Rewrite the arguments of find_upgraded_binaries to not use an instance
of MigrationItem. We want to call it at a time where we have not
created MigrationItems yet.
Signed-off-by: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
A removal hint will generate both source and per-arch excuses if the
version of the source package differs between testing and unstable. If
the source versions are the same then only the per-arch excuses will
be generated.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
In rare cases with hints with overlapping virtual packages provided by
different sources, this can make a difference.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
If there are multiple versions of an arch:all package in unstable (due
to outdated or no longer built arch:any packages) then only one of them
should be recorded in the list of binary packages built from the source
package. Otherwise we may try and remove the binary package from various
lists multiple times, leading to crashes.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
Given a source which provides two packages and has different versions
in testing and unstable, binNMUs in unstable corresponding to the
older source version should not be considered as migration candidates.
For example:
testing
-------
source 1
bin 1 arch1
bin 1 arch2
unstable
--------
source 2
bin 2 arch1
bin 1+b1 arch2
The binary migration on arch2 should not be considered a candidate.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
Although this should never happen, rather than crashing if one of the
versions is none, simply indicate that they are unequal.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
Although this isn't an issue during normal runs, the excuses might be
built multiple times during a hint-tester run and should not accumulate
during the run.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
For those hints which don't cause an immediate run (i.e. other than
easy, hint and force-hint), re-build the excuses after adding the
hint so that the actions are accounted for in later hints.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
A binNMU does not rebuild architecture:all packages. For migrations via
unstable this is not a problem as the packages corresponding to the
source upload are still present. However, for *pu migrations, the set of
packages considered only includes architecture-specific packages. In
order to avoid installability issues with packages in testing which
depend on the arch:all packages, we leave the existing arch:all packages
in testing and only consider the arch-specific packages for migration.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
The test only needs to consider whether any binaries exist on a given
arch, not how many of them there are (or indeed which binaries they are)
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
When checking whether a tpu source has built on a particular arch, we
should only consider binaries produced by the latest version of the
source package in tpu.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
Originally when binNMUs for packages in testing were scheduled, the
binaries would be installed into tpu with no accompanying source. This
allowed the "removed binary" portions of should_upgrade_srcarch() to be
skipped (as britney had generated a faux source record).
dak now adds the source package to tpu in such cases which lead to the
"removed binary" checks being applied to binNMUs in tpu with potentially
destructive consequences. For example, if a package with amd64 and i386
binaries in testing were binNMUed on just amd64, britney would notice
that there were no i386 binaries in tpu and subsequently remove the i386
binaries from testing as well.
In order to resolve this, we skip the check for removed binaries when
building excuses for a binary-only migration via *pu.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
The primary difference between the parsing / output of excuses for *pu
and unstable unblocks is the messages displayed. We can therefore remove
some duplication by having the same code handle both, outputting the
appropriate message.
Where a *pu package is also the subject of a "block" (most likely during
a freeze) we only supply the "needs approval" or "approved" message;
previously both "needs approval" and "not touching due to block" were
output, which is redundant. We ensure that there is always a dummy
"block" hint for *pu packages to provide the "needs approval" behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
An "approve" hint is effectively an unblock for tpu packages and britney
is already quiite happy to parse "unblock $pkg/$tpuversion".
We allow the old name to be used for compatibility and replace it with
"unblock" internally.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
A dependency on an arch-specific package which is not a valid candidate
should lead to the depending package not being a candidate.
For now we ensure that the generated excuses output remains the same,
so that we don't have to wait for consumers to adapt to a new format.
Changing the output format should be revisited at a later point.
See Debian bug #693068.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
The code using the variables was refactored in 694d614b. As a result
they were still set in iter_packages() but never subsequently used.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
Previously a package which became obsolete during a run would not be
automatically removed until the next run. This was due to the fact that
sources[][BINARIES] is not updated during the run. Instead, we build a
list of source packages which produce at least one binary and then
remove any packages not in that list.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
"not force and not earlyabort" simplifies to "not earlyabort" rather
than "not force", as an easy hint would set "earlyabort" but not
"force".
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
All callers of get_reverse_tree compute the same modification of its
return value, so move that computation into get_reverse_tree.
Signed-off-by: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
When processing a hint of the form "easy pkgX libX" where libX would be
a candidate for smooth updates because pkgX/testing depends on it but
pkgX/unstable does not, and there are no other reverse dependencies,
the old binary from libX can simply be dropped straight away.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
The only test currently implemented is to ensure that any prospective
hint contains at least one item beyond the hint name. This prevents
lines in a hint file consisting simply of e.g. "easy" being added to
the hint list and causing later processing to abort with an error.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
This causes Multi-arch dependencies like "pkg:i386" to show up as
unsatisfiable in excuses.
Previously, the dependency would be checked on the wrong architecture
(if available) and cause the package to become a valid candidate. The
package would still be prevent from migrating as the installability
checker does not know of the "pkg:i386" package.
Signed-off-by: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
In the unsat_deps case, it was used to update a field in the excuse,
but the field was never read anywhere.
