_vers(src.version, None)
|
|
src.maintainer and excuse.set_maint(src.maintainer)
|
|
src.section and excuse.set_section(src.section)
|
|
|
|
# if the package is blocked, skip it
|
|
for hint in self.hints.search('block', package=pkg, removal=True):
|
|
excuse.addhtml("Not touching package, as requested by %s "
|
|
"(check https://release.debian.org/testing/freeze_policy.html if update is needed)" % hint.user)
|
|
excuse.addreason("block")
|
|
self.excuses[excuse.name] = excuse
|
|
return False
|
|
|
|
excuse.is_valid = True
|
|
self.excuses[excuse.name] = excuse
|
|
return True
|
|
|
|
def should_upgrade_srcarch(self, src, arch, suite):
|
|
"""Check if a set of binary packages should be upgraded
|
|
|
|
This method checks if the binary packages produced by the source
|
|
package on the given architecture should be upgraded; this can
|
|
happen also if the migration is a binary-NMU for the given arch.
|
|
|
|
It returns False if the given packages don't need to be upgraded,
|
|
True otherwise. In the former case, a new excuse is appended to
|
|
the object attribute excuses.
|
|
"""
|
|
# retrieve the source packages for testing and suite
|
|
source_t = self.sources['testing'][src]
|
|
source_u = self.sources[suite][src]
|
|
|
|
# build the common part of the excuse, which will be filled by the code below
|
|
ref = "%s/%s%s" % (src, arch, suite != 'unstable' and "_" + suite or "")
|
|
excuse = Excuse(ref)
|
|
excuse.set_vers(source_t.version, source_t.version)
|
|
source_u.maintainer and excuse.set_maint(source_u.maintainer)
|
|
source_u.section and excuse.set_section(source_u.section)
|
|
|
|
# if there is a `remove' hint and the requested version is the same as the
|
|
# version in testing, then stop here and return False
|
|
# (as a side effect, a removal may generate such excuses for both the source
|
|
# package and its binary packages on each architecture)
|
|
for hint in self.hints.search('remove', package=src, version=source_t.version):
|
|
excuse.add_hint(hint)
|
|
excuse.addhtml("Removal request by %s" % (hint.user))
|
|
excuse.addhtml("Trying to remove package, not update it")
|
|
self.excuses[excuse.name] = excuse
|
|
return False
|
|
|
|
# the starting point is that there is nothing wrong and nothing worth doing
|
|
anywrongver = False
|
|
anyworthdoing = False
|
|
|
|
packages_t_a = self.binaries['testing'][arch][0]
|
|
packages_s_a = self.binaries[suite][arch][0]
|
|
|
|
# for every binary package produced by this source in unstable for this architecture
|
|
for pkg_id in sorted(x for x in source_u.binaries if x.architecture == arch):
|
|
pkg_name = pkg_id.package_name
|
|
|
|
# retrieve the testing (if present) and unstable corresponding binary packages
|
|
binary_t = pkg_name in packages_t_a and packages_t_a[pkg_name] or None
|
|
binary_u = packages_s_a[pkg_name]
|
|
|
|
# this is the source version for the new binary package
|
|
pkgsv = binary_u.source_version
|
|
|
|
# if the new binary package is architecture-independent, then skip it
|
|
if binary_u.architecture == 'all':
|
|
if pkg_id not in source_t.binaries:
|
|
# only add a note if the arch:all does not match the expected version
|
|
excuse.addhtml("Ignoring %s %s (from %s) as it is arch: all" % (pkg_name, binary_u.version, pkgsv))
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
# if the new binary package is not from the same source as the testing one, then skip it
|
|
# this implies that this binary migration is part of a source migration
|
|
if source_u.version == pkgsv and source_t.version != pkgsv:
|
|
anywrongver = True
|
|
excuse.addhtml("From wrong source: %s %s (%s not %s)" % (pkg_name, binary_u.version, pkgsv, source_t.version))
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
# cruft in unstable
|
|
if source_u.version != pkgsv and source_t.version != pkgsv:
|
|
if self.options.ignore_cruft:
|
|
excuse.addhtml("Old cruft: %s %s (but ignoring cruft, so nevermind)" % (pkg_name, pkgsv))
|
|
else:
|
|
anywrongver = True
|
|
excuse.addhtml("Old cruft: %s %s" % (pkg_name, pkgsv))
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
# if the source package has been updated in unstable and this is a binary migration, skip it
|
|
# (the binaries are now out-of-date)
|
|
if source_t.version == pkgsv and source_t.version != source_u.version:
|
|
anywrongver = True
|
|
excuse.addhtml("From wrong source: %s %s (%s not %s)" % (pkg_name, binary_u.version, pkgsv, source_u.version))
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
# find unsatisfied dependencies for the new binary package
|
|
self.excuse_unsat_deps(pkg_name, src, arch, suite, excuse)
|
|
|
|
# if the binary is not present in testing, then it is a new binary;
|
|
# in this case, there is something worth doing
|
|
if not binary_t:
|
|
excuse.addhtml("New binary: %s (%s)" % (pkg_name, binary_u.version))
|
|
anyworthdoing = True
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
# at this point, the binary package is present in testing, so we can compare
|
|
# the versions of the packages ...
|
|
vcompare = apt_pkg.version_compare(binary_t.version, binary_u.version)
|
|
|
|
# ... if updating would mean downgrading, then stop here: there is something wrong
|
|
if vcompare > 0:
|
|
anywrongver = True
|
|
excuse.addhtml("Not downgrading: %s (%s to %s)" % (pkg_name, binary_t.version, binary_u.version))
|
|
break
|
|
# ... if updating would mean upgrading, then there is something worth doing
|
|
elif vcompare < 0:
|
|
excuse.addhtml("Updated binary: %s (%s to %s)" % (pkg_name, binary_t.version, binary_u.version))
|
|
anyworthdoing = True
|
|
|
|
# if there is nothing wrong and there is something worth doing or the source
|
|
# package is not fake, then check what packages should be removed
|
|
if not anywrongver and (anyworthdoing or not source_u.is_fakesrc):
|
|
srcv = source_u.version
|
|
ssrc = source_t.version == srcv
|
|
# if this is a binary-only migration via *pu, we never want to try
|
|
# removing binary packages
|
|
if not (ssrc and suite != 'unstable'):
|
|
# for every binary package produced by this source in testing for this architecture
|
|
_, _, smoothbins = self._compute_groups(src,
|
|
"unstable",
|
|
arch,
|
|
False)
|
|
|
|
for pkg_id in sorted(x for x in source_t.binaries if x.architecture == arch):
|
|
pkg = pkg_id.package_name
|
|
# if the package is architecture-independent, then ignore it
|
|
tpkg_data = packages_t_a[pkg]
|
|
if tpkg_data.version == 'all':
|
|
if pkg_id not in source_u.binaries:
|
|
# only add a note if the arch:all does not match the expected version
|
|
excuse.addhtml("Ignoring removal of %s as it is arch: all" % (pkg))
|
|
continue
|
|
# if the package is not produced by the new source package, then remove it from testing
|
|
if pkg not in packages_s_a:
|
|
excuse.addhtml("Removed binary: %s %s" % (pkg, tpkg_data.version))
|
|
# the removed binary is only interesting if this is a binary-only migration,
|
|
# as otherwise the updated source will already cause the binary packages
|
|
# to be updated
|
|
if ssrc:
|
|
# Special-case, if the binary is a candidate for a smooth update, we do not consider
|
|
# it "interesting" on its own. This case happens quite often with smooth updatable
|
|
# packages, where the old binary "survives" a full run because it still has
|
|
# reverse dependencies.
|
|
if pkg_id not in smoothbins:
|
|
anyworthdoing = True
|
|
|
|
# if there is nothing wrong and there is something worth doing, this is a valid candidate
|
|
if not anywrongver and anyworthdoing:
|
|
excuse.is_valid = True
|
|
self.excuses[excuse.name] = excuse
|
|
return True
|
|
# else if there is something worth doing (but something wrong, too) this package won't be considered
|
|
elif anyworthdoing:
|
|
self.excuses[excuse.name] = excuse
|
|
|
|
# otherwise, return False
|
|
return False
|
|
|
|
def should_upgrade_src(self, src, suite):
|
|
"""Check if source package should be upgraded
|
|
|
|
This method checks if a source package should be upgraded. The analysis
|
|
is performed for the source package specified by the `src' parameter,
|
|
for the distribution `suite'.
