Currently autopkgtest tries to install our trigger from unstable and the rest
from testing. If that fails, than autopkgtest has a fall-back to allow all
packages from unstable to be installed. This has two severe issues:
1) the version of the test and the package it came from may be out-of-sync
2) too much from unstable may be installed, even stuff that should not/is not
allowed to migrate as it breaks stuff.
Make sure that test depends also get added to triggers if they are broken.
E.g. imagine the following scenario: trigger X changes (breaks) the output
generated by Y. Package Z has Y in the test dependencies and compares the
output in the autopkgtest. We want to have the opportunity that a new version
is automatically fixing the situation.
Two use cases are currently unsupported: needs-build (autopkgtest restriction)
and test dependencies generated by autodep8.
Admittedly, no policy adds them yet so this is currently no-op code.
However, future commits can start to rely on this infrastructure code.
Signed-off-by: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
Cherry-Pick: 80bf9060de6b7a7fe21f10da90f0dcc15b96ac1c
Cherry-Pick: f32907aceab7bdf37856ceef3122149c046f0ee1
Cherry-Pick: 9ef496177f86b18d9f910da1360dd773b82f1fb7
Cherry-Pick: b16530a37df93851fda35db016775056a6b0c218
Signed-off-by: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
Flatten the defaultdict(set) for unsat_deps into a standard dict for output
In case autopkgtest triggering is delayed because the required builds aren't
ready yet or the package is not installable, currently there is only the
message that autopktest delays the migration, but no hint why. This commit adds
these hints.
The initial idea was to do this to bootstrap the baseline, but it turns out
that this has the drawback it triggers runs for a package that has a new
autopkgtest where it didn't have it in the version in the target suite. It was
considered harmless (as it would just have a failing reference), but due to
autodep8, package can have a passing result in the target suite while the new
autopkgtest is actually broken. Such a package should not be blocked / getting
a penalty.
The alternative is to make the check here smarter, but as this is only for
bootstrapping, lets do that outside of britney proper.
When determining whether a policy applies to a given item, use the
suite class rather than the suite name.
Signed-off-by: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
Into 3 categories:
* target suite ("testing")
* primary source suite ("unstable")
* additional source suites ("pu" and "tpu")
This will be useful for implementing logic working with suites without
basing it on the name of the suite.
Signed-off-by: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
At the moment, it is just a glorified dict. However, we will
eventually use it to get rid of the hardcoded references to "testing"
etc. all over the code.
Signed-off-by: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