Signed-off-by: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
Use the is_valid in "html"-method to determine whether to write "Valid
candidate" or not. This avoids the occasional:
* Valid candidate
* Invalidated by dependency
* Not considered
Signed-off-by: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
generate_package_list had the unintended side-effect of regenerating
self.excuses (up top of the original excuses).
Signed-off-by: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
Presumably there once was a reason for having a notion of "depth",
but these days only 3 "values" were given as "maxdepth":
* "easy" (for easy hint)
* 0 (for "main run" or in a "hint"-hint)
* -1 (for force-hint)
Signed-off-by: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
This allows britney to load a python2.7 variant of the C module when
run under python2.7.
Note for python3, we add "python3" rather than "python3.Y". This is
to reflect the include path in the python3 package in the archive.
Signed-off-by: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
"affected" is not allowed to contain duplicates. Since the current
method of removing any such duplicates is
affected = list(set(affected))
then the order of affected is not important.
As a side effect, make get_reverse_tree return a set instead of a
list as its return value is always inserted into affected.
Signed-off-by: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
Features like the auto-hinter, smooth-upgrades and removal of obsolete
source packages are now unconditionally enabled.
Signed-off-by: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
An "obsolete source" is one which produces no binaries. This situation
generally arises when all of the binaries which used to be produced by
the source package are now built by other sources.
Sooner or later such sources will probably be auto-crufted from unstable,
but there's no real reason to keep them in testing in the meantime.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
The initial packages of a hint are HintItems, whereas other packages
considered whilst processing the hint will be MigrationItems. In
either case, the version information is irrelevant during the output
of hint processing and only displaying it for some items is confusing
and distracting. Therefore, whilst processing a hint we always use
unversioned names.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
Remove unused "excluded" argument from get_dependency_solvers and
excuse_unsat_deps. The argument was either always default or an empty
list.
Signed-off-by: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
Simply updating the include in britney-py.c, rebuilding and changing
the shebang of britney.py appears to be enough to make the switch in my
tests, so we just do that for now at least.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
If a hint item references unstable but its version is not correct for
that suite, we compare the version to the (t)pu version (if any) and
if a match is found update the item as if it had been explicitly
specified as applying to that suite originally.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
The feature is used to remove binaries left by smooth-updates and is not
exposed as an available hint type.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
Commit 94071b1649 excluded intra-source
dependencies from the determination as to whether a binary package was
eligible for smooth updates. Whilst this works in many cases, there
are situations where it breaks migration. For instance:
foo depends on libdropped1
libdropped1 depends on libdropped2
libdropped1 and libdropped2 are built from the same source; foo from
another source
libdropped2 is otherwise leaf in testing
In order to resolve this, we build a list of all packages which might
be eligible and filter out those which have reverse-dependencies outside
of their source package. For each remaining package, we consider it
eligible if its intra-source reverse-dependencies are within the list
of packages already determined to be eligible.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
The minimal set is comprised of only the first level of (reverse)
dependencies, before any further iterations of packages are added to
the set. In some cases, the result of the full iteration will contain
packages which cause problems when migrated but the minimal set,
although possibly a less optimal solution, may be able to migrate
successfully.
It is assumed that migrating the larger set of packages will be
preferred if possible, so minimal sets are tried later.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
The minimal set is comprised of only the first level of (reverse)
dependencies, before any further iterations of packages are added to
the set. In some cases, the result of the full iteration will contain
packages which cause problems when migrated but the minimal set,
although possibly a less optimal solution, may be able to migrate
successfully.
It is assumed that migrating the larger set of packages will be
preferred if possible, so minimal sets are tried later.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
In order to make a number of the changes required for the migration simpler,
we also complete the previous migration to using {Hint,Migration}Item rather
than passing around strings representing packages and converting between
the two forms in several places.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
The use of MigrationItem allows us to centralise the parsing and splitting of
package names and architectures, avoiding duplication and simplifying a
number of conditions.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
Rather than only considering pairs of packages, we start from a "leaf"
package (i.e. one with an excuse which declares no dependencies on
other packages' excuses) and recursively build a list of packages
which are the dependency or reverse dependency of a package already
in the list.
Any list which is a subset of another list is ignored and the remaining
items are then processed as "easy" hints.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
Previously we could not reliably detect whether an excuse's dependency
from a source package to a binNMU was valid, as the excuse did not
contain sufficient information to determine the set of architecture(s)
on which the dependency existed.
By modifying the representation of the dependency list in the excuse to
include an architecture list we can walk the relationships in reverse
in order to sanity-check the source -> binNMU dependency.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
When considering an excuse for pkg1/arch, a dependency on either of
pkg2/source or pkg2/arch should be considered acceptable so long
as there is a corresponding excuse.