|
|
|
|
It returns False if the given package doesn't need to be upgraded,
|
|
True otherwise. In the former case, a new excuse is appended to
|
|
the object attribute excuses.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
# retrieve the source packages for testing (if available) and suite
|
|
source_u = self.sources[suite][src]
|
|
if src in self.sources['testing']:
|
|
source_t = self.sources['testing'][src]
|
|
# if testing and unstable have the same version, then this is a candidate for binary-NMUs only
|
|
if apt_pkg.version_compare(source_t.version, source_u.version) == 0:
|
|
return False
|
|
else:
|
|
source_t = None
|
|
|
|
# build the common part of the excuse, which will be filled by the code below
|
|
ref = "%s%s" % (src, suite != 'unstable' and "_" + suite or "")
|
|
excuse = Excuse(ref)
|
|
excuse.set_vers(source_t and source_t.version or None, source_u.version)
|
|
source_u.maintainer and excuse.set_maint(source_u.maintainer)
|
|
source_u.section and excuse.set_section(source_u.section)
|
|
|
|
# the starting point is that we will update the candidate
|
|
update_candidate = True
|
|
|
|
# if the version in unstable is older, then stop here with a warning in the excuse and return False
|
|
if source_t and apt_pkg.version_compare(source_u.version, source_t.version) < 0:
|
|
excuse.addhtml("ALERT: %s is newer in testing (%s %s)" % (src, source_t.version, source_u.version))
|
|
self.excuses[excuse.name] = excuse
|
|
excuse.addreason("newerintesting")
|
|
return False
|
|
|
|
# check if the source package really exists or if it is a fake one
|
|
if source_u.is_fakesrc:
|
|
excuse.addhtml("%s source package doesn't exist" % (src))
|
|
update_candidate = False
|
|
|
|
# if there is a `remove' hint and the requested version is the same as the
|
|
# version in testing, then stop here and return False
|
|
for hint in self.hints.search('remove', package=src):
|
|
if source_t and source_t.version == hint.version or \
|
|
source_u.version == hint.version:
|
|
excuse.add_hint(hint)
|
|
excuse.addhtml("Removal request by %s" % (hint.user))
|
|
excuse.addhtml("Trying to remove package, not update it")
|
|
update_candidate = False
|
|
|
|
# check if there is a `block' or `block-udeb' hint for this package, or a `block-all source' hint
|
|
blocked = {}
|
|
for hint in self.hints.search(package=src):
|
|
if hint.type == 'block':
|
|
blocked['block'] = hint
|
|
excuse.add_hint(hint)
|
|
if hint.type == 'block-udeb':
|
|
blocked['block-udeb'] = hint
|
|
excuse.add_hint(hint)
|
|
if 'block' not in blocked:
|
|
for hint in self.hints.search(type='block-all'):
|
|
if hint.package == 'source' or (not source_t and hint.package == 'new-source'):
|
|
blocked['block'] = hint
|
|
excuse.add_hint(hint)
|
|
break
|
|
if suite in ('pu', 'tpu'):
|
|
blocked['block'] = '%s-block' % (suite)
|
|
excuse.needs_approval = True
|
|
|
|
# if the source is blocked, then look for an `unblock' hint; the unblock request
|
|
# is processed only if the specified version is correct. If a package is blocked
|
|
# by `block-udeb', then `unblock-udeb' must be present to cancel it.
|
|
for block_cmd in blocked:
|
|
unblock_cmd = "un" + block_cmd
|
|
unblocks = self.hints.search(unblock_cmd, package=src)
|
|
|
|
if unblocks and unblocks[0].version is not None and unblocks[0].version == source_u.version:
|
|
excuse.add_hint(unblocks[0])
|
|
if block_cmd == 'block-udeb' or not excuse.needs_approval:
|
|
excuse.addhtml("Ignoring %s request by %s, due to %s request by %s" %
|
|
(block_cmd, blocked[block_cmd].user, unblock_cmd, unblocks[0].user))
|
|
else:
|
|
excuse.addhtml("Approved by %s" % (unblocks[0].user))
|
|
else:
|
|
if unblocks:
|
|
if unblocks[0].version is None:
|
|
excuse.addhtml("%s request by %s ignored due to missing version" %
|
|
(unblock_cmd.capitalize(), unblocks[0].user))
|
|
else:
|
|
excuse.addhtml("%s request by %s ignored due to version mismatch: %s" %
|
|
(unblock_cmd.capitalize(), unblocks[0].user, unblocks[0].version))
|
|
if suite == 'unstable' or block_cmd == 'block-udeb':
|
|
tooltip = "check https://release.debian.org/testing/freeze_policy.html if update is needed"
|
|
# redirect people to d-i RM for udeb things:
|
|
if block_cmd == 'block-udeb':
|
|
tooltip = "please contact the d-i release manager if an update is needed"
|
|
excuse.addhtml("Not touching package due to %s request by %s (%s)" %
|
|
(block_cmd, blocked[block_cmd].user, tooltip))
|
|
excuse.addreason("block")
|
|
else:
|
|
excuse.addhtml("NEEDS APPROVAL BY RM")
|
|
excuse.addreason("block")
|
|
update_candidate = False
|
|
|
|
# if the suite is unstable, then we have to check the urgency and the minimum days of
|
|
# permanence in unstable before updating testing; if the source package is too young,
|
|
# the check fails and we set update_candidate to False to block the update; consider
|
|
# the age-days hint, if specified for the package
|
|
policy_info = excuse.policy_info
|
|
policy_verdict = PolicyVerdict.PASS
|
|
for policy in self.policies:
|
|
if suite in policy.applicable_suites:
|
|
v = policy.apply_policy(policy_info, suite, src, source_t, source_u)
|
|
if v.value > policy_verdict.value:
|
|
policy_verdict = v
|
|
|
|
if policy_verdict.is_rejected:
|
|
update_candidate = False
|
|
|
|
# Joggle some things into excuses
|
|
# - remove once the YAML is the canonical source for this information
|
|
if 'age' in policy_info:
|
|
age_info = policy_info['age']
|
|
age_hint = age_info.get('age-requirement-reduced', None)
|
|
age_min_req = age_info['age-requirement']
|
|
if age_hint:
|
|
new_req = age_hint['new-requirement']
|
|
who = age_hint['changed-by']
|
|
if new_req:
|
|
excuse.addhtml("Overriding age needed from %d days to %d by %s" % (
|
|
age_min_req, new_req, who))
|
|
else:
|
|
excuse.addhtml("Too young, but urgency pushed by %s" % who)
|
|
excuse.setdaysold(age_info['current-age'], age_min_req)
|
|
|
|
# if the suite is unstable, then we have to check the release-critical bug lists before
|
|
# updating testing; if the unstable package has RC bugs that do not apply to the testing
|
|
# one, the check fails and we set update_candidate to False to block the update
|
|
if 'rc-bugs' in policy_info:
|
|
rcbugs_info = policy_info['rc-bugs']
|
|
new_bugs = rcbugs_info['unique-source-bugs']
|
|
old_bugs = rcbugs_info['unique-target-bugs']
|
|
|
|
excuse.setbugs(old_bugs, new_bugs)
|
|
|
|
if new_bugs:
|
|
excuse.addhtml("%s <a href=\"https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?" \
|
|
"src=%s&sev-inc=critical&sev-inc=grave&sev-inc=serious\" " \
|
|
"target=\"_blank\">has new bugs</a>!" % (src, quote(src)))
|
|
excuse.addhtml("Updating %s introduces new bugs: %s" % (src, ", ".join(
|
|
["<a href=\"https://bugs.debian.org/%s\">#%s</a>" % (quote(a), a) for a in new_bugs])))
|
|
update_candidate = False
|
|
|
|
if old_bugs:
|
|
excuse.addhtml("Updating %s fixes old bugs: %s" % (src, ", ".join(
|
|
["<a href=\"https://bugs.debian.org/%s\">#%s</a>" % (quote(a), a) for a in old_bugs])))
|
|
if new_bugs and len(old_bugs) > len(new_bugs):
|
|
excuse.addhtml("%s introduces new bugs, so still ignored (even "
|
|
"though it fixes more than it introduces, whine at debian-release)" % src)
|
|
|
|
all_binaries = self.all_binaries
|
|
|
|
if suite in ('pu', 'tpu') and source_t:
|
|
# o-o-d(ish) checks for (t-)p-u
|
|
# This only makes sense if the package is actually in testing.
|
|
for arch in self.options.architectures:
|
|
# if the package in testing has no binaries on this
|
|
# architecture, it can't be out-of-date
|
|
if not any(x for x in source_t.binaries
|
|
if x.architecture == arch and all_binaries[x].architecture != 'all'):
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
# if the (t-)p-u package has produced any binaries on
|
|
# this architecture then we assume it's ok. this allows for
|
|
# uploads to (t-)p-u which intentionally drop binary
|
|
# packages
|
|
if any(x for x in self.binaries[suite][arch][0].values() \
|
|
if x.source == src and x.source_version == source_u.version and \
|
|
x.architecture != 'all'):
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
if suite == 'tpu':
|
|
base = 'testing'
|
|
else:
|
|
base = 'stable'
|
|
text = "Not yet built on <a href=\"https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?arch=%s&pkg=%s&ver=%s&suite=%s\" target=\"_blank\">%s</a> (relative to testing)" % (quote(arch), quote(src), quote(source_u.version), base, arch)
|
|
|
|
if arch in self.options.outofsync_arches:
|
|
text = text + " (but %s isn't keeping up, so never mind)" % (arch)
|
|
excuse.missing_build_on_ood_arch(arch)
|
|
else:
|
|
update_candidate = False
|
|
excuse.missing_build_on_arch(arch)
|
|
|
|
excuse.addhtml(text)
|
|
|
|
# at this point, we check the status of the builds on all the supported architectures
|
|
# to catch the out-of-date ones
|
|
pkgs = {src: ["source"]}
|
|
for arch in self.options.architectures:
|
|
oodbins = {}
|
|
uptodatebins = False
|
|
# for every binary package produced by this source in the suite for this architecture
|
|
for pkg_id in sorted(x for x in source_u.binaries if x.architecture == arch):
|
|
pkg = pkg_id.package_name
|
|
if pkg not in pkgs: pkgs[pkg] = []
|
|
pkgs[pkg].append(arch)
|
|
|
|
# retrieve the binary package and its source version
|
|
binary_u = all_binaries[pkg_id]
|
|
pkgsv = binary_u.source_version
|
|
|
|
# if it wasn't built by the same source, it is out-of-date
|
|
# if there is at least one binary on this arch which is
|
|
# up-to-date, there is a build on this arch
|
|
if source_u.version != pkgsv:
|
|
if pkgsv not in oodbins:
|
|
oodbins[pkgsv] = []
|
|
oodbins[pkgsv].append(pkg)
|
|
excuse.add_old_binary(pkg, pkgsv)
|
|
continue
|
|
else:
|
|
# if the binary is arch all, it doesn't count as
|
|
# up-to-date for this arch
|
|
if binary_u.architecture == arch:
|
|
uptodatebins = True
|
|
|
|
# if the package is architecture-dependent or the current arch is `nobreakall'
|
|
# find unsatisfied dependencies for the binary package
|
|
if binary_u.architecture != 'all' or arch in self.options.nobreakall_arches:
|
|
is_valid = self.excuse_unsat_deps(pkg, src, arch, suite, excuse)
|
|
if not is_valid:
|
|
update_candidate = False
|
|
|
|
# if there are out-of-date packages, warn about them in the excuse and set update_candidate
|
|
# to False to block the update; if the architecture where the package is out-of-date is
|
|
# in the `outofsync_arches' list, then do not block the update
|
|
if oodbins:
|
|
oodtxt = ""
|
|
for v in oodbins.keys():
|
|
if oodtxt: oodtxt = oodtxt + "; "
|
|
oodtxt = oodtxt + "%s (from <a href=\"https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?" \
|
|
"arch=%s&pkg=%s&ver=%s\" target=\"_blank\">%s</a>)" % \
|
|
(", ".join(sorted(oodbins[v])), quote(arch), quote(src), quote(v), v)
|
|
if uptodatebins:
|
|
text = "old binaries left on <a href=\"https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?" \
|
|
"arch=%s&pkg=%s&ver=%s\" target=\"_blank\">%s</a>: %s" % \
|
|
(quote(arch), quote(src), quote(source_u.version), arch, oodtxt)
|
|
else:
|
|
text = "missing build on <a href=\"https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?" \
|
|
"arch=%s&pkg=%s&ver=%s\" target=\"_blank\">%s</a>: %s" % \
|
|
(quote(arch), quote(src), quote(source_u.version), arch, oodtxt)
|
|
|
|
if arch in self.options.outofsync_arches:
|
|
text = text + " (but %s isn't keeping up, so nevermind)" % (arch)
|
|
if not uptodatebins:
|
|
excuse.missing_build_on_ood_arch(arch)
|
|
else:
|
|
if uptodatebins:
|
|
if self.options.ignore_cruft:
|
|
text = text + " (but ignoring cruft, so nevermind)"
|
|
else:
|
|
update_candidate = False
|
|
else:
|
|
update_candidate = False
|
|
excuse.missing_build_on_arch(arch)
|
|
|
|
if 'age' in policy_info and (policy_info['age']['current-age'] or
|
|
not policy_info['age']['age-requirement']):
|
|
excuse.addhtml(text)
|
|
|
|
# if the source package has no binaries, set update_candidate to False to block the update
|
|
if not source_u.binaries:
|
|
excuse.addhtml("%s has no binaries on any arch" % src)
|
|
excuse.addreason("no-binaries")
|
|
update_candidate = False
|
|
|
|
# check if there is a `force' hint for this package, which allows it to go in even if it is not updateable
|
|
forces = self.hints.search('force', package=src, version=source_u.version)
|
|
if forces:
|
|
excuse.dontinvalidate = True
|
|
if not update_candidate and forces:
|
|
excuse.addhtml("Should ignore, but forced by %s" % (forces[0].user))
|
|
excuse.force()
|
|
update_candidate = True
|
|
|
|
# if the package can be updated, it is a valid candidate
|
|
if update_candidate:
|
|
excuse.is_valid = True
|
|
|
|
self.excuses[excuse.name] = excuse
|
|
return update_candidate
|
|
|
|
def reversed_exc_deps(self):
|
|
"""Reverse the excuses dependencies
|
|
|
|
This method returns a dictionary where the keys are the package names
|
|
and the values are the excuse names which depend on it.
|
|
"""
|
|
res = defaultdict(list)
|
|
for exc in self.excuses.values():
|
|
for d in exc.deps:
|
|
res[d].append(exc.name)
|
|
return res
|
|
|
|
def invalidate_excuses(self, valid, invalid):
|
|
"""Invalidate impossible excuses
|
|
|
|
This method invalidates the impossible excuses, which depend
|
|
on invalid excuses. The two parameters contains the list of
|
|
`valid' and `invalid' excuses.
|
|
"""
|
|
excuses = self.excuses
|
|
|
|
# build the reverse dependencies
|
|
revdeps = self.reversed_exc_deps()
|
|
|
|
# loop on the invalid excuses
|
|
i = 0
|
|
while i < len(invalid):
|
|
# if there is no reverse dependency, skip the item
|
|
if invalid[i] not in revdeps:
|
|
i += 1
|
|
continue
|
|
# if the dependency can be satisfied by a testing-proposed-updates excuse, skip the item
|
|
if (invalid[i] + "_tpu") in valid:
|
|
i += 1
|
|
continue
|
|
# loop on the reverse dependencies
|
|
for x in revdeps[invalid[i]]:
|
|
# if the item is valid and it is marked as `dontinvalidate', skip the item
|
|
if x in valid and excuses[x].dontinvalidate:
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
# otherwise, invalidate the dependency and mark as invalidated and
|
|
# remove the depending excuses
|
|
excuses[x].invalidate_dep(invalid[i])
|
|
if x in valid:
|
|
p = valid.index(x)
|
|
invalid.append(valid.pop(p))
|
|
excuses[x].addhtml("Invalidated by dependency")
|
|
excuses[x].addreason("depends")
|
|
excuses[x].is_valid = False
|
|
i = i + 1
|
|
|
|
def write_excuses(self):
|
|
"""Produce and write the update excuses
|
|
|
|
This method handles the update excuses generation: the packages are
|
|
looked at to determine whether they are valid candidates. For the details
|
|
of this procedure, please refer to the module docstring.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
self.log("Update Excuses generation started", type="I")
|
|
|
|
# list of local methods and variables (for better performance)
|
|
sources = self.sources
|
|
architectures = self.options.architectures
|
|
should_remove_source = self.should_remove_source
|
|
should_upgrade_srcarch = self.should_upgrade_srcarch
|
|
should_upgrade_src = self.should_upgrade_src
|
|
|
|
unstable = sources['unstable']
|
|
testing = sources['testing']
|
|
|
|
# this list will contain the packages which are valid candidates;
|
|
# if a package is going to be removed, it will have a "-" prefix
|
|
upgrade_me = []
|
|
upgrade_me_append = upgrade_me.append # Every . in a loop slows it down
|
|
|
|
excuses = self.excuses = {}
|
|
|
|
# for every source package in testing, check if it should be removed
|
|
for pkg in testing:
|
|
if should_remove_source(pkg):
|
|
upgrade_me_append("-" + pkg)
|
|
|
|
# for every source package in unstable check if it should be upgraded
|
|
for pkg in unstable:
|
|
if unstable[pkg].is_fakesrc: continue
|
|
# if the source package is already present in testing,
|
|
# check if it should be upgraded for every binary package
|
|
if pkg in testing and not testing[pkg].is_fakesrc:
|
|
for arch in architectures:
|
|
if should_upgrade_srcarch(pkg, arch, 'unstable'):
|
|
upgrade_me_append("%s/%s" % (pkg, arch))
|
|
|
|
# check if the source package should be upgraded
|
|
if should_upgrade_src(pkg, 'unstable'):
|
|
upgrade_me_append(pkg)
|
|
|
|
# for every source package in *-proposed-updates, check if it should be upgraded
|
|
for suite in ['pu', 'tpu']:
|
|
for pkg in sources[suite]:
|
|
# if the source package is already present in testing,
|
|
# check if it should be upgraded for every binary package
|
|
if pkg in testing:
|
|
for arch in architectures:
|
|
if should_upgrade_srcarch(pkg, arch, suite):
|
|
upgrade_me_append("%s/%s_%s" % (pkg, arch, suite))
|
|
|
|
# check if the source package should be upgraded
|
|
if should_upgrade_src(pkg, suite):
|
|
upgrade_me_append("%s_%s" % (pkg, suite))
|
|
|
|
# process the `remove' hints, if the given package is not yet in upgrade_me
|
|
for hint in self.hints['remove']:
|
|
src = hint.package
|
|
if src in upgrade_me: continue
|
|
if ("-"+src) in upgrade_me: continue
|
|
if src not in testing: continue
|
|
|
|
# check if the version specified in the hint is the same as the considered package
|
|
tsrcv = testing[src].version
|
|
if tsrcv != hint.version:
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
# add the removal of the package to upgrade_me and build a new excuse
|
|
upgrade_me_append("-%s" % (src))
|
|
excuse = Excuse("-%s" % (src))
|
|
excuse.set_vers(tsrcv, None)
|
|
excuse.addhtml("Removal request by %s" % (hint.user))
|
|
excuse.addhtml("Package is broken, will try to remove")
|
|
excuse.add_hint(hint)
|
|
excuse.is_valid = True
|
|
excuses[excuse.name] = excuse
|
|
|
|
# extract the not considered packages, which are in the excuses but not in upgrade_me
|
|
unconsidered = [ename for ename in excuses if ename not in upgrade_me]
|
|
|
|
# invalidate impossible excuses
|
|
for e in excuses.values():
|
|
# parts[0] == package name
|
|
# parts[1] == optional architecture
|
|
parts = e.name.split('/')
|
|
for d in e.deps:
|
|
ok = False
|
|
# source -> source dependency; both packages must have
|
|
# valid excuses
|
|
if d in upgrade_me or d in unconsidered:
|
|
ok = True
|
|
# if the excuse is for a binNMU, also consider d/$arch as a
|
|
# valid excuse
|
|
elif len(parts) == 2:
|
|
bd = '%s/%s' % (d, parts[1])
|
|
if bd in upgrade_me or bd in unconsidered:
|
|
ok = True
|
|
# if the excuse is for a source package, check each of the
|
|
# architectures on which the excuse lists a dependency on d,
|
|
# and consider the excuse valid if it is possible on each
|
|
# architecture
|
|
else:
|
|
arch_ok = True
|
|
for arch in e.deps[d]:
|
|
bd = '%s/%s' % (d, arch)
|
|
if bd not in upgrade_me and bd not in unconsidered:
|
|
arch_ok = False
|
|
break
|
|
if arch_ok:
|
|
ok = True
|
|
if not ok:
|
|
e.addhtml("Impossible dependency: %s -> %s" % (e.name, d))
|
|
e.addreason("depends")
|
|
self.invalidate_excuses(upgrade_me, unconsidered)
|
|
|
|
# sort the list of candidates
|
|
self.upgrade_me = sorted( make_migrationitem(x, self.sources) for x in upgrade_me )
|
|
|
|
# write excuses to the output file
|
|
if not self.options.dry_run:
|
|
self.log("> Writing Excuses to %s" % self.options.excuses_output, type="I")
|
|
sorted_excuses = sorted(excuses.values(), key=lambda x: x.sortkey())
|
|
write_excuses(sorted_excuses, self.options.excuses_output,
|
|
output_format="legacy-html")
|
|
if hasattr(self.options, 'excuses_yaml_output'):
|
|
self.log("> Writing YAML Excuses to %s" % self.options.excuses_yaml_output, type="I")
|
|
write_excuses(sorted_excuses, self.options.excuses_yaml_output,
|
|
output_format="yaml")
|
|
|
|
self.log("Update Excuses generation completed", type="I")
|
|
|
|
# Upgrade run
|
|
# -----------
|
|
|
|
|
|
def get_nuninst(self, requested_arch=None, build=False):
|
|
"""Return the uninstallability statistic for all the architectures
|
|
|
|
To calculate the uninstallability counters, the method checks the
|
|
installability of all the packages for all the architectures, and
|
|
tracks dependencies in a recursive way. The architecture
|
|
independent packages are checked only for the `nobreakall`
|
|
architectures.
