Add a file build.info on etc/cloud
with the serial information
Signed-off-by: Samir Akarioh <samir.akarioh@canonical.com>
(cherry picked from commit 105acdebc7)
Initialize passwords from sources.list.
Use urllib everywhere.
This way authentication is added to all the required requests.
And incoming headers, are passed to the outgoing requests.
And all the response headers, are passed to the original client.
And all the TCP & HTTP errors are passed back to the client.
Thus should avoiding hanging requests upon failure.
Also rewrite the URI when requesting things.
This allows to use private-ppa.buildd outside of launchpad.
Signed-off-by: Dimitri John Ledkov <xnox@ubuntu.com>
(cherry picked from commit dc2a472871)
With that, the Dockerfile modifications[0] currently done externally
are done now here. That means that the created rootfs tarball can be
directly used within a Dockerfile to create a container from scratch:
FROM scratch
ADD livecd.ubuntu-oci.rootfs.tar.gz /
CMD ["/bin/bash"]
[0]
https://github.com/tianon/docker-brew-ubuntu-core/blob/master/update.sh
(cherry picked from commit a81972a58b)
This is a copy of the ubuntu-base project.
Currently ubuntu-base is used as a base for the docker/OCI container
images. The rootfs tarball that is created with ubuntu-base is
published under [0]. That tarball is used in the FROM statement of the
Dockerfile as base and then a couple of modifications are done inside
of the Dockerfile[1].
The ubuntu-oci project will include the changes that are currently
done in the Dockerfile. With that:
1) a Dockerfile using that tarball will be just a 2 line thing:
FROM scratch
ADD ubuntu-hirsute-core-cloudimg-amd64-root.tar.gz /
CMD ["/bin/bash"]
2) Ubuntu has the full control about the build process of the
docker/OCI container. No external sources (like [1]) need to be
modified anymore.
3) Ubuntu can publish containers without depending on the official
dockerhub containers[2]. Currently the containers for the AWS ECR
registry[3] use as a base[4] the official dockerhub containers. That's
no longer needed because a container just needs a Dockerfile described
in 1)
When the ubuntu-oci project has the modifications from [1] included,
we'll also update [1] to use the ubuntu-oci rootfs tarball as a base
and drop the modifications done at [1].
Note: Creating a new ubuntu-oci project instead of using ubuntu-base
will make sure that we don't break users who are currently using
ubuntu-base rootfs tarballs for doing their own thing.
[0] https://partner-images.canonical.com/core/
[1]
https://github.com/tianon/docker-brew-ubuntu-core/blob/master/update.sh
[2] https://hub.docker.com/_/ubuntu
[3] https://gallery.ecr.aws/ubuntu/ubuntu
[4]
https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-docker-images/ubuntu-docker-images/+oci/ubuntu/+recipe/ubuntu-20.04
(cherry picked from commit ac4a95b931)
I recently pulled initramfs logic out of the base build hook, and
dropped that into the `replace_kernel` function. Any cloud image that
does not leverage the generic virtual kernel was expected to call
`replace_kernel` to pull in a custom kernel. That function will
disable initramfs boot for images that use a custom kernel.
Minimal cloud images on amd64 use the linux-kvm kernel, but the build
hook does not utilize the `replace_kernel` function. Instead, the
kernel flavor is set in `auto/config`. I pulled that logic out of
`auto/config` and am now calling `replace_kernel` in the build hook.
I also moved a call to generate the package list so that it will pick
up the change to the linux-kvm kernel.
shim-signed depends on grub-efi-amd64-signed, which in turn has
alternative depends on either `grub-efi-amd64 | grub-pc`. However to
support booting with either via shim&signed-grub and BIOS, the choice
must be made to install grub-pc, not grub-efi-amd64.
This makes images consistent with Ubuntu Deskop, Live Server, buildd
bootable images; all of which already do install grub-pc and
shim-signed.
Additionally, this will ensure that autoremove is run after installing
anything in the CPC build hooks. This is done to avoid shipping images
that include packages that are autoremovable. This will clean-up as
packages are installed and detect any breakage at build time.
LP: #1901906
Builds in LP with the Xenial kernel were happy with the recursive mount of
/sys inside the chroot while performing snap-preseeding but autopkgtests
with the groovy kernel failed. With the groovy kernel the build was
unable to unmount sys/kernel/slab/*/cgroup/* (Operation not permitted).
This patch mounts /sys and /sys/kernel/security in the chroot in the
same way we've added for binary hooks. This provides the paths under
/sys needed for snap-preseed while avoiding issues unmounting other
paths.
(cherry picked from commit 84397b5098)
The snap-preseed command can do a number of things during the build
that are currently performed at first boot (apparmor profiles, systemd
unit generation, etc). This patch adds a call to reset the seeding and
apply these optimizations when adding a seeded snap. As a prerequisite
to calling snap-preseed we need to make /dev/mem available as well as
mounts from the host to perform this work, so those are also added here.
(cherry picked from commit 1ca11c9795)
The seed now specifies the lxd snap in focal as
'lxd=4.0/stable/ubuntu-20.04' which doesn't match the expectations of
the code with looks for lxd as the only snap in the seed for minimized
images. This patch updates the pattern to accept 'lxd' or 'lxd=*'.
ubuntustudio-default-settings in focal release has a Recommends to this
kernel, which makes it impossible to update the kernel later on, since
we would install the -updates and release kernel, which isn't allowed
and causes FTBFS. Hack out the focal-release kernel and let the rest of
the build process pull in the right one.
LP: #1884915
Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak
Samir Akarioh
Brian Murray
Dimitri John Ledkov
Jean-Baptiste Lallement
Thomas Bechtold
David Krauser
Joshua Powers
Robert C Jennings
Iain Lane