Dependencies from pkg1/source to pkg2/arch will still be considered
"impossible", as pkg1's excuse does not contain any information
regarding the architecture(s) on which its dependency to pkg2 exists.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
This allows the consideration of packages from proposed-updates to be
{dis,en}abled depending on whether the configuration file specifies
the path to the packages / sources files.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
This is most likely to be useful near the beginning of a release cycle,
when the versions of a package in stable and testing are the same and
the new version of the package is unable to migrate from unstable for
some reason.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
The permissions issues which led to the writing being disabled no longer
exist and not persisting the date list makes b2 unsuitable for use as a
primary implementation.
If a binary package being processed as part of a hint has moved source
packages, the installability checks for the new version of the binary
need to include the reverse-dependency information from the previous
version. In order to allow this, modify doop_source() to take an
optional list of undo information and iter_packages() to pass such
a list when processing hints.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
This reduces the number of ways in which we refer to uninstallable packages
to two. Those should probably be unified further to be consistent across
all parts of the code, but in the meantime this ensures that methods are
internally consistent in their terminology.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
The bug data has contained lists of bugs rather than simple counts for some
time now. Update the log messages to reflect this reality.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
When undoing the removal of a binary package by an "easy" hint, ensure
that the apt system is updated with the correct version of the package.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
Given a package where the version in testing is arch:all and uninstallable
on architecture $arch and the version in unstable is arch:any but still
uninstallable on $arch, we need to ensure that installability checks add the
package to $arch's uninstallble list rather than just the list for
${arch}+all.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
Rather than mapping "src:foo" to "foo" whilst building the bug hashes,
we store the src: bugs "as is" in the hash, and then include them in the
list of relevant bugs when building the list for a source package.
This avoids a situation where a bug filed against "src:foo" can impede
the migration of the binary package "foo", built from a different source
package.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
If new binary packages are removed from the system afer the original
packages have been re-introduced, a binary package which has moved
between source packages may be removed entirely. See Debian bug #624716
for more details.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
Starting with version 0.7.100, python-apt introduced a new API which
replaced several functions which created objects with real classes and
updated a number of method names to be PEP8 compliant.
get_full_tree may be passed an initial package which does not exist in the
target suite, for example because a package declares an obsolete conflict
on a second package which has subsequently been removed.
If the package was previously arch:all and uninstallable and has moved to
being architecture-dependent, becoming installable in the process, then it
will not be in the architecture-dependent uninstallability set; we
therefore should try removing it from that set.
When marking the reverse dependencies of each binary package as affected
by a sourceful update to testing, the reverse dependencies of those
packages are also affected, and so on.
This helps to avoid situations where the installability of immediate
reverse dependencies is unchanged, but that of other packages in the
dependency chain is altered, for example where alternative dependencies
are used.
See Debian bug #614249 for further details.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
This extends the scope of commit 5e3a245759
to include cases where the tpu binNMUs are explicitly included in an "easy"
or "hint" rather than processed as part of the main run.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
When undoing the addition to the result set of a binNMU from tpu, the package
name from the hint will end in ${arch}_tpu, not ${arch}, so we should check
for both cases. At the same time, reverse the sense of the associated test
to make the logic more obvious.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
"${pkg}/${arch}_tpu" means "the tpu binary packages for $pkg on
architecture $arch", not "the unstable binary packages for $pkg on
architecture ${arch}_tpu"
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
Previously, an "approve" hint would allow a package to migrate from
testing-proposed-updates to testing even if packages were not available
for some architectures on which the package existed in testing.
The t-p-u package must now have built on the same architectures as the
existing package in testing; the previous behaviour can be achieved by
combining "approve" and "force" hints.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
t-p-u packages are identified by the package name ending in "_tpu", not
by the first character of the name doing so
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
t-p-u approval previously required both an "unblock" and an "approve"
hint if the package was blocked; the "approve" should be sufficient and
this is the simplest method of achieving that.
There are some cases where this does not quite do the right thing (e.g.
for a package which has both a t-p-u "approve" hint and an "unblock"
hint for the package in unstable) but it is preferable to requiring
t-p-u hints to be added in pairs always.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
If the internal tables used in the C module are not large enough to store
the list of discovered packages then checking installability becomes very
slow.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
Allow a package which is a candidate but invalidated by one or
more dependencies to be "force"d.
Based on a patch to britney by Andreas Barth <aba@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
The Sources file for unstable will contain multiple records for a single
source package when one or more architectures has out-of-date binaries.
As the latest version is that which will be considered for migration, only
that version should be added to the list of available sources.
This is not currently an issue in live use, as the data files are already
pre-processed by britney before being passed to britney2.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
Currently a bug against src:foo is treated as if it were filed against
foo. As both may exist in the input list, we accumulate bugs for each
package rather than assuming package names are unique.
Signed-off-by: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
britney now uses the "BugsV" files rather than "Bugs". The new
files contain a list of bugs, not a count, and the migration
of the package is dependent on there being no new RC bugs in unstable
relative to testing, rather than simply fewer RC bugs.
Niels Thykier
Adam D. Barratt
Colin Watson
Cyril Brulebois
Mehdi Dogguy
Julien Cristau
Philipp Kern
Jurij Smakov
Adeodato Simó
Fabio Tranchitella