|
|
|
|
It returns a dictionary with the architectures as keys and the list
|
|
of uninstallable packages as values.
|
|
|
|
NB: If build is False, requested_arch is ignored.
|
|
"""
|
|
# if we are not asked to build the nuninst, read it from the cache
|
|
if not build:
|
|
return read_nuninst(self.options.noninst_status,
|
|
self.options.architectures)
|
|
|
|
nuninst = {}
|
|
|
|
# local copies for better performance
|
|
binaries = self.binaries['testing']
|
|
inst_tester = self._inst_tester
|
|
|
|
# for all the architectures
|
|
for arch in self.options.architectures:
|
|
if requested_arch and arch != requested_arch: continue
|
|
# if it is in the nobreakall ones, check arch-independent packages too
|
|
check_archall = arch in self.options.nobreakall_arches
|
|
|
|
# check all the packages for this architecture
|
|
nuninst[arch] = set()
|
|
for pkg_name in binaries[arch][0]:
|
|
pkgdata = binaries[arch][0][pkg_name]
|
|
r = inst_tester.is_installable(pkgdata.pkg_id)
|
|
if not r:
|
|
nuninst[arch].add(pkg_name)
|
|
|
|
# if they are not required, remove architecture-independent packages
|
|
nuninst[arch + "+all"] = nuninst[arch].copy()
|
|
if not check_archall:
|
|
for pkg in nuninst[arch + "+all"]:
|
|
bpkg = binaries[arch][0][pkg]
|
|
if bpkg.architecture == 'all':
|
|
nuninst[arch].remove(pkg)
|
|
|
|
# return the dictionary with the results
|
|
return nuninst
|
|
|
|
def eval_nuninst(self, nuninst, original=None):
|
|
"""Return a string which represents the uninstallability counters
|
|
|
|
This method returns a string which represents the uninstallability
|
|
counters reading the uninstallability statistics `nuninst` and, if
|
|
present, merging the results with the `original` one.
|
|
|
|
An example of the output string is:
|
|
1+2: i-0:a-0:a-0:h-0:i-1:m-0:m-0:p-0:a-0:m-0:s-2:s-0
|
|
|
|
where the first part is the number of broken packages in non-break
|
|
architectures + the total number of broken packages for all the
|
|
architectures.
|
|
"""
|
|
res = []
|
|
total = 0
|
|
totalbreak = 0
|
|
for arch in self.options.architectures:
|
|
if arch in nuninst:
|
|
n = len(nuninst[arch])
|
|
elif original and arch in original:
|
|
n = len(original[arch])
|
|
else: continue
|
|
if arch in self.options.break_arches:
|
|
totalbreak = totalbreak + n
|
|
else:
|
|
total = total + n
|
|
res.append("%s-%d" % (arch[0], n))
|
|
return "%d+%d: %s" % (total, totalbreak, ":".join(res))
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _compute_groups(self, source_name, suite, migration_architecture,
|
|
is_removal,
|
|
allow_smooth_updates=True,
|
|
removals=frozenset()):
|
|
"""Compute the groups of binaries being migrated by item
|
|
|
|
This method will compute the binaries that will be added,
|
|
replaced in testing and which of them are smooth updatable.
|
|
|
|
Parameters:
|
|
* "source_name" is the name of the source package, whose
|
|
binaries are migrating.
|
|
* "suite" is the suite from which the binaries are migrating.
|
|
[Same as item.suite, where available]
|
|
* "migration_architecture" is the architecture determines
|
|
architecture of the migrating binaries (can be "source" for
|
|
a "source"-migration, meaning all binaries regardless of
|
|
architecture). [Same as item.architecture, where available]
|
|
* "is_removal" is a boolean determining if this is a removal
|
|
or not [Same as item.is_removal, where available]
|
|
* "allow_smooth_updates" is a boolean determing whether smooth-
|
|
updates are permitted in this migration. When set to False,
|
|
the "smoothbins" return value will always be the empty set.
|
|
Any value that would have been there will now be in "rms"
|
|
instead. (defaults: True)
|
|
* "removals" is a set of binaries that is assumed to be
|
|
removed at the same time as this migration (e.g. in the same
|
|
"easy"-hint). This may affect what if some binaries are
|
|
smooth updated or not. (defaults: empty-set)
|
|
- Binaries must be given as ("package-name", "version",
|
|
"architecture") tuples.
|
|
|
|
Returns a tuple (adds, rms, smoothbins). "adds" is a set of
|
|
binaries that will updated in or appear after the migration.
|
|
"rms" is a set of binaries that are not smooth-updatable (or
|
|
binaries that could be, but there is no reason to let them be
|
|
smooth updated). "smoothbins" is set of binaries that are to
|
|
be smooth-updated.
|
|
|
|
Each "binary" in "adds", "rms" and "smoothbins" will be a
|
|
tuple of ("package-name", "version", "architecture") and are
|
|
thus tuples suitable for passing on to the
|
|
InstallabilityTester.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unlike doop_source, this will not modify any data structure.
|
|
"""
|
|
# local copies for better performances
|
|
sources = self.sources
|
|
binaries_t = self.binaries['testing']
|
|
inst_tester = self._inst_tester
|
|
|
|
adds = set()
|
|
rms = set()
|
|
smoothbins = set()
|
|
|
|
# remove all binary packages (if the source already exists)
|
|
if migration_architecture == 'source' or not is_removal:
|
|
if source_name in sources['testing']:
|
|
source_data = sources['testing'][source_name]
|
|
|
|
bins = []
|
|
check = set()
|
|
# remove all the binaries
|
|
|
|
# first, build a list of eligible binaries
|
|
for pkg_id in source_data.binaries:
|
|
binary, _, parch = pkg_id
|
|
if (migration_architecture != 'source'
|
|
and parch != migration_architecture):
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
# Work around #815995
|
|
if migration_architecture == 'source' and is_removal and binary not in binaries_t[parch][0]:
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
# Do not include hijacked binaries
|
|
if binaries_t[parch][0][binary].source != source_name:
|
|
continue
|
|
bins.append(pkg_id)
|
|
|
|
for pkg_id in bins:
|
|
binary, _, parch = pkg_id
|
|
# if a smooth update is possible for the package, skip it
|
|
if allow_smooth_updates and suite == 'unstable' and \
|
|
binary not in self.binaries[suite][parch][0] and \
|
|
('ALL' in self.options.smooth_updates or \
|
|
binaries_t[parch][0][binary].section in self.options.smooth_updates):
|
|
|
|
# if the package has reverse-dependencies which are
|
|
# built from other sources, it's a valid candidate for
|
|
# a smooth update. if not, it may still be a valid
|
|
# candidate if one if its r-deps is itself a candidate,
|
|
# so note it for checking later
|
|
rdeps = set(inst_tester.reverse_dependencies_of(pkg_id))
|
|
# We ignore all binaries listed in "removals" as we
|
|
# assume they will leave at the same time as the
|
|
# given package.
|
|
rdeps.difference_update(removals, bins)
|
|
|
|
smooth_update_it = False
|
|
if inst_tester.any_of_these_are_in_testing(rdeps):
|
|
combined = set(smoothbins)
|
|
combined.add(pkg_id)
|
|
for rdep in rdeps:
|
|
for dep_clause in inst_tester.dependencies_of(rdep):
|
|
if dep_clause <= combined:
|
|
smooth_update_it = True
|
|
break
|
|
|
|
if smooth_update_it:
|
|
smoothbins = combined
|
|
else:
|
|
check.add(pkg_id)
|
|
|
|
# check whether we should perform a smooth update for
|
|
# packages which are candidates but do not have r-deps
|
|
# outside of the current source
|
|
while 1:
|
|
found_any = False
|
|
for pkg_id in check:
|
|
rdeps = inst_tester.reverse_dependencies_of(pkg_id)
|
|
if not rdeps.isdisjoint(smoothbins):
|
|
smoothbins.add(pkg_id)
|
|
found_any = True
|
|
if not found_any:
|
|
break
|
|
check = [x for x in check if x not in smoothbins]
|
|
|
|
# remove all the binaries which aren't being smooth updated
|
|
for pkg_id in (pkg_id for pkg_id in bins if pkg_id not in smoothbins):
|
|
binary, version, parch = pkg_id
|
|
# if this is a binary migration from *pu, only the arch:any
|
|
# packages will be present. ideally dak would also populate
|
|
# the arch-indep packages, but as that's not the case we
|
|
# must keep them around; they will not be re-added by the
|
|
# migration so will end up missing from testing
|
|
if migration_architecture != 'source' and \
|
|
suite != 'unstable' and \
|
|
binaries_t[parch][0][binary].architecture == 'all':
|
|
continue
|
|
else:
|
|
rms.add(pkg_id)
|
|
|
|
# single binary removal; used for clearing up after smooth
|
|
# updates but not supported as a manual hint
|
|
elif source_name in binaries_t[migration_architecture][0]:
|
|
version = binaries_t[migration_architecture][0][source_name].version
|
|
rms.add((source_name, version, migration_architecture))
|
|
|
|
# add the new binary packages (if we are not removing)
|
|
if not is_removal:
|
|
source_data = sources[suite][source_name]
|
|
for pkg_id in source_data.binaries:
|
|
binary, _, parch = pkg_id
|
|
if migration_architecture not in ['source', parch]:
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
if self.binaries[suite][parch][0][binary].source != source_name:
|
|
# This binary package has been hijacked by some other source.
|
|
# So don't add it as part of this update.
|
|
#
|
|
# Also, if this isn't a source update, don't remove
|
|
# the package that's been hijacked if it's present.
|
|
if migration_architecture != 'source':
|
|
for rm_b, rm_v, rm_p in list(rms):
|
|
if (rm_b, rm_p) == (binary, parch):
|
|
rms.remove((rm_b, rm_v, rm_p))
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
# Don't add the binary if it is old cruft that is no longer in testing
|
|
if (parch not in self.options.outofsync_arches and
|
|
source_data.version != self.binaries[suite][parch][0][binary].source_version and
|
|
binary not in binaries_t[parch][0]):
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
adds.add(pkg_id)
|
|
|
|
return (adds, rms, smoothbins)
|
|
|
|
def doop_source(self, item, hint_undo=None, removals=frozenset()):
|
|
"""Apply a change to the testing distribution as requested by `pkg`
|
|
|
|
An optional list of undo actions related to packages processed earlier
|
|
in a hint may be passed in `hint_undo`.
|
|
|
|
An optional set of binaries may be passed in "removals". Binaries listed
|
|
in this set will be assumed to be removed at the same time as the "item"
|
|
will migrate. This may change what binaries will be smooth-updated.
|
|
- Binaries in this set must be ("package-name", "version", "architecture")
|
|
tuples.
|
|
|
|
This method applies the changes required by the action `item` tracking
|
|
them so it will be possible to revert them.
|
|
|
|
The method returns a tuple containing a set of packages
|
|
affected by the change (as (name, arch)-tuples) and the
|
|
dictionary undo which can be used to rollback the changes.
|
|
"""
|
|
undo = {'binaries': {}, 'sources': {}, 'virtual': {}, 'nvirtual': []}
|
|
|
|
affected_pos = set()
|
|
affected_remain = set()
|
|
|
|
# local copies for better performance
|
|
sources = self.sources
|
|
packages_t = self.binaries['testing']
|
|
inst_tester = self._inst_tester
|
|
eqv_set = set()
|
|
|
|
updates, rms, _ = self._compute_groups(item.package,
|
|
item.suite,
|
|
item.architecture,
|
|
item.is_removal,
|
|
removals=removals)
|
|
|
|
# remove all binary packages (if the source already exists)
|
|
if item.architecture == 'source' or not item.is_removal:
|
|
if item.package in sources['testing']:
|
|
source = sources['testing'][item.package]
|
|
|
|
|
|
eqv_table = {}
|
|
|
|
for rm_pkg_id in rms:
|
|
binary, _, parch = rm_pkg_id
|
|
key = (binary, parch)
|
|
eqv_table[key] = rm_pkg_id
|
|
|
|
for new_pkg_id in updates:
|
|
binary, _, parch = new_pkg_id
|
|
key = (binary, parch)
|
|
old_pkg_id = eqv_table.get(key)
|
|
if old_pkg_id is not None:
|
|
if inst_tester.are_equivalent(new_pkg_id, old_pkg_id):
|
|
eqv_set.add(key)
|
|
|
|
# remove all the binaries which aren't being smooth updated
|
|
for rm_pkg_id in rms:
|
|
binary, version, parch = rm_pkg_id
|
|
p = (binary, parch)
|
|
binaries_t_a, provides_t_a = packages_t[parch]
|
|
pkey = (binary, parch)
|
|
|
|
pkg_data = binaries_t_a[binary]
|
|
# save the old binary for undo
|
|
undo['binaries'][p] = rm_pkg_id
|
|
if pkey not in eqv_set:
|
|
# all the reverse dependencies are affected by
|
|
# the change
|
|
affected_pos.update(inst_tester.reverse_dependencies_of(rm_pkg_id))
|
|
affected_remain.update(inst_tester.negative_dependencies_of(rm_pkg_id))
|
|
|
|
# remove the provided virtual packages
|
|
for j, prov_version, _ in pkg_data.provides:
|
|
key = (j, parch)
|
|
if key not in undo['virtual']:
|
|
undo['virtual'][key] = provides_t_a[j].copy()
|
|
provides_t_a[j].remove((binary, prov_version))
|
|
if not provides_t_a[j]:
|
|
del provides_t_a[j]
|
|
# finally, remove the binary package
|
|
del binaries_t_a[binary]
|
|
inst_tester.remove_testing_binary(rm_pkg_id)
|
|
# remove the source package
|
|
if item.architecture == 'source':
|
|
undo['sources'][item.package] = source
|
|
del sources['testing'][item.package]
|
|
else:
|
|
# the package didn't exist, so we mark it as to-be-removed in case of undo
|
|
undo['sources']['-' + item.package] = True
|
|
|
|
# single binary removal; used for clearing up after smooth
|
|
# updates but not supported as a manual hint
|
|
elif item.package in packages_t[item.architecture][0]:
|
|
binaries_t_a = packages_t[item.architecture][0]
|
|
pkg_id = binaries_t_a[item.package].pkg_id
|
|
undo['binaries'][(item.package, item.architecture)] = pkg_id
|
|
affected_pos.update(inst_tester.reverse_dependencies_of(pkg_id))
|
|
del binaries_t_a[item.package]
|
|
inst_tester.remove_testing_binary(pkg_id)
|
|
|
|
# add the new binary packages (if we are not removing)
|
|
if not item.is_removal:
|
|
packages_s = self.binaries[item.suite]
|
|
|
|
for updated_pkg_id in updates:
|
|
binary, new_version, parch = updated_pkg_id
|
|
key = (binary, parch)
|
|
binaries_t_a, provides_t_a = packages_t[parch]
|
|
equivalent_replacement = key in eqv_set
|
|
|
|
# obviously, added/modified packages are affected
|
|
if not equivalent_replacement:
|
|
affected_pos.add(updated_pkg_id)
|
|
# if the binary already exists in testing, it is currently
|
|
# built by another source package. we therefore remove the
|
|
# version built by the other source package, after marking
|
|
# all of its reverse dependencies as affected
|
|
if binary in binaries_t_a:
|
|
old_pkg_data = binaries_t_a[binary]
|
|
old_pkg_id = old_pkg_data.pkg_id
|
|
# save the old binary package
|
|
undo['binaries'][key] = old_pkg_id
|
|
if not equivalent_replacement:
|
|
# all the reverse conflicts
|
|
affected_pos.update(inst_tester.reverse_dependencies_of(old_pkg_id))
|
|
affected_remain.update(inst_tester.negative_dependencies_of(old_pkg_id))
|
|
inst_tester.remove_testing_binary(old_pkg_id)
|
|
elif hint_undo:
|
|
# the binary isn't in testing, but it may have been at
|
|
# the start of the current hint and have been removed
|
|
# by an earlier migration. if that's the case then we
|
|
# will have a record of the older instance of the binary
|
|
# in the undo information. we can use that to ensure
|
|
# that the reverse dependencies of the older binary
|
|
# package are also checked.
|
|
# reverse dependencies built from this source can be
|
|
# ignored as their reverse trees are already handled
|
|
# by this function
|
|
for (tundo, tpkg) in hint_undo:
|
|
if key in tundo['binaries']:
|
|
tpkg_id = tundo['binaries'][key]
|
|
affected_pos.update(inst_tester.reverse_dependencies_of(tpkg_id))
|
|
|
|
# add/update the binary package from the source suite
|
|
new_pkg_data = packages_s[parch][0][binary]
|
|
binaries_t_a[binary] = new_pkg_data
|
|
inst_tester.add_testing_binary(updated_pkg_id)
|
|
# register new provided packages
|
|
for j, prov_version, _ in new_pkg_data.provides:
|
|
key = (j, parch)
|
|
if j not in provides_t_a:
|
|
undo['nvirtual'].append(key)
|
|
provides_t_a[j] = set()
|
|
elif key not in undo['virtual']:
|
|
undo['virtual'][key] = provides_t_a[j].copy()
|
|
provides_t_a[j].add((binary, prov_version))
|
|
if not equivalent_replacement:
|
|
# all the reverse dependencies are affected by the change
|
|
affected_pos.add(updated_pkg_id)
|
|
affected_remain.update(inst_tester.negative_dependencies_of(updated_pkg_id))
|
|
|
|
# add/update the source package
|
|
if item.architecture == 'source':
|
|
sources['testing'][item.package] = sources[item.suite][item.package]
|
|
|
|
# Also include the transitive rdeps of the packages found so far
|
|
compute_reverse_tree(inst_tester, affected_pos)
|
|
compute_reverse_tree(inst_tester, affected_remain)
|
|
# return the package name, the suite, the list of affected packages and the undo dictionary
|
|
return (affected_pos, affected_remain, undo)
|
|
|
|
def try_migration(self, actions, nuninst_now, lundo=None, automatic_revert=True):
|
|
is_accepted = True
|
|
affected_architectures = set()
|
|
item = actions
|
|
packages_t = self.binaries['testing']
|
|
|
|
nobreakall_arches = self.options.nobreakall_arches
|
|
new_arches = self.options.new_arches
|
|
break_arches = self.options.break_arches
|
|
arch = None
|
|
|
|
if len(actions) == 1:
|
|
item = actions[0]
|
|
# apply the changes
|
|
affected_pos, affected_remain, undo = self.doop_source(item, hint_undo=lundo)
|
|
undo_list = [(undo, item)]
|
|
if item.architecture == 'source':
|
|
affected_architectures = set(self.options.architectures)
|
|
else:
|
|
affected_architectures.add(item.architecture)
|
|
else:
|
|
undo_list = []
|
|
removals = set()
|
|
affected_pos = set()
|
|
affected_remain = set()
|
|
for item in actions:
|
|
_, rms, _ = self._compute_groups(item.package, item.suite,
|
|
item.architecture,
|
|
item.is_removal,
|
|
allow_smooth_updates=False)
|
|
removals.update(rms)
|
|
affected_architectures.add(item.architecture)
|
|
|
|
if 'source' in affected_architectures:
|
|
affected_architectures = set(self.options.architectures)
|
|
|
|
for item in actions:
|
|
item_affected_pos, item_affected_remain, undo = self.doop_source(item,
|
|
hint_undo=lundo,
|
|
removals=removals)
|
|
affected_pos.update(item_affected_pos)
|
|
affected_remain.update(item_affected_remain)
|
|
undo_list.append((undo, item))
