Previously, we would always create empty data structures for "pu" and
"tpu" if these optional suites were not configured. However, we only
reference "pu" and "tpu" directly in very few spots that can easily be
rewritten.
Signed-off-by: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
Into 3 categories:
* target suite ("testing")
* primary source suite ("unstable")
* additional source suites ("pu" and "tpu")
This will be useful for implementing logic working with suites without
basing it on the name of the suite.
Signed-off-by: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
At the moment, it is just a glorified dict. However, we will
eventually use it to get rid of the hardcoded references to "testing"
etc. all over the code.
Signed-off-by: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
1) the update didn't happen for all but the first
2) we don't want a package that fixes a regression in unstable to influence the
reference for another package until it actually migrates, so this updating
is flawed.
All the output is a duplicate of what is being sent to the root logger
(albeit in a different format) and in e.g. our test suite the output
is entirely redundant.
Signed-off-by: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
With a bit of code we can replace the manual file-handling for
"upgrade_output" with a logger. This will enable us to refactor other
bits that currently depend on "output_write" by making those bits use
a logger instead.
This also migrates "do_hint" to use the new output logger. This is
due to "do_hint" being the only method relying on writing of partial
lines and maintaining support for that in "output_write" would have
been non-trivial.
To ensure "pretty" formatting to stdout, the messages in
"output_write" are now chopped into multiple lines.
The only visible change is that the output to stdout from
"output_write" now also includes the prefix with a timestamp.
However, then contents of "upgrade_output" remain unchanged
deliberately.
Signed-off-by: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
We already know the item is successful when we print it and the next
line ("final:") will confirm it any way.
Signed-off-by: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
AFAICT all of the items are no longer relevant. Not to mention we
have a separate bug tracker (now?) that is much more suited for bugs
plus sphinx docs that could easily grow a "Known Issues" section as
well.
Signed-off-by: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
Niels Thykier
Paul Gevers