|
|
|
|
# Optimise the test if we may revert directly.
|
|
# - The automatic-revert is needed since some callers (notably via hints) may
|
|
# accept the outcome of this migration and expect nuninst to be updated.
|
|
# (e.g. "force-hint" or "hint")
|
|
if automatic_revert:
|
|
affected_remain -= affected_pos
|
|
else:
|
|
affected_remain |= affected_pos
|
|
affected_pos = set()
|
|
|
|
# Copy nuninst_comp - we have to deep clone affected
|
|
# architectures.
|
|
|
|
# NB: We do this *after* updating testing as we have to filter out
|
|
# removed binaries. Otherwise, uninstallable binaries that were
|
|
# removed by the item would still be counted.
|
|
|
|
nuninst_after = clone_nuninst(nuninst_now, packages_t, affected_architectures)
|
|
must_be_installable = self.constraints['keep-installable']
|
|
|
|
# check the affected packages on all the architectures
|
|
for arch in affected_architectures:
|
|
check_archall = arch in nobreakall_arches
|
|
|
|
check_installability(self._inst_tester, packages_t, arch, affected_pos, affected_remain,
|
|
check_archall, nuninst_after)
|
|
|
|
# if the uninstallability counter is worse than before, break the loop
|
|
if automatic_revert:
|
|
worse = False
|
|
if len(nuninst_after[arch]) > len(nuninst_now[arch]):
|
|
worse = True
|
|
else:
|
|
regression = nuninst_after[arch] - nuninst_now[arch]
|
|
if not regression.isdisjoint(must_be_installable):
|
|
worse = True
|
|
# ... except for a few special cases
|
|
if worse and ((item.architecture != 'source' and arch not in new_arches) or
|
|
(arch not in break_arches)):
|
|
is_accepted = False
|
|
break
|
|
|
|
# check if the action improved the uninstallability counters
|
|
if not is_accepted and automatic_revert:
|
|
undo_copy = list(reversed(undo_list))
|
|
undo_changes(undo_copy, self._inst_tester, self.sources, self.binaries, self.all_binaries)
|
|
|
|
return (is_accepted, nuninst_after, undo_list, arch)
|
|
|
|
def iter_packages(self, packages, selected, nuninst=None, lundo=None):
|
|
"""Iter on the list of actions and apply them one-by-one
|
|
|
|
This method applies the changes from `packages` to testing, checking the uninstallability
|
|
counters for every action performed. If the action does not improve them, it is reverted.
|
|
The method returns the new uninstallability counters and the remaining actions if the
|
|
final result is successful, otherwise (None, []).
|
|
"""
|
|
group_info = {}
|
|
rescheduled_packages = packages
|
|
maybe_rescheduled_packages = []
|
|
|
|
for y in sorted((y for y in packages), key=attrgetter('uvname')):
|
|
updates, rms, _ = self._compute_groups(y.package, y.suite, y.architecture, y.is_removal)
|
|
result = (y, frozenset(updates), frozenset(rms))
|
|
group_info[y] = result
|
|
|
|
if selected is None:
|
|
selected = []
|
|
if nuninst:
|
|
nuninst_orig = nuninst
|
|
else:
|
|
nuninst_orig = self.nuninst_orig
|
|
|
|
nuninst_last_accepted = nuninst_orig
|
|
|
|
self.output_write("recur: [] %s %d/0\n" % (",".join(x.uvname for x in selected), len(packages)))
|
|
while rescheduled_packages:
|
|
groups = {group_info[x] for x in rescheduled_packages}
|
|
worklist = self._inst_tester.solve_groups(groups)
|
|
rescheduled_packages = []
|
|
|
|
worklist.reverse()
|
|
|
|
while worklist:
|
|
comp = worklist.pop()
|
|
comp_name = ' '.join(item.uvname for item in comp)
|
|
self.output_write("trying: %s\n" % comp_name)
|
|
accepted, nuninst_after, comp_undo, failed_arch = self.try_migration(comp, nuninst_last_accepted, lundo)
|
|
if accepted:
|
|
selected.extend(comp)
|
|
if lundo is not None:
|
|
lundo.extend(comp_undo)
|
|
self.output_write("accepted: %s\n" % comp_name)
|
|
self.output_write(" ori: %s\n" % (self.eval_nuninst(nuninst_orig)))
|
|
self.output_write(" pre: %s\n" % (self.eval_nuninst(nuninst_last_accepted)))
|
|
self.output_write(" now: %s\n" % (self.eval_nuninst(nuninst_after)))
|
|
if len(selected) <= 20:
|
|
self.output_write(" all: %s\n" % (" ".join(x.uvname for x in selected)))
|
|
else:
|
|
self.output_write(" most: (%d) .. %s\n" % (len(selected), " ".join(x.uvname for x in selected[-20:])))
|
|
nuninst_last_accepted = nuninst_after
|
|
rescheduled_packages.extend(maybe_rescheduled_packages)
|
|
maybe_rescheduled_packages.clear()
|
|
else:
|
|
broken = sorted(b for b in nuninst_after[failed_arch]
|
|
if b not in nuninst_last_accepted[failed_arch])
|
|
compare_nuninst = None
|
|
if any(item for item in comp if item.architecture != 'source'):
|
|
compare_nuninst = nuninst_last_accepted
|
|
# NB: try_migration already reverted this for us, so just print the results and move on
|
|
self.output_write("skipped: %s (%d, %d, %d)\n" % (comp_name, len(rescheduled_packages),
|
|
len(maybe_rescheduled_packages), len(worklist)))
|
|
self.output_write(" got: %s\n" % (self.eval_nuninst(nuninst_after, compare_nuninst)))
|
|
self.output_write(" * %s: %s\n" % (failed_arch, ", ".join(broken)))
|
|
|
|
if len(comp) > 1:
|
|
self.output_write(" - splitting the component into single items and retrying them\n")
|
|
worklist.extend([item] for item in comp)
|
|
else:
|
|
maybe_rescheduled_packages.append(comp[0])
|
|
|
|
self.output_write(" finish: [%s]\n" % ",".join( x.uvname for x in selected ))
|
|
self.output_write("endloop: %s\n" % (self.eval_nuninst(self.nuninst_orig)))
|
|
self.output_write(" now: %s\n" % (self.eval_nuninst(nuninst_last_accepted)))
|
|
self.output_write(eval_uninst(self.options.architectures,
|
|
newly_uninst(self.nuninst_orig, nuninst_last_accepted)))
|
|
self.output_write("\n")
|
|
|
|
return (nuninst_last_accepted, maybe_rescheduled_packages)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def do_all(self, hinttype=None, init=None, actions=None):
|
|
"""Testing update runner
|
|
|
|
This method tries to update testing checking the uninstallability
|
|
counters before and after the actions to decide if the update was
|
|
successful or not.
|
|
"""
|
|
selected = []
|
|
if actions:
|
|
upgrade_me = actions[:]
|
|
else:
|
|
upgrade_me = self.upgrade_me[:]
|
|
nuninst_start = self.nuninst_orig
|
|
|
|
# these are special parameters for hints processing
|
|
force = False
|
|
recurse = True
|
|
lundo = None
|
|
nuninst_end = None
|
|
better = True
|
|
extra = []
|
|
|
|
if hinttype == "easy" or hinttype == "force-hint":
|
|
force = hinttype == "force-hint"
|
|
recurse = False
|
|
|
|
# if we have a list of initial packages, check them
|
|
if init:
|
|
if not force:
|
|
lundo = []
|
|
for x in init:
|
|
if x not in upgrade_me:
|
|
self.output_write("failed: %s is not a valid candidate (or it already migrated)\n" % (x.uvname))
|
|
return None
|
|
selected.append(x)
|
|
upgrade_me.remove(x)
|
|
|
|
self.output_write("start: %s\n" % self.eval_nuninst(nuninst_start))
|
|
if not force:
|
|
self.output_write("orig: %s\n" % self.eval_nuninst(nuninst_start))
|
|
|
|
|
|
if init:
|
|
# init => a hint (e.g. "easy") - so do the hint run
|
|
(better, nuninst_end, undo_list, _) = self.try_migration(selected,
|
|
self.nuninst_orig,
|
|
lundo=lundo,
|
|
automatic_revert=False)
|
|
if force:
|
|
# Force implies "unconditionally better"
|
|
better = True
|
|
|
|
if lundo is not None:
|
|
lundo.extend(undo_list)
|
|
|
|
if recurse:
|
|
# Ensure upgrade_me and selected do not overlap, if we
|
|
# follow-up with a recurse ("hint"-hint).
|
|
upgrade_me = [x for x in upgrade_me if x not in set(selected)]
|
|
|
|
if recurse:
|
|
# Either the main run or the recursive run of a "hint"-hint.
|
|
(nuninst_end, extra) = self.iter_packages(upgrade_me, selected, nuninst=nuninst_end, lundo=lundo)
|
|
|
|
nuninst_end_str = self.eval_nuninst(nuninst_end)
|
|
|
|
if not recurse:
|
|
# easy or force-hint
|
|
if force:
|
|
self.output_write("orig: %s\n" % nuninst_end_str)
|
|
self.output_write("easy: %s\n" % nuninst_end_str)
|
|
|
|
if not force:
|
|
self.output_write(eval_uninst(self.options.architectures,
|
|
newly_uninst(nuninst_start, nuninst_end)))
|
|
|
|
if not force:
|
|
break_arches = set(self.options.break_arches)
|
|
if all(x.architecture in break_arches for x in selected):
|
|
# If we only migrated items from break-arches, then we
|
|
# do not allow any regressions on these architectures.
|
|
# This usually only happens with hints
|
|
break_arches = set()
|
|
better = is_nuninst_asgood_generous(self.constraints,
|
|
self.options.architectures,
|
|
self.nuninst_orig,
|
|
nuninst_end,
|
|
break_arches)
|
|
|
|
if better:
|
|
# Result accepted either by force or by being better than the original result.
|
|
if recurse:
|
|
self.output_write("Apparently successful\n")
|
|
self.output_write("final: %s\n" % ",".join(sorted( x.uvname for x in selected )))
|
|
self.output_write("start: %s\n" % self.eval_nuninst(nuninst_start))
|
|
if not force:
|
|
self.output_write(" orig: %s\n" % self.eval_nuninst(self.nuninst_orig))
|
|
else:
|
|
self.output_write(" orig: %s\n" % nuninst_end_str)
|
|
self.output_write(" end: %s\n" % nuninst_end_str)
|
|
if force:
|
|
self.output_write("force breaks:\n")
|
|
self.output_write(eval_uninst(self.options.architectures,
|
|
newly_uninst(nuninst_start, nuninst_end)))
|
|
self.output_write("SUCCESS (%d/%d)\n" % (len(actions or self.upgrade_me), len(extra)))
|
|
self.nuninst_orig = nuninst_end
|
|
self.all_selected += selected
|
|
if not actions:
|
|
if recurse:
|
|
self.upgrade_me = extra
|
|
else:
|
|
self.upgrade_me = [x for x in self.upgrade_me if x not in set(selected)]
|
|
else:
|
|
self.output_write("FAILED\n")
|
|
if not lundo: return
|
|
lundo.reverse()
|
|
|
|
undo_changes(lundo, self._inst_tester, self.sources, self.binaries, self.all_binaries)
|
|
|
|
self.output_write("\n")
|
|
|
|
def assert_nuninst_is_correct(self):
|
|
self.log("> Update complete - Verifying non-installability counters", type="I")
|
|
|
|
cached_nuninst = self.nuninst_orig
|
|
self._inst_tester.compute_testing_installability()
|
|
computed_nuninst = self.get_nuninst(build=True)
|
|
if cached_nuninst != computed_nuninst:
|
|
only_on_break_archs = True
|
|
self.log("==================== NUNINST OUT OF SYNC =========================", type="E")
|
|
for arch in self.options.architectures:
|
|
expected_nuninst = set(cached_nuninst[arch])
|
|
actual_nuninst = set(computed_nuninst[arch])
|
|
false_negatives = actual_nuninst - expected_nuninst
|
|
false_positives = expected_nuninst - actual_nuninst
|
|
# Britney does not quite work correctly with
|
|
# break/fucked arches, so ignore issues there for now.
|
|
if (false_negatives or false_positives) and arch not in self.options.break_arches:
|
|
only_on_break_archs = False
|
|
if false_negatives:
|
|
self.log(" %s - unnoticed nuninst: %s" % (arch, str(false_negatives)), type="E")
|
|
if false_positives:
|
|
self.log(" %s - invalid nuninst: %s" % (arch, str(false_positives)), type="E")
|
|
self.log(" %s - actual nuninst: %s" % (arch, str(actual_nuninst)), type="I")
|
|
self.log("==================== NUNINST OUT OF SYNC =========================", type="E")
|
|
if not only_on_break_archs:
|
|
raise AssertionError("NUNINST OUT OF SYNC")
|
|
else:
|
|
self.log("Nuninst is out of sync on some break arches",
|
|
type="W")
|
|
|
|
self.log("> All non-installability counters are ok", type="I")
|
|
|
|
|
|
def upgrade_testing(self):
|
|
"""Upgrade testing using the unstable packages
|
|
|
|
This method tries to upgrade testing using the packages from unstable.
|
|
Before running the do_all method, it tries the easy and force-hint
|
|
commands.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
self.log("Starting the upgrade test", type="I")
|
|
self.output_write("Generated on: %s\n" % (time.strftime("%Y.%m.%d %H:%M:%S %z", time.gmtime(time.time()))))
|
|
self.output_write("Arch order is: %s\n" % ", ".join(self.options.architectures))
|
|
|
|
self.log("> Calculating current uninstallability counters", type="I")
|
|
self.nuninst_orig = self.get_nuninst()
|
|
# nuninst_orig may get updated during the upgrade process
|
|
self.nuninst_orig_save = self.get_nuninst()
|
|
|
|
if not self.options.actions:
|
|
# process `easy' hints
|
|
for x in self.hints['easy']:
|
|
self.do_hint("easy", x.user, x.packages)
|
|
|
|
# process `force-hint' hints
|
|
for x in self.hints["force-hint"]:
|
|
self.do_hint("force-hint", x.user, x.packages)
|
|
|
|
# run the first round of the upgrade
|
|
# - do separate runs for break arches
|
|
allpackages = []
|
|
normpackages = self.upgrade_me[:]
|
|
archpackages = {}
|
|
for a in self.options.break_arches:
|
|
archpackages[a] = [p for p in normpackages if p.architecture == a]
|
|
normpackages = [p for p in normpackages if p not in archpackages[a]]
|
|
self.upgrade_me = normpackages
|
|
self.output_write("info: main run\n")
|
|
self.do_all()
|
|
allpackages += self.upgrade_me
|
|
for a in self.options.break_arches:
|
|
backup = self.options.break_arches
|
|
self.options.break_arches = " ".join(x for x in self.options.break_arches if x != a)
|
|
self.upgrade_me = archpackages[a]
|
|
self.output_write("info: broken arch run for %s\n" % (a))
|
|
self.do_all()
|
|
allpackages += self.upgrade_me
|
|
self.options.break_arches = backup
|
|
self.upgrade_me = allpackages
|
|
|
|
if self.options.actions:
|
|
self.printuninstchange()
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
# process `hint' hints
|
|
hintcnt = 0
|
|
for x in self.hints["hint"][:50]:
|
|
if hintcnt > 50:
|
|
self.output_write("Skipping remaining hints...")
|
|
break
|
|
if self.do_hint("hint", x.user, x.packages):
|
|
hintcnt += 1
|
|
|
|
# run the auto hinter
|
|
self.auto_hinter()
|
|
|
|
if getattr(self.options, "remove_obsolete", "yes") == "yes":
|
|
# obsolete source packages
|
|
# a package is obsolete if none of the binary packages in testing
|
|
# are built by it
|
|
self.log("> Removing obsolete source packages from testing", type="I")
|
|
# local copies for performance
|
|
sources = self.sources['testing']
|
|
binaries = self.binaries['testing']
|
|
used = set(binaries[arch][0][binary].source
|
|
for arch in binaries
|
|
for binary in binaries[arch][0]
|
|
)
|
|
removals = [ MigrationItem("-%s/%s" % (source, sources[source].version))
|
|
for source in sources if source not in used
|
|
]
|
|
if removals:
|
|
self.output_write("Removing obsolete source packages from testing (%d):\n" % (len(removals)))
|
|
self.do_all(actions=removals)
|
|
|
|
# smooth updates
|
|
removals = old_libraries(self.sources, self.binaries, self.options.outofsync_arches)
|
|
if self.options.smooth_updates:
|
|
self.log("> Removing old packages left in testing from smooth updates", type="I")
|
|
if removals:
|
|
self.output_write("Removing packages left in testing for smooth updates (%d):\n%s" % \
|
|
(len(removals), old_libraries_format(removals)))
|
|
self.do_all(actions=removals)
|
|
removals = old_libraries(self.sources, self.binaries, self.options.outofsync_arches)
|
|
else:
|
|
self.log("> Not removing old packages left in testing from smooth updates (smooth-updates disabled)",
|
|
type="I")
|
|
|
|
self.output_write("List of old libraries in testing (%d):\n%s" % \
|
|
(len(removals), old_libraries_format(removals)))
|
|
|
|
self.assert_nuninst_is_correct()
|
|
|
|
# output files
|
|
if not self.options.dry_run:
|
|
# re-write control files
|
|
if self.options.control_files:
|
|
self.log("Writing new testing control files to %s" %
|
|
self.options.testing)
|
|
write_controlfiles(self.sources, self.binaries,
|
|
'testing', self.options.testing)
|
|
|
|
for policy in self.policies:
|
|
policy.save_state(self)
|
|
|
|
# write HeidiResult
|
|
self.log("Writing Heidi results to %s" % self.options.heidi_output)
|
|
write_heidi(self.options.heidi_output, self.sources["testing"],
|
|
self.binaries["testing"])
|
|
|
|
self.log("Writing delta to %s" % self.options.heidi_delta_output)
|
|
write_heidi_delta(self.options.heidi_delta_output,
|
|
self.all_selected)
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.printuninstchange()
|
|
self.log("Test completed!", type="I")
|
|
|
|
def printuninstchange(self):
|
|
self.log("Checking for newly uninstallable packages", type="I")
|
|
text = eval_uninst(self.options.architectures, newly_uninst(
|
|
self.nuninst_orig_save, self.nuninst_orig))
|
|
|
|
if text != '':
|
|
self.output_write("\nNewly uninstallable packages in testing:\n%s" % \
|
|
(text))
|
|
|
|
def hint_tester(self):
|
|
"""Run a command line interface to test hints
|
|
|
|
This method provides a command line interface for the release team to
|
|
try hints and evaluate the results.
|
|
"""
|
|
self.log("> Calculating current uninstallability counters", type="I")
|
|
self.nuninst_orig = self.get_nuninst()
|
|
self.nuninst_orig_save = self.get_nuninst()
|
|
|
|
import readline
|
|
from completer import Completer
|
|
|
|
histfile = os.path.expanduser('~/.britney2_history')
|
|
if os.path.exists(histfile):
|
|
readline.read_history_file(histfile)
|
|
|
|
readline.parse_and_bind('tab: complete')
|
|
readline.set_completer(Completer(self).completer)
|
|
# Package names can contain "-" and we use "/" in our presentation of them as well,
|
|
# so ensure readline does not split on these characters.
|
|
readline.set_completer_delims(readline.get_completer_delims().replace('-', '').replace('/', ''))
|
|
|
|
known_hints = self._hint_parser.registered_hints
|
|
|
|
while True:
|
|
# read the command from the command line
|
|
try:
|
|
user_input = input('britney> ').lower().split()
|
|
except EOFError:
|
|
print("")
|
|
break
|
|
except KeyboardInterrupt:
|
|
print("")
|
|
continue
|
|
# quit the hint tester
|
|
if user_input and user_input[0] in ('quit', 'exit'):
|
|
break
|
|
# run a hint
|
|
elif user_input and user_input[0] in ('easy', 'hint', 'force-hint'):
|
|
try:
|
|
self.do_hint(user_input[0], 'hint-tester',
|
|
[k.rsplit("/", 1) for k in user_input[1:] if "/" in k])
|
|
self.printuninstchange()
|
|
except KeyboardInterrupt:
|
|
continue
|
|
elif user_input and user_input[0] in known_hints:
|
|
self._hint_parser.parse_hints('hint-tester', self.HINTS_ALL, '<stdin>', [' '.join(user_input)])
|
|
self.write_excuses()
|
|
|
|
try:
|
|
readline.write_history_file(histfile)
|
|
except IOError as e:
|
|
self.log("Could not write %s: %s" % (histfile, e), type="W")
|
|
|
|
def do_hint(self, hinttype, who, pkgvers):
|
|
"""Process hints
|
|
|
|
This method process `easy`, `hint` and `force-hint` hints. If the
|
|
requested version is not in unstable, then the hint is skipped.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
if isinstance(pkgvers[0], tuple) or isinstance(pkgvers[0], list):
|
|
_pkgvers = [ MigrationItem('%s/%s' % (p, v)) for (p,v) in pkgvers ]
|
|
else:
|
|
_pkgvers = pkgvers
|
|
|
|
self.log("> Processing '%s' hint from %s" % (hinttype, who), type="I")
|
|
self.output_write("Trying %s from %s: %s\n" % (hinttype, who, " ".join("%s/%s" % (x.uvname, x.version) for x in _pkgvers)))
|
|
|
|
ok = True
|
|
# loop on the requested packages and versions
|
|
for idx in range(len(_pkgvers)):
|
|
pkg = _pkgvers[idx]
|
|
# skip removal requests
|
|
if pkg.is_removal:
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
inunstable = pkg.package in self.sources['unstable']
|
|
rightversion = inunstable and (apt_pkg.version_compare(self.sources['unstable'][pkg.package].version, pkg.version) == 0)
|
|
if pkg.suite == 'unstable' and not rightversion:
|
|
for suite in ['pu', 'tpu']:
|
|
if pkg.package in self.sources[suite] and apt_pkg.version_compare(self.sources[suite][pkg.package].version, pkg.version) == 0:
|
|
pkg.suite = suite
|
|
_pkgvers[idx] = pkg
|
|
break
|
|
|
|
# handle *-proposed-updates
|
|
if pkg.suite in ['pu', 'tpu']:
|
|
if pkg.package not in self.sources[pkg.suite]: continue
|
|
if apt_pkg.version_compare(self.sources[pkg.suite][pkg.package].version, pkg.version) != 0:
|
|
self.output_write(" Version mismatch, %s %s != %s\n" % (pkg.package, pkg.version, self.sources[pkg.suite][pkg.package].version))
|
|
ok = False
|
|
# does the package exist in unstable?
|
|
elif not inunstable:
|
|
self.output_write(" Source %s has no version in unstable\n" % pkg.package)
|
|
ok = False
|
|
elif not rightversion:
|
|
self.output_write(" Version mismatch, %s %s != %s\n" % (pkg.package, pkg.version, self.sources['unstable'][pkg.package].version))
|
|
ok = False
|
|
if not ok:
|
|
self.output_write("Not using hint\n")
|
|
return False
|
|
|
|
self.do_all(hinttype, _pkgvers)
|
|
return True
|
|
|
|
def auto_hinter(self):
|
|
"""Auto-generate "easy" hints.
|
|
|
|
This method attempts to generate "easy" hints for sets of packages which
|
|
must migrate together. Beginning with a package which does not depend on
|
|
any other package (in terms of excuses), a list of dependencies and
|
|
reverse dependencies is recursively created.
|
|
|
|
Once all such lists have been generated, any which are subsets of other
|
|
lists are ignored in favour of the larger lists. The remaining lists are
|
|
then attempted in turn as "easy" hints.
|
|
|
|
We also try to auto hint circular dependencies analyzing the update
|
|
excuses relationships. If they build a circular dependency, which we already
|
|
know as not-working with the standard do_all algorithm, try to `easy` them.
|
|
"""
|
|
self.log("> Processing hints from the auto hinter", type="I")
|
|
|
|
sources_t = self.sources['testing']
|
|
excuses = self.excuses
|
|
|
|
# consider only excuses which are valid candidates and still relevant.
|
|
valid_excuses = frozenset(y.uvname for y in self.upgrade_me
|
|
if y not in sources_t or sources_t[y].version != excuses[y].ver[1])
|
|
excuses_deps = {name: valid_excuses.intersection(excuse.deps)
|
|
for name, excuse in excuses.items() if name in valid_excuses}
|
|
excuses_rdeps = defaultdict(set)
|
|
for name, deps in excuses_deps.items():
|
|
for dep in deps:
|
|
excuses_rdeps[dep].add(name)
|
|
|
|
def find_related(e, hint, circular_first=False):
|
|
excuse = excuses[e]
|
|
if not circular_first:
|
|
hint[e] = excuse.ver[1]
|
|
if not excuse.deps:
|
|
return hint
|
|
for p in excuses_deps[e]:
|
|
if p in hint or p not in valid_excuses:
|
|
continue
|
|
if not find_related(p, hint):
|
|
return False
|
|
return hint
|
|
|
|
# loop on them
|
|
candidates = []
|
|
mincands = []
|
|
seen_hints = set()
|
|
for e in valid_excuses:
|
|
excuse = excuses[e]
|
|
if excuse.deps:
|
|
hint = find_related(e, {}, True)
|
|
if isinstance(hint, dict) and e in hint:
|
|
h = frozenset(hint.items())
|
|
if h not in seen_hints:
|
|
candidates.append(h)
|
|
seen_hints.add(h)
|
|
else:
|
|
items = [(e, excuse.ver[1])]
|
|
orig_size = 1
|
|
looped = False
|
|
seen_items = set()
|
|
seen_items.update(items)
|
|
|
|
for item, ver in items:
|
|
# excuses which depend on "item" or are depended on by it
|
|
new_items = set((x, excuses[x].ver[1]) for x in excuses_deps[item])
|
|
new_items.update((x, excuses[x].ver[1]) for x in excuses_rdeps[item])
|
|
new_items -= seen_items
|
|
items.extend(new_items)
|
|
seen_items.update(new_items)
|
|
|
|
if not looped and len(items) > 1:
|
|
orig_size = len(items)
|
|
h = frozenset(seen_items)
|
|
if h not in seen_hints:
|
|
mincands.append(h)
|
|
seen_hints.add(h)
|
|
looped = True
|
|
if len(items) != orig_size:
|
|
h = frozenset(seen_items)
|
|
if h != mincands[-1] and h not in seen_hints:
|
|
candidates.append(h)
|
|
seen_hints.add(h)
|
|
|
|
for l in [ candidates, mincands ]:
|
|
for hint in l:
|
|
self.do_hint("easy", "autohinter", [ MigrationItem("%s/%s" % (x[0], x[1])) for x in sorted(hint) ])
|
|
|
|
def nuninst_arch_report(self, nuninst, arch):
|
|
"""Print a report of uninstallable packages for one architecture."""
|
|
all = defaultdict(set)
|
|
for p in nuninst[arch]:
|
|
pkg = self.binaries['testing'][arch][0][p]
|
|
all[(pkg.source, pkg.source_version)].add(p)
|
|
|
|
print('* %s' % arch)
|
|
|
|
for (src, ver), pkgs in sorted(all.items()):
|
|
print(' %s (%s): %s' % (src, ver, ' '.join(sorted(pkgs))))
|
|
|
|
print()
|
|
|
|
def output_write(self, msg):
|
|
"""Simple wrapper for output writing"""
|
|
print(msg, end='')
|
|
self.__output.write(msg)
|
|
|
|
def main(self):
|
|
"""Main method
|
|
|
|
This is the entry point for the class: it includes the list of calls
|
|
for the member methods which will produce the output files.
|
|
"""
|
|
# if running in --print-uninst mode, quit
|
|
if self.options.print_uninst:
|
|
return
|
|
# if no actions are provided, build the excuses and sort them
|
|
elif not self.options.actions:
|
|
self.write_excuses()
|
|
# otherwise, use the actions provided by the command line
|
|
else:
|
|
self.upgrade_me = self.options.actions.split()
|
|
|
|
with open(self.options.upgrade_output, 'w', encoding='utf-8') as f:
|
|
self.__output = f
|
|
|
|
# run the hint tester
|
|
if self.options.hint_tester:
|
|
self.hint_tester()
|
|
# run the upgrade test
|
|
else:
|
|
self.upgrade_testing()
|
|
|
|
self.log('> Stats from the installability tester', type="I")
|
|
for stat in self._inst_tester.stats.stats():
|
|
self.log('> %s' % stat, type="I")
|
|
|
|
|
|
if __name__ == '__main__':
|
|
Britney().main()
|